Dismissal of impeachment raps vs. Sara without hearing evidence a disservice, solons say
'At the end of the day, ano ba yung basis ng motion to dismiss? Each Senator should act as an impartial judge, whether or not they are in favor of the accused or not," Manila Rep. Ernix Dionesio said.
The Senate impeachment court dismissing the complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte without hearing the evidence is a disservice to the Filipino people and a clear partiality, House members said on Thursday.
Senate President Francis Escudero said the day before that the impeachment court may vote to dismiss the impeachment complaint against the Vice President outright by a majority vote in the event such motion is put forward, given that there is no motion that is prohibited.
'At the end of the day, ano ba yung basis ng motion to dismiss? Each Senator should act as an impartial judge, whether or not they are in favor of the accused or not," Manila Rep. Ernix Dionesio said.
"Doon mo makikita na may pinapanigan agad kapag nagmo-motion to dismiss without hearing a piece or pieces of evidence. Wala pang pinipresentan, gusto na nalang i-dismiss,' he added.
(What is the basis of motion to dismiss to begin with? If a Senator-judge will make a motion to dismiss without hearing the pieces of evidence, then that Senator-judge is clearly partial because he or she wants a dismissal without hearing the evidence.)
'The people are watching, history will write itself now. We don't want to overstep, but it is our opinion that the impeachment is the best way to see whether or not guilty or not guilty after [the Senator-judges] seeing the pieces of evidence,' Dionesio added.
Lanao Del Sur Rep. Zia Alonto Adiong said senator-judges should base their decision whether to convict or acquit an impeachable official on the merits of the complaint rather than dismissing it outright.
'I still maintain my optimism that they will decide based on the merits of the evidence. There are senators who have already prejudged the outcome or already have their own leanings, their own biases," Adiong said.
"Wala naman problema if they vote for either to convict or to acquit. Basta ang position lang po namin is to respect what the Constitution says and let the impeachment process proceed,' he added.
(If the motion to dismiss will be put forward...there is no problem if a Senator-judge want to acquit or convict. But our position that we should respect what the Constitution says remains.)
The impeachment complaint filed by over 200 lawmakers back in February 5 accuses the Vice President of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the Constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes mainly over alleged misuse of around P612.5 million worth of confidential funds and threatening to kill President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr., his wife Liza and the President's cousin and Speaker Martin Romualdez of Leyte.
'It's not the question of can they do it? It's the question of why should they do it?" Adiong said as regards the impeachment court dismissing the complaint without hearing the evidence.
"There is a verified impeachment na complaint... allegations that constitutes high crimes, tantamount to betrayal of public trust, among others, laid down in the Constitution...the public deserves to know the truth," Adiong said.
The full-blown presentation of evidence in an impeachment trial, Adiong said, will also serve justice to the Vice President.
'The only way for us to find out the truth and at the same time give due process to the defendant is to continue with the impeachment trial,' Adiong said. –NB, GMA Integrated News
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
3 hours ago
- GMA Network
DepEd vows accountability, clean hiring, no ‘pay-for-position'
The Department of Education (DepEd) on Wednesday reaffirmed its zero tolerance policy against "pay-for-position" schemes, condemning all forms of corruption involving appointments, promotions, and designations within the agency. In a statement, DepEd emphasized that all personnel movements must be based strictly on merit, fitness, and competence, in line with civil service laws and established rules. 'Any act of soliciting, offering, or receiving money, favors, or undue advantage in exchange for an appointment, promotion, or reassignment is a grave offense,' the agency warned, noting that such acts are punishable under Republic Act No. 3019 or the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, and may lead to administrative, civil, and criminal penalties. The department called on educators, staff, and the public to report any such corrupt practices directly to the Office of the Secretary, the DepEd Central Office, or law enforcement agencies such as the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI)and the Philippine National Police (PNP). 'The Department guarantees that all complaints will be treated with strict confidentiality,' the statement read, adding that whistleblowers will be protected through appropriate safeguards. In a separate message, Education Secretary Sonny Angara gave a firm warning against individuals exploiting the system for personal gain. 'Sa ilalim ng aking pamumuno, hindi ko pahihintulutan ang anumang uri ng katiwalian sa loob ng Kagawaran ng Edukasyon, kasama diyan ang mga nababalitang pagbebenta ng posisyon o pagtanggap ng kapalit para sa trabaho, promosyon, o puwesto,' Angara said. (Under my leadership, I will not tolerate any form of corruption within the Department of Education, including reports of selling positions or receiving favors in exchange for jobs, promotions, or assignments.) 'Hindi makatarungan na may mga gustong paikliin ang proseso kapalit ng pera o impluwensiya, habang dumadaan ang karamihan sa maayos, patas, at legal na paraan. Dapat tayo ay may kakayahan, integridad, at malasakit sa bansa at kabataang Pilipino,' he added. (It is unjust that some people try to shortcut the process using money or influence, while others go through it fairly and legally. We must be guided by competence, integrity, and compassion for our country and the Filipino youth.) 'Kung may sinumang lalabag, asahan ninyong hindi kami magdadalawang-isip na isuplong sila sa kinakaukulan. Papanagutin sila ng ating batas at papatawan ng nararapat na parusa,' Angara said. (If anyone violates this, you can be sure we will not hesitate to report them to the authorities. They will be held accountable and punished under the law.) DepEd urged all its personnel to remain vigilant and uphold the values of integrity and professionalism, stressing: 'Positions in the Department are earned—not bought." — Sherylin Untalan/BM, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
3 hours ago
- GMA Network
Senate to allow evidence vs. VP Sara if impeach rap is constitutional —Alan Cayetano
The Senate impeachment court will allow the presentation of evidence against Vice President Sara Dutete on one condition: if the said court has already resolved that the impeachment complaint is constitutional. 'I can only assure the public na aabot tayo sa ebidensya if the whole impeachment court says na wala itong fatal constitutional defect that takes out jurisdiction from the court,' Senator Alan Cayetano, a lawyer, told reporters. (The public can be assured that we will reach the presentation of evidence if the whole impeachment court says that the complaint has no constitutional defect.) Cayetano made known his position a day after Senate President Francis Escudero said that the Senate can vote on the motion to dismiss the impeachment complaint if such motion is put forward by either a senator-judge or the camp of the Vice President. Further, Escudero said that a motion to dismiss the impeachment complaint against the Vice President outrightly can be carried via a majority vote, just like any other motion. 'Hindi pa pwedeng ipakita mo muna lahat ng ebidensya mo kay VP Sara, saka natin tignan kung may jurisdiction o wala,' Cayetano added. (You can't show the evidence against the Vice President and then later decide if the court has jurisdiction over the case or otherwise) Duterte and Senator Ronald dela Rosa, who are both seeking to dismiss the impeachment complaint, argue that the complaint violates the Constitution's one-year bar rule, which only allows for the filing of one impeachment complaint against an impeachable official per year. The House prosecution panel contends that the fourth impeachment complaint filed by over 200 members of the House against the Vice President is the lone verified impeachment complaint filed against her because the first three impeachment complaints were never forwarded by House Secretary General Reginald Velasco to the Office of Speaker and Leyte Rep. Martin Romualdez. An impeachment complaint must be referred to the Office of Speaker for it to be scheduled for House Committee on Justice deliberation. The fourth impeachment complaint filed last February 5, however, had more than 200 House members as endorsers or way above the Constitutional requirement of one-third of all House members for it to be directly transmitted to the Senate and for the impeachment trial to 'proceed forthwith.' Realm of possibilities Cayetano then said that Escudero was simply laying out possibilities and not guaranteeing dismissal of the impeachment complaint. 'Just because you can, it doesn't mean you should. We really have to take a deep breath and think what's best for the country. And that's precisely why we agreed to return the impeachment complaint to the House first,' Cayetano said. Cayetano was referring to the motion of dela Rosa seeking to dismiss the impeachment rap against the Vice President allegedly due to being violative of the one-year bar rule. Dela Rosa's motion put forward before the Senate impeachment court last June 11, however, was amended to returning the impeachment complaint to the House and requiring the House to submit certifications that it did not violate the one-year bar rule and that the 20th Congress, which will only start on July 28, will still pursue the impeachment case against the Vice President. 'Kung na-dismiss during that time, what would be next? Pagdating nung bagong labing dalawang senador, back to zero kami. But ngayon na ibinalik, so one, mahihimay natin yung issue that did they or did they not violate the Constitution in terms of one impeachment lang in a year,' Cayetano said. 'Secondly, obvious naman yung ano eh, pagka nag-appoint sila ng bagong prosecutor at dumating sila, interesado pa sila. Kung hindi sila dumating sa korte, hindi na sila interesado. Pero hindi mo pwedeng sabihin 'yan from the 19th Congress [na iyon rin ang gagawin ng mga] nasa 20th Congress,' Cayetano said. (Also, if the House appoints a new set of prosecutors, then that would show that they remain interested in pursuing the impeachment case. If they don't show up, then they are not interested anymore. But we cannot assume that what the 19th Congress wants to do will be the same for the 20th Congress.) Cayetano then said there is no need for the public to be alarmed at this point. 'Don't panic because one, there's the Supreme Court. If you have a majority who says that they (House) violated the Constitution, babagksak at babagsak 'yan Supreme Court 'yan. Secondly, what's the worst case? They can file another one after one year,' Cayetano said. (If the Senate court finds the impeachment case unconstitutional, then it can be questioned before the Supreme Court. And what is the worst case? They would have to file another impeachment complaint after one year.) —LDF, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
6 hours ago
- GMA Network
Dismissal of impeachment raps vs. Sara without hearing evidence a disservice, solons say
'At the end of the day, ano ba yung basis ng motion to dismiss? Each Senator should act as an impartial judge, whether or not they are in favor of the accused or not," Manila Rep. Ernix Dionesio said. The Senate impeachment court dismissing the complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte without hearing the evidence is a disservice to the Filipino people and a clear partiality, House members said on Thursday. Senate President Francis Escudero said the day before that the impeachment court may vote to dismiss the impeachment complaint against the Vice President outright by a majority vote in the event such motion is put forward, given that there is no motion that is prohibited. 'At the end of the day, ano ba yung basis ng motion to dismiss? Each Senator should act as an impartial judge, whether or not they are in favor of the accused or not," Manila Rep. Ernix Dionesio said. "Doon mo makikita na may pinapanigan agad kapag nagmo-motion to dismiss without hearing a piece or pieces of evidence. Wala pang pinipresentan, gusto na nalang i-dismiss,' he added. (What is the basis of motion to dismiss to begin with? If a Senator-judge will make a motion to dismiss without hearing the pieces of evidence, then that Senator-judge is clearly partial because he or she wants a dismissal without hearing the evidence.) 'The people are watching, history will write itself now. We don't want to overstep, but it is our opinion that the impeachment is the best way to see whether or not guilty or not guilty after [the Senator-judges] seeing the pieces of evidence,' Dionesio added. Lanao Del Sur Rep. Zia Alonto Adiong said senator-judges should base their decision whether to convict or acquit an impeachable official on the merits of the complaint rather than dismissing it outright. 'I still maintain my optimism that they will decide based on the merits of the evidence. There are senators who have already prejudged the outcome or already have their own leanings, their own biases," Adiong said. "Wala naman problema if they vote for either to convict or to acquit. Basta ang position lang po namin is to respect what the Constitution says and let the impeachment process proceed,' he added. (If the motion to dismiss will be put is no problem if a Senator-judge want to acquit or convict. But our position that we should respect what the Constitution says remains.) The impeachment complaint filed by over 200 lawmakers back in February 5 accuses the Vice President of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the Constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes mainly over alleged misuse of around P612.5 million worth of confidential funds and threatening to kill President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr., his wife Liza and the President's cousin and Speaker Martin Romualdez of Leyte. 'It's not the question of can they do it? It's the question of why should they do it?" Adiong said as regards the impeachment court dismissing the complaint without hearing the evidence. "There is a verified impeachment na complaint... allegations that constitutes high crimes, tantamount to betrayal of public trust, among others, laid down in the public deserves to know the truth," Adiong said. The full-blown presentation of evidence in an impeachment trial, Adiong said, will also serve justice to the Vice President. 'The only way for us to find out the truth and at the same time give due process to the defendant is to continue with the impeachment trial,' Adiong said. –NB, GMA Integrated News
