CarPlay Ultra debuts in Aston Martin
First seen in action inside the high-performance Aston Martin DBX 707, CarPlay Ultra goes far beyond simple phone mirroring to offer a fully integrated digital cockpit experience. And with several major manufacturers already lined up to implement the technology, this could mark a turning point in automotive software design.
CarPlay, as we've known it, has essentially functioned as a mirrored smartphone interface, pulling selected apps and functions like navigation, music and messages onto the car's central screen. But CarPlay Ultra takes a leap forward. No longer just a phone-on-a-screen, the system blends Apple's intuitive design language with live vehicle data and native user-interface (UI) features to create a more unified digital experience across all the screens in a car, including the digital instrument cluster.
The big shift comes in how CarPlay Ultra handles information. There are now three layers of content delivery. First, the familiar mirrored apps from your iPhone. Then, what Apple calls local UI , which integrates real-time data from the car (like fuel level, speed and climate settings) into the Apple interface. Finally, there's punch-through UI , which allows certain pages from the car's native system, such as the reversing camera or high-end audio settings, to appear within the CarPlay environment without alteration.
In practice, it means no more jumping between two clashing interfaces. Everything from maps to media to seat heating can be accessed via the same clean, Apple-designed visual language. And it's fully responsive to your car's hardware. In the DBX 707, for instance, the system spans a 10.25-inch touchscreen and a digital instrument cluster, adapting dynamically to both.
Read more 2022 Aston Martin DBX707 review
One of the headline features is CarPlay Ultra's ability to take over the instrument cluster. Apple provides manufacturers with a design toolkit, which each car brand can customise to suit their models. Aston Martin has developed multiple cluster layouts, from classic twin roundels in racing green to a full-screen navigation view with minimal driver distraction. Swiping left or right on the steering wheel's thumb pad allows drivers to switch between these options, while up and down gestures change the data displayed in the centre such as tyre pressures, trip info, or media.
Customisation doesn't stop there. Within the settings menu, users can tweak colours and some visual elements (though layout choices remain fixed, for now). CarPlay Ultra also supports full integration of climate controls, media, and other key functions. You can interact via the screen, physical buttons (if your car has them), or Siri, which is now linked directly to the voice command button on the wheel.
From May 15, all new Aston Martins sold in the US will come pre-loaded with CarPlay Ultra. Customers with recent models can have it retrofitted at a dealership. A global rollout is expected within the next year. And it's not just Aston on board; brands like Porsche, Hyundai, Renault, Volvo and Ford have confirmed upcoming models with CarPlay Ultra support.
To use CarPlay Ultra, drivers will need a car with a digital instrument cluster, iOS 18.4 or later, and an iPhone 12 or newer. The connection is entirely wireless after the first pairing, which is either via cable or wireless sync.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
4 days ago
- RNZ News
Tech giants Apple and Google lose landmark court case as federal judge rules they engaged in anti-competitive conduct
By Michael Atkin and Melanie Vujkovic Fortnite was kicked off the Google and App stores in 2020 for offering its own in-app payment system. Photo: ABC News: Evan Young/Epic Games In a landmark decision, the federal court has on Tuesday ruled against tech giants Apple and Google in a major win for consumers, finding that the companies engaged in anti-competitive conduct. Judge Jonathan Beach found that both companies had broken the law by misusing their market power in the way they run their app stores which sell everything from smartphone apps to computer games. It clears the way for two class actions covering millions of Australian consumers and developers to pursue substantial compensation for the price and commissions they paid for digital content - which according to legal representatives for the class actions were heavily inflated on the app stores. Justice Beach also ruled on two cases brought by Epic Games, the developer of blockbuster online game Fortnite. Justice Beach also ruled on two cases brought by Epic Games, the developer of blockbuster online game Fortnite. Photo: Epic Games He found Google and Apple breached section 46 of the competition and consumer act by misusing their market power to reduce competition but he rejected other allegations including that the companies had engaged in unconscionable conduct - behaviour so harsh it goes against good conscience. Consumer advocates and class action lawyers believe the judgement could have a significant impact on how digital platforms operate in Australia and may result in lower prices, increased competition and more innovation. The exact amount of compensation that 15 million consumers and 150,000 app developers could be entitled to will be determined at another hearing. A key factor in that calculation will be how much less people would have paid Apple and Google if those anti-competitive practices weren't in place. Joel Phibbs, with Phi Finney and McDonald, is representing developers and users in an open class action against Apple and Google Photo: ABC News: Patrick Stone The class actions by law firms Phi Finney McDonald and Maurice Blackburn was brought on behalf of app developers who sold their apps and other content, as well as users who bought them on the Apple and Google stores between November 2017 until June 2022. Joel Phibbs, Principal at Phi Finney McDonald told the ABC the amount of compensation could be substantial, "likely to be in the hundreds of millions of dollars." Both Epic Games and the class action lawyers alleged Apple and Google ran illegal monopolies for app sales, by banning or heavily discouraging other stores or websites. This meant app developers were forced to use the tech giants' payment platforms where both companies collected between 15 and 30 per cent of sales revenue in fees. The battle began in 2020, when Fortnite was kicked off the Google and Apple app stores for offering its own in-app payment system, bypassing the tech giants and their commission. Apple's App Store is the exclusive platform where its native apps are distributed, and under its terms and conditions for developers, it won't allow any third party app store be distributed on its devices - iPhones and iPads - in Australia. Fortnite launched a #FreeFortnite campaign after Apple blocked the app. Photo: Epic Games It also makes it "technically impossible" to directly download apps onto iOS devices outside of its App Store. Justice Beach said the way Apple ran its App Store and its requirement that developer's use its payment platform had negatively impacted competition. He said Apple had "engaged in conduct… that had the purpose or is likely to have or had the effect of substantially lessening competition in such markets". "Specifically, conduct that prevents or prohibits the direct downloading or sideloading of native apps and conduct that prevents or prohibits developers and users from using alternative payment methods." While Apple argued it imposed those restrictions for security concerns and risks, Justice Beach ruled it remained anti-competitive. "The fact that Apple has imposed those centralised app distribution system for the purpose of protecting security, does not entail that there is not also a substantial anti-competitive purpose involved." In a statement, Apple said, "we welcome the Australian court's rejection of some of Epic's claims, however, we strongly disagree with the court's ruling on others." "Apple faces fierce competition in every market where we operate. We continuously invest and innovate to make the App Store the safest place for users to get apps and a great business opportunity for developers in Australia and around the world," it said. Apple maintained that it faces stiff competition from Google, Samsung and other stores and the commissions it charges developers have been decreasing and that many pay none at all. In contrast to Apple products, Android users can use more than one app store and directly download apps from websites. However, Epic Games successfully argued in the case that Google still imposed its own payment system for the Google Play store and its control of the android ecosystem and use of restrictive contracts and conditions heavily impacted competition and therefore prices. Justice Beach found Google had engaged in conduct, "that's had or is likely to have had the effect of substantially lessening competition in such markets." Google told the ABC in a statement: "We disagree with the court's characterisation of our billing policies and practices, as well as its findings regarding some of our historical partnerships, which were all shaped in a fiercely competitive mobile landscape." Despite that, Google said it was pleased Justice Beach had recognised that it offered some additional competition for app distribution beyond its Google Play store. "We welcome the court's rejection of Epic's demands that we distribute app stores from within the Google Play store, and Epic's attacks on other critical security protections that users rely on." Epic Games has been suing both companies in courts around the world, including in Europe, the United Kingdom and the United States. Last month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld a jury verdict and a permanent injunction against Google. The US court found that Google had violated federal and Californian antitrust laws by maintaining monopoly power in Android app distribution and billing services and unlawfully tying the use of the Play Store to its billing system. An earlier case, brought by Epic against Apple in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, resulted in Apple being ordered to allow developers to direct consumers to payment providers outside of the App Store. A spokesperson for Australia's consumer watchdog the ACCC said it continued to argue for reform to combat anti-competitive practices by tech giants. It recently completed a five year inquiry into digital platforms. "The ACCC has observed conduct by the most powerful digital platforms that is distorting the competitive process," the spokesperson said. "This conduct includes denying interoperability, self-preferencing and tying, exclusivity agreements, impeding switching, and withholding access to important hardware, software, and data inputs. "We believe a digital platform regulatory regime will promote innovation, investment and productivity." - ABC
Techday NZ
4 days ago
- Techday NZ
Visa appoints Meble Tin to lead Oceania marketing from Sydney
Visa has appointed Meble Tin as Head of Marketing for Oceania, overseeing Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands. Tin, who will be based in Sydney, officially joins Visa on 2 September 2025, following roles at Apple and Airbnb where she built experience in brand development and customer engagement across both global and regional markets. Appointment details In her new position, Tin will lead the marketing agenda across Oceania, covering brand, client and consumer engagement. She is expected to play a significant part in aligning Visa's expanding capabilities with its regional marketing strategies and helping to scale marketing services for partners in banking, fintech, and merchant sectors. Tin most recently served at Airbnb, where she led marketing for Asia Pacific. Prior to that, she held senior global marketing roles at Apple, including leading global marketing for the 'Today at Apple' programme, a retail experience initiative delivered across over 500 stores worldwide, recognised with Grand Prix and Titanium awards at Cannes Lions. Industry background Her background includes experience in adapting strategies for local markets while keeping a focus on broader, global brand goals. At Airbnb, Tin helped tailor marketing approaches to meet the diverse needs of audiences across Asia Pacific, combining local relevance with the wider ambitions of the brand. Alan Machet, Visa Group Country Manager for Oceania, commented on the appointment: "This is a pivotal appointment for us. Meble brings a unique blend of global brand-building expertise and regional market insight - and will help sharpen the way we show up as a business, a brand and a marketing partner to our clients." At Visa, Tin is expected to guide marketing efforts at a time of ongoing change for the payments industry, particularly as digital commerce continues to shift how brands reach and connect with people. Marketing services focus Tin's role will support Visa's investment in marketing services for clients. These services are designed to help organisations drive growth by tapping into Visa's data resources, creative capabilities and marketing platforms. The company is focusing on strengthening partnerships with banks, fintech companies, and merchants throughout the region. Danielle Jin, Regional Head of Marketing for Asia Pacific, spoke about the skills Tin brings to the organisation: "Meble has an instinct for turning complex technology into compelling customer narratives. That's a powerful asset not just for Visa's brand, but for the value we deliver to our clients across the region." Meble Tin, discussing her new role and what drew her to Visa, said: "Visa is a brand that touches every part of daily life - and that's what excites me. As digital commerce continues to evolve, we have an opportunity to help businesses grow by combining innovation with insight, and creativity with local connection." Tin's appointment comes at a time when Visa is focusing on building its regional presence in Oceania and developing capabilities to support local and international partners amid a changing payments landscape. She will begin her new role leading Visa's marketing direction from September, guiding strategy across Australia, New Zealand, and the Pacific Islands.
RNZ News
07-08-2025
- RNZ News
Big investment payouts even experts let get away
Photo: AFP / Spencer Platt / Getty Images If you've ever wished you put a few dollars into Bitcoin when it was changing hands for pocket change or snapped up Apple shares when they were selling for cents, you're not alone. Even investment experts have ones that got away. Here are some of the investments we regret missing out on. Hamilton Hindin Greene investment advisor Jeremy Sullivan said someone who had invested $10,000 in Amazon's IPO in 2007 would have just under $30 million now. They would have had to stick with it through some volatility along the way though, including through the 'Dot Com' crash, when its share price fell by more than 90 percent. Devon Funds Management retail head Greg Smith agreed Amazon could be a missed opportunity - it traded for US7c in May 1997, but shares are now more than US$220. Bitcoin has been the outperformer of the investment world recently. Chartered accountant and chief executive of Swyftx digital investment platform Jason Titman said, if someone had invested $36,500 in Bitcoin over the past decade - equivalent to $10 a day - they would now hold a portfolio worth about $2.8 million. Smith said he was in London in 2013, when Bitcoin was $1000. "A crypto fanatic told me to buy it, I hadn't even heard of it and didn't." Smith said he also regretted not buying A2 Milk shares, when they were 2c in 2004. The share price hit more than $20 in 2020 and is about $8.60 now. Smith said he also regretted missing out on Apple in the 1980s, when it regularly changed hands for less than US30c and is now more than US$210. Smith said Nvidia was up 66000 percent since its IPO in 1999 and up 1500 percent since 2020. In July, it became the world's first US$4 trillion company. The surge was driven by demand for its chips, which are used in AI. "There have been lofty expectations, but they've been delivering on that," Smith said in June. "They've ridden the generative AI boom and it's getting real demand." Infometrics chief executive Brad Olsen said not buying into Facebook in the early days was one of his regrets. You could buy shares for about US$20 in 2012 and they are worth more than US$770 now. "In hindsight, there's heaps I wish I bought," Olsen said. "Probably buying a property when I was a baby, that would have been my best investment, but there's also enough that I remember thinking about that had as much attention at the time about 'you should buy now' that I'm glad I never bought either - remember NFTs? "There's a range of products or options that were complete losers, and there were others that performed really well. That's the risk you'd have taken and why I don't really have any massive regrets. "I was happy with my risk tolerance at the time and still am." Kernel founder Dean Anderson said, rather than an investment he wished he had bought, there was one he should not have sold. "In my last year of university, 15 years ago, I bought a 1967 series 2 Land Rover. It was an absolute original, all the spare roofs, paperwork and just two owners - the army and then a retiree, who used it for his annual duck hunt. "I paid $1800 for the whole lot. While there was definitely a sense of 'what the hell did you buy that for' from dad, soon enough, he was out and about driving it. "It was an absolutely amazing vehicle, and responsible for many summer road trips and wine tours. Sold it a couple of years later, when it was hard to find somewhere to store it. "I made three times my investment on it, plus plenty of memories, but it would be 30 times that today - and who knows how many more memories." Property investment coach Steve Goodey said owning a big plot of land "just about anywhere" in Auckland 10 years ago would have made someone wealthy. New Zealand's median house price has increased from about $170,000 in 2000 to just under $800,000. As rules have changed, parcels of land that could be subdivided or house more properties have experienced significant increases in value. Between August last year and July this year, RocketLab shares increased from about US$5 to US$51. CoreLogic research head Nick Goodall said that benefited some members of his family - but not others. "We have a small Hatch account for our children, a way of teaching them about money," he said. "We said to the kids, 'What would you like to invest in?' "'You watch Disney, do you want to buy some shares in Disney? You're into sport, do you want to buy Nike?' "'You like rockets, do you want to buy RocketLab?' "This is very small scale, but we ended up buying some shares for our middle child, and there's been a 60 percent increase in three months or whatever. His sister's, like, 'I want some of that'. "In hindsight, it's anything that's seen strong growth in value over time. I like the idea of what has done well, but also sits morally with you." Koura founder Rupert Carlyon said he wished he had gone into the S&P500 ETF 20 years ago "and kept on doubling it". "A safe, low-risk investment that has done extremely well. "I simply wish I had known how easy investing could be much earlier." Simplicity chief economist Shamubeel Eaqub said he had some investments he regretted getting into, such as Ubco, which collapsed in January, but was recently saved . "I have many such stories, but that's my fun money - mainly for start-ups, some of which become big payoffs. "The savings I have are in diversified portfolios, because stock picking and timing the market aren't things I can do consistently. I think focussing on one or two that got away, which can of course make someone immensely rich, distracts from the wider story of what works, regular habitual savings and the power of compounding." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
