logo
Are Those Viral ‘Cooling Blankets' for Real?

Are Those Viral ‘Cooling Blankets' for Real?

WIRED13-06-2025
Jun 13, 2025 7:00 AM According to physics, any blanket can cool you—for a few minutes. But a real cooling blanket is possible with phase-change materials. Photograph:If you spend much time on the internet, you will see the same things pop up again and again. For me, it's these 'cooling blankets' that people talk about on social media. I mean, it sounds great for summer—just like a blanket that warms you up but in reverse.
Sadly, these products don't do what they claim. They might be breathable so they don't make you as hot as an ordinary blanket would, but you'd still be cooler with no blanket at all. However, there is hope. Someone has created a real cooling blanket that's sort of awesome. Of course, there's a bunch of physics here, so let's get to it. Temperature vs. Energy
Temperature is one of those words everyone uses and no one understands. In chemistry it's the average kinetic energy, or vibrational motion, of the molecules in a substance. The greater the commotion, the higher the temperature.
But I like this more pragmatic definition: Temperature is the property two objects will have in common when they're in contact for a long time. So, if you take a hot block of metal and set it against a cold block of metal, eventually they will have the same temperature. Heat flows from the warmer thing to the cooler thing until they equalize. (Note: It doesn't work the other way around; you can't transfer 'coolness.')
We also talk about objects having a certain amount of thermal energy , which you'd get by adding up the kinetic energy of all the particles inside it. It depends on three things: the mass of the object, its temperature, and the material it's made of. So for instance, focusing on mass, big potatoes have more thermal energy than small potatoes at the same temperature.
Now, if you look at the type of material, every substance has a 'specific heat capacity,' which is the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of that substance by one degree. Try this at home. Find two objects that have been sitting in your room for a while, so they're both at room temperature. Here, I have a block of wood and a block of aluminum.
Touch both objects. They're the same temperature, but the wood feels warmer, right? Why is that? It's not about temperature but thermal energy. When your hand touches an object, there is a heat conduction interaction. Energy is transferred from your warmer hand to the cooler object until the two are the same temperature. However, with the metal block it takes way more energy to reach the temperature of your hand. It feels cooler because it causes your hand to lose more energy.
You'll notice the same thing when you go swimming. An air temperature of 75°F feels nice and comfortable, but wading into water of the same temperature feels really cold. That's because water has a much higher mass and specific heat capacity than air, which causes you to lose more thermal energy and feel colder. All Blankets Cool
So, blankets, how do they work? A blanket is basically an insulator. That means it prevents energy transfer between objects at different temperatures. Wrapping yourself in a blanket on a cold day keeps you from losing body heat to the air around you, so you feel warmer. Similarly, if you put a blanket around a cold soda on a warm day, it will slow down the transfer of thermal energy from the air to the soda, keeping the soda cold longer.
But what if you feel hot and you put on a blanket? In that case, two things can happen at once. It can still act as a thermal insulator and slow down the transfer of energy between you and the air. Unless the ambient air is above 98.5°F, this is going to make you hotter, not cooler.
However, the blanket can also have a thermal interaction with your body. Suppose you have a 80°F blanket in contact with a 98°F person. This will raise the temperature of the blanket while reducing the thermal energy of your body. Yes, it will act as a cooling blanket—at least for a few minutes, until the temperatures are equalized.
So, what makes one blanket cool more effectively than another? First, it should have a high mass, so that it takes a lot of energy to warm up. Second, the blanket needs to make good contact with your skin to increase the thermal interaction. So, one of those light fluffy blankets won't cool you off that much. Other than that, it's just a normal blanket.
But I'm a sucker for trying these things, so I bought a cheap 'cooling blanket' online. (I know, someone will say it doesn't work unless you get an expensive one.) For those who say their cooling blanket was out in the sun and they measured a 75°F temperature, I don't believe you. Check this out. I have three blankets on my sofa. One of them is the cooling blanket and the others are normal. In back is the same picture taken with an infrared camera so that different colors represent different temperatures.
Can you tell which one is the cooling blanket? Nope. You can't. There's almost no difference in the temperatures. They are all cooling blankets. They are also all normal blankets. A Real Cooling Blanket
But what if I told you it's possible to have a thermal interaction between two objects but one of them doesn't change in temperature. Yes, this is a thing—it's called a phase transition. It happens whenever a material changes from solid to liquid or liquid to gas.
Here's an interesting experiment. Imagine I take a beaker with frozen water (aka ice) that's colder than the freezing point (maybe –10°C). Then I put the beaker on a hot plate and add energy to it, measuring the temperature of the water as I go. Here is what that would look like:
As you can see, the ice increases in temperature until it reaches the melting point, 0°C (32°F). At that point the temperature levels off, and it remains constant until all the ice melts—even though heat is still being added to the system. Why is that? It's because the energy is being used to break the molecular bonds and turn the solid into a liquid. Once it's entirely liquid, the temperature starts rising again, until it reaches the boiling point (100°C). Again, the temperature levels off until all the water turns to gas. (This is why it's nice to cook with boiling water—it stays the same temperature.)
You can see how this would make for a better cooling blanket. Because of these temperature plateaus during a phase change, you can keep transferring thermal energy from your body to the blanket without the blanket getting warmer and becoming ineffective.
Does this mean you could use an ice blanket, maybe with the water in a flexible lining, to cool yourself? Sure. But it would be excruciating and you might get frostbite. Also, once you melt the ice and heat up the water, you'd need to put your blanket back in the freezer before you could use it again.
But how about a material that has a melting point closer to the temperature of the human body? In this video from the YouTube channel NighthawkInLight, Ben Cusick makes just such a phase-change material (PCM) from common salts (sodium sulfate and sodium chloride).
Of course I had to try making some of this stuff myself. I'm not a chemist, but I think it turned out pretty well.
It depends on your mixture and the type of salts used, but these kinds of materials have a melting point somewhere around 18°C (65°F). Why does that matter? Well, first, it's not so cold that it hurts. Second, you don't need a freezer; a cool place like a basement floor will make it refreeze.
And best of all, the high melting point means it will melt slowly at room temperature, so the phase transition lasts a long time—hours instead of minutes—and it will cool you off during this whole time. Put this stuff in the lining of a blanket and voilà! Pretty cool, right?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Subjects, schools and gender – what the latest A-level data shows
Subjects, schools and gender – what the latest A-level data shows

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Subjects, schools and gender – what the latest A-level data shows

Subjects, schools and gender – what the latest A-level data shows Business studies and physics are booming, while entries for French and German have sunk to a record low, this year's A-level results show. There is also evidence that the gap in performance between private and state schools is narrowing, but there remains a sharp gender imbalance among key subjects. Here the PA news agency takes a look at some of the long-term trends in the latest exam data. – Most popular subjects: What's up and what's down? While there was no change this year in the top choices for A-levels, with maths, psychology, biology and chemistry once again occupying the first four spots, there were big changes further down the chart. Business studies appears in the top five for the first time, up from sixth place in 2024. The subject has gained steadily in popularity in recent years, rising from 13th in the rankings in 2015 to 10th in 2020, eighth in 2022, then climbing one place in each successive year. Last year's fifth most popular subject, history, has dropped to seventh place, while physics has leaped from ninth to sixth. It is the first time since at least 2000 – the earliest available archive data – that no arts or humanities subjects have appeared in the top five. As in previous years, the top subject choices vary by gender. For boys, the most popular A-levels this year were maths, physics, economics, chemistry and business studies; for girls, it was psychology, biology, maths, chemistry and sociology. – French resumes its decline The number of French A-level entries has resumed its long-term decline, more than reversing last year's unexpected rise and suggesting the long-term future of the subject is grim. There were 6,858 entries in 2025, down from 7,544 in 2024 and the lowest figure since current data began. Entries have fallen 34% in the past 10 years and 53% in the last two decades. German has also resumed its descent after a small increase in 2024, with just 2,224 entries this year, down year on year from 2,431 and another new low. Entries for German have dropped 45% in the past decade and 62% since 2005. The one piece of positive news for the 'big three' foreign languages is a slight rise in entries for Spanish, with 8,325 in 2025, up from 8,238 in 2024, though below the recent peak of 9,139 in 2021. Among the smaller modern languages, the most popular were Chinese (1,624 entries, down from 1,643 in 2024) and Russian (1,118, up from 1,044). – State v private gap narrows The gap between the proportion of A-level entries at private schools receiving top grades and those at state schools has narrowed slightly. Some 48.5% of entries at independent schools – including city training colleges – were awarded A or A* this year, compared with 25.4% of entries at state-funded schools – a gap of 23.1 percentage points. This is down from 23.9 points last year, when the figures were 48.6% for independent schools and 24.7% for state schools. But it is larger than in the pre-pandemic year of 2019, when the gap stood at 21.3 points (43.9% for independent schools, 22.6% for state schools). During the pandemic the gap widened considerably, peaking at 30.0 points in 2021. – Gender imbalance persists Computing recorded the biggest gender imbalance towards males for the sixth year in a row, with boys making up 81% of entries and girls 19% – a slight narrowing on last year, when the figures were 83% and 17%. Physics (76% boys, 24% girls), accounting (73% and 27%) and further maths (also 73% and 27%) were the other subjects skewed most heavily towards males. The biggest imbalance towards females was in the subject of health and social care, as has been the case each year since 2021. In the double award for this subject, girls made up 96% of entries and boys just 4%, while in the single award the figures were 89% and 11%. Performing/expressive arts (92% girls, 8% boys) and English literature (80% girls, 20% boys) were other subjects with predominantly female entries.

IBM, Google claim quantum computers are almost here after major breakthroughs: ‘It doesn't feel like a dream anymore'
IBM, Google claim quantum computers are almost here after major breakthroughs: ‘It doesn't feel like a dream anymore'

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

IBM, Google claim quantum computers are almost here after major breakthroughs: ‘It doesn't feel like a dream anymore'

The decades-long quest to create a practical quantum computer is accelerating as major tech companies say they are closing in on designs that could scale from small lab experiments to full working systems within just a few years. IBM laid out a detailed plan for a large-scale machine in June, filling in gaps from earlier concepts and declaring it was on track to build one by the end of the decade. 'It doesn't feel like a dream anymore,' Jay Gambetta, head of IBM's quantum initiative, told Financial Times. 'I really do feel like we've cracked the code and we'll be able to build this machine by the end of the decade.' Google, which cleared one of the toughest technical obstacles late last year, says it is also confident it can produce an industrial-scale system within that time frame, while Amazon Web Services cautions that it could still take 15 to 30 years before such machines are truly useful. Quantum computing is a new kind of computing that doesn't just think in 0s and 1s like today's computers. Instead, it uses qubits — tiny quantum bits — that can be 0, 1, or both at the same time. This lets quantum computers explore many possibilities at once and find answers to certain complex problems much faster than normal computers. Quantum computing could speed up the discovery of new drugs and treatments, make artificial intelligence systems faster and more capable and improve the accuracy of market predictions and fraud detection in finance. It could also dramatically improve efficiency in areas like traffic routing, shipping, energy grids and supply chains while driving green innovation by helping design better batteries, cleaner energy systems and more sustainable technologies. But scaling them up from fewer than 200 qubits — the quantum version of a computing bit — to over 1 million will require overcoming formidable engineering challenges. Qubits are inherently unstable, maintaining their special quantum states for only fractions of a second, and adding more of them can create interference that scrambles calculations. Even if the fundamental physics problems are solved, the industry still faces the task of industrializing quantum technology. This means building chips that can house large numbers of qubits, and developing much bigger refrigeration units to keep the systems at near absolute zero. Systems using superconducting qubits, like those from IBM and Google, have made some of the fastest progress but require extreme cooling and are difficult to control. Meanwhile, some companies are betting on radically new qubit designs. Amazon and Microsoft claim to have harnessed a new state of matter to produce more reliable components, although these are still in early development. 'Just because it's hard, doesn't mean it can't be done,' Mark Horvath, an analyst at Gartner, told FT.

AI And The Future Of Work: Andrew Yang's Caution Vs. Labor's Optimism
AI And The Future Of Work: Andrew Yang's Caution Vs. Labor's Optimism

Forbes

time34 minutes ago

  • Forbes

AI And The Future Of Work: Andrew Yang's Caution Vs. Labor's Optimism

Andrew Yang, technology policy advocate and former presidential candidate, has been sounding alarms about automation's impact for years. At the Ai4 conference in Las Vegas, he was interviewed by Nancy Scola on his views of AI and universal basic income, while at another session, Taylor Stockton, Chief Innovation Officer at the U.S. Department of Labor shared the administration's plans to deal with AI and workforce disruption. The two offered sharply different takes on how artificial intelligence is reshaping the workforce, and what should be done about it. While Yang urges caution on AI-accelerated job disruption, Stockton says those predictions are missing the bigger story. Both see AI reshaping the labor market. They just disagree on what's needed to support the changing labor market. Yang: The Displacement Is Already Happening Yang doesn't speak in hypotheticals. He says CEOs have told him directly they've frozen hiring and started layoffs because AI tools are now doing work once assigned to humans. That shift isn't theoretical. It's already showing up in revised job numbers. From May to July, the bulk of new jobs came from healthcare, an industry still difficult to automate. Other sectors are seeing a slow drain. In his words, a 'tidal wave' is rolling through the economy while Washington stands 'inert or unresponsive.' He expects millions in call centers, retail, and food service to be hit, along with white-collar professionals who assumed they were safe. 'Anyone who thinks that the white-collar blood bath is nonsense is going to be wrong,' he said, warning it may only take months for skeptics to see the scale. The human cost, Yang added, doesn't always make headlines. 'If you're a 50-year-old executive who has lost a job, that's not a really sympathetic narrative to the population at large,' he noted. 'But that's a real impact for the family, and then you multiply that times 100,000 and we have a real problem.' His solution is to share the gains. If AI drives GDP per capita from $82,000 into six figures, part of that should reach households directly. He points to universal basic income and expanded child tax credits as ways to keep people afloat during upheaval. For Yang, it's not just about paychecks. Once the link between effort and reward breaks, he says, people stop trying. Younger generations, he warns, are already showing drops in conscientiousness and agreeableness. Some of that, he fears, can't be reversed. US Department of Labor: AI as an Engine for Opportunity Stockton's starting point is different. He doesn't buy into visions of empty offices and shuttered plants. 'The fear of mass job displacement is deeply overstated,' he says. History shows that major technology shifts, from mechanized farming to the Internet, ended with more jobs, not fewer. AI, in his telling, is following a similar pattern. He points to roles emerging right now such as AI prompt engineers and governance analysts, many of which don't require a traditional degree. In healthcare, AI is producing clinical notes so physicians can spend more time with patients. On factory floors and construction sites, sensors catch hazards before they become accidents. The Department of Labor's plan hinges on agility, tracking AI's impact on jobs in real time, using that data to adjust policy, and running pilot programs for rapid retraining. Stockton wants apprenticeships to become a core path into careers, targeting one million active placements in critical fields such as advanced manufacturing and AI infrastructure. He also wants AI literacy baked into education from K-12 to adult retraining. Stockton shared an emphasis on apprenticeships and alternatives to the traditional 4-year college education as a path to relevance in the AI-powered economy. A study he cited showed 52 percent of the Class of 2023 unemployed or underemployed a year after graduation. 'The College for All movement has failed,' he told the audience. 'A bachelor's degree no longer guarantees access to professional employment. Apprenticeships offer a faster, debt-free alternative…and combine paid job experience with training that directly maps to employer needs.' The federal approach isn't just reactive. In July, the White House released the 'America's AI Action Plan,' a 90-point blueprint under three main headings: Accelerating AI Innovation, Building American AI Infrastructure, and Leading in International AI Diplomacy and Security. It calls for streamlining permits for data centers and chip plants, strengthening the electric grid, creating regulatory sandboxes, and exporting a full-stack AI package to allies, while keeping U.S. values embedded in the technology. Stockton sees the plan as a wind at the back of his workforce push. Common Ground, Clear Differences Both Yang and Stockton agree AI's advance is fast and the pace will unsettle certain jobs. They see healthcare and other people-focused work as relatively safe for now. Both stress that while AI can handle parts of a process, people must decide what the system should aim for. Where they diverge is in the first move. Yang wants immediate income support to keep families stable while the market finds its footing. Stockton believes the priority is rapid adaptation including AI literacy, nimble training programs, and routes into new careers. Yang points to struggling college grads and laid-off mid-career workers. Stockton thinks some of those losses are more about post-pandemic corrections or strategic shifts than about AI alone. Studies fuel both arguments. McKinsey pegs the annual global productivity boost from generative AI at up to $4.4 trillion. PwC reports that jobs exposed to AI have grown 38 percent in the U.S. since the tech's arrival, though roles with less exposure have grown faster. News stories document both companies replacing whole teams with AI systems and companies using AI to amplify human work. In high-risk industries, AI has improved safety and output, which mirrors Stockton's vision in action. In customer service or routine analysis, AI is consolidating headcount, exactly what Yang warns about. What's Likely Ahead Over the next five years, productivity gains are likely to show up before job growth does. Companies that adopt AI early will push output higher without adding staff. Jobs will keep blending human skills with AI tools, making Stockton's AI literacy agenda more pressing. And if wages lag profits for too long, political pressure for income-based solutions could build quickly. Both men see high stakes. Stockton imagines a workforce ready to keep pace. Yang doubts the system can pivot fast enough. A blended strategy including training and adaptation alongside income support could prove the safest bet. Whether it's adopted may depend on whether policymakers, business leaders, and educators can keep up with the technology's acceleration. AI isn't waiting. Neither can the people whose jobs it touches.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store