
Are Those Viral ‘Cooling Blankets' for Real?
Jun 13, 2025 7:00 AM According to physics, any blanket can cool you—for a few minutes. But a real cooling blanket is possible with phase-change materials. Photograph:If you spend much time on the internet, you will see the same things pop up again and again. For me, it's these 'cooling blankets' that people talk about on social media. I mean, it sounds great for summer—just like a blanket that warms you up but in reverse.
Sadly, these products don't do what they claim. They might be breathable so they don't make you as hot as an ordinary blanket would, but you'd still be cooler with no blanket at all. However, there is hope. Someone has created a real cooling blanket that's sort of awesome. Of course, there's a bunch of physics here, so let's get to it. Temperature vs. Energy
Temperature is one of those words everyone uses and no one understands. In chemistry it's the average kinetic energy, or vibrational motion, of the molecules in a substance. The greater the commotion, the higher the temperature.
But I like this more pragmatic definition: Temperature is the property two objects will have in common when they're in contact for a long time. So, if you take a hot block of metal and set it against a cold block of metal, eventually they will have the same temperature. Heat flows from the warmer thing to the cooler thing until they equalize. (Note: It doesn't work the other way around; you can't transfer 'coolness.')
We also talk about objects having a certain amount of thermal energy , which you'd get by adding up the kinetic energy of all the particles inside it. It depends on three things: the mass of the object, its temperature, and the material it's made of. So for instance, focusing on mass, big potatoes have more thermal energy than small potatoes at the same temperature.
Now, if you look at the type of material, every substance has a 'specific heat capacity,' which is the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of that substance by one degree. Try this at home. Find two objects that have been sitting in your room for a while, so they're both at room temperature. Here, I have a block of wood and a block of aluminum.
Touch both objects. They're the same temperature, but the wood feels warmer, right? Why is that? It's not about temperature but thermal energy. When your hand touches an object, there is a heat conduction interaction. Energy is transferred from your warmer hand to the cooler object until the two are the same temperature. However, with the metal block it takes way more energy to reach the temperature of your hand. It feels cooler because it causes your hand to lose more energy.
You'll notice the same thing when you go swimming. An air temperature of 75°F feels nice and comfortable, but wading into water of the same temperature feels really cold. That's because water has a much higher mass and specific heat capacity than air, which causes you to lose more thermal energy and feel colder. All Blankets Cool
So, blankets, how do they work? A blanket is basically an insulator. That means it prevents energy transfer between objects at different temperatures. Wrapping yourself in a blanket on a cold day keeps you from losing body heat to the air around you, so you feel warmer. Similarly, if you put a blanket around a cold soda on a warm day, it will slow down the transfer of thermal energy from the air to the soda, keeping the soda cold longer.
But what if you feel hot and you put on a blanket? In that case, two things can happen at once. It can still act as a thermal insulator and slow down the transfer of energy between you and the air. Unless the ambient air is above 98.5°F, this is going to make you hotter, not cooler.
However, the blanket can also have a thermal interaction with your body. Suppose you have a 80°F blanket in contact with a 98°F person. This will raise the temperature of the blanket while reducing the thermal energy of your body. Yes, it will act as a cooling blanket—at least for a few minutes, until the temperatures are equalized.
So, what makes one blanket cool more effectively than another? First, it should have a high mass, so that it takes a lot of energy to warm up. Second, the blanket needs to make good contact with your skin to increase the thermal interaction. So, one of those light fluffy blankets won't cool you off that much. Other than that, it's just a normal blanket.
But I'm a sucker for trying these things, so I bought a cheap 'cooling blanket' online. (I know, someone will say it doesn't work unless you get an expensive one.) For those who say their cooling blanket was out in the sun and they measured a 75°F temperature, I don't believe you. Check this out. I have three blankets on my sofa. One of them is the cooling blanket and the others are normal. In back is the same picture taken with an infrared camera so that different colors represent different temperatures.
Can you tell which one is the cooling blanket? Nope. You can't. There's almost no difference in the temperatures. They are all cooling blankets. They are also all normal blankets. A Real Cooling Blanket
But what if I told you it's possible to have a thermal interaction between two objects but one of them doesn't change in temperature. Yes, this is a thing—it's called a phase transition. It happens whenever a material changes from solid to liquid or liquid to gas.
Here's an interesting experiment. Imagine I take a beaker with frozen water (aka ice) that's colder than the freezing point (maybe –10°C). Then I put the beaker on a hot plate and add energy to it, measuring the temperature of the water as I go. Here is what that would look like:
As you can see, the ice increases in temperature until it reaches the melting point, 0°C (32°F). At that point the temperature levels off, and it remains constant until all the ice melts—even though heat is still being added to the system. Why is that? It's because the energy is being used to break the molecular bonds and turn the solid into a liquid. Once it's entirely liquid, the temperature starts rising again, until it reaches the boiling point (100°C). Again, the temperature levels off until all the water turns to gas. (This is why it's nice to cook with boiling water—it stays the same temperature.)
You can see how this would make for a better cooling blanket. Because of these temperature plateaus during a phase change, you can keep transferring thermal energy from your body to the blanket without the blanket getting warmer and becoming ineffective.
Does this mean you could use an ice blanket, maybe with the water in a flexible lining, to cool yourself? Sure. But it would be excruciating and you might get frostbite. Also, once you melt the ice and heat up the water, you'd need to put your blanket back in the freezer before you could use it again.
But how about a material that has a melting point closer to the temperature of the human body? In this video from the YouTube channel NighthawkInLight, Ben Cusick makes just such a phase-change material (PCM) from common salts (sodium sulfate and sodium chloride).
Of course I had to try making some of this stuff myself. I'm not a chemist, but I think it turned out pretty well.
It depends on your mixture and the type of salts used, but these kinds of materials have a melting point somewhere around 18°C (65°F). Why does that matter? Well, first, it's not so cold that it hurts. Second, you don't need a freezer; a cool place like a basement floor will make it refreeze.
And best of all, the high melting point means it will melt slowly at room temperature, so the phase transition lasts a long time—hours instead of minutes—and it will cool you off during this whole time. Put this stuff in the lining of a blanket and voilà! Pretty cool, right?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Northern Lights Alert: 8 States May See Aurora Borealis Monday Night
Some geomagnetic storm conditions are expected Monday, possibly making the northern lights visible in several states in the northern U.S., according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. NOAA forecast auroral activity with a Kp index of three on a scale of nine for Monday night, suggesting the northern lights will be 'quite pleasing to look at' for those in the right areas. Periods of 'minor' geomagnetic storms are possible Monday because of 'influences' of high-speed winds from a cooler, less dense spot on the sun's surface, NOAA said. Monday's auroral forecast indicates a maximum Kp index of nearly five may be reached, according to NOAA's three-day forecast, which shows the northern lights could become visible in parts of South Dakota, Wyoming, Iowa, New York, New Hampshire, Vermont and Maine. The best chance to see the northern lights is forecast for most of northern Canada and Alaska, with a lower likelihood expected in northeastern Washington, northern Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, northern Wisconsin and Upper Michigan. (See map below.) Monday's view line. NOAA NOAA recommends traveling to a high vantage point away from light pollution to see the northern lights, which the agency said are best seen between 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. local time. With a regular camera, photography experts told National Geographic that a wide-angle lens, an aperture or F-stop of four or less and a focus set to the furthest possible setting is recommended. NOAA suggests using a tripod and enabling night mode if using a smartphone. Activity on the sun's surface peaked in October 2024, meaning the northern lights will likely be more visible into early 2026, NOAA and NASA projections suggest. This peak features an increase in solar events like solar flares and coronal mass ejections, which are responsible for auroral activity. Molecules of oxygen and nitrogen collide with electrons from these events, causing the electrons to become 'excited' before releasing energy in the form of light.


Health Line
an hour ago
- Health Line
Heart Arrhythmia After COVID-19 Vaccine: A Very Rare Side Effect
Arrhythmia is not a known side effect of COVID-19 vaccines. But ongoing monitoring has shown rare instances of heart complications in people who have received the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna mRNA vaccines. Arrhythmia affects the rate or rhythm at which the heart beats. Your heart might beat too fast (tachycardia), too slow (bradycardia), too early (premature contraction), or erratically (fibrillation). Arrhythmia can also be a sign of myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart muscle. Myocarditis is a very rare side effect of Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. You're more likely to experience arrhythmia or myocarditis caused by COVID-19 itself than from the COVID-19 vaccine. At least 2 out of every 10 people hospitalized with COVID-19 experience heart problems, including damage to their heart muscle and arrhythmia. This is what scientists mean when they say the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks. Keep reading to learn more about heart arrhythmia and myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination. What the research says Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that higher than normal cases of heart inflammation have been reported in the United States after COVID-19 vaccination with the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccines. These heart issues occurred mostly in males between ages 12 and 39 after they received the second dose of the vaccine, usually within a few days of receiving the vaccine. This side effect hasn't been observed in people who received the Johnson & Johnson vaccine or the Novavax protein subunit vaccine. The Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines are messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines. These vaccines contain genetically engineered mRNA that teaches your cells how to create antibodies capable of fighting the coronavirus that causes COVID-19. Traditional vaccines, like the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine, contain genetic material from the virus, which also helps your body create antibodies. A 2021 analysis of CDC data found that people ages 12 to 39 who received their second COVID-19 mRNA vaccine had about a 13 in 1 million chance of experiencing heart inflammation. In other words, this side effect is exceedingly rare. Another 2021 study involved people ages 16 and up who were vaccinated against COVID-19. It also found slightly increased risks of heart inflammation after participants' first and second doses of COVID-19 vaccines in the first 28 days after vaccination. This research included the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine as well as the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines. This risk of myocarditis did appear to be a bit higher after a second dose of the Moderna vaccine — not the other vaccines studied — and was only observed in people younger than 40. Vaccination for people with preexisting heart conditions Even though arrhythmias are sometimes associated with myocarditis, no direct association was found between arrhythmia and COVID-19 vaccination. The American Heart Association recommends that anyone with heart disease get vaccinated against COVID-19 as soon as possible. This is because they're at a much greater risk of heart-related complications from the coronavirus than they are from any COVID-19 vaccine. However, if you or your child has experienced myocarditis after a vaccine before, discuss your options with your doctor before getting vaccinated. What are the symptoms of heart arrhythmia? Arrhythmia doesn't always cause symptoms — that's why you'll sometimes hear it called 'asymptomatic.' But possible symptoms can include: chest pain shortness of breath feeling like the heart is fluttering or pounding (palpitations) rapid heartbeat slow or irregular heartbeat A 2021 study suggests that most people suspected to have myocarditis after COVID-19 experienced chest pain about 2 or 3 days after the second dose of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Arrhythmia during COVID-19 Arrhythmias are more often seen after developing COVID-19 than after vaccination. In small studies conducted in Wuhan, China, during the initial outbreak of COVID-19, arrhythmias occurred at a rate of 16.7% of people hospitalized with COVID-19, with 44.4% of those who were hospitalized being treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). A retrospective 2021 study of 3,970 COVID-19 admissions at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City found that atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter (AF/AFL) happened in 10% of study participants. AF/AFL was also associated with a 46% higher risk of death — compared with 26% of study participants who had no arrhythmias. Viral infection is the most common cause of inflammation in the heart muscle in children. Children who develop myocarditis after COVID-19 also typically experience a more severe case than if it happens after a COVID-19 vaccination. Heart complications can occur even after you recover from COVID-19. Common vaccine side effects Heart problems are a very rare side effect of COVID-19 vaccines. More common side effects are mild and temporary, including: fever pain and soreness at injection site fatigue headache chills body aches These side effects occur as the vaccine triggers a response from your immune system. In other words, these side effects mean the vaccine is doing its job. Is the COVID-19 vaccine still effective? When first studied in earlier coronavirus variants, COVID-19 vaccines were shown to be roughly: 95% effective at preventing coronavirus infection 94% effective at preventing COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths among fully vaccinated adults Yet viruses constantly change. Several new variants have emerged since the novel coronavirus first appeared. But even though the first COVID-19 vaccines aren't as effective at preventing infection by the Delta or Omicron variants, they offer significant protection against these variants by reducing your risk of: severe illness hospitalization death Research published in 2022 estimates that COVID-19 vaccines are still up to 90% effective at preventing severe outcomes of COVID-19, including the need for invasive mechanical ventilation or death. People who are fully vaccinated and received a third booster had the highest level of protection against severe disease and hospitalization. Newer boosters have since been developed. Who should get a COVID-19 vaccine? Under the new administration, the CDC recommends that most people ages 18 years and older get an annual COVID-19 vaccine, while those 6 months to 17 years old and pregnant people make a personal decision with their loved ones. However, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends vaccination for every child 6 months or older, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends vaccination for all pregnant people.


Gizmodo
2 hours ago
- Gizmodo
NASA Moves Ahead With Private ISS Mission After Air Leak Repairs
NASA is looking to launch Axiom Space's fourth private mission to the International Space Station (ISS) this week, after recent attempts to repair air leaks in the Russian module appear to have been successful. Last week, the space agency abruptly postponed the launch of Axiom Mission 4, which was set to launch on June 11. NASA cited a new pressure signal in a segment of the Zvezda service module that's been leaking air, very slowly, for nearly six years. In a follow-up statement on Saturday, NASA explained that the pressure signal (a change in airflow or cabin pressure picked up by sensors) may be a sign that the leaks have been sealed. There's also a chance, however, that air began flowing to a different area in the aft segment of the Russian module, leading to the new pressure signal. 'Following the most-recent repair, pressure in the transfer tunnel has been stable. Previously, pressure in this area would have dropped,' NASA wrote in a statement. 'This could indicate the small leaks have been sealed. Teams are also considering the stable pressure could be the result of a small amount of air flowing into the transfer tunnel across the hatch seal from the main part of [the] space station.' NASA is monitoring the change in pressure over time, and evaluating the condition of the transfer tunnel and the hatch seal between the space station and the back of the Zvezda module. In the meantime, the agency decided to go ahead with the launch of AX-4 no earlier than Thursday, June 19. The mission will be led by spaceflight veteran Peggy Whitson, a former NASA astronaut who holds the national record for the most cumulative days spent in space. She will be joined by pilot Shubhanshu Shukla of India, mission specialist Sławosz Uznański-Wiśniewski of Poland, and mission specialist Tibor Kapu of Hungary. The decision to postpone the mission was to allow more time for NASA and the Russian space agency, Roscosmos, to evaluate the situation on board the ISS and decide if more troubleshooting is needed before adding more crew members to the space station. In its most recent statement, NASA said that 'teams are making progress evaluating the transfer tunnel configuration.' Roscosmos first reported the leak in August 2020, tracing it to the Zvezda life support module that Russia launched to low Earth orbit in July 2000. Since then, the rate at which air is leaking from the Zvezda service module has doubled from one pound a day to a little over two pounds a day, according to a report released in 2024. That led NASA to elevate the leak to the highest level of risk. At the time, it was reported that NASA and Roscosmos could not agree on the root cause of the leak or a way to fix it. Although it's taken years to address, the recent repair efforts show some progress in trying to fix the leaky space station. Whether or not the aging ISS is fit to host more astronauts right now remains to be seen.