logo
Trump's 5% NATO spend target 'very, very difficult' to meet, Greek PM says

Trump's 5% NATO spend target 'very, very difficult' to meet, Greek PM says

Business Mayor5 days ago

Global Economy May 23, 2025
Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz (not pictured) speak to the media following talks at the Chancellery on May 13, 2025 in Berlin, Germany.
Sean Gallup | Getty Images News | Getty Images
It would be challenging for NATO members to deliver on U.S. President's Donald Trump's defense spending demands, Greece's prime minister told CNBC.
The White House leader has frequently called for NATO nations to increase their security contribution to 5% of their gross domestic product — a target Greece's Kyriakos Mitsotakis questions can be met.
'I think 5% frankly, is very, very difficult,' he said in an interview with CNBC's Silvia Amaro that was aired on 'Europe Early Edition' Friday.
'If we're talking about hard defense spending, I think 3.5% is probably the ceiling of … what could be sort of accepted,' Mitsotakis said.
He nevertheless noted that the 5% mark could be a long-term target if broader expenses such as critical infrastructure were to fall under the spending umbrella.
'So it really depends on how we do the accounting,' he noted.
NATO chief Mark Rutte has reportedly suggested that NATO members should increase defense spending to 3.5% of GDP, while committing an additional 1.5% to wider security-related matters.
Many NATO countries have historically struggled to meet the alliance's currently lower 2% target, earning Trump's ire.
NATO estimates suggest the U.S. spent around 3.4% of its GDP on defense in 2024, with only two other allies — Poland and Estonia — allocating a bigger share of their economic power to security matters over the period.
Poland has also already committed to boosting its defense spending to a level as high as 5% in the coming years, while other countries have been more cautious, warning that such expenditures could be difficult for them to manage.
German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul last week also indicated that the country was backing Trump's target. The result of Rutte's suggestion was 'indeed the 5% demanded by President Trump, that he believes are necessary, and we are following him in this respect,' he said.
A decision about new defense spending targets could be made at the next NATO summit in late June.
Speaking to CNBC, Greece's Mitsotakis said Trump was right to demand more defense expenditures from NATO allies.
'Donald Trump was right when in 2017 he said you're not doing your fair share, because we didn't,' he said. 'We understand now that there is no free lunch and we cannot free ride.'
Greece itself spent nearly 3.1% of its GDP on defense last year, NATO estimates. Athens has been consistently exceeding the 2% target for many years and began ramping up defense expenses further in 2020 amid long-running tensions with its neighbor Turkey over issues including maritime borders.
'We spend more than 3% for very specific reasons, and we were also advocating very much for a change in European rules to encourage us to be able to spend more,' Mitsotakis said, adding that there had been some progress in this area.
European Union fiscal rules have for years restricted the extent of debt and budgetary deficits that a member country can incur. Recently, the European Commission has made moves toward easing fiscal constraints as part a wider security package. Read More Why merger mania is coming to the fore in the mining industry
Speaking to CNBC, Mitsotakis — who has previously said the European Commission's plans could be more ambitious — noted it was also important to continue discussions about a potential European facility to support defense spending.
READ SOURCE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Advent in talks to buy Kereis from Bridgepoint
Advent in talks to buy Kereis from Bridgepoint

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Advent in talks to buy Kereis from Bridgepoint

Private equity firm Advent has initiated exclusive negotiations for the acquisition of Kereis, a multi-channel insurance brokerage in Europe, from private asset investor Bridgepoint. Terms of the potential deal remain undisclosed at this stage. The proposed acquisition is contingent on regulatory clearance and consultations with employees. Set up in 1991 with its headquarters in Paris, Kereis specialises in providing insurance broking services to insurers and banking partners. Kereis holds expertise in housing protection in France, overseeing more than 17 million contracts and supported by a workforce of more than 1,700 across seven European nations. Kereis CEO Philippe Gravier stated: 'This project opens a promising new chapter for Kereis, after 5 years of a successful partnership with Bridgepoint. 'We look forward to working closely with Advent as we continue to invest for the long term in our digital capabilities, expand into new markets, and deliver innovative solutions to our partners and clients across Western Europe.' Following the Bridgepoint partnering in 2020, Kereis has achieved a two-fold increase in revenue and has diversified into areas of corporate risk, health, and property and casualty (P&C) insurance. The company's growth and international reach have been significantly bolstered through mergers and acquisitions over the last three years. Advent director Hadrien de Bardies said: 'Our potential investment in Kereis builds on Advent's long-standing track record in financial services. We will leverage our global network and operational resources to help Kereis scale further, broaden its product offering, and strengthen its leadership position in the European market.' Advent's portfolio in the insurance sector includes investments in CCC Intelligent Solutions and Shift Technology. It also has history in France, stretching over 25 years and encompassing 15 platform deals with recent investments include Parfums de Marly – INITIO in 2023 and Mangopay in 2022. "Advent in talks to buy Kereis from Bridgepoint " was originally created and published by Life Insurance International, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Ukraine's memorandum proposes ceasefire across land, air, and sea, NYT reports
Ukraine's memorandum proposes ceasefire across land, air, and sea, NYT reports

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ukraine's memorandum proposes ceasefire across land, air, and sea, NYT reports

Ukraine's proposed memorandum to Russia includes provisions for a ceasefire on land, in the air, and at sea, to be monitored by international partners, the New York Times (NYT) reported on May 30, citing an unnamed senior Ukrainian official. Ukraine has submitted its document to the Russian side ahead of a second round of peace talks between Kyiv and Moscow that may take place in Istanbul on June 2, Defense Minister Rustem Umerov said on May 28. The points reported by NYT echo Ukraine's and its partners' long-standing call for a comprehensive, unconditional ceasefire on land, in the air, and at sea for at least 30 days — a proposal Russia has consistently ignored. The peace talks in Istanbul also concluded on May 16 with no agreement between the two sides on a ceasefire. Ukrainian Deputy Foreign Minister Serhii Kyslytsia, who was present at the Istanbul talks, said that Russia's negotiating team in Istanbul has repeatedly stated that "an unconditional ceasefire is categorically unacceptable." Moscow has proposed June 2 as the date for the next round of talks with Ukraine, despite escalating its attacks on the country. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on May 29 that the Russian delegation, led by presidential aide Vladimir Medinsky, is prepared to present the ceasefire memorandum to the Ukrainian side and provide necessary clarifications during the next Istanbul meeting. Presidential Office Chief of Staff Andriy Yermak said that Ukraine is ready to hold the new round of talks next week but insists on receiving the memorandum in advance. Reuters reported that Putin's conditions for ending Russia's war against Ukraine include a written pledge by NATO not to accept more Eastern European members, lifting of some sanctions, and Ukraine's neutral status, among other demands. Read also: Infighting around EU rearmament undermines grand ambitions for European defense We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

Opinion - More renters are getting lawyers during evictions, and that's a good thing
Opinion - More renters are getting lawyers during evictions, and that's a good thing

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - More renters are getting lawyers during evictions, and that's a good thing

Last year, landlords in Los Angeles filed almost 90,000 eviction cases. These cases are hard on tenants: Beyond just the immediate loss of housing, eviction leads to drops in income, higher rates of homelessness, serious health issues, and even increased risk of death. Yet the vast majority of Angelenos who navigate the complex eviction court process do so alone. That is about to change. Last month, Los Angeles joined 18 other cities, two counties, and five states across the nation where most or all tenants are guaranteed a lawyer when they go to court for an eviction. These 'right-to-counsel' programs improve outcomes for individual tenants, but their impact goes further: They can help to coordinate services, change the way the courts operate, and open up new possibilities for tenant organizing. As researchers who study eviction in the U.S., we urge more jurisdictions to push forward housing justice and stability for renters by extending the right to counsel. These programs are particularly important now. Over the last twenty years, rents have gone up much faster than incomes, leaving half of renters cost-burdened. Faced with these sorts of affordability challenges — and given evidence that homelessness is at an all-time high and rising — the federal government should be taking steps to protect renters. Instead, it is making the situation worse. The Trump administration is proposing shrinking the Department of Housing and Urban Development and gutting key benefits such as Housing Choice Vouchers. Right-to-counsel programs provide an example of what state and local governments can do to step into the leadership void created by federal retrenchment. Pop culture has sold us the myth that every defendant has the right to an attorney. But that's not true. Americans aren't necessarily guaranteed a government-funded lawyer when faced with a civil action such as debt collection, a child custody claim, or a landlord-tenant dispute. They're on their own unless they can afford a lawyer, and most people can't. These civil actions are far more common than criminal cases. In any given year, almost half of Americans have to deal with a civil legal case. Take eviction, for example. An average of 7.6 million Americans face eviction cases annually; only 4 percent of these tenants have lawyers to help them through this rapid, complicated, and deeply consequential process. That started changing in 2017, when New York City established the nation's first right to counsel program. Since then, this movement has expanded protections for renters in San Francisco, Baltimore, Detroit, and dozens of other places. Although programs differ in who receives access to a lawyer and when in the process they can get help, the basic idea is the same: to provide tenants with legal assistance during what may be their darkest hour. For tenants who now have lawyers, these programs make a world of difference. Eviction filings are less likely to result in a tenant being removed by court order, and even those that do result in evictions often leave the tenant owing less money. The benefits to health and well-being are also substantial. For example, the availability of right to counsel during pregnancy reduces adverse birth outcomes among newborns. At the end of the day, a lawyer cannot make up for missed rent. But in our work studying how jurisdictions have implemented right-to-counsel, we have seen how the presence of lawyers defending tenants can lead to wholesale culture shifts in civil courts — something that rental assistance and other one-time interventions don't achieve. We have seen courts where, rather than just rubber-stamping landlords' eviction cases, judges now inform tenants of their rights and postpone hearings to make sure that they are represented. Courts can become a place where advocates and social workers connect tenants with services and resources and diversion is a priority. To meet their full potential, state and local leaders need to provide the stable, long-term funding necessary to launch and run these programs right. That means adequate money for outreach and education so that tenants know that protections are available if they show up to court. It also means sufficient funding to ensure that enough lawyers are available, a challenge that the New York City program has faced. San Francisco provides a model of how to do this right, steadily increasing funding, even expanding support during the pandemic when other programs were being cut. Right to counsel programs are bringing change, justice, and hope for renters experiencing one of the most difficult challenges of their lives. As the federal government pulls back supports and reverses longstanding legal protections for low-income renters, it's time for state and local leaders to work together to expand protections like right-to-counsel in a sustainable way that can help as many families as possible avoid the irreversible fallout of eviction and the risk of homelessness. Peter Hepburn is an assistant professor of sociology at Rutgers University-Newark and associate director of Princeton University's Eviction Lab. Emily A. Benfer is a professor of clinical law at the George Washington University Law School and a research collaborator at the Princeton University Eviction Lab. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store