The Guardian becomes the first media owner in the world with a Carbon Literate sales team
Guardian Advertising has announced today that it is the first media company in the world to train its entire sales team to be certified Carbon Literate.
Being Carbon Literate means that all staff in the advertising team understand the carbon costs and impact of everyday activities and the ability to help reduce emissions on an individual, community and organisational basis.
The decision to train the team was driven by industry research highlighting a knowledge gap in climate change within advertising. For example, a recent study by the WFA and Kantar revealed that 35% of marketers reported a lack of knowledge and skills in sustainability, an increase from 20% in 2021.
As the leading global voice on the climate crisis, Guardian Advertising took the view that its staff, who are all in customer-facing roles, should be equipped with the skills to talk confidently about this issue and help find practical ways to address it.
The Guardian sustainability team created a bespoke course based on the Guardian's award-winning climate journalism. The course is accredited by the Carbon Literacy Project, a UK charity helping inform and empower people globally to take action on the climate emergency.
At the end of the programme, staff committed to a series of individual and team actions, which are estimated to prevent up to 20,000kgs of CO2e emissions.
Following the training, Guardian Advertising has made three commitments:
Taking the Guardian's Carbon Literacy workshop to the industry via its quarterly Agency Council update and regular meetings with key clients and agency partners
Implementing a new tool to measure campaign carbon emissions. This will help clients make informed choices about their media spend
Implementing AdGreen, an Ad Net Zero initiative to reduce emissions from advertising production - to strengthen the Guardian's commitment to sustainable production practices in content partnerships.
As a result of the training, 97% of participants said they felt more knowledgeable about climate change and confident about identifying actions that will reduce their team's carbon impact. Some 84% of participants now feel confident talking to clients and colleagues about the climate crisis (up from 28% before the workshop).
Phil Korbel, co-founder and director for external relations, Carbon Literacy, said:
'It's brilliant to have the Guardian join the community of Carbon Literate employers. Their baseline of climate commitment was already high, but this demonstrates how a specialised course can build targeted capacity such as that of a sales team being better able to pitch their low carbon offer. The pledge to spread the training into their sector is just the sort of thing we love to see as Carbon Literacy becomes a norm in professional development. I look forward to seeing the next stage of the story as the Guardian thrives through its deployment of Carbon Literacy.'
Julie Richards, director of sustainability and operational transformation, Guardian Media Group, said:
'At the Guardian we made great progress over the last five years to cut our own company emissions by over 40%. As a global media organisation we also have the ability to make a much wider positive impact with readers and with the agencies and brands that we work with. Sustainability is part of everyone's job and it has been fantastic to partner with our advertising team on this Carbon Literacy workshop.'
James Fleetham, director of advertising, Guardian Media Group, said: 'The climate crisis is the defining issue of our times. It's an increasingly important conversation in advertising and that's right, but we have a lot to learn. So I'm pleased we've been able to equip our team with the knowledge and confidence to talk about it with customers, using our world class reporting.'
[ENDS]
Notes for editors
Guardian News & Media press office: media.enquiries@theguardian.com
About the Guardian Media Group
Guardian Media Group is amongst the world's leading media organisations. Its core business is Guardian News & Media (GNM), publisher of theguardian.com, one of the largest English-speaking quality news websites in the world.
In the UK, Guardian Media Group publishes the Guardian newspaper six days a week, first published in 1821. Since launching its US and Australian digital editions in 2011 and 2013, respectively, traffic from outside of the UK now represents around two-thirds of the Guardian's total digital audience. The Guardian also has an international digital edition and a new European edition that launched in 2023.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Pembrokeshire Herald
8 hours ago
- Pembrokeshire Herald
Cabinet approves transport strategy wish list
PEMBROKESHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL'S Cabinet has endorsed a Regional Transport Strategy that relies on Welsh Government funding of £125m over the next five years. However, the plan also relies on the Council spending other money allocated to it by the Welsh Government to pay for the delivery of Welsh Government as well as local priorities. Based on comparisons between similar projects, the low end of the cost of delivering the Pembrokeshire-only projects will be at least £66m. That suggests that not only will all the projects not come to fruition in the plan period but also indicates that the Welsh Government funding allocation to them underestimates the cost of delivering the majority, if not all, of the projects. If the strategy's budget is fantasy, the prospects of delivering all of it are even more fanciful. The projects in the strategy read like a Guardian reader's wishlist instead of something grounded in local needs. ACTIVE TRAVEL SCHEMES DOMINATE The thirty-plus projects located solely in Pembrokeshire include fifteen schemes solely dedicated to active travel or which incorporate active travel as part of them. In context, and based on the cost of delivering similar schemes, the low-end estimate for 'active travel' schemes alone is around £22m. 'Active Travel' under the Welsh Government's Active Travel Act refers to efforts to reduce the use of cars for everyday journeys, such as commuting and education. Active travel schemes create infrastructure which supports walking, cycling, and wheeling (e.g., wheelchairs, mobility scooters). Those schemes work well in urban areas. However, in rural areas with dispersed working populations, such as Pembrokeshire, their impact is less beneficial. The now-former Welsh Government minister Lee Waters got an earful from Plaid Cymru and fringe environmental groups (mostly funded by the Welsh Government) when he dared say that cars would continue to be the primary mode of transportation in rural Wales. If an MS from Dolgellau can use an e-scooter to get the mile and a half from their taxpayer-funded flat in Cardiff to the Senedd, there's evidently no reason why commuters between Fishguard and Haverfordwest can't do the same. The active travel schemes planned for Pembrokeshire include a Multi-User Route from Narberth to Haverfordwest, an active travel route from Pembroke Dock to Pennar, one from Pembroke to Angle, six schemes in and around Tenby, and an expansion of the County Council's e-bike scheme. BIG TICKET SPENDING The big spending item is the relocation of the A487 at Newgale. That project has been on the cards for fourteen years, if not longer. It forms part of the Welsh Government's regional transport strategy as a permanent solution to the challenge of coastal erosion and the increased risks of tidal and pluvial flooding, standing against less certain and temporary interventions to hold the existing line. As it is part of the Regional Strategy, it will be predominantly funded by the Welsh Government through project-specific grants, in the same way as the preliminary investigations and public engagement. The plan will funnel transport funding towards supporting the Celtic Sea Freeport. Its backers hope the Freeport's economic impact will be positive and spread across the Freeport area. However, the existing transport infrastructure for it is a bad joke. Addressing its shortcomings is a major component of the Regional Transport Strategy. Setting aside projects scheduled for Neath Port Talbot, millions of pounds are projected to be spent on hydrogen fuel infrastructure and green/blue energy grid improvements. However, one project guaranteed to cause controversy seeks to increase road capacity and flow through Pembroke to support increased traffic from the Celtic Freeport development in the Angle Peninsula. Bearing in mind obvious geographical and logistical constraints and its need to cross conservation areas and sensitive landscapes within the National Park, any road expansion (there's also an active travel route planned) will likely cause uproar and cost tens of millions to deliver. That is, however, a long-term project. MORE TRANSPORT HUBS In the medium term, the Regional Strategy looks at a multi-million-pound project to improve roads between Haverfordwest and Milford Haven. That scheme looks to address congestion between the county town and the centre of Freeport operations in Pembrokeshire. Again, geographical and logistical issues suggest that the project will find it difficult to do much more than put lipstick on a pig. If, however, the scheme manages to resolve the congestion hotspots at Cartlett, Salutation Square (subject to a separate congestion-easing plan), Freemen's Way, and Johnston as far as the Sunnycroft Roundabout, it will doubtless be welcomed by commuters. And, if you thought one transport hub was a bad idea, there's more to come – from the Milford Haven transport interchange to one planned for Pembroke Dock, improved access to Fishguard's ferry port, and a host of other projects that will connect Pembrokeshire's public transport network, as the plan puts it poetically 'ensuring better multimodal connectivity'. Given the almost certain budget problems which these projects will encounter and, therefore, cause the County Council when it comes to setting its budgets, ensuring Pembrokeshire gets what it needs to improve the local economy instead of what the Welsh Government thinks it ought to have will be a major source of tension and contention. If half of the plan is delivered on time, on budget, and within the Welsh Government's funding envelope, its effects will be limited – as we will all have pigs to fly around on.
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Gen Z in the US: tell us how you spend your money
When it comes to finances, gen Z has developed its own language from terms such as 'loud budgeting' (not being afraid to say you're being thrifty) and 'doom spending' (mindlessly spending money as a form of self-therapy). Whether you prefer 'soft spending' or 'cash stuffing', we're interested in finding out more about 18-to-28-year-olds and their finances. How much money do you earn and what are your spending habits like? Do you prefer to save or spend – or a balance of both? You can tell us what your finances are like and what you spend your money on by filling in the form below, or messaging us. Please include as much detail as possible Please note, the maximum file size is 5.7 MB. Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. If you include other people's names please ask them first. Contact us on WhatsApp or Signal at +447766780300. For more information, please see our guidance on contacting us via WhatsApp, For true anonymity please use our SecureDrop service instead.
The Guardian
4 days ago
- The Guardian
‘Saying Trump is dangerous is not enough': Bernie Sanders on Biden, billionaires – and why the Democrats failed
'I think what Trumpism is about, is an understanding that the system in America is not working for working-class people,' says Bernie Sanders, sat in the Guardian's offices in London. 'In a phoney, hypocritical way, Trump has tapped into that. His quote-unquote 'solutions' will only make a bad situation worse.' In person, Sanders' 83 years read differently than in photograph, perhaps because of how conversational he is. His voice is magnetic – a Brooklyn accent that feels both warm and tough. 'But what I have been aware of, and I've talked about it for years, is that in America, the very richest people are doing phenomenally well, while 60% of our people live paycheck to paycheck.' Later, he will say the same thing to an audience in London – only with more emphasis and passion. 'Sixty per cent. Six-zero. Do you know what paycheck to paycheck means?' It's exhilarating to hear Sanders speak to a crowd: his zeal is reflected back in their faces, his moral clarity is such a relief, set against the cynicism and resignation of most of the Democratic party's opposition to Trump and his administration. Class war is as old as time, but it's a peculiarity of this age that you rarely hear a politician name it. 'I do,' he tells me. 'There is a class war going on. The people on top are waging that war.' It's a look at what could have been. Sanders ran, of course, to be the Democratic presidential candidate in 2016, and again in 2020. The first time, there was a real sense, in the US and abroad, that something incredible might happen: that someone with 'almost no name recognition,' he says, a senator from the small state of Vermont, might successfully challenge Hillary Clinton, whom the party had already anointed. We all know how that worked out. Was it the greatest disappointment of his political life? 'Well, you're too busy to feel things,' he says. 'You're just working very hard.' What is absolutely unequivocal is his criticism of the Democrats. The party, he thinks, lacks any real progressive promise. 'What they say is, 'The status quo is working pretty good, and we will tinker around the edges', and that is not a message that resonates with working people'. He refuses to indulge in any personal ill-will towards Joe Biden or Kamala Harris. The most he'll voice is a weary resignation about 2020, when his campaign 'won the first three states, primary states, in terms of popular votes. Then the Democratic establishment made sure the other candidates dropped out, and they rallied around Joe Biden. You know, that's the world that we live in. We are taking on not just the Republican leadership, we are taking on a Democratic establishment which is tied to elements of corporate America.' During the 2024 election, he 'worked very hard to see that Kamala Harris was elected. I was all over the country and was one of her major surrogates. We begged our campaign to start talking about the needs of working people. But their consultants and the money people behind them thought of another strategy, showing that she was more conservative, that she worked with people like Liz Cheney, worked with Republicans, had billionaires going out and saying that she's wonderful. They thought that was the right approach. I did not think that was the approach, and I was public about that.' He pauses, and not for effect: it's hard to relive November 2024. 'But my voice did not carry,' he says. Sanders started his political life in 1981, when he was elected mayor of Burlington, Vermont. His brother, Larry, is 90 and lives in Oxfordshire. He stood as a Green candidate in David Cameron's old parliamentary seat in 2016. In a speech that year, supporting Sanders as the Democratic nominee, Larry gave a brief portrait of their parents. 'Eli Sanders and Dorothy Wexford Sanders. They did not have easy lives, and they died young,' he said. Dorothy was born in New York, to Jewish immigrant parents fleeing Russian pogroms. Eli arrived in the US in 1921, most of his family remaining in what is now Poland and what was then Austrian Galicia, to be 'wiped out by Hitler,' Sanders has said in the past. Eli worried constantly about providing for his family and both he and Dorothy were political, Larry said in the speech: 'They loved the New Deal of Franklin D Roosevelt, and would be especially proud that Bernard is renewing that vision.' Sanders' charge to the Democrats now is twofold. 'Their weakness is, I think, that their credibility is now quite low. And they don't have much of a message for working people, other than to say Trump is dangerous. I think that's just not enough.' He point blank refuses to get into Trump's administration – its excesses, surprises, non-surprises, without first walking through everything that was already wrong with the US. 'What the Democrats have to absolutely make clear is this: we're going to take on the billionaire class. They're going to start paying their fair share of taxes. We're going to have healthcare for all people as a human right. We're going to have a strong childcare system that every American can afford. We're going to make public colleges and universities tuition-free. We're going to create millions of jobs transforming our energy system away from fossil fuel. We're going to build housing – boy, housing is like it is here, just a huge crisis. We're going to build millions of units of low-income and affordable housing. Do Democrats say that? No.' That Sanders will not be drawn on every new Trump calumny, instead focusing on an economic reality that's been worsening for decades, does help him keep on course. And it definitely doesn't stop him giving Trump both barrels. 'We don't usually have presidents suing the media, threatening the media if they write bad stories about them. We don't usually have presidents threatening to impeach judges. We don't have presidents suing law firms. You add all that together, it is a movement for authoritarianism.' Is it worse than he predicted? I was thinking specifically about the extrajudicial detentions and deportations, students dragged off campus and held for weeks, perfectly legal migrants sent to El Salvador, when they weren't even from there. 'First time around, Trump was not as well organised. They've had four years to get their act together, so to speak. And that's what this Project 2025 document was about.' Project 2025 was a document published by rightwing thinktank the Heritage Foundation in 2024, offering a terrifying vision for a second Trump term. An outright proposal to dismantle the US government, it was a roadmap to crackdown on immigration, LGBTQ+ rights, abortion rights – as well as being against action on the climate crisis and against vaccines. If it looked like a blueprint for The Handmaid's Tale and The Road combined, none of the alarm last year could ever have encompassed the reality that would come. Among many other things, the Trump administration would go on to deport people without due process, and then ignore a supreme court ruling that an 18th-century wartime declaration about 'alien enemies' was not a proper legal instrument. I ask a question about who funds the Heritage Foundation – as it keeps all donations secret, which raises questions about whose interests Project 2025 is really serving. His reply is impatient: 'It doesn't matter who it is they have. There's no lack of well-paid, right-wing consultants and intellectuals who can move this country to an oligarchic authoritarian society.' His tone is clear – stop getting lost in detail, stop looking for hidden connections, stop messing around and start fighting. 'One of the frightening aspects of what's going on is the degree to which the establishment-type folks have caved in, and so quickly,' he says. 'That was much less the case, during Trump's first term.' He mentions Jeff Bezos, 'who one had assumed was kind of a moderate Democrat', losing his editorial board because they were going to endorse Kamala Harris. 'Same thing in the Los Angeles Times. When you have ABC agreeing to a settlement with Trump; the bogus lawsuit against CBS that Paramount are negotiating right now. When you have major, billion-dollar law firms saying, 'OK, we plead guilty to having clients who went to court against you and your friends, that was a terrible crime, we're going to give you millions of dollars.' Harvard has buckled up a little bit and appears not to be caving in, but a lot of universities have. None of this was the case eight years ago. They are creating the overall mentality that it will be dangerous to be strongly critical of Donald Trump.' In other areas, money is talking so loudly in politics that it's all you can hear. Sanders has used Gaza as an example when he says that politicians are afraid to speak out on Israel's actions in case Super Pacs – which can put forward unlimited amounts of money for a candidate – will penalise them at the next election. Today, he says it's not just Gaza, but a host of other issues. 'If you say, 'Do you really think it's a good idea to cut Medicaid and give tax breaks to billionaires? Do you really think that climate change is a hoax?' there will be a number, not a majority, but a number of Republicans who would say: 'No. But if I stand up and vote 'no', the next day, Elon Musk would say, 'All right, you are going to be primaried [a candidate will be fielded against you], and Trump will support your opponent. I will put unlimited sums of money to elect your opponent.'' Good luck to you.'' While that pattern is undoubtedly visible across many issues, the example of Gaza is particularly stark – with groups such as Aipac, funded by pro-Israel billionaires, putting tens of millions of dollars against congressional candidates, mainly Democrats, that it did not deem to be sufficiently supportive of Israel in the run-up to 2024. As the atrocities in Gaza leave many in civil society dumbfounded, what is the long game here, I ask. 'That's a difficult question, and I don't know the answer. I will tell you that the United States has had a long-term relationship with Israel, and there are many people who have intellectually chosen not to understand that Netanyahu does not represent the Israel of 20 years ago. The moderate democratic society is now controlled by right-wing racist extremists who have done, and are doing today, absolutely horrific things to the Palestinian people in violation of American law and international law. They refuse to recognise that.' In Dublin, he was heckled for not using the word genocide, and some US progressives were dismayed, two years ago, when he didn't call for an immediate ceasefire. He speaks out now, choosing his words carefully; he's not on the fence. Since the end of March, Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (he always calls her that, never AOC), have been holding campaign rallies all over the US from Arizona to Utah. They are deliberately not skipping the diehard Democratic states – but have been more surprised by the numbers they've been getting in red states. 'This is not a campaign. This is a political rally, and I think the numbers are almost unprecedented. Large numbers of people, including in conservative areas, do not want to see oligarchy in America, do not want to see authoritarianism, do not want to see massive tax breaks for the rich and cuts to the programmes that working-class people desperately need.' Sure, he and AOC sometimes disagree, 'my wife and I disagree on issues! But Alexandria, I think, comes pretty much from where I come from.' He has hope for the future, too. There are a couple of dozen people in the house Progressive Caucus – a 98-strong group of the more left-wing members of the Democratic party in Congress – that are 'strong progressives', he says. 'Alexandria is maybe one of the most articulate and charismatic, but there are others there as well.' Ilhan Omar, Ayanna Pressley and Rashida Tlaib to name a few. Sanders is clear that he and Ocasio-Cortez are not trying to start a third political party. Instead, they're 'trying to build a grassroots movement of working-class people and young people … If you're seeing candidates now arising who are progressive, that's down to a lot of the work that we are doing for the 2026 midterms.' Sanders in person is very much as he is in his book, It's OK to Be Angry About Capitalism, in which he lays out some principles, among them, 'wars and excessive military budgets are not good'; 'carbon emissions are not good'; 'racism, sexism, homophobia and xenophobia are not good'; 'exploiting workers is not good'. It's really the sight of him igniting a crowd that's so hopeful, which holds for him, too – he keeps his optimism because he has the 'fortune of being able to go around the country and speak to large numbers of wonderful people'. The message doesn't change, though – it doesn't have to be new: it just has to be true. As he leaves to make his way upstairs to the photography studio, he strides on ahead, his wife Jane O'Meara Saunders, an activist herself, making small talk with me in his wake. It's not that he's performing vigour in an era where politicians' ages are relentlessly analysed. It's just his manner – all this urgent change should have happened yesterday.
