
Number Of 'Trumpugees' Leaving America Continues to Rise
A week ahead of a crucial Supreme Court decision on Monday, which delivered yet another blow to the United States' transgender community, Grover Wehman-Brown was at "the bitter end of packing" ahead of their big move to Europe.
Wehman-Brown, a transgender writer and consultant, read the writing on the wall long before the country's top court threw out judicial decisions favoring trans people and sided with states that have introduced bans on youth transgender care, like Tennessee.
In the years since President Donald Trump's first mandate, Wehman-Brown had noticed that things were changing in the country. Last year, in the lead-up to the presidential election, they became sure: the U.S. was no longer a country where their non-traditional, LGBTQ+ family could thrive, or even feel welcome.
They are hardly the only people to feel that way. The past few months have seen a surge in the number of Americans looking into leaving the U.S. or seeking dual citizenship because of the political climate gripping the country, especially LGBTQ+ individuals and families.
A recent survey conducted by Harris Poll found that four in 10 U.S. adults (42 percent) have considered or plan to relocate outside the country to improve their quality of life or financial position. Among younger generations, these numbers were even higher, at 63 percent among Gen Zers and 52 percent among millennials.
Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva
One company helping Americans relocate to the Netherlands, GTFO Tours, reported a 200 percent increase in inquiries from U.S. nationals in the days following Trump's decision to deploy hundreds of National Guard troops to quell anti-deportation protests in Los Angeles last month. The company refers to them as "Trumpugees."
"I think a lot of Americans have sort of been waiting to see how things are going, but they just keep getting worse," Bethany Quinn, a relocation coach working for GTFO Tours, told Newsweek.
Since January, there has been a series of crucial "moments" that have been identified with a spike in interest among U.S. nationals to relocate abroad.
"The inauguration was one of the moments, where on the first day Trump issued 30 different executive orders that reversed 60+ years of progress that people have made," Quinn said. "And then, I think, the fact that Trump took control of the military to attack U.S. citizens [in Los Angeles] was also deeply deeply concerning."
That might have been the moment when many Americans realized that even living in a blue state couldn't keep them away from the conservative wave sweeping the country.
"I think in the past, there have been a lot of very wealthy people who have sort of moved around depending on when and where the tax laws are," Quinn said. "And I think there is probably an increase in folks doing that too now, but a lot of Americans are just looking to have a peaceful life. They just wanna live their lives and they don't want to worry about their safety. They don't wanna worry about their government collapsing."
'I Don't Want To Shrink Again'
Wehman-Brown is originally from rural Ohio, but has moved with their wife to many different cities and regions around the U.S. for the 14 years they have been together, "trying to find the right mix of things we need in our life."
That includes LGBTQ+ friendly places with strong economies and job opportunities, access to nature and greenery, a good environment to raise kids, and that are neither too hot nor too expensive.
For the past decade, they have been moving back and forth between the San Francisco Bay Area and western Massachusetts, where they lived until last week. But even these places, regarded among the most liberal in the country, did not offer Wehman-Brown's family the safety and stability they were seeking.
"I have been working in social justice communications and tracking the news very closely, both in terms of housing costs and housing unaffordability and the increasingly fraying social net. And I was seeing that crisis continue to get worse and worse," Wehman-Brown told Newsweek.
"I was also working for an organization tracking and responding to white supremacy; and as I was tracking the rise of the right, I started talking very seriously with my wife about considering making life elsewhere."
Grover Wehman-Brown (inset). Main: Wehman-Brown's family during a visit to the Netherlands ahead of their move from the United States.
Grover Wehman-Brown (inset). Main: Wehman-Brown's family during a visit to the Netherlands ahead of their move from the United States.
Grover Wehman-Brown/EPLi
Wehman-Brown became increasingly aware that LGBTQ+ people in the U.S. were facing a political and legal backlash. "I found myself becoming more and more isolated again as I was assessing increased risk," they said.
"I'm trans and I'm visibly gender non-conforming and I grew up in the 90s in rural Ohio and experienced a lot of violence, people running me off the roads, job discrimination, people slamming me into lockers, people threatening to kill me or assault me for being in a straight bar," they said.
"That kind of constant threat and vigilance is what I came out into, and it feels like we've returned to a time where some of those tensions are present again in my life," they said, even though they were living "in one of the most liberal and queer-affirming states in our country."
Wehman-Brown decided they didn't want to "shrink" again, and they wanted their kids, aged 10 and 12, to live the best lives possible.
"They are at a very specific time in their lives, where what happens in the next 10 years is going to set the stage for their life," they said.
Making Life Elsewhere
About three weeks into the second Trump administration, when Elon Musk started mass layoffs and cuts at federal agencies, Wehman-Brown and their wife decided to move their family to the Netherlands.
"I had gone to the Netherlands once 15 years ago, and I really liked the short amount of time I spent there, so I was like, 'this is really a lovely place where everybody seems busy and purposeful, but cooperating well together and things are running smoothly,'" they said.
Free health insurance, well-funded schools and the widespread use of English in Dutch society sealed the deal. However, despite numerous perks to look forward to, it has been challenging to take the step to leave the U.S., potentially for good.
"Emotionally, it's just been very hard to unwind the connections and community relationships we've built here," Wehman-Brown said.
"And I also love the land we live on, our house. It's sad to walk away from caring for it," they added.
"Logistically, we were pretty worried about finding a house, because we've heard it's been really challenging," they said.
But working with a company that helps expats find housing in the Netherlands, Wehman-Brown and their family have found a "really great apartment" to rent, which also allowed them to get a Dutch-American Friendship Treaty (DAFT) visa.
This visa, aimed at American entrepreneurs, "is one of the easiest ways for Americans to move to Europe," Quinn said. "A lot of other countries have start-up visas, but they tend to have higher capital requirements, and they also are pickier about what kind of industry you can work in," they added.
"But in the Netherlands, you can really do pretty much any kind of freelancing. I know a guy who sells brownies at the market and has a very successful business," they said.
Wehman-Brown hopes to continue working in writing and consulting, while their kids have luckily found a spot in an international school in the Netherlands. Despite their disillusionment with how things are going in the U.S., Wehman-Brown has not given up on the country entirely yet.
"I still believe that this country is full of mostly amazing, brave, creative people who ultimately want to live peacefully together," they said. "And I'm hopeful that the U.S. in 15 or 20 years might be a place where I want to spend large chunks of my life again."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

4 minutes ago
Trump admin live updates: Trump, Schumer trade barbs over Senate nominations
The Senate voted on some of Trump's nominations before the August recess. 2:17 The Senate on Saturday considered some of President Donald Trump's nominations before the August recess. Earlier this week, Trump issued an executive order slapping tariffs on many of America's trading partners but the new duties are set to go into effect in seven days. Trump also continues to face questions over his administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files and his relationship with the accused sex trafficker. Latest headlines: 3 minutes ago Johnson makes last-minute visit to Israel 57 minutes ago Greer suggests Aug. 12 tariff deadline for China could slide 1 hour and 37 minutes ago Texas state House set to consider new congressional maps on Monday Here's how the news is developing. 46 Updates Jul 28, 2025, 10:00 AM EDT Trump says he is 'allowed' to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, but it's 'inappropriate' to discuss When asked by reporters if he would pardon Ghislaine Maxwell -- the convicted associate of deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein -- President Donald Trump said he is "allowed to give her a pardon" but "nobody's approached me with it." "Nobody's asked me about it. Right now, it would be inappropriate to talk about it," Trump said on Monday. He said he hasn't been "overly interested" in the Epstein files, and called the 'whole thing a hoax' in regard to whether his name is in the files. Jul 28, 2025, 9:56 AM EDT Starmer says he has a 'very good relationship' with Trump British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he has a "very good personal relationship" with President Donald Trump, emphasizing that the United Kingdom and the United States have "always stood together." In terms of best interests for the two countries, Starmer added that he and Trump have a "huge amount of common ground." Trump says he is 'not interested in talking' to Putin President Donald Trump said he has "always gotten along" with Russian President Vladimir Putin, but on Monday, he said he is "not interested in talking" to him. "Russia could be so rich right now. But instead, they spend everything on war. I really thought this was going to end. Every time I think it's going to end, he kills people," Trump said. Earlier on Monday, Trump said he would reduce the 50-day window for Russia to agree to a peace deal with Ukraine. Jul 28, 2025, 9:37 AM EDT Trump says Powell 'has to' cut interest rates While meeting British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, President Donald Trump said Fed Chair Jerome Powell "has to" cut interest rates. "He should cut. A smart person should cut," Trump said. This comes after Trump visited the Federal Reserve on Thursday, repeating calls for lower interest rates while standing alongside Powell.


New York Post
5 minutes ago
- New York Post
Hochul warns that ‘pathetic' Stefanik is just Trump lemming
Gov. Kathy Hochul on Sunday blasted 'pathetic' GOP potential election foe Elise Stefanik as someone who would give President Trump nearly unfettered power over the state if governor. Hochul, a Democrat, warned that the president, who grew up in New York, has his sights set on helping a Republican become governor. 'If a Republican gets elected as governor against me, think about the power that Donald Trump will have over everything in the state, including the city,' Hochul warned on ABC 7's 'Up Close with Bill Ritter. 'That's what should give people great pause,' she said. The governor seemed amused that Trump appeared to intervene in New York GOP politics to encourage Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) not to run against her. 4 Gov. Kathy Hochul on Sunday argued that her expected GOP rival will be a puppet for President Trump. Hans Pennink 4 Upstate GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik has been a fierce critic of Hochul's performance. Getty Images She also swiped at Stefanik, an upstate congresswoman who is widely expected to throw her hat into the 2026 gubernatorial ring, accusing her of playing rough and tumble politics. Last week, in the wake of the deadly Midtown massacre in which a sicko fatally gunned down four people, including an NYPD officer, Stefanik spotlighted a 2020 social-media post from Democratic Socialist mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani who said the NYPD is 'racist, anti-queer & a major threat to public safety.' 'Flashback : Kathy Hochul's very own Commie Mamdani A disgrace and truly unfit to be Mayor of NYC,' Stefanik wrote in the post. 4 The Midtown massacre gunman carried his rifle in plain view before Monday's heinous attack. Obtained by NY Post Hochul fired back Sunday, 'It's pathetic and especially in the time when we're a city that's in mourning, to be taking cheap shots and trying to infer that he had something to do with this,' the governor swiped. 'I mean, come on.' While Hochul is the favorite heading into 2026, Republicans have overperformed in several state elections in recent years. In 2022, for example, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin lost to Hochul by about 6.4 percentage points. Hochul also re-upped her well-worn push to ban so-called 'assault rifles' and noted how the gunman trekked down from Nevada to unleash upon innocent people in New York City. 'Why do we even allow these weapons of mass destruction to be sold anywhere in America? Other countries have completely banned them,' the governor said. 'Why can't Congress and the president step up and say, 'This is it, no more?' ' The gunman, who died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound, carried an M4 rifle while marching into the building to unleash fire, according to the cops. Hochul argued it takes 'political courage' to enact gun control and appealed to Trump. 4 President Trump has helped clear a path for Elise Stefanik to apparently run for governor in his home state, New York. AP 'I'd be willing to make the case,' she said. 'And you know how important this is. You never know what's going to be a breakthrough. 'This is President Trump's hometown. He knows these streets. He knows these buildings. And so does anyone who might understand the incredible vulnerability that people and they're going to their jobs every single day in Midtown.'


The Hill
5 minutes ago
- The Hill
How foreign policy could crash Republican midterm prospects
This summer's MAGA revolt over the Epstein Files has challenged the longstanding assumption that President Trump has an unbreakable bond with the Republican base. Trump loyalists from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) to Steve Bannon to Tucker Carlson have recently criticized the president not just on the Epstein disclosures but also on Medicaid cuts in the 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' Yet new polling shows that another issue could cost Trump crucial support and substantially lower his standing among independent voters whom Republicans need in order to win future elections. While Republicans largely rallied around Trump following the June 22 bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, recent YouGov polling commissioned by the Center for Economic and Policy Research demonstrates substantial political risks for the president and his party if he supports an expanded war involving Israel and Iran. When respondents consider the economic consequences of a broader conflict, as well as their trust in the justifications offered for involvement in such a war, Trump faces overwhelming dissent among Independents. These voters are about one-third of the electorate and currently about evenly split between Democrat-leaning and Republican-leaning. If an issue becomes important in an election and the Independent voters move strongly in one direction, that can swing the election. A clear majority of voters — 65 percent — reported they would hold Trump responsible if gasoline prices rose to $6 a gallon as a result of expanded U.S. military involvement. Among Independent voters, this sentiment rises to 69 percent. Further, when informed that economists would expect a significant rise in mortgage interest rates to result from an expanded conflict — potentially adding over $100,000 in lifetime payments for a typical home — 72 percent oppose U.S. military involvement, with two thirds of those expressing 'strong' opposition. Most polls treat foreign policy decisions as isolated events, simply asking whether voters support or oppose military action. But major interventions do not occur in isolation — they can impact gas prices, mortgage rates and overall confidence in politicians and their political parties. A true measure of public sentiment on expanded military involvement must account for these potential and even likely consequences, which often drive voter attitudes more than abstract strategic considerations. Donald Trump rose politically by highlighting Americans' declining trust in institutions, from government regulators and health experts to traditional media. But the polling shows that Trump himself faces serious accusations from his base of breaching public trust and caving to wealthy donors advocating unconditional support for Israeli policies that millions of voters view as wrong and dangerous. Sixty-three percent of respondents expressed concern that Trump's decision to attack Iran could be influenced by major campaign donors, a concern particularly strong among Independents. And two-thirds of voters — including nearly one-third of Republicans — feel that intervening in an Israel-Iran conflict contradicts Trump's core 'America First' promise. In June, Tucker Carlson accused Trump of being 'complicit in the act of war' following Israel's attacks on Iran, and influential MAGA voices like Steve Bannon echoed similar skepticism. Yet commentary alone is unlikely to shift conservative public opinion. People respond to tangible impacts in their lives. If Trump once again follows Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu into major military action in the Middle East, the consequences may extend beyond geopolitics and significantly impact the president's party in next year's midterm elections. Consider some midterm math. On all five questions related to U.S. intervention in Iran, voters who identify as Republican or Democrat overwhelmingly aligned with their respective parties. For example, by a ratio of 88 percent to 12 percent, Democrats said they did not believe that 'Trump is getting involved in this war for the sake of U.S. national security.' Republicans held the opposite view, with 77 percent believing national security was the reason and 23 percent not believing it. This leaves Independent voters as potentially decisive. According to current polling data, Independents are evenly divided between 'Republican-leaning' and 'Democrat-leaning,' generally indicating close national elections. However, on questions regarding U.S. participation in a war against Iran, Independents are solidly opposed, by a margin of two to one. This leads to an overall result of 63-37 saying that they do not believe that U.S. involvement in such a war is 'for the sake of national security.' While the June war between Israel and Iran appears to be over, another Israeli attack in the near future remains quite possible. Should Trump decide to join such an operation before the next election, it could significantly undermine Republican chances of retaining Congress. Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. He is the author of 'Failed: What the 'Experts' Got Wrong About the Global Economy (Oxford University Press). Justin Talbot Zorn is a senior adviser at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a Truman National Security Fellow, and served as legislative director for three members of Congress.