logo
Tesla Robotaxi Safety Monitor Forced to Clamber Into Driver's Seat and Take Over, Passenger Says

Tesla Robotaxi Safety Monitor Forced to Clamber Into Driver's Seat and Take Over, Passenger Says

Yahoo01-07-2025
Earlier this year, Elon Musk promised that Tesla's robotaxis would launch offering fully "unsupervised" rides with "no one in the car."
That turned out to be a lie. And less than a week into the robotaxi service's debut, which is currently limited to a tiny geofenced area in Austin, Texas, it's already become apparent that the self-driving cars are very much reliant on the human supervisors — or "safety monitors" — that Musk was adamant he wouldn't need.
In an incident shared on Wednesday, a popular Tesla content creator who goes by the handle "Dirty Tesla" said that after his robotaxi ride dropped him off, the vehicle struggled to exit the tight parking lot and appeared to back up into a parked car.
After that car left, according to Dirty Tesla, the safety monitor got out of the front passenger seat, climbed into the driver's seat to take over, and then drove away.
Footage uploaded to X shows the robotaxi abruptly stopping while trying to squeeze its way out and flashing its hazard lights — a sign that the safety monitor manually intervened. The video doesn't show the human supervisor taking over the vehicle. But if Dirty Tesla's account is true, it sounds like labelling them as merely safety "monitors" may be a little misleading, if they're having to actually drive the cars.
"I wouldn't even call this unsupervised," Dirty Tesla wrote in a reply to his video. "It's clearly supervised."
https://twitter.com/dirtytesla/status/1937736544242012174
Prior to the launch, Tesla kept many details of its robotaxi service under wraps, and avoided even offering a hard launch date. The inclusion of the safety monitors, who sit in the front passenger seat instead of the driver's, wasn't revealed until the automaker started sending invites to testers just days ahead of the debut.
The news immediately raised eyebrows. Beyond contradicting Musk's earlier promise, it's unusual for a robotaxi service to still require human employees in the vehicles during the commercial phase of operations, TechCrunch noted, which Tesla — charging an eye-rolling $4.20 per ride — immediately jumped into.
Meanwhile, the automaker has remained suspiciously opaque about the extent that its robotaxis would rely on "teleoperators," or human employees located offsite but ready to remotely pilot the vehicles. It's not clear why the safety monitor elected to take over the robotaxi that dropped off Dirty Tesla, instead of allowing a teleoperator to take charge.
It's telling that mere days into the robotaxi launch, this isn't the only instance where a human employee was forced to intervene. A video taken by Tesla influencer and investor Dave Lee showed his robotaxi ride nearly rear-end a UPS truck that it failed to recognize was backing up into the same spot that the Tesla was turning into to drop off its passenger. The crash was avoided when the safety monitor quickly read the situation and tapped the "Stop in Lane" button on the touchscreen, bringing the self-driving car to a halt.
The incidents where the safety monitor didn't intervene aren't any less concerning. A growing Reddit list of these incidents — highlighted by the Verge — includes cases where a robotaxi dropped off a passenger in the middle of an intersection, drove over a curb, unexpectedly slammed the brakes so hard that the person recording the video dropped her phone, and came to a complete stop in the middle of the road seemingly because it mistook a tree shadow for an object. (Critics who argue that Tesla made a huge mistake by relying only on cameras to see instead of augmenting its cars with lidar systems will have a field day with that one.)
Some also show the Tesla vehicles violating traffic laws, including clearly driving over the speed limit, and crossing a road's solid double yellow lines to make it into a left turn lane. This has earned Tesla the attention of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which confirmed on Monday that it had contacted Musk's company to gather more information, though it hasn't launched an official investigation.
It's worth keeping in mind that this already concerning number of incidents is coming from a fleet of just ten to 20 cars, which are operating in an extremely limited part of the city that engineers have manually mapped out. Prior to the rollout, Musk promised that over 1,000 Tesla robotaxis would be deployed in Austin "within a few months" of launching, and that one million of these cars would be on American roads by the end of 2026. What we've seen so far suggests that the autonomous cab service is far from being safe enough to scale up to such a ludicrous degree.
More on robotaxis: Tesla Stock in Tailspin After Error-Plagued Robotaxi Debut
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk's xAI faces European scrutiny over Grok's 'horrific' antisemitic posts
Musk's xAI faces European scrutiny over Grok's 'horrific' antisemitic posts

CNBC

time31 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Musk's xAI faces European scrutiny over Grok's 'horrific' antisemitic posts

The European Union on Monday called in representatives from Elon Musk's xAI after the company's social network X, and chatbot Grok, generated and spread anti-semitic hate speech, including praise for Adolf Hitler, last week. A spokesperson for the European Commission told CNBC via e-mail that a technical meeting will take place on Tuesday. xAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Sandro Gozi, a member of Italy's parliament and member of the Renew Europe group, last week urged the Commission to hold a formal inquiry. "The case raises serious concerns about compliance with the Digital Services Act (DSA) as well as the governance of generative AI in the Union's digital space," Gozi wrote. X was already under a Commission probe for possible violations of the DSA. Grok also generated and spread offensive posts about political leaders in Poland and Turkey, including Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk and Turkish President Recep Erdogan. Over the weekend, xAI posted a statement apologizing for the hateful content. "First off, we deeply apologize for the horrific behavior that many experienced. ... After careful investigation, we discovered the root cause was an update to a code path upstream of the @grok bot," the company said in the statement. Musk and his xAI team launched a new version of Grok Wednesday night amid the backlash. Musk called it "the smartest AI in the world." xAI works with other businesses run and largely owned by Musk, including Tesla, the publicly traded automaker, and SpaceX, the U.S. aerospace and defense contractor. Despite Grok's recent outburst of hate speech, the U.S. Department of Defense awarded xAI a $200 million contract to develop AI. Anthropic, Google and OpenAI also received AI contracts.

What Do Josef Newgarden, Team Penske Have To Do To Win Races?
What Do Josef Newgarden, Team Penske Have To Do To Win Races?

Fox News

time32 minutes ago

  • Fox News

What Do Josef Newgarden, Team Penske Have To Do To Win Races?

NEWTON, Iowa — Josef Newgarden led a combined 304 laps at Iowa Speedway over the weekend. He doesn't have too much to show for it. Yes, he finished second in Saturday's race. But when a driver leads 232 of 275 laps, that driver believes that a trophy should accompany the effort. On Sunday, he still had arguably the best car but circumstances resulted in him leading 72 laps and finishing 10th. Those results show what everyone has seen all year: Penske cars do have speed but execution and other bad luck have soured their season. After a 2-3-4 finish Saturday with Newgarden, Will Power and Scott McLaughlin, they finished 10-24-26 in the second race of the weekend doubleheader. That was after Power had an engine issue for the second consecutive week and McLaughlin crashed when Devlin DeFrancesco got loose underneath him. "We just have to keep doing what you are doing," Newgarden said. "Team Penske is working incredibly hard. [Saturday] was a good day for everybody. You could see the spirits lift. "They don't need to change what they are doing. They are doing a great job. They brought a fast car here again today." It could be argued that no matter what's occurring, doing the same thing would produce the same results. Power is eighth in the standings, McLaughlin is 12th and Newgarden sits in 14th. "I have zero doubt in our process and what we do," Newgarden said earlier in the weekend after winning the pole for the Saturday race. "I've been here a long time. I've worked with the best of the best. "We have really good people. Still do. And I think the worst thing to do would be to change what our process is. To overreact would be the wrong decision. That's definitely not what we should be doing." Newgarden called this a "unique" stretch. For a proud organization like Team Penske, it certainly isn't easy. Newgarden had a slow pit stop that cost him track position Saturday and then, with another dominant car on Sunday, he had the misfortune of the yellow coming out when he was pitting. On a short track (0.894-mile) such as Iowa Speedway, he lost a lap in the sequence and then, when he got his lap back, he had to rally from the rear of the field. He regained the lead but another somewhat slow pit stop quickly followed by a caution cost him track position late in the race. Newgarden has 31 career victories and hates to lose. So even the second-place finish Saturday was not one that thrilled him. "With this [aero] package I was flat out," Newgarden said about trying to pass Pato O'Ward at the end of the race Saturday. "I couldn't do anything different. He got position, and that was that." As Newgarden was answering questions politely but not with long answers, Power needled him. "Josef loves to answer questions at the moment," Power said. "He's seething. Seething. He didn't win. He was close, man." For Power and McLaughlin, they could feel more of the same this year with good days and bad days. McLaughlin wrecked in qualifying on Saturday, meaning he had to start at the rear for both races. He worked his way from 27th to fourth in the first race, an incredible run. But his race on Sunday ended on the first lap when Devlin DeFrancesco got loose underneath him and they both wiped out. "It's the story of our year," McLaughlin said. McLaughlin could blame himself, as the crash Saturday put him in that position. Power had an engine issue that Chevrolet will look into. "These things come at such inconvenient times, but everyone goes through it," Power said. "It's just one of those things." It obviously hasn't been a smooth year for Penske, which released its three top INDYCAR executives after a technical issue during Indy 500 qualifying was the second significant violation since the start of the 2024 season. Earlier this month, the organization announced that Jonathan Diuguid had been promoted to President of the INDYCAR and sports car programs while Travis Law was named Competition Director for the programs. Both Diuguid and Law had experience in INDYCAR but had been focusing on sports car roles in recent years. The NASCAR leadership did not change. McLaughlin said Friday at Iowa that things do seem settled with the leadership in place. "I wouldn't want to be with another team in terms of when we're down in this right now," McLaughlin said. "With the resources, the people, I really think we're going to be just fine. "It's going to take some time, but I feel like this is meant to happen and we'll get going." The one thing that is important to realize, McLaughlin said, is that all three drivers, when they haven't had the speed they wanted, are fighting similar issues. So where the team is focusing on getting better is across the board of the three teams. "We've had a very good run," McLaughlin said. "It's just matter of maybe it was meant to happen, maybe this was meant to just put us through the hardest point to realize how good it is when we are going well. "That's how I'm looking at it. I'm full of positivity. ... [Other teams] are doing great jobs. We're working hard." Now they need to see the work turn into wins. "We had plenty of potential to win a race all year," Power said. "It is just a strange year." Bob Pockrass covers NASCAR and INDYCAR for FOX Sports. He has spent decades covering motorsports, including over 30 Daytona 500s, with stints at ESPN, Sporting News, NASCAR Scene magazine and The (Daytona Beach) News-Journal. Follow him on Twitter @bobpockrass.

US government is giving leading AI companies a bunch of cash for military applications
US government is giving leading AI companies a bunch of cash for military applications

Engadget

time33 minutes ago

  • Engadget

US government is giving leading AI companies a bunch of cash for military applications

The US Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office (CDAO) is handing out millions of dollars to the leading AI companies to develop military applications. Each of these "awards" are worth up to $200 million, with Anthropic, Google, OpenAI and xAI on the receiving end. The agency notes that this money will be used to "develop agentic AI workflows across a variety of mission areas." In other words, this is primarily for military applications. A press release says the move will "broaden" the Department of Defense's use of AI to "address critical national security needs." 'The adoption of AI is transforming the department's ability to support our warfighters and maintain strategic advantage over our adversaries,' said Chief Digital and AI Officer Dr. Doug Matty. He went on to say that this will "accelerate the use of advanced AI" in the "warfighting domain." As part of this effort, CDAO will be providing access to the latest generative AI models to "Combatant Commands, the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Staff." For the uninitiated, CDAO is an arm of the Department of Defense that was created in 2022. The stated mission is to accelerate the department's "adoption of data, analytics and artificial intelligence from the boardroom to the battlefield." It's worth noting that xAI is one of the companies receiving government largesse. This news comes on the same day the company started offering a version of Grok for federal use . It comes less than a week after Grok went totally off the rails and started going off on anti-semitic tirades , referring to itself as "MechaHitler." It's also a fascinating development because the relationship between xAI CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump has soured in recent months . Trump has been threatening to cut Musk's companies off from government subsidies, but it looks like that threat has no teeth given today's announcement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store