Sliding oil prices have reopened the door to Russian crude
Earlier this year, the Western energy industry began to calculate how it might tiptoe back into Russia if there is peace in Ukraine.
One group isn't hanging around. A cadre of Greek shipping magnates has sent a stream of ships to Russian ports in recent months, stepping back into the fold as the go-to distributors of Moscow's crude to the world.
The jump back into the lucrative trade follows a fall in oil prices this year. Handling Russian oil is legal under Western sanctions if the price is below $60 a barrel.
The Greek moves also reflect signs of a rapprochement between the U.S. and Moscow soon after President Trump's return to office. But Trump's recent criticism of President Vladimir Putin—including a warning of further sanctions—shows why many other Western companies have been cautious about rebuilding their businesses in Russia.
Greek shipping companies collectively control the world's biggest tanker fleet, giving them a powerful role in the oil market and access in Washington. Recent meetings with Trump administration officials left some Greek shipping chiefs more confident they won't be targeted for handling Russian exports, people familiar with the discussions said.
'Everyone's feeling like it's safe to go back," said Michelle Bockmann, a London-based maritime analyst. 'The mood music is Iran no, but Russia yes."
A State Department spokesperson said the U.S. wanted to give diplomacy a chance and that there were 'a range of measures available" if Trump 'determines that Putin is not interested in negotiating."
Greek ships moved 26% of Russian crude shuttled from Baltic and Black Sea ports in April and 30% in March, more than double their market share in 2024, according to Vortexa, a firm that tracks ships.
Most other European and U.S. tanker companies have avoided ferrying Russian oil. They see risks in operating in a country at war with an ally of Western governments and whose economy is under a patchwork of sanctions.
Greek tanker owners mostly stopped ferrying Russian crude in late 2023 when oil prices rose above the $60 cap, a measure introduced to limit Moscow's profit from a key export. That left most of Russia's crude to be handled by the 'shadow fleet" of aging tankers with obscure owners, which was assembled by Moscow to sidestep the sanctions.
Greece is a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the European Union, and agreed to enforce measures to isolate Russia's economy after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
But this year, a surge in Saudi output, coupled with concerns that the trade war will hurt the world economy, has dragged the price of benchmark Brent crude down 14% to about $64 a barrel. Russian barrels fetch closer to $50, reflecting the discount attached to the country's oil since the start of the war.
At the same time, oil traders have called on Greek tankers to replace dozens of shadow-fleet ships that have effectively been put out of action by new Western sanctions.
Among the tanker owners sending their ships back to Russian ports are Ioannis Alafouzos, Andreas Martinos and George Prokopiou, according to shipping data and industry executives.
The Alafouzos family controls more than a dozen tankers through Okeanis Eco Tankers, which is listed in New York. At the request of its Scandinavian investors, the company stopped handling Russian oil in 2023, soon after the sanctions took effect.
But the family kept moving Russian petroleum with tankers it owns privately. Mostly named after islands in the Cyclades, the ships have picked up Russian crude nine times this year, according to the shipping data.
In all, Alafouzos-controlled vessels have called at Russian ports about 140 times since the war started, the data show. Several dozen of the trips were to transport Kazakh crude exported from Russia's Black Sea coast.
Alafouzos is a prominent figure in Greece, where he owns the soccer club Panathinaikos as well as a newspaper and TV station among other assets. His son, Aristidis Alafouzos, is Okeanis's chief executive.
Alafouzos Jr. told analysts last year that sailing in the Black Sea was no riskier than the Arabian Gulf. 'And the AG is somewhere where everyone goes," he said.
Prokopiou's Dynacom Tankers has loaded Russian crude six times this year, shipping data show. Martinos's Minerva, meanwhile, sent its first tanker to pick up Russian crude in more than a year this March. Another Minerva ship is due to load in the Baltic port of Primorsk within days.
Both companies have also moved Russian products, including diesel and Kazakh crude, from Russian ports dozens of times this year.
Spokespeople for Dynacom and Minerva didn't respond to requests for comment.
Tanker owners can demand higher freight rates to charter their ships to traders moving Russian oil than for mainstream voyages. The premium partly reflects the legal and compliance costs of working in Russia. There is also less competition as many Western tanker companies consider Russia off limits.
To be sure, not all Greek tanker owners think freight rates are high enough to compensate for the risks associated with ferrying Russian crude.
One of them is George Economou, who controls a fleet through TMS Tankers. Economou moved huge amounts of Russian crude after the price cap first took effect in late 2022 but is sitting out the current rush, according to people familiar with the matter.
TMS is instead limiting its Russian business to a type of fuel oil.
'It's a fluid market situation," said Basil Karatzas, chief executive of U.S.-based Karatzas Marine Advisors. 'Many shipowners have a different risk assessment."
Write to Joe Wallace at joe.wallace@wsj.com and Costas Paris at costas.paris@wsj.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Moments after Trump applauds X as free speech haven, platform melts down in one of its worst outages yet
Right after Donald Trump praised X as a free speech app, it stopped working for many users. People couldn't post or see new updates. The app later said it was fixed, but this was the third major issue in a week. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs Just after Donald Trump called X a " free speech platform ", the app completely broke down. People using X said the app was only showing posts from 24 hours ago. Some users saw the login welcome screen, even if they were already logged in. Lots of people couldn't see their timelines or share any posts, according to problem began around 3:45 p.m. ET, and many users started reporting issues on Downdetector, a site that tracks app problems. At the peak, around 4:15 p.m., there were 25,000 outage reports from users around the world. X's own Developer Platform said it was a "site-wide outage" and that some parts of the API were not working. By 6:15 p.m., the number of complaints dropped, but hundreds of users were still having issues.X later said that "all systems are operational", meaning the app should be back to normal. The outage happened shortly after Elon Musk left his role as head of the fictional Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), at the White House, according to The Daily Beast a press conference, Trump praised Musk for his work and called him someone who has given "service to America without comparison". Trump also said Musk runs 'the largest free speech platform on the internet.' This wasn't the first time X went down recently. It was actually the third outage in just over a week, as per earlier outage happened on Monday because of a fire at a U.S. data center owned by X. Another outage last week was blamed by Musk on a "massive cyber attack". Since Musk bought X in 2022, crashes and tech problems have gone up a lot. This is partly because new tech workers at X were messing with the X API, which helps other software work with X, as per The Guardian that Musk left the White House, people might think he'd have more time to fix problems at his companies, like X. But Trump joked that "Elon's really not leaving", hinting he'll still be around in some way. No official reason has been given yet for what caused this huge crash on X, as per The Daily Beast reason is unclear, but it happened shortly after his praise and during ongoing tech this was the third major crash in a week, one happened because of a fire, and another was blamed on a cyberattack.


Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Who pressured India into ceasefire?: Congress demands answers on Operation Sindoor, terms of peace with Pakistan
NEW DELHI: As the fog surrounding Operation Sindoor begins to lift, the Congress on Saturday launched a direct attack on the Modi government, demanding clarity on the terms of the ceasefire with Pakistan following India's retaliatory strikes for the Pahalgam terror attack. Senior leaders Mallikarjun Kharge and Pawan Khera accused the government of 'misleading the nation' and questioned whether it had demanded the extradition of most-wanted terrorists from Islamabad. What were the conditions of peace with Pakistan? At a press conference in Delhi, Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera raised sharp questions: 'When will the terrorists behind the Pahalgam attack be caught? Who procured the RDX for Pulwama? Under what pressure was the ceasefire with Pakistan finalised?' Khera asked if India had used the moment to demand the extradition of Hafiz Saeed, Masood Azhar, and Dawood Ibrahim. 'We want strong answers to strong questions,' he said, adding, 'Was justice served to the women who lost their husbands in Pahalgam?' India had launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and PoJK in response to the attack in Pahalgam. The strikes were followed by Pakistani retaliation, which was successfully repelled by India, including airbase assaults. Kharge: 'Trump's claim contradicts Shimla Agreement' Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge added weight to the criticism, alleging that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was using the military operation for electoral gain. Referring to an interview given by India's Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) in Singapore, Kharge said, 'Important questions must be asked now that the fog of war is clearing.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trading CFD dengan Teknologi dan Kecepatan Lebih Baik IC Markets Mendaftar Undo He cited the CDS's remarks acknowledging that Indian Air Force jets were briefly grounded, recalibrated, and then redeployed within two days. 'We salute their courage. But a strategic review is urgently needed,' Kharge said. He reiterated Congress's demand for a comprehensive review of India's defence preparedness by an independent expert committee, similar to the post-Kargil assessment. Kharge also flagged former US President Donald Trump's repeated assertions that he helped broker the ceasefire. 'This is a direct affront to the Shimla Agreement. Instead of clarifying Trump's claims, PM Modi is on a campaign spree, taking credit for the bravery of our armed forces while remaining silent on the terms of the ceasefire.' Congress demands special Parliament session Calling the matter too serious to ignore, Kharge demanded that the government immediately convene a special session of Parliament to discuss Operation Sindoor and its aftermath. 'Are India and Pakistan being hyphenated again? What were the real terms behind the ceasefire announced by our Foreign Secretary on the 10th, just hours after Trump's tweet?' he asked. '140 crore patriotic Indians deserve to know this,' Kharge concluded.


Indian Express
44 minutes ago
- Indian Express
UN nuclear watchdog flags Iran's growing uranium stockpile amid talks with US
Iran has significantly increased its stockpile of uranium enriched close to weapons-grade levels, a confidential report by the UN's nuclear watchdog revealed Saturday, urging Tehran to urgently change course and cooperate with ongoing investigations. The report, seen by the Associated Press, comes amid several rounds of quiet talks between Tehran and Washington over a possible nuclear deal that US President Donald Trump is trying to finalise. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), as of May 17, Iran has accumulated 408.6 kilograms of uranium enriched up to 60 per cent—a 50 per cent rise from February's 274.8 kilograms. This level is just a technical step away from the 90 per cent enrichment needed for nuclear weapons. The IAEA warned that Iran is now 'the only non-nuclear-weapon state to produce such material'— a development it described as a 'serious concern.' The agency noted that it is enough for about 10 nuclear weapons if further refined as 'approximately 42 kilograms of 60 per cent enriched uranium' is enough, if further enriched, to produce one atomic bomb. Though Iran insists its nuclear programme is peaceful, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi has previously warned that the country now possesses enough enriched uranium to potentially make 'several' nuclear bombs. Meanwhile, US intelligence assessments say Iran has not yet launched a weapons programme but has 'undertaken activities that better position it to produce a nuclear device, if it chooses to do so,' AP reported. Grossi on Saturday reiterated his 'urgent call upon Iran to cooperate fully and effectively' with the IAEA's years-long investigation into unexplained uranium traces found at several undeclared sites. A second 22-page report, also shared confidentially with member states, criticised Iran's cooperation as 'less than satisfactory' and cited continuing concerns over locations where uranium particles were detected. These include Turquzabad, Varamin, and Marivan—sites the IAEA believes were linked to a 'structured nuclear programme' carried out until the early 2000s using undeclared nuclear material. One of these locations, Turquzabad, was first revealed in 2018 by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who described it as a 'clandestine nuclear warehouse' disguised as a rug-cleaning facility. Iran denied the claim, but IAEA inspectors later found manmade uranium particles there. A fourth site, Lavisan-Shian, which was demolished by Iran after 2003, remains part of the IAEA's probe despite never being inspected. The report could prompt further action from European countries, potentially including the reimposition of snapback sanctions lifted under the 2015 nuclear deal, which is set to formally expire in October. Iranian officials have downplayed expectations of a deal. On Thursday, senior figures in Tehran said any agreement must involve the full lifting of sanctions and permit continued nuclear development. Their remarks followed President Trump's comment that he had urged Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to delay any strike on Iran, giving Washington more time to pursue diplomacy. Trump said on Friday that he still believes a deal is possible in the 'not too distant future.' 'They don't want to be blown up. They would rather make a deal,' he said of Iran. He added, 'That would be a great thing that we could have a deal without bombs being dropped all over the Middle East.' However, Israel on Saturday accused Iran of being 'totally determined' to acquire nuclear weapons. 'Such a level of enrichment exists only in countries actively pursuing nuclear weapons and has no civilian justification whatsoever,' said a statement from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office. In response, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reiterated Tehran's opposition to nuclear arms. 'If the issue is nuclear weapons, yes, we too consider this type of weapon unacceptable,' Araghchi, who is also Iran's lead negotiator in the US-Iran talks, said in a televised speech, as per BBC. 'We agree with them on this issue.' (With inputs from Associated Press, BBC, Reuters)