Here's How Much You Must Make To Afford a Home in the Midwest's Best Cities
Check Out:
Learn More:
To provide a feel for how much income is needed for homeownership in the Midwest's most livable spots, GOBankingRates has analyzed data from AreaVibes, the U.S. Census, Sperling's BestPlaces, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Zillow and the Federal Reserve. The good news for Midwesterners — and potential Midwesterners — is that each location in our top 10 has a median household income that far exceeds its average annual cost of living.
Here's the full list of the most livable cities and the salary needed for homeownership, along with median household income and some additional information about each location.
10. Farmington, Michigan
Livability score: 91
Salary needed (annual cost of living): $47,500
Median household income: $94,115
About 30 minutes northwest of Detroit by car, Farmington has about 12,000 residents. The median value of a single-family home in Farmington is $322,000, and the average mortgage is $1,900 a month.
Also Find:
See More:
9. Rochester, Minnesota
Livability score: 92
Salary needed (annual cost of living): $46,013
Median household income: $87,767
Rochester is located in southeast Minnesota, about 90 miles southeast of Minneapolis. Home to the famous Mayo Clinic, Rochester has a population of about 122,000. The average monthly mortgage here comes in just shy of $2,000, and the median value of single-family homes is $331,000.
Discover More:
8. Bexley, Ohio
Livability score: 92
Salary needed (annual cost of living): $61,980
Median household income: $152,526
Bexley is one of several suburbs of Columbus, Ohio, to make this list. The median value of a single-family home in Bexley is $546,000. Around 13,500 people reside here.
7. Ankeny, Iowa
Livability score: 92
Salary needed (annual cost of living): $47,905
Median household income: $106,603
You'll find Ankeny 12 miles north of Des Moines. With about 70,000 residents, Ankeny is one of Iowa's fastest-growing cities. The median value of a single-family home in Ankeny is $346,000.
6. Clawson, Michigan
Livability score: 92
Salary needed (annual cost of living): $43,814
Median household income: $86,630
Clawson is a Detroit suburb. The median value of single-family homes in Clawson is $280,000, relatively low compared to many other parts of the U.S. The average monthly mortgage is $1,650.
Read More:
5. Shorewood, Wisconsin
Livability score: 92
Salary needed (annual cost of living): $60,373
Median household income: $89,135
A suburb of Milwaukee, the village of Shorewood is located alongside Lake Michigan. The average value of a home in Shorewood comes in just over $500,000. The average monthly mortgage is $2,981.
4. University Heights, Ohio
Livability score: 93
Salary needed (annual cost of living): $40,625
Median household income: $98,474
University Heights sits about 10 miles east of Cleveland in northeast Ohio. On top of its strong livability score, University Heights offers relatively affordable housing. The median value of a single-family home is $259,000, and the average cost of a monthly mortgage is in the $1,500 range.
3. Whitefish Bay, Wisconsin
Livability score: 93
Salary needed (annual cost of living): $66,459
Median household income: $154,255
Whitefish Bay is located just north of Milwaukee on the shores of Lake Michigan. A village with about 15,000 residents, Whitefish Bay is more expensive than many of the other entries in this list. You can expect to pay $3,520 on average for your mortgage each month, and homes here have a median value around $600,000.
Find Out:
2. Grandview Heights, Ohio
Livability score: 94
Salary needed (annual cost of living): $61,586
Median household income: $113,862
This Columbus suburb has a population of about 8,500. The median value of single-family homes here is $539,000. The average monthly mortgage will run you around $3,200.
1. Worthington, Ohio
Livability score: 94
Salary needed (annual cost of living): $57,750
Median household income: $124,734
Livable Worthington is located just north of Columbus, the state capital. Worthington is a popular destination for retirees, with about 21% of its 15,000 residents age 65 and up. Worthington's household median income ($125,000) far exceeds its average annual cost of living ($58,000). The median value of a single-family home here is $480,000.
Editor's note: Photos are for representational purposes only and might not reflect the exact locations listed.
Methodology: For this study, GOBankingRates analyzed cities across the United States with the highest livability scores, as sourced from AreaVibes. The 30 most livable cities in each state were identified. To qualify for this study, each city had to have all data points available and a total population of at least 5,000. Data was sourced from the U.S. Census American Community Survey, Sperling's BestPlaces, the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey, Zillow Home Value Index for March 2025 and Federal Reserve Economic Data. All data was collected on and is up to date as of May 14, 2025.
More From GOBankingRates
10 Used Cars That Will Last Longer Than an Average New Vehicle
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: Here's How Much You Must Make To Afford a Home in the Midwest's Best Cities
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Max Eisenbud Upped to Head of Client Representation at WME Sports
Max Eisenbud has been promoted to head of client representation for WME Sports, overseeing the Hollywood talent agency's business across tennis, golf, action sports and sports content. The longtime tennis agent was most recently head of clients for the agency's IMG Tennis division, which he will continue to lead. IMG Tennis clients include Grand Slam champions Carlos Alcaraz, Coco Gauff and Iga Swiatek, as well as Serena Williams, John McEnroe, Andy Murray, Taylor Fritz, Ben Shelton and Frances Tiafoe. More from The Hollywood Reporter Patrick Whitesell Starts Joint Venture With Universal Music Group AI-Powered Animation Studio Toonstar Signs With WME (Exclusive) WME Promotes Rich Gambale to Partner in Unscripted TV (Exclusive) WME Group co-chairman Christian Muirhead said in a statement: 'There are few individuals like Max Eisenbud, an agent and a leader who is passionate, creative, and one of the hardest working people in our business. Over the past 25 years he has developed some of the world's top tennis players and transformed IMG Tennis into the undisputed leader. Max is a natural fit to lead WME Sports into the future where we will continue to invest and grow under Max's leadership.' Having joined IMG in 2000, Eisenbud went on to represent champions Maria Sharapova and Li Na as they built up commercial ventures away from the tennis court. Eisenbud's team at WME Sports will include Lee White in sports content, Josh Levy on the broadcast group front, and Mike Zavodsky in the property solutions business. WME Sports represents athletes, broadcasters, executives and institutions driving the sports industry worldwide by negotiating contracts, major brand deals and launching media ventures. The new role for Eisenbud follows WME parent Endeavor going private once more as part of a $25 billion deal by Silver Lake, and the the newly-private businesses going by the name of WME Group. WME Group includes the WME agency, marketing firm 160over90, IMG licensing, and the unscripted studio Pantheon Media Group (formerly named Asylum Entertainment). Best of The Hollywood Reporter How the Warner Brothers Got Their Film Business Started Meet the World Builders: Hollywood's Top Physical Production Executives of 2023 Men in Blazers, Hollywood's Favorite Soccer Podcast, Aims for a Global Empire
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
As Senate race heats up, political expert cautions candidates about going too far to the right
There is still more than a year from the 2026 midterm election, but in battleground Georgia the race for Senate is heating up. U.S. Rep. Mike Collins officially announced on Monday that he is running for Senate, as Georgia Insurance Commissioner John King just last week announced he was suspending his campaign in the race. Collins now joins fellow Republican U.S. Rep. Buddy Carter in the race to unseat Democratic incumbent Sen. Jon Ossoff. 'So, in these primaries, you tend to have to go pretty far to the right,' University of North Georgia political science professor Nathan Price told Channel 2's Richard Elliot. Both Collins and Carter are trying to court the GOP base as both men hope to get President Trump's endorsement. Price isn't surprised that both men are racing to the right. RELATED STORIES: Insurance Commissioner John King suspends campaign for U.S. Senate Gov. Kemp announces decision on Senate run in 2026, ending speculation With Brian Kemp not running for Senate, which Georgia Republicans could challenge Jon Ossoff? He thinks it's necessary to win the GOP primary but cautions that going too far right could turn off moderate voters in places like Cobb and North Fulton counties, places where voters like Republican Gov. Brian Kemp but don't much care for Trump. 'If you move too far to the right where you are not able to win those highly educated, suburban voters in those swing states, it makes the math very difficult,' Price said. Kemp reportedly told the Republican Senate campaigns he wouldn't endorse any of them, something that may have led to King's exit from the race last week. Kemp reportedly plans to endorse his longtime family friend Derek Dooley once Dooley decides if he wants to run. Either way, the Republicans could be in for a messy and expensive primary - something they wanted to avoid. 'The Republicans to have a good shot at this seat want to avoid a messy primary fight that causes them to spend a lot of resources before they even get their chance at that general election,' Price said. Elliot reached out to people close to Dooley to see if he could get a hint of when and if he may make a decision to run. So far, he hasn't heard back from them.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why these 4 very good NBA players remain unsigned
NBA free agency is, for the most part, complete. Players have signed, the dust has settled and teams are headed toward a few quiet weeks of summer vacation. Yet, there are four very solid players — forward Jonathan Kuminga (Warriors) and guards Josh Giddey (Bulls), Cam Thomas (Nets) and Quentin Grimes (76ers) — who are each still without contracts. Kuminga, Giddey, Thomas and Grimes were ranked seventh, ninth, 11th and 15th, respectively, in USA TODAY Sports' original ranking of Top 25 players available this cycle. So, why are they still available? Well, for one, each is a restricted free agent, meaning that their most recent team can match any offer sheet the player would sign with any other franchise. But there are several other market factors impacting their status. Here's an explainer on why these talented restricted free agents remain unsigned: What's the difficulty with restricted free agency? Restricted free agency is a lever that limits a player's self-determination in free agency. In an ideal scenario on the player side, the player can seek his so-called market value in negotiations with other teams — often using potential suitors as leverage plays to get the most recent team to pay up. If a team declines to match the offer sheet, then the player will join the other franchise courting him. But this was always going to be a tough offseason for players looking to get paid. In simplest terms, there was not a lot of available cap space, as teams increasingly look to avoid luxury taxes and dipping into the punitive apron triggers. And because teams who were active in the opening days of free agency seemingly wanted to avoid the uncertainty of extending an offer sheet to a player who might not ultimately be available, the market shifted toward unrestricted free agents. The issue of available salary cap space is magnified even further, now that teams mostly have their rosters set, leaving very little budget for these talented players. That depressed market, therefore, gives the most recent teams a massive advantage in negotiations. In essence, the teams with the rights to these restricted free agents are negotiating only against themselves, meaning they have increased leverage, and no real urgency to offer massive contracts — at least in the short term. The player, however, also has the option to accept his team's qualifying offer, thus playing out the final season of his rookie contract. Then, at the conclusion of the 2025-26 season, the player would become an unrestricted free agent. This would give the player the option to take a short-term loss — playing under a contract that is well below market value — to later enter the market unencumbered, just one year later. Jonathan Kuminga Still only 22 years old, Kuminga has had an uneven career with the Warriors, since the team selected him seventh overall in the 2021 NBA Draft. Kuminga flashed potential in the 2023-24 season as a versatile wing scorer who could slash and get to the rim, but he ultimately lost his spot in the rotation last season, particularly when Golden State traded for Jimmy Butler. Kuminga averaged 15.3 points per game last season — which was down from 16.1 the year previous — but the decline in his efficiency and shooting percentage (45.4%, down from his career-high 52.9% in 2023-24) is most concerning. The case for Golden State to re-sign Kuminga: He's an athletic player with tons of potential, and the Warriors will need his youth to maximize what the team has left with Stephen Curry, Jimmy Butler and Draymond Green each in their mid-30s. The case against: Although their working relationship appears to be on solid footing, Steve Kerr has, at times, seemingly lacked trust in Kuminga, particularly to close out games. Although Kuminga has flashed potential, he remains somewhat unproven, so justifying a lucrative deal may be challenging. Josh Giddey Giddey is approaching triple-double territory for a season. In 2024-25 — his fourth season in the NBA and first with the Bulls — the 6-8 guard averaged 14.6 points, 8.1 rebounds, 7.2 assists and shot 46.5% from the field and 37.8% on 3-pointers. In the final 15 games of the season, Giddey averaged 20.3 points, 10.4 rebounds and 9.7 assists. The case for Chicago to re-sign Giddey: It's difficult to find that kind of production, and that's why Giddey is seeking a lucrative long-term contract. He's just 22 years old and is the kind of player who can help win games with his scoring, passing and rebounding. The Bulls also gave up Alex Caruso to acquire Giddey. The case against: Patrick Williams' five-year, $90 million deal stings, and Chicago's hesitancy to give Giddey a big contract stems from the front office's decision on Williams' deal. There are optics involved, and the Bulls' front office needs the appearance of 'winning' a negotiation — or at least not looking like they screwed up. Cam Thomas Thomas can score. He averaged 24 points on 43.8% shooting from the field and 34.9% on 3s in 2024-25 — though he played in just 25 games due to a hamstring injury. The season before, he played in 66 games and averaged 22.5 points with similar shooting percentages (44.2%, 36.4%). The case for Brooklyn to re-sign Thomas: On a rebuilding and mostly young team with a payroll that is manageable, Thomas is a proven scorer, and he could be valuable as a player in a trade at a later date. The case against: NBA analyst Zach Lowe on his podcast said the consensus on Thomas was that he is an 'empty calories ball hog.' Thomas objected, saying 'This is most likely the same consensus (from) teams who can't guard me and send double teams from jump ball.' Is Thomas a starter who can do more than get buckets on a quality team or a scoring spark off the bench? The answer isn't clear. Quentin Grimes Grimes just turned 25 and proved he can be a reliable scorer in the 28 games he played with Philadelphia, after the Sixers acquired him ahead of the February trading deadline. Grimes scored 21.9 points per game with Philly, adding 5.2 rebounds and 4.5 assists. Granted, the 76ers were plagued with injuries and Grimes had an elevated role, but Grimes more than answered the call and is looking to cash in on that performance. The case for Philadelphia to re-sign Grimes: The 76ers battled injury issues last season, and there's no guarantee that this roster, with Paul George and Joel Embiid potentially still facing lingering issues, won't face similar issues in 2025-26. The case against: The Sixers have two of the worst contracts in the NBA in Paul George and Joel Embiid, so paying Grimes presents its own challenges. Plus, with Tyrese Maxey, second-year Jared McCain and rookie No. 3 overall selection VJ Edgecombe, the 76ers are already loaded at guard. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: NBA restricted free agency: Why are these 4 players still unsigned?
