logo
West End beats Broadway in theatre revival. What's the secret?

West End beats Broadway in theatre revival. What's the secret?

Yahoo15-03-2025

By Barbara Lewis and Muvija M
LONDON (Reuters) - London's West End theatres are enjoying record ticket sales and drawing millions of pounds of investment as a pandemic-era tax break that will become permanent next month persuades some producers to choose Britain over Broadway.
A record 17.1 million people attended West End shows in 2023, and a similar number in 2024, according to the Society of London Theatre (SOLT). That compares to 15.3 million in 2019, before COVID-19 shut entertainment venues globally.
Audiences in New York are meanwhile down by nearly a fifth from pre-pandemic levels, figures from the Broadway League show.
Producers cite lower costs in London than on Broadway, which has a comparable but less generous tax scheme, as well as the attraction of one of the world's richest theatre traditions.
"I will absolutely say, and I say this both with knowledge and with love, the UK is the best place in the world to make and to see theatre," SOLT board member Patrick Gracey said.
Gracey, who has produced West End and Broadway shows, led efforts to persuade Britain's Labour government to maintain the scheme introduced by its Conservative predecessor, which offers tax relief for touring shows of up to 45% of production costs.
Finance minister Rachel Reeves confirmed in October the tax break would stay rather than progressively decrease from April.
"The costs themselves are lower (in London), but the tax incentive makes it a no-brainer," said New York-based accountant and theatre specialist Scott Bartolf, who works with producers in both cities.
GREATER VARIETY AND BIGGER PRODUCTIONS
Theatre industry bodies elsewhere are calling for similar initiatives, including in Gracey's native Australia.
"(The tax scheme) has been widely recognised as a game-changer for the UK theatre industry," Live Performance Australia said in an emailed statement. "It has made the UK a much more compelling proposition for investors in theatre."
Henny Finch, joint CEO of London's Donmar Warehouse, said the tax break was a lifeline without which the theatre would have to reduce the size and number of new productions.
And because it applies to touring productions, theatres outside the British capital, many of which have seen their funding dwindle with public spending cuts, also get a boost.
Steve Mannix of the Mercury Theatre in Colchester, southeast England, said the tax break helped provide "an essential source of income for regional theatres".
New York's tax incentives, in place since 2021, allow Broadway theatre companies to claim tax credits for up to 25% of production expenses, capped at $3 million per production.
The scheme, worth a total $300 million, is due to expire in September, but under New York budget proposals could be extended for two years with a top-up of $100 million.
Even so, producing a musical on Broadway costs 3-5 times as much as in the West End, according to an analysis by Gordon Cox, contributing theatre editor for Variety.
The Broadway League has more than 700 members, including producers, theatre owners and operators. It estimates 12.3 million admissions in the 2023-2024 season, which ended in May last year, 16.8% less than the record hit in 2018-2019.
That partly reflects the slower return of audiences from the outskirts of New York, said the League's president Jason Laks. Ticket prices are also far higher than in London.
Laks also saw Britain's tax scheme as a lure.
"Our Broadway theatres can't move, but the productions can, and I get that, and so a producer may choose to produce or open a show in the UK because of the favourable economic tax credits that they have over there," he said.
ECONOMIC RATIONALE
Britain's creative industries are among those identified by Reeves as potential motors for economic growth, and the 126-billion-pound sector has shown a faster recovery from the pandemic compared to the wider economy.
Research by SOLT has found that for every pound spent on a theatre ticket, 1.40 pounds is spent in the local area, including in bars and restaurants.
Harder to measure is the West End's contribution to Britain's soft power: it attracts tens of thousands of visitors each day to its 39 theatres in the heart of London. Broadway has 41 theatres.
Arts minister Chris Bryant told Reuters via email the tax relief would help to ensure "top quality productions" across the country and especially in London.
"London is the world's premier destination for theatre-goers, drawing in hundreds of thousands of people every year, and making a significant contribution to the capital's economy," he said.
LOCAL VERSUS NATIONAL
Data obtained by Reuters via a freedom of information request show London productions received 42 million pounds of 66 million paid in theatre tax relief in the financial year 2021-22. The rest of the southeast received 6 million pounds, and other regions between 1 million and 2 million pounds apiece.
But provincial theatres have also benefited.
Producer Jamie Wilson said the tax scheme had influenced his decision to trial musical "The Devil Wears Prada" on audiences in Plymouth, southwest England, before its London opening.
Leeds Playhouse, whose "In Dreams" premiered in the northern English city then moved to Toronto, said the tax break "has enabled us to continue to co-produce shows ... which otherwise would have been threatened by the current economic pressures".
Regional theatres nevertheless "desperately need more money to support the infrastructure", Wilson said. A SOLT report published in July 2024 found 40% of 65 theatre venues surveyed across the UK would become too unsafe to use within five years without a capital injection.
With producers saying there are not enough West End venues to meet demand, those theatres could get a boost if more Broadway productions head to Britain.
"They won't be able to find a West End theatre, so they will be looking for a regional theatre to open those musicals, which is great ... for the regions," Wilson said.
($1 = 0.7788 pounds)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RAYE Gets Candid About Amy Winehouse Comparisons Ahead of New Music with Mark Ronson: 'I'm in Awe of Her' (Exclusive)
RAYE Gets Candid About Amy Winehouse Comparisons Ahead of New Music with Mark Ronson: 'I'm in Awe of Her' (Exclusive)

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

RAYE Gets Candid About Amy Winehouse Comparisons Ahead of New Music with Mark Ronson: 'I'm in Awe of Her' (Exclusive)

RAYE is set to release two collaborations with Mark Ronson: "Suzanne" on Friday, June 13 and "Grandma Calls the Boy Bad News" on the F1 soundtrack later this month She tells PEOPLE about approaching the collaboration after garnering comparisons to Amy Winehouse, with whom Ronson worked closely "I'm in awe of her. We all are, and we miss her," says RAYE of WinehouseWorking with Mark Ronson on new music is a big deal for RAYE. The "Escapism" singer-songwriter, 27, is gearing up to release two songs with the 9-time Grammy-winning producer, 49, this month, and the pairing feels like a natural fit given how often RAYE gets compared to Ronson's late frequent collaborator, Amy Winehouse. Both soulful vocalists with musical knowledge beyond their years, RAYE and Winehouse certainly have some artistic similarities. She's a huge fan of the "Rehab" artist — but getting in the studio with Ronson, who worked prominently on Winehouse's Back to Black album, was a bit daunting at first. "Honestly, I'm not gonna lie, I actually was quite nervous and scared to work with him," RAYE tells PEOPLE backstage at the Governors Ball Music Festival in New York City, noting that she's seen both positive and negative comments on her sonic resemblance to Winehouse. "I just do want to say that I know I can never, ever, ever, ever, ever attempt to replace or imitate Amy. I'm in awe of her. We all are, and we miss her," explains the "Oscar Winning Tears" performer, whose eclectic music incorporates elements of pop, jazz, R&B, hip-hop, dance and electronic genres — all tied together by her powerhouse vocals. Before immediately jumping at the opportunity to work with Ronson, RAYE thought about what listeners might think. "It's quite a tough thing to even allow myself to create so freely with him," she says. "But I really just wanted to be like, 'Do you know what? I just need to forget what anyone else is gonna say about this.' I absolutely love this producer. I've always wanted to work with this producer since I was a little girl." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. RAYE and Ronson's first collaboration, "Suzanne," is out this Friday, June 13. They'll release another song, "Grandma Calls the Boy Bad News," on the soundtrack for the upcoming F1 film later this month. "We've made music together that I'm so proud of, and I love," she says. "I play it, and it makes me happy and joyful, so I'm proud." Beyond the upcoming releases, RAYE is working on the follow-up project to her debut album, 2023's My 21st Century Blues. She previously faced a setback when her car — featuring a journal of handwritten new lyrics — was stolen at the end of 2023, but now she's back in creative mode. There's another element of the process, however, that she's struggling with. "I don't have an album title," she admits. "I'm like, 'What is it gonna be called?' It's stressing me out right now, I can't lie, because I've got the music starting to really come there." "I just don't know what this album's gonna be called," adds RAYE. "In my humble opinion, My 21st Century Blues is such a fire album title, and I can't hand in an album title that's less good than that." Read the original article on People

Brad Pitt Reveals "F1" Film Was His Dream Experience
Brad Pitt Reveals "F1" Film Was His Dream Experience

Buzz Feed

timean hour ago

  • Buzz Feed

Brad Pitt Reveals "F1" Film Was His Dream Experience

Motorsport fans are about to get a high-octane dose of cinema with F1 — the upcoming highly-anticipated film that's already being hailed as one of the most ambitious racing movies ever made. Directed by Top Gun: Maverick's Joseph Kosinski, F1 stars Brad Pitt as Sonny Hayes, a retired Formula 1 driver who returns to the sport to race for a fictional team called APXGP (pronounced 'apex'). He's joined by British actor Damson Idris, who plays rookie teammate Joshua Pearce. And while the team and characters may be fictional, almost everything else about the film is very, very real. While kicking off the press tour in Mexico City, Pitt called the project 'a dream come true', revealing that he'd been trying to make a racing film for decades. 'For me, it was just a no-brainer,' he said. 'When Joe had this audacious plan to invent us in the racing season, to put us actually in the cars, it was just a dream come true.' Kosinski's vision was clear from the beginning: to make the most immersive and realistic racing film ever made. That meant no faking it — Pitt and Idris had to actually learn how to drive. 'We started this training and we ended up getting to drive for basically two years in the making of this,' Pitt explained. 'By the end of it, Damps and I — I say we were quite tasty… as drivers.' That realism extended beyond just learning how to drive. Pitt and the production team — with major help from seven-time world champion and executive producer Lewis Hamilton — gained access to the inner workings of F1, even sitting in on drivers' meetings to ensure authenticity. Pitt said it was important to earn the respect of the sport and its athletes. 'We had to go in and just try to earn their trust, let them know how much we respect the sport, how much we want to get it right, and how much we want to include them,' he shared. The cars themselves posed another challenge. Pitt described the Formula 1 steering wheel as 'extreme', filled with too many buttons to count. 'The idea of being in the car and dealing with these forces, G-forces, the physics of it all, is just something you cannot fake,' he said. 'It is incredible what these guys can do.' He added that the precision and speed required from F1 drivers was 'staggering', especially considering how tightly packed the grid is during races. 'The idea that these guys can go around a four-mile track and all be within one second of each other — it's awesome,' Pitt said. 'It's a religion for me. The downforce, the way these cars stick — there's nothing I can compare it to.' A huge part of the film's authenticity comes from Hamilton's input — both creatively and technically. 'We would have meetings with him — some 12-hour meetings — as we developed the story and the script,' Pitt said. 'A lot of him is in the film, certainly in the way the story ends. Even in post, he would tell us things like, 'You're in the wrong gear at Turn 6', or, 'Make sure you add the reverb when you go down the straight'. His knowledge is unfathomable.' F1 hits Australian cinemas on June 26, 2025 and judging by the scale, the access, and the passion behind it, it's set to become a defining moment in motorsport cinema.

Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, US appeals court rules
Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, US appeals court rules

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, US appeals court rules

By Dietrich Knauth and Nate Raymond (Reuters) -A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on grounds that Trump had exceeded his authority by imposing them. The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. means Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his "Liberation Day" tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and Mexico. The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the tariffs to remain in place while the appeals play out. The Federal Circuit said the litigation raised issues of "exceptional importance" warranting the court to take the rare step of having the 11-member court hear the appeal, rather than have it go before a three-judge panel first. It scheduled arguments for July 31. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the U.S. Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term pause. The ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties and the other by 12 U.S. states. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S. or freeze their assets. Trump is the first U.S. president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at U.S. borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all U.S. trading partners imposed in April were a response to the U.S. trade deficit. The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long U.S. practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, D.C., also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store