Crime scene forensics used to recreate British hillfort siege
Although attempts had previously been made to invade and colonise northern Britain, emperor Hadrian had settled for dividing the islands with a wall.His successor in 138AD, Antonius Pius came to power without any military victories to his name and decided to make his mark in what is now Scotland.Just two years later a 5,000-strong army marched north towards the indigenous stronghold of Burnswark Hill where they created siege camps on either side.About 3,000 locals were either living - or had taken refuge - within the hillfort's palisade defences.Dr John Reid of the Trimontium Trust said: "Antonius Pius sends his Legate - or senior general in Britain - to take Caledonia for him and for Rome."The first thing they hit when coming from Hadrian's Wall is Burnswark Hill."
The results of an archaeological survey of the site a decade ago were added to previous data and finds from studies which took place in the 1890s, 1920s and 1960s.By using drones, the Trimontium Trust was able create an accurate 3D terrain model of the Roman camps and the hillfort.Forensic ballistics pinpointed the angles of attack and mapping allowed precision detailing on the recreation down to a 2cm (0.8in) pebble within the site.For over a year the archaeologists worked with digital artist Robert Gapper of Virtual Histories to build the 3D walkthrough.Prof Campbell added: "One of the advantages of Burnswark is that there is so much still on the ground to start with."Because it is such an unique site, we've been able to drop people, buildings and weapons - in their appropriate styles - into where they would have been to create this overview."
Featuring more than 8,000 individual characters, the 3D digital reconstruction relives the moments before the Roman army stormed the hillfort.Visitors to the Trimontium Museum in Melrose can now use headsets for a virtual walkthrough of the unfolding drama.Dr Reid added: "We know missiles were shot in showers and did some serious damage - they were travelling at speeds of up to 70 metres per second."Then there were arrows from Syrian archers, and ballista balls - the size of grapefruits - being shot from the three platforms, and finally the sling bullets, which were anti-personnel weapons to take arms, legs and heads off."Then from the main camp there would have been a rapid outpouring of infantry heading straight up to the summit to breakthrough the defences."They quickly broke through and - from evidence - herded the last of the resistance to the west end of the hill."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Little-known actor emerges as surprising contender to play the next James Bond in much-anticipated new movie
A surprising new contender to take over the role of James Bond has emerged, and he's largely unknown. Following months of speculation surrounding the highly-anticipated next instalment of the 007 franchise, Bond fans at last found out the movie's director last month. Denis Villeneuve is the man trusted by Amazon to mastermind their new endeavour, after the company purchased the Bond franchise in a massive $8.5billion deal. And the self-proclaimed 'die-hard' Bond fan, who previously directed Dune, seemingly quickly got to work on touting actors for the lead role with three stars emerging as favourites a short time later. Household names Aaron Taylor-Johnson, 35, Dunkirk star Jack Lowden, also 35, and British fan-favourite Theo James, 40, shot to the top of odds lists following Villeneuve's appointment. But now a lesser-known Brit is believed to have entered the running to become the next actor with a license to kill. The surprising new contender is none other than Scott Rose-Marsh, 37. The actor, who is currently eighth-favourite for the part according to Oddschecker, is perhaps an eyebrow-raising candidate given his lack of experience in film and television. Despite only previously bagging roles in the relatively underseen movies Wolves of War and Code of Silence, Scott has soared above contenders such as Jack Lowden, 35, and Superman star Henry Cavill, 42. Yet he remains behind a host of popular and, perhaps crucially more experienced, actors in the running for the role. Fresh off the success of 28 Years Later, Taylor-Johnson is still the favourite for the part, while Tom Holland and Theo James sit in second and third place. While perhaps surprisingly, British actor and Mufasa star Aaron Pierre, 31, currently fourth, found himself in the mix a couple of weeks ago. It comes after rumours began to swirl about who could be the next Bond girl in the new film. Film-lovers were sent into a frenzy earlier this month when Euphoria actress Sydney Sweeney, 27, was revealed to be one of the favourites for the part. The British actor, who is currently eighth-favourite for the part according to Oddschecker, is perhaps an eyebrow-raising candidate given his lack of experience in film and television (pictured in Code of Silence) Next James Bond favourites, according to Oddschecker 1) Aaron Taylor-Johnson 2) Tom Holland 3) Theo James 4) Aaron Pierre 5) Harris Dickinson 6) Jacob Elordi 7) James Norton 8) Scott Rose-Marsh 9) Jack Lowden 10) Henry Cavill She is believed to be a friend of the new movie's director, according to The Sun. A source told the publication: 'Sydney is the top name on the casting sheet for Bond. 'Denis believes she is hugely talented, as well as having an alluring appeal to younger generations, vital in modernising the franchise. 'They've hung out together a lot and he has admired her stratospheric rise.' Amazon completed their acquisition of MGM studios, which previously owned the Bond franchise, earlier this year. It was later announced that David Heyman and Amy Pascal would be the film's producers, with Villeneuve set to serve as executive producer. The French-Canadian filmmaker said following his appointment: 'Some of my earliest movie-going memories are connected to 007. I grew up watching James Bond films with my father, ever since Dr. No with Sean Connery.' 'I'm a die-hard Bond fan. To me, he's sacred territory. I intend to honor the tradition and open the path for many new missions to come.' The filmmaker admitted: 'This is a massive responsibility, but also, incredibly exciting for me and a huge honor.' He also went on to thank Bond producers Amy and David, adding they 'are absolutely thrilled to bring him back to the screen. Thank you to Amazon MGM Studios for their trust'. Amy and David said: 'Denis Villeneuve has been in love with James Bond movies since he was a little boy. 'It was always his dream to make this movie, and now it's ours, too. We are lucky to be in the hands of this extraordinary filmmaker.' After Amazon acquired MGM in 2022, they obtained full creative control of the 007 franchise with a deal they struck with Barbara and Michael, the offspring of original James Bond producer, Albert R. Broccoli. Barbara and Michael had been overseeing the franchise since 1995, when their father ceded control of his Eon Productions company. Villeneuve made his directorial debut in 1998 with August 32nd on Earth, which premiered at the Cannes Film Festival that year. He followed that up with Maelstrom (2000), Polytechnique (2009) and Incendies (2010), the latter of which was nominated for Best International Film at the Academy Awards. The filmmaker broke through in Hollywood with 2013's Prisoners, a dark drama starring Hugh Jackman and Jake Gyllenhaal. He continued to win acclaim for 2013's Enemy, 2015's Sicario, 2016's Arrival, 2017's Blade Runner 2049 and, most recently, 2021's Dune: Part One and 2024's Dune: Part Two. Amazon bosses are currently said to be considering locations in which to set the much-anticipated new film, which experts predicted is likely to be released at the end of next year or in 2027. Due to a filming ban being imposed in Central London next year, new locations are reportedly being considered - with Liverpool a frontrunner, according to The Sun. An insider told the publication: 'This will no doubt irk Bond purists who already fear Amazon taking over the 007 franchise may lead to them making big changes. 'But Liverpool is a well-known alternative to London for film-makers. 'It has appeared in everything from The Batman to Captain America and Harry Potter movies, doubling up as international cities.' The source added that it doesn't necessarily mean the story will be set in Liverpool - though eagle-eyed Merseysiders will no doubt spot their city centre in the background.
Telegraph
8 hours ago
- Telegraph
Why it's really the British we have to thank for the atom bomb
Manhattan, Mayson, Maud. One of these is synonymous with the race to build an atomic bomb during the first half of the 1940s. But we ought to have heard of all three, argues Gareth Williams in his book The Impossible Bomb – a pacy and potent mix of wartime politics and high technology. Williams sets out to recover the role of British scientists in building the bomb, but there's no triumphalism here. Pinned to a noticeboard in his study, Williams tells us, is a black lapel badge bearing the logo of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament. Now an emeritus professor at the University of Bristol, Williams grew up in the post-war years fearing that he might see a 'mushroom cloud boiling up into the sky above the rooftops'. Williams was motivated to write this book after discovering some declassified government papers pertaining to a secretive 'Maud Committee'. He later heard a scientist who'd worked on the British hydrogen bomb make a striking claim: that without Britain's help, the United States wouldn't have been able to create a working atomic bomb until after the Second World War ended. This isn't, it must be said, a new idea. As Williams accepts, it was put forward by a war correspondent named Ronald Clark back in 1961. But myth-making in America about the birth of the nuclear age has long sidelined British figures, and still does. American Prometheus (2005), the Kai Bird and Martin J Sherwin biography on which the Oscar-winning film Oppenheimer (2023) was based, all but reduces the British contribution to a man hosting a dinner party at Los Alamos. After some helpful preliminaries on the history of atomic physics, The Impossible Bomb begins in the 1930s, as trepidation among scientists is growing. The destructive potential of splitting the atom is dawning on them, just as Europe appears once again to be moving towards war. The Hungarian-born physicist Leo Szilard begs colleagues to stop publishing their ideas on nuclear fission, and asks the editor of Physical Review to record the date of manuscript submissions on the subject – thereby preserving claims to originality – then lock them away in a drawer. When these efforts meet with mixed results, Szilard helps to compose a letter to US president Franklin D Roosevelt in 1939 – co-signed by Albert Einstein – urging that America try to beat Nazi Germany to the bomb. This moment is often treated as the origin of the Manhattan Project. But Williams argues that most scientists in the United States were, at this point, unconvinced that an atomic weapon was feasible in the near-term. They were more interested in developing radar, and were confident that if America were drawn into the war, their conventional forces would see them through. In the early years of the conflict, the most promising work on a bomb was happening in Britain. Enter Maud, a committee formed in Britain in the spring of 1940. (Though its name was written in capitals as MAUD, and thus was usually taken to be an acronym, the letters didn't stand for anything.) It came about in response to a document created by two expatriate German physicists working at the University of Birmingham: Otto Frisch and Rudolf Peierls. The Frisch-Peierls memorandum sketched out the theory behind a 'super-bomb', to be created using uranium-235. By the summer, Williams tells us, Maud involved four universities (Cambridge, Oxford, Liverpool, Birmingham) and boasted five Nobel laureates, including James Chadwick and John Cockcroft. In its final report, in 1941, the committee concluded that a super-bomb could be made in two years: great excitement followed, and an organisation was formed to work on the project, with the usefully abstract name of the 'Tube Alloys Directorate'. Williams excels at interweaving the technical challenges of the subsequent months with the vicissitudes of politics. We find Churchill and Roosevelt wary of one another, at first, on the question of atomic co-operation. 'Mayson' was Roosevelt's proposal for Anglo-American partnership; but for a time, at least, Churchill wanted a British bomb, independent of the Americans. It wasn't to be. American help turned out to be indispensable in building a 'super-bomb'. In the end, British scientists had to set aside their own work on Tube Alloys and travel to the USA – to Los Alamos, Berkeley and Oak Ridge – to help on what became the Manhattan Project. Chadwick was among around 84 British scientists making the journey, and neither of the bombs detonated over Japan in August 1945, concludes Williams, would have been possible without them. Through Frisch and Peierls, we experience the profound anxiety of Jewish refugees living in Britain during these years; they were only too aware of how they would likely fare if the Nazis won the race to build a bomb. Across the water in Germany, great minds such as Werner Heisenberg were hard at work trying to make that happen. We encounter British and American spies working around the clock to ascertain the state of the Nazi effort, and to thwart it wherever they could. The Americans considered abducting Heisenberg during one of his research trips to Switzerland. Williams's labours in the archive have been considerable, but the result is a significant contribution to our understanding of 'the most significant international collaboration of the 20th century'. It's eminently readable, too: to follow the development of nuclear weapons requires the explanation of plenty of science, but Williams succeeds, deploying vivid analogies and simple sketches. A spherical aluminium container for a globe of uranium oxide, constantly turning in order to keep heavy water circulating, is an especially memorable one. Williams compares it to 'an oversized glitterball that someone had forgotten to switch off after the last dance'. ★★★★★
The Guardian
15 hours ago
- The Guardian
Full-body scans of 100,000 people could change way diseases are detected and treated
Scientists expect to gain unprecedented insights into human ageing and the earliest signs of disease after scanning 100,000 people from head to toe in the world's largest whole body imaging project. The completion of the decade-long task means qualifying researchers worldwide will have access to 1bn de-identified images of the hearts, brains, abdomens, blood vessels, bones and joints of volunteers alongside medical histories and rich data on their genetic makeup, health and lifestyle. Subsets of the images compiled by UK Biobank, which follows the health of half a million people in Britain, have already underpinned breakthroughs in how the heart influences psychiatric disorders and shown that the scans can predict dozens of future diseases. They also suggest no amount of alcohol consumption is healthy. 'Researchers now have an incredible window into the body,' said Naomi Allen, the chief scientist at UK Biobank. 'For the first time, researchers can study how we age and how diseases develop in stunning detail and at a massive scale.' 'We hope that the findings … will change the way the world detects and treats disease before people get sick,' she added. The imaging project captured 12,000 images from each volunteer, revealing the size, shape and structure of the brain, bones, heart and other organs, along with bone density and body fat. Ultrasound scans on arteries in the neck looked for blockages or narrowing that raise the risk of stroke. Paul Matthews, the chair of the UK Biobank imaging group, and a professor of neuroscience at Imperial College London, said the scans were so detailed that scientists could spot people at higher risk of dementia from changes that were previously invisible. The scans reveal differences in brain size as small as a teaspoon of water, or a few tenths of a per cent of the brain's total volume, he said. The procedure is now being trialled in the NHS. Other work based on the brain scans found that consuming one to two units of alcohol per day was associated with changes in brain size and structure, potentially contributing to memory loss and dementia. 'Unfortunately, there is no perfectly safe level and certainly no benefit to the brain from just a glass of wine a day,' Matthews said. Patricia Munroe, a professor of molecular medicine at Queen Mary University of London, works on the genetics of heart structure, function and disease. The new images capture cycles of heartbeats, allowing her to search for genes that govern the heart's function as a pump, as well as its structure, and see when they go awry. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Doctors have long used body mass index (BMI) to assess people's risk of diabetes and heart disease, but abdominal scans show that people with the same BMI and waist measurement can have radically different fat distributions, which alters their risk of heart disease. UK Biobank is now re-scanning 60,000 volunteers to see how people's brains, bodies and bones change in the years after their first scan. Louise Thomas, a professor of metabolic imaging at the University of Westminster, has looked at body scans taken two years apart. 'The results were shocking. The amount of visceral fat, the bad fat in the abdomen, had increased,' she said. Muscle also becomes more fatty. 'As we get older, we become more and more marbled,' she said. 'We're becoming wagyu beef.' Medical advances made from the images are expected to transform procedures in the NHS. One of Thomas's colleagues automated the detection of aneurysms – life-threatening bulges in blood vessel walls. While men are already screened for them, women are not, even though they are more serious in women. 'We can do lots of things we weren't able to do before. It's quite extraordinary,' Thomas added.
