logo
I live in Britain; I grew up in Israel. It's painful to say, but we need real UK sanctions to save Gaza

I live in Britain; I grew up in Israel. It's painful to say, but we need real UK sanctions to save Gaza

The Guardiana day ago
After months of complete blockade or extremely limited supplies, and with thousands of famished children in Gaza at risk of death, Israel finally relented last week to allow increased levels of aid, as well as electricity and water, into the territory. Yet given Israel's systematic destruction of Gaza's medical infrastructure, the aid will not prevent irreversible damage to many severely malnourished children. And even in the best scenario, this is but a hiatus.
For many months now, Israel's far-right government has been unambiguous in its words and actions. It has made Gaza uninhabitable through the destruction of the built environment and infrastructure. The plan, repeatedly stated by Benjamin Netanyahu and his ministers, is the ethnic cleansing ('voluntary emigration') of the bulk of Gaza's population. It is now clear that the Israeli government is willing to slow down this campaign temporarily, but it will not stop unless it is forced to, by international pressure. Such pressure has been entirely inadequate.
The UK has scaled up its rhetoric, to words such as 'appalled' and 'horrified'. It has also limited arms shipments to Israel, and placed sanctions on ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir. Yet surely a G7 member, the world's sixth largest economy and a close ally of Israel can do more. 'Netanyahu only listens to Trump, and even then only sometimes,' says Emily Thornberry, implying there's little to do beyond pleading with the US president.
This is a profound misunderstanding of Israel, and an underestimation of the UK's options. Indeed, Netanyahu and his ministers would not listen to the UK. But Netanyahu is not an all-powerful dictator like Vladimir Putin, and Israel is no North Korea. Its economy is highly globalised, and its society cherishes its ties to the world. It has deep material and emotional investments in those connections, including to the UK. From the banking system to defence cooperation, from trade to tourism and academia, the UK is connected to Israel in myriad ways. By continuing business as usual, Israel's international partners are allowing the Israeli government to continue with its genocidal campaign with no consequences beyond symbolic gestures of disapproval and statements.
After 7 October 2023, the horror of Hamas's massacre prompted western governments to support Israel as it launched its retaliation against Gaza, effectively giving the far-right government carte blanche. Despite unprecedented international criminal court arrest warrants against Netanyahu for the crime of starvation, international sanctions on Israel remain extremely limited. The Israeli government is banking on this. 'We can kill 100 Palestinians every night in Gaza and no one in the world cares,' said one member of the coalition recently. Sadly, so far he has not been proved wrong.
Over the past 21 months, tens of thousands of Israelis have taken to the streets to demand a ceasefire and hostage release deal. While polls show overwhelming support for ending the war, the fragmented and demoralised opposition has not been able to bring the government down. This is partly because, despite pleas from the hostages' families and activists, Israel's key economic powerbrokers in the finance and IT industries and trade unions have been reluctant to take an active stand against the government, even if many of them are deeply opposed to it.
This reluctance stems, at least in part, from the fact that Israel's economy has proved surprisingly resilient. True, Israel's credit rating was downgraded and the government deficit has ballooned. But at the same time, since July 2024, the Tel Aviv stock exchange has risen by close to 30%. Growth in 2026 is expected at 4.6%, and unemployment is extremely low. The war has even benefited key economic sectors: Israel's defence exports are booming, and the UK is one of those export destinations. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, between 2020 and 2024 Israel was the second largest supplier of arms to the UK.
In the UK and Europe, there are new mobilisations of Israelis against the genocide, calling for sanctions. In December 2024, more than 500 Israelis in the UK called on the government to sanction Ben Gvir and Smotrich. In the past couple of months, a new group of Israelis in the UK, Mi-Neged – with which I am involved – called on Keir Starmer and David Lammy to impose far-reaching sanctions on Israel, not only on a few 'bad apples' but systemically. Such measures would include suspending the Trade and Partnership Agreement (TPA) and halting military cooperation.
For many of us, this is a deeply painful moment. Calling on our government to sanction the state where we grew up, to which we are closely attached and where our families and friends live is not an easy step. But we are horrified not only by what has happened but also by what is likely to happen if we do not take such steps.
UK suspension of Israel's preferential trade access could push the EU in the same direction. As a trading bloc, the EU is Israel's largest export destination, accounting for a third of Israeli exports. Proposals to suspend articles in Israel's EU association agreement are on the table.
For now, there is an Israeli middle and upper-middle class receptive to external pressure. That constituency has sufficient power and influence to translate this into political action. Israeli civil society is still able to mobilise and challenge the government. Yet Netanyahu's clampdown on protesters and the press is intensifying: the government's power grab is rapid and far-reaching. There are serious fears that the next Knesset elections would not be free or fair. The less democratic and the more messianic Israel becomes, the less effective sanctions would be. The time to act is now.
Yair Wallach is a reader in Israeli studies and head of the Centre for Jewish Studies at Soas University of London
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Arab nations tell Hamas to ‘disarm' and end rule of Gaza after Starmer ultimatum
Arab nations tell Hamas to ‘disarm' and end rule of Gaza after Starmer ultimatum

The Independent

time39 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Arab nations tell Hamas to ‘disarm' and end rule of Gaza after Starmer ultimatum

Arab nations have taken the unprecedented step of telling Hamas to lay down its arms and surrender control of Gaza. Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Egypt called for the terrorist group to 'disarm' and disband. It the first time these countries have condemned the group and demanded it to play no part in the future of Palestine. The landmark shift comes after Sir Keir Starmer issued Israel with an ultimatum, pledging to recognise Palestine if Benjamin Netanyahu's administration fails to take steps to end the war in Gaza by September. The three countries joined 14 other countries, including Britain and France, in calling for the disbandment of the group. The declaration, produced after a United Nations conference in New York, read: 'In the context of ending the war in Gaza, Hamas must end its rule in Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority, with international engagement and support, in line with the objective of a sovereign and independent Palestinian State.' French foreign minister Jean-Noel Barrot described the declaration as 'both historic and unprecedented'. 'For the first time, Arab countries and those in the Middle East condemn Hamas, condemn October 7, call for the disarmament of Hamas, call for its exclusion from Palestinian governance, and clearly express their intention to normalise relations with Israel in the future,' he said. On Tuesday, the prime minister recalled the Cabinet from their summer holidays to discuss steps to end what he called the 'appalling situation in Gaza', where a UN assessment has warned the population is facing a mounting humanitarian crisis. Sir Keir said the UK would only refrain from recognising Palestine if Israel allows more aid into Gaza, stops annexing land in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two months. Hamas must immediately release all remaining Israeli hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm and 'accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza', Sir Keir also said. But the pledge sparked international backlash, with Emily Damari – a British-Israeli woman who was held hostage by Hamas for more than a year – warning that Sir Keir is 'not standing on the right side of history'. She accused the prime minister of a 'moral failure', warning that the ultimatum 'risks rewarding terror'. 'It sends a dangerous message: that violence earns legitimacy", she added. Meanwhile, the Israeli prime minister issued a furious response, saying the decision 'rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism and punishes its victims.' Mr Netanyahu added: 'A jihadist state on Israel's border today will threaten Britain tomorrow. Appeasement towards jihadist terrorists always fails. It will fail you too. It will not happen.' US president Donald Trump also accused the UK of 'rewarding Hamas' with the ultimatum, despite previously saying he did not mind the PM 'taking a position' on the issue. It comes amid confusion over whether or not the release of remaining hostages is a condition for the recognition of Palestine, with transport secretary Heidi Alexander on Wednesday morning tying herself in knots on the issue. She told the BBC ministers have 'always said right from day one that the hostages need to be released', adding that the UK expects 'Hamas to act in the same way as we expect Israel to act'. But asked directly if the release of hostages is a condition for recognition, she said: 'We will be making an assessment in September'. Speaking to Sky, she added: 'This isn't about Hamas, this is actually about delivering for the Palestinian people and making sure that we can get aid in.' The conditional pledge to recognise Palestine came amid mounting domestic pressure on the prime minister after more than 250 cross-party MPs signed a letter calling for ministers to take the step. The formation of a new left-wing political party, led by Jeremy Corbyn and ex-Labour MP Zarah Sultana last week piled further pressure on the PM to act. Sarah Champion, the senior Labour MP who organised the letter, told BBC Radio 4 the prime minister's announcement was 'a really big movement' and would send a message to Israel that the status quo 'is not good enough'. But she added: 'I am a little concerned though that from what I'm hearing it seems to be conditional on Israel accepting some terms and I don't understand why the two things are being linked together.' Opposition parties also raised concerns about the conditional nature of the UK's position, with Lib Dem Leader Sir Ed Davey criticising Sir Keir for using Palestinian statehood as a 'bargaining chip', while Plaid Cymru's Liz Saville Roberts called for the 'immediate recognition of Palestine'. Addressing the UN Assembly on Tuesday, foreign secretary David Lammy backed the statement signed by Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Egypt saying: 'Hamas must never be rewarded for the monstrous attack on Oct 7.' 'It must immediately release the hostages, agree to an immediate ceasefire, accept it will have no role in governing Gaza and commit to disarmament.'

Out of despair has sprung some unexpected hope for Gaza
Out of despair has sprung some unexpected hope for Gaza

The Independent

time39 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Out of despair has sprung some unexpected hope for Gaza

It may not be a simple and direct example of cause and effect, but the calls from leading nations in the Arab world for Hamas to disarm and give up its claim to govern Gaza must be giving Sir Keir Starmer additional confidence that his decision to recognise a sovereign Palestinian state is on the right side of history. The prime minister made it clear in his historic statement that these terrorists must 'accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza', and this evidence that the regional geopolitical balance is tipping further against them is highly encouraging. Of course, Hamas can still count on the backing of the ayatollahs in Tehran, but Iran is certainly no longer the power it once was, and their other allies, the Houthi rebels in Yemen, have been similarly quieted. Remarkably, it is almost the entire Arab world, represented by the Arab League, that has made this historic move, in concert with European nations and others. They all now want to see an end to Hamas rule in Gaza, however nominal it may now in reality be, and their call is unequivocal: 'In the context of ending the war in Gaza, Hamas must end its rule in Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority, with international engagement and support, in line with the objective of a sovereign and independent Palestinian state.' With the recent backing for a state of Palestine by Sir Keir and President Macron, the tectonic plates have shifted. The fact that the leaders of Britain and France, two of the old colonial powers in the area, have joined at last in the cause of establishing a free and viable Palestinian state has no doubt weighed heavily in the balance in a part of the world where history matters. As David Lammy, the foreign secretary, said, that part of the Balfour Declaration pertaining to the Palestinian Arabs is now being honoured. The Arab League's declaration is by far the best news that has come from the UN summit being held in New York on a two-state solution. Israel and the United States have chosen not to attend, and the Americans also recently pulled out of the peace talks in Qatar, but even the Trump administration cannot entirely ignore this wind of change blowing through some of America's most important allies and partners – Saudi Arabia and Egypt being the pre-eminent examples. If President Trump wishes to extend the Abraham Accords process that was such a notable success in his first term, then he too should welcome these latest diplomatic initiatives and back them enthusiastically. The Abraham peace treaties, which entailed diplomatic recognition of Israel, that were concluded with the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan, can and should be joined by Saudi Arabia and others – as President Trump has always intended. It would make Israel more secure, and all involved more prosperous. Indeed, the prospect of the Saudis and Israelis normalising their relations may have been one motive for the Hamas terrorists committing their atrocities on 7 October 2023 – to disrupt such peaceful trends. President Trump also said that he was content for Sir Keir to 'take a position' on Palestinian sovereignty when he was in Scotland only a few days ago, and has repeated that he doesn't have to agree with what the British and French are doing. That is far from an outright condemnation, and, as momentum builds, he may judge that he can lend more backing. In any case, the president should further brief his secretary of state, Marco Rubio, on what a return to the Abraham Accords process would mean to the administration's legacy, and the prospects for extending American power and trade across the Middle East. There are reservations. The claim made by the Israelis, by Mr Trump and others, that recognising Palestinian sovereignty is a 'reward' for Hamas terrorism is an understandable one – but it is wrong. As has been seen with the widespread demands for Hamas to give up the hostages, disarm and transfer governance to the Palestinian Authority, the organisation is hardly being rewarded for what it did. It is not Hamas that is to be recognised as a legitimate authority, but the Palestinian Authority and President Abbas, based in Ramallah, who are no allies of Hamas. The truth that Benjamin Netanyahu has to confront is that it is his conduct of the war in Gaza that has made more Western states – normally friends and partners of Israel – decide that recognition of Palestinian sovereignty has to be made now for fear that the whole project of a two-state solution and lasting peace becomes completely unviable. In other words, had the Israelis gone after the Hamas leaders and the terrorists, rather than flattening the entire territory, with the loss of an estimated 80,000 lives, these moves on establishing the state of Palestine would not be taking place. Not that it matters much in the context of a historic move towards peace that is as dramatic as it is unexpected, the prime minister has also defused the growing unrest in his own party over Gaza. Sir Keir's principled stand that Israel had a right to defend itself after the 7 October attacks cost him dear in domestic electoral terms, but he stuck with it. It stands today, too – but the disproportionate way Israel has behaved towards civilians, culminating in a growing famine, has undoubtedly weakened its international support and left the nation isolated. In that sense, in lashing out in a vengeful manner for so long, it is Mr Netanyahu who has played into Hamas's plans and damaged the long-term interests of the Israeli people. That war suited him politically, as it did Hamas, is one of the more uncomfortable aspects of this conflict. Today, out of despair has sprung some unexpected hope for Gaza and for an end to the suffering of the Palestinian people – but also for Israel to be free of attack and invasion. Mr Netanyahu's government will not be in power for ever, and the inglorious era of Hamas rule is coming to a close. Those factors are also cause for optimism. That hope for peace should be cherished, for everyone knows what the inhuman alternative looks like, and it doesn't work.

Freed hostage Emily Damari accuses Starmer of being on wrong side of history
Freed hostage Emily Damari accuses Starmer of being on wrong side of history

Powys County Times

time39 minutes ago

  • Powys County Times

Freed hostage Emily Damari accuses Starmer of being on wrong side of history

A British-Israeli woman who was held hostage by Hamas for more than a year has said Sir Keir Starmer is 'not standing on the right side of history' after his pledge to recognise a Palestinian state. Emily Damari accused the Prime Minister of 'moral failure' over the move. Sir Keir announced on Tuesday that the UK could take the step of recognising statehood in September, ahead of a major UN gathering. The UK will refrain from doing so only if Israel allows more aid into Gaza, stops annexing land in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire, and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two months. The move has been criticised by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who claimed it 'rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism'. Ms Damari, who was released from Hamas captivity in January, said in a post on Instagram on Wednesday: 'Prime Minister Starmer is not standing on the right side of history. Had he been in power during World War II, would he have advocated recognition for Nazi control of occupied countries like Holland, France or Poland? 'This is not diplomacy — it is a moral failure. Shame on you, Prime Minister. 'As a dual British-Israeli citizen who survived 471 days in Hamas captivity, I am deeply saddened by Prime Minister Starmer's decision to recognise Palestinian statehood. This move does not advance peace — it risks rewarding terror. It sends a dangerous message: that violence earns legitimacy. 'By legitimising a state entity while Hamas still controls Gaza and continues its campaign of terror, the Prime Minister is not promoting a solution; he is prolonging the conflict. Recognition under these conditions emboldens extremists and undermines any hope for genuine peace. Shame on you!!!' In a statement from Downing Street on Tuesday after an urgent Cabinet meeting on Gaza, Sir Keir said the UK's 'message to the terrorists of Hamas is unchanged but unequivocal: they must immediately release all of the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm, and accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store