House Votes To Repeal Student Loan Forgiveness And Repayment Plans — 4 Takeaways
WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 21: Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) speaks to reporters as he departs ... More for the White House as ongoing negotiations between House leadership, the White House and the House Freedom Caucus on the "One, Big, Beautiful Bill" continue at the U.S. Capitol Building on May 21, 2025 in Washington, DC. The bill includes significant changes to federal student loan forgiveness and repayment plans. (Photo by)
Republican lawmakers in the House of Representatives passed sweeping reconciliation legislation early Thursday that, among other things, would repeal several key federal student loan forgiveness and repayment programs and slash more than $300 billion in education-related spending. The bill narrowly passed by a 215 to 214 vote, mostly along party lines. The student loan reforms are part of a broader effort by Congressional Republicans to slash federal spending to help offset the costs of extending expiring tax cuts.
'President Trump's America First agenda is finally here, and we are advancing that today," said House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) shortly after the bill's passage.
'Today we cleared a huge hurdle, and we are one step closer to delivering on our promise to the American people to cut government waste," said Education and Workforce Committee Chairman Tim Walberg (R-MI) in a statement on Thursday. "It's time we stopped asking taxpayers to foot the bill for our broken student loan system that has left borrowers in trillions of dollars of debt and has caused college costs to balloon. It's time we stopped asking a factory worker in Michigan or a rancher in Texas to subsidize the student debt of a lawyer in Manhattan. I urge my colleagues in the Senate to end the status quo and get this bill to the President's desk.'
While the reforms to student loan forgiveness and repayment programs are massive in scope, and the House's passage of the legislation is a key step in the process, the bill is not enshrined into law quite yet. Here's what's in the legislation, and what student loan borrowers should know.
The reconciliation bill would make major changes to federal student loan forgiveness programs, including:
The bill would preserve tax relief for student loan discharges based on a student loan borrower's death or total and permanent disability.
The reconciliation legislation would also make significant changes to federal student loan repayment programs, upending decades of precedent. The changes include:
The changes would be particularly devastating to Parent PLUS borrowers. Most Parent PLUS borrowers not already enrolled in the ICR plan would be effectively cut off from any income-driven repayment plan and most pathways to student loan forgiveness, including through PSLF.
The Republican bill would also make major reforms to the disbursement of federal aid. The legislation would phase out or severely limit the Graduate PLUS and Parent PLUS programs, which advocacy groups argue would force many families to rely more on private student loans. Private student loans generally have fewer consumer protections and more limited repayment options.
The bill would also make major changes to Pell Grant disbursements, which some advocates have argued would limit higher education accessibility to lower-income students and families. Pell Grants are a form of federal student aid that does not have to be repaid.
While the passage of the reconciliation bill by the House of Representatives was a key step in the process of the bill becoming law, it's not a done deal yet. Now the bill heads to the Senate, where Republican lawmakers could make changes to the legislation's provisions. But it's unclear whether Republican senators will scale back the provisions impacting student loan forgiveness and repayment programs.
'Comprehensive reform of higher education is needed,' said Senator Bill Cassidy (R-LA), chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee President in remarks on the Senate floor on Wednesday. 'Trump and Secretary McMahon are making progress, including fixing our broken student loan program. But, congressional action is needed to create lasting change.' Cassidy pointed to pending legislation in the Senate to repeal the SAVE plan, eliminate the Graduate PLUS program, and eliminate most existing income-driven repayment plan options – all of which are elements of the House version of the bill that Republican lawmakers passed early Thursday.
Student loan borrower advocacy organizations slammed the legislation.
'Rather than check the abuses of the executive branch, Congressional Republicans appear ready to abuse the reconciliation process to rewrite higher education policy—shrinking access to federal financial aid, cutting or eliminating grants for about two-thirds of Pell recipients, removing guardrails that protect students from predatory schools, and placing enormous pressure on state higher education budgets," said Mike Pierce, executive director of Student Borrower Protection Center, in a statement during a Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions hearing on Wednesday. 'The result will push millions of families into the private loan market and, in the same bill, gut the CFPB—the regulator charged with protecting these very same families.'
All eyes are now on the Senate as lawmakers evaluate whether to change the provisions of the House bill that would make significant reforms to federal student loan forgiveness and repayment plans.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
27 minutes ago
- CNN
Venezuelans in Florida react to Trump's new travel ban
President Donald Trump signed a proclamation to ban travel from several countries to the US, citing security risks, with one of the countries being Venezuela. Venezuelans in Florida reacted to the ban, with one worrying about their visa.
27 minutes ago
Michigan House Republicans sue the secretary of state over election training materials
KALAMAZOO, Mich. -- Michigan Republicans are suing the battleground state's top elections executive over access to election training materials. The lawsuit filed Thursday is the latest escalation in a brewing dispute that began when the GOP took majority control of the state's House of Representatives last year. Since winning control of the chamber in the 2024 election, statehouse Republicans have repeatedly scrutinized the state's election processes and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat who is running for governor in 2026. The conflict comes as some state Republicans echo past false claims of election fraud in Michigan, which was a prime target of President Donald Trump and his backers after his 2020 election loss. Republicans on the chamber's Oversight Committee subpoenaed Benson in April, seeking access to training materials for local clerks and staff who administer elections, including access to the Bureau of Elections' online learning portal. Benson's office released some requested materials in response to the subpoena, but not all, citing cybersecurity and physical security concerns related to administering elections and the voting process. The office has said it needs to review the online portal for 'sensitive information" and make redactions. 'Since the beginning of this saga, Secretary Benson has asked lawmakers to let a court review their request for sensitive election information that, in the wrong hands, would compromise the security of our election machines, ballots and officials,' Michigan Department of State spokesperson Cheri Hardmon said in a statement Thursday. House Republicans say the goal of reviewing the material is to ensure clerks are trained in accordance with Michigan law. The House voted along party lines in May to hold Benson in contempt for not completely complying with the subpoena. The request for training materials originally came from GOP state Rep. Rachelle Smit, who has pushed false claims that the 2020 election was stolen. Smit is the chair of the House elections committee, which was renamed to the Elections Integrity Committee with the new Republican majority. 'Secretary Benson has proven she is unwilling to comply with our subpoena and Michigan law,' Rep. Smit said in a statement Thursday. 'She's skirted the rules and done whatever she could to avoid public scrutiny. It's become overwhelmingly clear that she will never release the training materials we're looking for without direction from a court." The lawsuit asks the Michigan Court of Claims to intervene and compel Benson to comply with the subpoena. 'The public interest is best served if the constitutional order of the State of Michigan is preserved and the Legislature can properly perform its duty to regulate the manner of elections in the state and, if deemed necessary, enact election laws for the benefit of Michigan residents,' the lawsuit says. Benson gained national attention for defending the results of the 2020 election in the face of Trump's attempts to undercut the outcome nationwide and in Michigan. Multiple audits — including one conducted by the then-Republican-controlled Michigan Senate — concluded former President Joe Biden won the state in 2020 and that there was no widespread or systemic fraud. Benson has remained a subject of GOP scrutiny this year. A Republican state representative introduced three articles of impeachment against Benson on Tuesday, and several of the accusations continue to cast doubts on the results of the 2020 election. With Democrats in control of the state Senate, it's unlikely the impeachment articles will result in a conviction.
27 minutes ago
Detained Columbia graduate claims ‘irreparable harm' to career and family as he pleads for release
NEW YORK -- A Columbia graduate facing deportation over his pro-Palestinian activism on campus has outlined the 'irreparable harm' caused by his continued detention as a federal judge weighs his release. Mahmoud Khalil said in court filings unsealed Thursday that the 'most immediate and visceral harms' he's faced in his months detained in Louisiana relate to missing out on the birth of his first child in April. 'Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone,' the 30-year-old legal U.S. resident wrote. 'When I heard my son's first cries, I buried my face in my arms so no one would see me weep.' He also cited potentially 'career-ending' harms from the ordeal, noting that Oxfam International has already rescinded a job offer to serve as a policy advisor. Even his mother's visa to come to the U.S. to help care for his infant son is also now under federal review, Khalil said. 'As someone who fled prosecution in Syria for my political beliefs, for who I am, I never imagined myself to be in immigration detention, here in the United States,' he wrote. 'Why should protesting this Israel government's indiscriminate killing of thousands of innocent Palestinians result in the erosion of my constitutional rights?' Spokespersons for the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment. Khalil's 13-page statement was among a number of legal declarations his lawyers filed highlighting the wide-ranging negative impacts of his arrest. Dr. Noor Abdalla, his U.S. citizen wife, described the challenges of not having her husband to help navigate their son's birth and the first weeks of his young life. Students and professors at Columbia wrote about the chilling effect Khalil's arrest has had on campus life, with people afraid to attend protests or participate in groups that can be viewed as critical of the Trump administration. Last week, a federal judge in New Jersey said the Trump administration's effort to deport Khalil likely violates the Constitution. Judge Michael Farbiarz wrote the government's primary justification for removing Khalil — that his beliefs may pose a threat to U.S. foreign policy — could open the door to vague and arbitrary enforcement. Khalil was detained by federal immigration agents on March 8 in the lobby of his university-owned apartment, the first arrest under Trump's widening crackdown on students who joined campus protests against .
