logo
'It doesn't cost the government anything' - Wayne Brown calls for bed tax rethink

'It doesn't cost the government anything' - Wayne Brown calls for bed tax rethink

RNZ News10 hours ago
Auckland mayor Wayne Brown is at odds with the government over a bed night levy.
Photo:
RNZ / Marika Khabazi
Auckland's mayor Wayne Brown is
renewing his call for a bed levy for the supercity
, as it deals with
some serious economic troubles
.
Its unemployment rate of 6.1 percent is the highest of any region.
National Minister and Auckland-based MP Paul Goldsmith told
Morning Report
on Wednesday there's been a long Covid hangover.
"The economy's flat, everybody's feeling it. Of course there's two speeds, down in the south and in rural New Zealand we're getting some growth and some upbeat economic news from the regions but of course it's a real struggle in Auckland so that's what our real focus is on."
Brown agreed the government would be focused on the city because it was where the election in a year's time would be decided.
He was adamant that what he was advocating for was a bed levy - not a tax - and it wouldn't go to the government.
"They [the government] use the word tax so they can say no more taxes. It's just dumb, it's not a tax any more than it would be a targeted rate. The people who've asked for it are the industry it would be collected from."
He wanted it to be set at 2.5 percent which would raise $27 million which would be enough to attract the likes of a Taylor Swift concert or a State of Origin match.
Cities need around $3 million to $4m to attract concerts by artists such as Taylor Swift, the Auckland mayor says.
Photo:
AFP
Cities needed to pay upfront around $3m-4m to bring in each major event. It would enable Auckland to compete against the likes of Sydney which has a bed night levy, he said.
"It doesn't cost the government anything. ... It doesn't make sense ..."
When Auckland held large events and the hotels filled up, another $100 could be added to the cost of a hotel room "so noone's gonna miss it".
It was also "bollocks" for the government to blame the cost of living crisis, Brown said.
Those most affected couldn't afford $500 Taylor Swift concert tickets or to stay at the top hotels.
He said the government was focused on tourism but had raised the international tourist levy so it was "cheeky" to deny Auckland a bed levy.
Brown believed the government would "cave" on the issue, in part because Auckland was the region that decided the fate of the government at elections.
He had built a good working relationship with some of the ministers, such as Chris Bishop and Shane Reti.
"We have had a number of wins."
He believed it was ACT that was the main handbrake on the government agreeing to the bed levy.
Councillor Kerrin Leoni, who is standing against Brown in the city's upcoming mayoral election, said she also supported a bed tax.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Plymouth councillor Murray Chong kicked out after labelling policy ‘racist'
New Plymouth councillor Murray Chong kicked out after labelling policy ‘racist'

RNZ News

time9 minutes ago

  • RNZ News

New Plymouth councillor Murray Chong kicked out after labelling policy ‘racist'

Councilllor Murray Chong makes his "racist" claims at a New Plymouth District Council meeting. Photo: Te Korimako o Taranaki/LDR New Plymouth's mayor has thrown councillor Murray Chong out of a meeting for calling a new policy racist and questioned a Hobson's Pledge founder's motives for stoking division. Would-be mayor Max Brough and running-mate councillor Gordon Brown also faced criticism, after defending Chong at this week's New Plymouth District Council meeting. Kevin Moratti - a founding board member of Hobson's Pledge - last week denounced the council's new buy-local plan as "race-based". Moratti said he wanted the New Plymouth Ratepayers Alliance given access to council decision-making "just as some other unelected parties are". The council's procurement plan aims to save money, while making local economic, social, cultural and environmental gains. Among many goals, it seeks to improve partnerships with iwi, hapū and Māori businesses, so they can supply council alongside other local companies. At Tuesday's meeting, Chong vowed to oppose it. "We do have a racist policy here." Mayoral contender Sam Bennett objected, saying council policies were based on the Local Government Act and Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and "are no way race-based". Outgoing mayor Neil Holdom upheld the objection. Chong withdrew the comment, then immediately repeated it. "The reality is, if the word 'race' [sic] and it involves a race, that is racist," Chong said. He accused councillors of following the previous Labour Government's agenda. Holdom ruled that incorrect, banning him from speaking further. "Councillor Chong, it's three strikes and I'm saying you can sit down, because… you've disparaged this organisation." "This is a racist policy," Chong insisted. Holdom ordered him out. Mayor Neil Holdom ordered councillor Murray Chong from the chambers. Photo: Te Korimako o Taranaki/LDR "It's time to go, Councillor Chong." Chong tried to approach Moratti, who was in the audience. For years, the pair have campaigned against specific representation for mana whenua. "Out!" shouted the mayor. Mayoral candidate Brough attempted to explain Chong's concern. "We're going to... be doing this again in a few months, because the government will change the rules," he said. "I think that's Murray's point." Councillor Brown said Chong "just used the wrong words". "I don't think it was his intent, so cut him some slack?" he pleaded. "The oral language not his greatest strength and he's done well over the last 12 years to get where he is." Councillor Dinnie Moeahu said he'd clearly heard what Chong said. "You two try and justify that behaviour… when you say he didn't mean it that way," said Moeahu. "Those who keep questioning our standing in our community, in our country… what are you afraid of and what have you lost? "All I see is finally we're being included." Councillor Harry Duynhoven pointed to the councillors' oath to serve the entire community. "Mr Moratti, I see you laughing," said the former Labour minister. "I'm surprised you're not on the ballot paper, that you haven't actually put yourself up there and gone for it, because you think you can do it better." Like similar groups nationwide, the New Plymouth Ratepayers Alliance is aligned with the Taxpayers' Union, which forbids members standing for office. Chong and Brough set up the ratepayer group with Moratti, but stepped aside to get elected. Councillor Anneka Carlson Matthews said they didn't represent all ratepayers. "They are racist and outdated, and I'm happy to call that out." Mayor Holdom made her withdraw the racism allegation. Councillor Bryan Vickery urged Moratti and others to read the "pretty impressive" procurement strategy. "I don't see this in any way as being separatist. In fact, the tenor of this document is being fair to all - but inclusive." Holdom said councillors ought to lead inclusivity. "It's disappointing, when people come into the organisation and try to divide us," he said. "It's shadow-boxing, the fear of something that doesn't exist. "It's a fear that somehow being inclusive… comes at a cost to someone else. "Just be aware of the people that want to do this and what are their agendas, because it's clear to me that they are not acting in this community's best interest, so what are they trying to achieve?" Businessman Brough favours local contracting, so voted for the procurement strategy at last week's finance committee, but backtracked on Tuesday and abstained. With Chong expelled, Brough was the sole councillor not in favour. Moratti has been an Act candidate for parliament, while Chong has stood for NZ First and the New Conservatives. Last week, Moratti said he'd not been a Hobson's Pledge member for 10 years, but as recently as 2021, confirmed he was a trustee. On Tuesday, he refused questions, saying the LDR story revealing his demand for decision-making influence was biased. "We will not give it any more energy." - LDR is local body journalism funded by RNZ and NZ on Air Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Greyhound racing industry takes court action
Greyhound racing industry takes court action

RNZ News

time31 minutes ago

  • RNZ News

Greyhound racing industry takes court action

Racing Minister Winston Peters has ordered a halt to greyhound racing from August 2026. Photo: PHOTOSPORT Lawyers for the Greyhound Racing Association have told the High Court in Wellington that the ban on greyhound racing will have a devastating effect on the livelihoods of more than 1000 people. Last December, Racing Minister Winston Peters announced the sport would be banned from August 2026. On Thursday, the association argued in court that the work of a ministerial advisory committee tasked with implementing the ban should be stopped, until a judicial review of the legislation was heard. Lawyer Chris Finlayson said the government had erred in directing the industry to monitor and improve animal welfare standards, only to ignore the results in cabinet's decision-making process. The court was told the racing industry had engaged with three reviews of the sport in just over a decade and had consistently shown willingness to comply with directives to improve animal welfare, and controls surrounding injuries and deaths, as well as track standards and rehoming initiatives. He said the cabinet paper - on which the decision to ban the sport was based - was "misleading" and a "very selective characterisation" of the key issues facing cabinet, which he argued was the industry's animal welfare standards, not the erosion of public license - society's acceptance of the practices of the sport. Finlayson said the government - after directing the industry to undertake a statutory process and then "blandly ignore it" - contradicted its obligation to consider the expertise of the industry in legislating towards the sport. Lawyers for the Greyhound Racing Association (left to right) Chris Finlayson KC and Jonathan Kaye at the High Court in Wellington. Photo: RNZ/Bill Hickman "The standard of animal welfare of greyhound racing is high," Finlayson said. "It aligns with the standards in other jurisdictions and is applied with significantly more rigour than pet dogs." Finlayson said the uncertainty over the recommendations of the ministerial advisory committee's plan to wind down the sport was resulting in members of the industry leaving the country before the ban, a collapse in breeding numbers and serious mental-health issues in participants of the industry. He argued, after the ban, New Zealanders could still bet on Australian dog races, which had "equal or lesser" animal welfare standards than Aotearoa's racing industry. Counsel for the Attorney General - acting on behalf of the Minister of Racing - said interim relief application was "fundamentally premised on a need to stop the legislation". Lawyer Katherine Anderson said the action, if successful, "would frustrate the introduction of the bill to Parliament". She said it was "undeniably clear" the court could not make an order to prevent the introduction of a bill. "It's very clear that the applicant fundamentally [says] the decision is wrong and is attempting to draw you in." She said it was up to the Minister to decide "how and if" parties would be consulted before the bill was put to Parliament. Lawyers for the Attorney General - acting on behalf of the Minister of Racing - (left to right) Katherine Anderson and Emma Dowse at the High Court in Wellington. Photo: RNZ/Bill Hickman "There's no straight jacket on the minister to go to the racing industry saying, 'Is there a ban on greyhound racing that's required on welfare grounds?'. "They've been elected to make policy decisions and, if people don't like it, they can be un-elected," Anderson said. Throughout proceedings, Judge Dale La Hood pressed the Greyhound Racing Association's counsel to clarify how the action would benefit the industry, if it's success was not to prevent the ban. "You need to explain to me... what you're seeking to have... stopped, other than preventing a ban on greyhound racing. I don't know if I understand what the benefit of interim relief would be to your client, if it doesn't halt the ban. "That's crucial to my decision on whether you've got a case," La Hood said. Finlayson said he would undertake to clarify his client's intent in a memorandum to the judge after the day's proceedings. Judge La Hood reserved his decision. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

The Panel with Jennie Moreton and Sue Kedgley Part 1
The Panel with Jennie Moreton and Sue Kedgley Part 1

RNZ News

time39 minutes ago

  • RNZ News

The Panel with Jennie Moreton and Sue Kedgley Part 1

Photo: SERGIO HANQUET Tonight, on The Panel, Wallace Chapman is joined by panellists Jennie Moreton and Sue Kedgley First up, new figures show the amount of Kiwisaver funds that bought into weapon companies increased by 40 percent this year: is your Kiwisaver invested in weapons involved in the war in Gaza? And they discuss microplastics, specifically the Global Plastic Treaty talks which are in danger of collapsing

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store