logo
Vintage Chicago Tribune: Pope John Paul II's visit in 1979

Vintage Chicago Tribune: Pope John Paul II's visit in 1979

Chicago Tribune08-05-2025
Today, the world learned the identity of the new leader of the Catholic Church — Leo XIV. Robert Prevost, a Chicago native, became the first American pope.
Only one pope has ever visited Chicago.
Pope John Paul II (formerly known as Karol Wojtyla) was the first non-Italian leader of the Catholic Church in almost half a century. Born in Poland in 1920 but not ordained a priest until after World War II, the master of at least a dozen languages was elected Oct. 16, 1978 — making him among the youngest popes in history — amid much jubilation from Chicago's Polish American community, which was the largest outside Warsaw.
'My parishioners are in seventh heaven,' Bishop Alfred L. Abramowicz told the Tribune at the time. 'Pope John Paul II will be as lovable as John Paul I. He is an extremely holy man and is well-beloved by his people. He is a scholar, but he also has a great touch with the laboring man. During the war years he was a worker in a chemical factory in Krakow.'
There were three leaders of the Roman Catholic Church in 1978. Cardinal Albino Luciani of Venice was elected Aug. 26, 1978, following the death of Pope Paul VI. Yet the pontificate of Pope John Paul I (Luciani's chosen name) would become among the shortest in the church's history. He died of a heart attack in his sleep just 33 days after his election. Pope John Paul I's successor would become among the church's longest-serving pontiffs.
Rumors began to circulate in June 1979 that Pope John Paul II might travel to Chicago, which was then home to 2.4 million Catholics making it the largest archdiocese in North America. After his office confirmed the pontiff would speak before the United Nations General Assembly in New York City, word spread that he would return to Chicago in October 1979.
That's right — it wasn't the former Polish cardinal's first time in the city. He led a group of bishops on a tour of the United States — that stopped in Chicago — in 1976.
On a cold, windy autumn night at 7 p.m., Pope John Paul II stepped off the Shepherd I jetliner to cheers from the more than 1,000 well-wishers and dignitaries that showed up at O'Hare International Airport to greet him. Escorted by Cardinal John Cody, the pontiff was serenaded by a group of 30 violin players, aged 3 to 15, before departing in a limousine.
When his motorcade made a brief detour from the Kennedy Expressway to travel along stretches of Nagle, Milwaukee and Lawrence avenues, an estimated 750,000 people — many who could barely see him — lined his path. Another 30,000 gathered outside his next stop.
The Pope delivered his first statement to the people of Chicago at Holy Name Cathedral: 'How greatly I would like to meet each one of you personally, to visit you in your homes, to walk your streets so that I may better understand the richness of your personalities and the depth of your aspiration. May God uplift humanity in this great city of Chicago.'
As world-renowned opera singer Luciano Pavarotti sang 'Ave Maria,' the pontiff sat in a chair at the center of the sanctuary's altar. He 'appeared slightly weary on his arrival in Chicago, the third city he visited during the day,' the Tribune reported.
He skipped a planned break to continue to St. Peter's Church in the Loop where he was welcomed by a large assembly of Franciscan brothers and members of other Catholic orders.
Finally arriving at Cardinal Cody's residence, 1555 N. State Parkway, at 10:15 p.m., Pope John Paul II took to a balcony to give those outside yet another sign — the last act from his first day in the city.
'Cupping (his hands) together, he placed them on his cheek, tilted his head in a sleeping motion, and smiling, reentered the mansion at 10:25 p.m.,' the Tribune reported.
Friday began with shivering 40-degree temperatures 'that numbed thousands of pilgrims who wore parkas and scarves and sipped coffee while they waited for a glimpse of the pontiff in the many places he toured,' Tribune reporters Monroe Anderson and William Gaines wrote.
Entering a motorcade shortly before 7:30 a.m., the pontiff was escorted throughout the city's neighborhoods with tens of thousands greeting him with songs and cheers. He stopped to celebrate Mass in Spanish at Providence of God Church in Pilsen then in Polish at Five Holy Martyrs Church. Estimates of between 70,000 to 200,000 people crowded shoulder-to-shoulder outside each site.
Shortly after 2 p.m. the Pope took to the skies to see the city from a helicopter, cruising above the South Side and the lakefront before landing in Lincoln Park for a quick ride back to the cardinal's residence.
For three hours, Grant Park became a church. A huge crowd — estimated at 1 million or more people — its congregation.
'Perhaps what didn't happen at the Mass was as impressive as what did: The crowd did not, for the most part, become restless and rowdy, even though many — including children — had waited for four hours and longer,' Tribune reporter Michael Hirsley wrote a few days later.
When the pontiff departed for Washington, D.C., he had been seen by some 2 million people throughout Chicago.
'If Chicago gushed unabashedly at its visitor from the Vatican, the 59-year-old leader of 600 million Catholics made Chicagoans feel it was a mutual friendship,' Hirsley wrote.
Pope John Paul II's nearly 3-hour Mass in Grant Park supposedly attracted 500,000 to 1.5 million people. One Tribune reporter wondered if the park could host a crowd nearly half as large as the city itself? Bill Currie set out to get answers.
Vintage Chicago Tribune: 5 largest crowd estimates in city historyCurrie discovered the only way 1 million people could have attended the Mass was for some to be standing in — or on — Lake Michigan. He remains convinced that most crowd estimates are incorrect.
'I don't think 1 million people (let alone 2 million) have ever gathered together in any one place in the world since time immemorial,' Currie said. 'Prove it, I say.'
Thanks for reading!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gabbard strips security clearances of 37 intelligence officials, including many with Biden ties
Gabbard strips security clearances of 37 intelligence officials, including many with Biden ties

The Hill

time28 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Gabbard strips security clearances of 37 intelligence officials, including many with Biden ties

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revoked the security clearances of 37 current and former intelligence officials, sharing the list in a move that prompted swift criticism that the Trump administration was politicizing clearances. Among those on the list are several Biden administration officials, including Maher Bitar, who joined the National Security Council (NSC) after previously working for then-House Intelligence Chair Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) amid the first Trump impeachment. Bitar has since returned to Schiff's office. Emily Horne, an NSC spokesperson under Biden, also had her clearance revoked, as did Brett Holmgren, who most recently served as Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research and who is married to former Biden White House Counsel Dana Remus. Gabbard, without evidence, accused those listed of politicizing or leaking intelligence or 'committing intentional egregious violations of tradecraft standards.' She said the move came at the direction of President Trump. 'Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right. Those in the Intelligence Community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the interests of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold. In doing so, they undermine our national security, the safety and security of the American people and the foundational principles of our democratic republic,' Gabbard wrote on X. The announcement was quickly condemned by national security professionals, including others who have had their clearances revoked by Trump. 'Can you say 'Privacy Act violation'? I certainly can. Further proof of weaponization and politicization. The vast majority of these individuals are not household names & are dedicated public servants who have worked across multiple presidential administrations,' said Mark Zaid, a national security attorney who has represented those who have had clearance revoked and also had his own clearance stripped under Trump. Zaid noted that the move was first published by The New York Post ahead of the public announcement by Gabbard. 'Pure politicization of security clearance process. These are unlawful decisions that deviate from decades of precedent. Completely unprofessional that individuals are targeted in [a] way that impacts their careers, yet they are not notified before leaking memo to friendly media,' he wrote on X. Larry Pfeiffer, who served as senior director of the White House situation room and chief of staff at the CIA, said the decision would only undercut U.S. intelligence. 'The skill and talent that Trump and Gabbard deprive the US national security and intelligence communities, govt & private sector, is huge. Makes one wonder who they are really working for, directly, indirectly, or as useful idiots,' he wrote on X, ending the tweet with a Russian flag. The list also cuts clearances for those who have spoken in the media about various Trump administration decisions. Beth Sanner, a longtime national security official who also served during the first Trump administration, has commented on Trump's policies through her role as a national security analyst at CNN. Charles Kupchan, who worked at NSC under the Clinton and Obama administrations, and Sarah Vinograd, who was at NSC under Obama and at the Department of Homeland Security under Biden, have also recently commented on Trump's foreign policy moves. Trump has revoked security clearances for a number of officials, including those who signed onto a letter saying the Hunter Biden laptop had the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign, as well as the clearances of attorneys working at major law firms.

Is this the end of history?
Is this the end of history?

Boston Globe

time28 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Is this the end of history?

🛒 Cartoon: A Market Basket moment Revising the nation's history, Trump style By David Shribman In his first term, Donald Trump mounted a relentless, remorseless war against the truth, issuing according to the Washington Post 30,573 Last week, the White House sent the Smithsonian This order demands 'content corrections where necessary' to replace 'divisive or ideologically driven language' with what the administration claims would be 'unifying, historically accurate, and constructive descriptions' on exhibits. As benign as that might sound, it opens the door to a frontal attack on the independence of a cultural establishment known for its down-the-middle presentation of the nation's history. Advertisement With 21 museums, the Smithsonian is known as both the 'nation's attic' (its nickname) and the national curator (its functional role), with beloved items that include the 30-by-34-foot flag that inspired Francis Scott Key to write the lyrics to the 'Star-Spangled Banner.' But earlier this summer, under pressure from the administration, its National Museum of American History removed references to Trump's two impeachments from its Advertisement The reference to Trump was restored, but confidence in the museum has not been damaged. To be sure, collisions over the truth — what it is, who gets to tell it, what its purpose is — are as old as the Even so, the Smithsonian episode and its recent precursors — including David Kennedy, the Pulitzer-winning historian at Stanford University, expressed concern that the health, plurality, diversity, and integrity of America's civil institutions — celebrated since the time of Alexis de Tocqueville — are endangered. 'All history is contested, and national histories are among the most contested territories in the cultural landscape,' he said in an email exchange with me. 'But it has long been taken as a self-evident principle that the contestation must proceed with scrupulous attention to the facts and to responsible methods of research and presentation.' Advertisement Even the national parks have become battlegrounds, through the March executive order attacking instances where sites 'perpetuate a false reconstruction of American history, inappropriately minimize the value of certain historical events or figures, or include any other improper partisan ideology.' That prompted the senior director of cultural resources of the Beyond the administration's focus 'on the greatness of the achievements and progress of the American people' as mandated in that executive order, the administration also is seeking to force its own version of events onto contemporary life even as it applies a shiny varnish over the past. This summer, the administration expanded its airbrushing to include government data, when Trump fired a Labor Department official whose report on job creation didn't jibe with the president's expectations, hopes, or needs. This is the data that companies depend on to make critical decisions about investments and hiring, that academics use to chart the nation's economic direction, that policy makers use to determine when to act and when to remain still. Whitewashing this data, as Trump seems inclined to do, will only hurt the nation's ability to keep its economy humming. Economist Advertisement More broadly, if the facts about American history are obscured or buried, or if the truth is devalued or cancelled in the daily course of national government, the country will eventually become a land 'where ignorant armies clash by night,' as Already the fight about the truth has divided the country, with a An assault against facts, or against history, or against fair-minded renderings of events commemorated in national parks and landmarks, are in essence an assault against the oldest values of the country, forged in the ultimate rebellion against authority undertaken by the Revolutionary Founders. But the blueprint for fighting crimes against the truth is even older, and is found in Scripture. 'These are the things you shall do,' the What the right, left, and center are saying about Trump's Ukraine attempts at peace-making Curated by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine delivers remarks at a meeting with President Donald Trump and European leaders. DOUG MILLS/NYT FROM THE RIGHT In The New York Sun, Advertisement FROM THE LEFT In The New York Times, columnist FROM THE CENTER In The Atlantic, staff writers Advertisement War and peas By Christopher Weyant Christopher Weyant Before you leave... Trivia by Gwen Egan Around what percentage of the Smithsonian's collections are on display at any given time? A. Less than 1% B. More than 50% C. Less than 5% D. More than 25% Think you know the answer? Try your hand Thanks for reading Right, Left, and Center. Globe Opinion's free weekly newsletter about local and national politics. ✍🏼 If you'd like to receive it in your inbox every Wednesday, you can 📬 Delivered Wednesdays. David Shribman is a nationally syndicated columnist. He can be reached at

White House Launches TikTok Account as Ban Remains on Hold
White House Launches TikTok Account as Ban Remains on Hold

Newsweek

time29 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

White House Launches TikTok Account as Ban Remains on Hold

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The White House on Tuesday officially launched a TikTok account (@whitehouse), aiming to tap into the platform's reach of more than 150 million U.S. users to share President Donald Trump's messages and policy priorities. While previous intelligence assessments warned that the app could be vulnerable to influence from its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, the launch reflects the administration's focus on creative and direct engagement with broader audiences. Trump has previously praised the app, saying it helped him connect with younger voters and boost support in his victory over Democrat Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election. In June, President Trump issued his third executive order delaying enforcement of the U.S. TikTok ban—this time extending the deadline to September 17, 2025, giving ByteDance additional time to divest or face removal under the law. "The Trump administration is committed to communicating the historic successes President Trump has delivered to the American people with as many audiences and platforms as possible," said White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. The move builds on the platform's role in Trump's successful 2024 campaign, particularly in reaching younger voters. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store