ICC prosecutor Khan on leave amid sexual misconduct probe
The move is unprecedented and there is no clear procedure for replacing Khan. The situation creates added uncertainty for the ICC, which is already facing an existential crisis due to US sanctions over its arrest warrants for Israeli officials.
Khan's office said the prosecutor had taken leave until the end of the investigation by the UN Office of Internal Oversight Services.
In a written statement, Khan's attorneys rejected all allegations of wrongdoing. They said he said he had taken leave because media attention on the matter affected his ability to focus on his work but did not intend to resign.
"Our client remains the prosecutor, has not stepped down and has no intention of doing so," law firm Carter-Ruck said.
In a letter sent to his staff and seen by Reuters, the prosecutor said that he had been keeping his position under constant review. "In light of escalating media reports, I have made the considered decision to take leave," Khan said.
"My decision is driven by deep and unwavering commitment to the credibility of our office and the court, and to safeguard the integrity of the process and fairness to all involved," he said.
Khan had earlier ignored calls by NGOs and ICC staff to step down while the investigation was under way.
Several of those NGOs on Friday hailed his decision to temporarily step aside as a sign that no one is above the law.
"Stepping aside helps protect the court's credibility and the trust of victims, staff, and the public. For the alleged victim and whistle blowers, this is also a moment of recognition and dignity," said Danya Chaikel of human rights watchdog FIDH.
Others said Khan's leave would not derail the ICC's investigations as the office of the prosecutor is not a one-man show.
"In fact, removing an individual whose alleged behaviour may have fuelled a toxic work culture may strengthen the office's ability to carry out its mandate with professionalism and public trust,' Alix Vuillemin of the Women's Initiatives for Gender Justice told Reuters.
The ICC has high-profile war crimes investigations under way into the Israel-Hamas conflict and Russia's war in Ukraine.
At Khan's request, the ICC issued arrest warrants for President Vladimir Putin on suspicion of deporting children from Ukraine, and for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for alleged war crimes in Gaza. Neither country is a member of the court and both deny the accusations and reject ICC jurisdiction.
The ICC's investigation into Israel's conduct led the US administration of President Donald Trump to impose sanctions on Khan, which the ICC president says have put the court itself at risk.
Sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive matter, told Reuters that Khan had spoken to UN investigators last week in what was believed to be the final interview of a months-long outside investigation into the allegations that started in December.
It was unclear when the probe would finish.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Trump sets new deadline for Russia over Ukraine war
TURNBERRY, Scotland: United States President Donald Trump set a new deadline on Monday (Jul 28) of 10 or 12 days for Russia to make progress toward ending the war in Ukraine or face consequences, underscoring frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin over the three-and-a-half-year-old conflict. Trump has threatened sanctions on both Russia and buyers of its exports unless progress is made. The fresh deadline suggests the US president is prepared to move forward on those threats after previous hesitation to do so. Speaking in Scotland, where he was holding meetings with European leaders and playing golf, Trump said he was disappointed in Putin and shortening a 50-day deadline he had set on the issue earlier this month. "I'm going to make a new deadline of about ... 10 or 12 days from today," Trump told reporters during a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. "There's no reason in waiting ... We just don't see any progress being made." There was no immediate comment from the Kremlin. In a post on X, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, a close ally of Putin, said Trump was playing "a game of ultimatums" that could lead to a war involving the US. Medvedev wrote: "Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with (Trump's) own country." Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy praised Trump's "particularly significant" statement as timely in trying to move forward to a peace settlement. "Clear stance and expressed determination by @POTUS – right on time, when a lot can change through strength for real peace," Zelenskyy wrote on X. "I thank President Trump for his focus on saving lives and stopping this horrible war," Zelenskyy said. Ukraine, he said later in his nightly video address, favoured tougher sanctions as a "key element" in ending the war. "Russia pays attention to sanctions, pays attention to such losses," he said. Trump, who has expressed annoyance also with Zelenskyy, has not always followed tough talk about Putin with action, citing what he deems a good relationship that the two men have had previously. On Monday, Trump indicated he was not interested in more talks with Putin. He said sanctions and tariffs would be used as penalties for Moscow if it did not meet Trump's demands. "There's no reason to wait. If you know what the answer is going to be, why wait? And it would be sanctions and maybe tariffs, secondary tariffs," Trump said. "I don't want to do that to Russia. I love the Russian people." Ukraine had proposed a summit between Putin and Zelenskyy before the end of August, but the Kremlin has said that timeline was unlikely and that a meeting could only happen as a final step to clinch peace. Russia's foreign ministry said on Saturday that if the West wanted real peace with Ukraine, it would stop supplying Kyiv with weapons. Trump has repeatedly voiced exasperation with Putin for pursuing attacks on Ukraine despite US efforts to end the war. Trump has played up successes in other parts of the world where the US has helped to broker peace agreements and has been flattered by some leaders who suggest he should be given the Nobel Peace Prize. "I'm disappointed in President Putin," Trump said on Monday. "I'm going to reduce that 50 days that I gave him to a lesser number because I think I already know the answer what's going to happen." Trump, who is also struggling to achieve a peace deal in Gaza, has touted his role in ending conflicts between India and Pakistan as well as Rwanda and Congo. Before returning to the White House in January, Trump campaigned on a promise to end Russia's conflict with Ukraine in a day. "We thought we had that settled numerous times, and then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kyiv and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever," Trump said. "And I say that's not the way to do it."
Straits Times
8 hours ago
- Straits Times
‘No alternative' to two-state solution for Israel, Palestinians: France's Foreign Minister
Find out what's new on ST website and app. French President Emmanuel Macron had announced that he would formally recognise a State of Palestine in September 2025. There is 'no alternative' to a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians, France told a UN conference co-chaired with Saudi Arabia on July 28. 'Only a political, two-state solution will help respond to the legitimate aspirations of Israelis and Palestinians to live in peace and security. There is no alternative,' French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said at the start of the three-day meeting. Days before the conference, French President Emmanuel Macron announced that he would formally recognise a State of Palestine in September 2025. In an interview with French weekly La Tribune Dimanche, Mr Barrot said that other European countries will confirm 'their intention to recognise the state of Palestine' during the conference, without confirming which. 'All states have a responsibility to act now,' said Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa at the start of the meeting, calling for an international force to deploy to help underwrite Palestinian statehood. 'Recognise the state of Palestine without delay.' France is hoping that Britain will take this step. More than 200 British members of Parliament on July 25 voiced support for the idea, but Prime Minister Keir Starmer reiterated that recognition of a Palestinian state 'must be part of a wider plan'. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia Cambodia, Thailand agree to 'immediate and unconditional ceasefire' to de-escalate border row Singapore Tanjong Katong sinkhole: Road recovery works progressing steadily, tests under way Singapore ST Explains: What we know about the Tanjong Katong sinkhole so far Singapore Foreign workers who rescued woman from sinkhole given tokens of appreciation Asia Gunman kills 5 near Bangkok's Chatuchak market before taking own life Business SIA Q1 profit falls 59%; airline group sees volatile times ahead Singapore Man exposed daughter's identity despite court order after she was removed from his care Singapore Over 6 years' jail for conman who cheated 13 victims of more than $1.2m According to an AFP database, at least 142 of the 193 UN member states – including France – now recognise the Palestinian state proclaimed by the Palestinian leadership in exile in 1988. In 1947, a resolution of the UN General Assembly decided on the partition of Palestine, then under a British mandate, into two independent states – one Jewish and the other Arab. The following year, the state of Israel was proclaimed. For several decades, the vast majority of UN member states have supported the idea of a two-state solution, Israelis and Palestinians living side-by-side. But after more than 21 months of war in Gaza, the ongoing expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, and Israeli officials declaring designs to annex occupied territory, it is feared a Palestinian state could be geographically impossible. The current war in Gaza started following a deadly attack by Hamas on Israel, which responded with a large-scale military response that has claimed tens of thousands of Palestinian lives. This week's conference comes at a moment when 'the prospect of a Palestinian state has never been so threatened, or so necessary,' Mr Barrot said. Call for courage Beyond facilitating conditions for the recognition of a Palestinian state, the meeting will focus on three other issues – reform of the Palestinian authority, disarmament of Hamas and its exclusion from Palestinian public life, and normalisation of relations with Israel by Arab states. However, no new normalisation deals are expected to be announced at the meeting, according to a French diplomatic source. On the other hand, 'for the first time, Arab countries will condemn Hamas and call for its disarmament,' Mr Barrot said. The conference 'offers a unique opportunity to transform international law and the international consensus into an achievable plan and to demonstrate resolve to end the occupation and conflict once and for all, for the benefit of all peoples,' said Palestinian ambassador to the UN Riyad Mansour, calling for 'courage' from participants. Israel and the US were not taking part in the meeting, amid growing international pressure to mount on Israel to end nearly two years of war in Gaza. Despite 'tactical pauses' in some military operations announced by Israel, the humanitarian catastrophe in the ravaged coastal territory is expected to dominate speeches by representatives of more than 100 countries as they take the podium. Mr Bruno Stagno, chief advocacy officer at Human Rights Watch, said 'more platitudes about a two-state solution and peace process will do nothing to advance the conference's goals, nor to halt the extermination of Palestinians in Gaza'. AFP
Straits Times
8 hours ago
- Straits Times
US has likely moved nuclear weapons to UK first time since 2008
Find out what's new on ST website and app. This is seen as a signal to Russian President Vladimir Putin that US remains committed to European security. The US has likely stationed nuclear weapons in the UK for the first time since 2008, in a signal to Russian President Vladimir Putin that it remains committed to European security. On July 16, a US military aircraft flew with its transponder on – making its identification and location publicly visible – from a US nuclear weapons depot at Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque, New Mexico, to an airbase in the UK city of Lakenheath, according to defence analysts and open-source data. The C-17 flight involved the US Air Force's Prime Nuclear Airlift Force, which transports nuclear weapons, and did not fly over any other nation's territory, according to Mr William Alberque, a Europe-based senior fellow at the Pacific Forum. The US and UK governments have longstanding policies of not commenting on the status or location of their nuclear weapons. US Department of Defence budget documents show that millions of dollars of work on surety facilities – the term the Pentagon uses to describe nuclear weapon security – has been in progress at Lakenheath for several years. The weapons the aircraft most likely delivered were the new B61-12 thermonuclear bombs, increasing the number of US tactical nuclear weapons in Europe for the first time since the Cold War. 'There are strong indications' that the US has returned nuclear weapons to the UK, said Mr Hans Kristensen, director of the Federation of American Scientists' Nuclear Information Project. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia Cambodia, Thailand agree to 'immediate and unconditional ceasefire' to de-escalate border row Singapore Tanjong Katong sinkhole: Road recovery works progressing steadily, tests under way Singapore ST Explains: What we know about the Tanjong Katong sinkhole so far Singapore Foreign workers who rescued woman from sinkhole given tokens of appreciation Asia Gunman kills 5 near Bangkok's Chatuchak market before taking own life Business SIA Q1 profit falls 59%; airline group sees volatile times ahead Singapore Man exposed daughter's identity despite court order after she was removed from his care Singapore Over 6 years' jail for conman who cheated 13 victims of more than $1.2m Mr Alberque said the decision to leave the flight transponders on indicates the US wants to show Russia that it is not reducing its nuclear capability in Europe. Nato officials declined to immediately comment. 'This is a down payment that there's more to come on shifting Nato 's deterrence posture toward strengthening,' M r Alberque said. 'Returning US nuclear weapons to the UK is no small feat.' The move also signals that the US is committing more flexible nuclear capabilities to Europe, creating a wider range of options for its forces, said Dr Sidharth Kaushal, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute. 'Capabilities such as the B61 can contribute to limiting the impact of Russia's large advantage in theater-level nonstrategic nuclear weapons,' Dr Kaushal said. US President Donald Trump has hardened his approach to Mr Putin in recent weeks, agreeing to send Ukraine more US-made Patriot missiles through European purchases and threatening to hit Russia with secondary tariffs if it does not agree to a cease fire within 50 days. On July 28 , Mr Trump said that he would reduce that deadline, adding that the was 'disappointed' in Mr Putin. The UK announced in June that it would purchase at least a dozen new US-made F-35A fighter jets capable of carrying B61-12 nuclear bombs. This week, its Ministry of Defence stated in an updated policy document that ' Nato 's nuclear deterrence also relies on US nuclear weapons deployed in Europe and supporting capabilities and infrastructure provided by allies.' The new jets will be available to fly Nato 's nuclear mission, according to the document. 'This decision reintroduces a nuclear role for the Royal Air Force for the first time since the UK retired its sovereign air-launched nuclear weapons after the Cold War,' the Ministry of Defence said in the document. B61-12 thermonuclear gravity bombs carry a warhead with a yield adjustable between 0.3 kilotons and 50 kilotons, according to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. They can be carried on F-35A fighter jets as well as other US and Nato aircraft. Yield measures the explosive power of a nuclear weapon, measured in the equivalent in tons of conventional explosives. Designed to be much more accurate than previous B61 models, its variable yield means it can used against small military targets as well as population centers. The apparent shipment to the UK means the bomb is now fully deployed in Europe at seven bases across six Nato countries, Mr Kristensen said. US nuclear weapons, even those on other countries' territory, can only be used after the direct authorisation of the US President. BLOOMBERG
