INMerge Innovation Summit 2025 to Gather Global Tech Leaders and Investors in Baku
BAKU, AZERBAIJAN / ACCESS Newswire / July 23, 2025 / The INMerge Innovation Summit, the region's leading event for innovation, entrepreneurship, and technology leadership, is set to return on September 29-30, 2025, at the Baku Convention Center. Now in its 5th edition, the Summit has become a flagship initiative of PASHA Holding, Azerbaijan's largest diversified business group, and a key force advancing regional and international cooperation in the innovation space.
This year, INMerge will once again bring together more than 1,000 founders, investors, and tech leaders from over 50 countries for two days of high-level dialogue, practical insights, and strategic networking. The 2025 program features headline speakers including Ed Catmull (Co-founder of Pixar and former President of Pixar Animation Studios), Zack Kass (AI Futurist and Former Head of Go-To-Market at OpenAI), Marc Randolph (Co-founder and first CEO of Netflix), Narmin Farzaliyeva (Head of Marketing, Amazon Europe), and Baris Aldanmaz (Head of Business, Türkiye and Central & Southern Asia, TikTok), alongside a broader roster of global experts shaping the future of technology and business.
A Platform for Regional and Global Collaboration
More than a conference, INMerge designed to accelerate the flow of ideas, partnerships, and investment across multiple innovation ecosystems. Its mission is to strengthen collaboration between government, industry, and the startup community, with a clear focus on practical outcomes and long-term impact.
'INMerge Innovation Summit has grown into a cornerstone event in our innovation agenda-designed to foster meaningful connections, inspire bold thinking, and accelerate the exchange of ideas across borders. Our ambition is to see INMerge evolve into a leading force within the innovation ecosystem of this part of the world, connecting talent, capital, and vision to shape the future of business and technology.' - Tugra Musayeva, Head of Innovations at PASHA Holding
Investor Matchmaking & INBattle Startup Competition
INMerge 2025 features dedicated investor matchmaking sessions, offering selected startups the opportunity to connect directly with global investors and corporate partners.
At the heart of the startup program is the INBattle Startup Competition, where founders present their ventures to a panel of seasoned investors and experts. With a $30,000 prize pool co-invested by PASHA Holding, INBattle provides a launchpad for promising ideas ready to scale across regional and international markets.
Keynotes, Panels, and Executive Conversations
The Summit will host a curated program of keynote talks, thematic panels, and closed-door sessions focused on the evolving landscape of innovation, investment, and regional integration.
The full agenda and speaker lineup for INMerge 2025 will be announced in the coming weeks. Attendees can expect two days of high-level discussions, strategic networking, and access to one of the region's most influential innovation platforms.
For registration and partnership inquiries, visit www.inmerge.az.
About PASHA Holding
Established in 2006, PASHA Holding LLC is a diversified investment company managing a portfolio of businesses across banking, insurance, construction, information technology, property development, and tourism. The Holding operates through both controlling interests in its subsidiaries-collectively known as PASHA Group-and select minority private equity investments. Built on a foundation of sound governance and strategic investment, PASHA Holding plays a key role in shaping the business landscape of Azerbaijan and beyond.
Media Contact:
Xenia Sofronova
[email protected]
SOURCE: INMerge Innovation Summit
press release
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Technical Program Manager Interview Prep Course Launch - Interview Kickstart's FAANG TPM Experts Share Interview Preparation Secrets
Santa Clara, Aug. 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- As the world moves deeper into 2025, the role of Technical Program Managers has evolved from simple project coordinators to strategic leaders who drive innovation and ensure the successful delivery of complex technical initiatives. In today's rapidly changing tech landscape, companies are dealing with increasingly sophisticated projects that involve multiple teams, cutting-edge technologies, and tight deadlines. This complexity has made Technical Program Managers more valuable than ever before, as they serve as the crucial bridge between technical teams and business objectives. Recognizing this growing demand and the specialized skills required, Interview Kickstart has developed a comprehensive Technical Program Manager Course that prepares professionals for these strategic leadership roles at top technology companies. To learn more about the course, visit: The modern Technical Program Manager needs to understand not just project management principles, but also the technical details of the systems they're managing. They work closely with engineering teams to design scalable architectures, coordinate releases across multiple products, and ensure that technical decisions align with business goals. This dual expertise in both technical and management domains makes them essential for companies trying to move fast while maintaining quality and reliability. In 2025, Technical Program Managers are expected to have a deep understanding of system design principles, especially when it comes to building scalable solutions. They need to know how different components of a system work together, understand the trade-offs between different architectural choices, and be able to communicate these concepts clearly to both technical and non-technical stakeholders. This technical depth allows them to make informed decisions about project priorities, resource allocation, and timeline planning. Given these evolving requirements, traditional project management training is no longer sufficient for aspiring Technical Program Managers. They need comprehensive preparation that combines technical knowledge with program management skills, which is exactly what Interview Kickstart's Technical Program Manager Course provides. The course is specifically designed to prepare professionals for the demands of modern TPM roles at top technology companies. The course spans 15 to 17 weeks and provides a thorough foundation in both technical concepts and program management principles. Students dive deep into data structures and algorithms, which helps them understand the technical challenges their engineering teams face. This knowledge is crucial when making decisions about project scope, timeline estimation, and resource planning. The scalable system design modules teach students how to think about building systems that can handle growth, which is essential knowledge for any TPM working on products that need to scale. What makes this course particularly valuable is its industry-relevant curriculum that includes 4 to 6 weeks of training on specific technical domains. Students can choose to focus on areas like data engineering, machine learning, data science, frontend development, backend systems, site reliability engineering, test engineering, Android development, iOS development, and more. This specialization allows future TPMs to develop deeper expertise in the areas most relevant to their career goals, making them more effective in their roles. The course requires a significant commitment of 10 to 12 hours per week, which includes live sessions where students interact with instructors and peers, practice solving coding problems, and participate in live doubt-solving sessions. This hands-on approach ensures that students don't just learn theory but also develop practical skills they can apply immediately in their work. The 1:1 personalized coaching from FAANG professionals provides invaluable guidance from people who have successfully navigated TPM roles at the world's most demanding tech companies. One of the most valuable aspects of the program is the 15 mock interviews with FAANG+ interviewers. These practice sessions simulate real interview conditions and help students understand what top companies are looking for in Technical Program Manager candidates. The feedback from these sessions is incredibly detailed and helps students identify areas for improvement before they face actual interviews. In a job market where Technical Program Managers are in high demand but companies have very specific requirements, having comprehensive preparation makes all the difference between landing the target role and continuing to search. For more information, visit: About Interview Kickstart Interview Kickstart, founded in 2014, is a trusted upskilling platform designed to help tech professionals secure roles at FAANG and other leading tech companies. With over 20,000 success stories, it has become a go-to resource for career advancement in the tech industry. The platform offers a flexible learning experience with live classes and over 100,000 hours of on-demand video lessons. This ensures learners have the tools they need to dive deep into technical concepts and refine their skills on their own schedule. Additionally, 1:1 coaching sessions provide personalized support in areas like resume building and LinkedIn optimization, enhancing each learner's professional profile. ### For more information about Interview Kickstart, contact the company here:Interview KickstartBurhanuddin Pithawala+1 (209) 899-1463aiml@ Patrick Henry Dr Bldg 25, Santa Clara, CA 95054, United States CONTACT: Burhanuddin Pithawala
Forbes
9 minutes ago
- Forbes
How Smart Leaders Use Constraints to Drive Strategic Innovation
Recently, reports began circulating that Nvidia was developing a detuned version of its next-generation Blackwell chip for China. The new chip would be slower on paper, lower priced, and engineered to comply with U.S. export limits. This wasn't a retreat—it was a redesign. Rather than waiting for the wall to move, the company chose to build right up to the wall. Nvidia's decision captures something essential about leadership under pressure. When reality draws a hard line, the instinct is to negotiate for more room. Another quarter. Another budget cycle. Another exemption. The alternative is to treat the line itself as part of the brief. Nvidia's response is less about salvaging a market than about reframing the problem: take the rule, freeze it, and optimize around it faster than anyone else can respond. The limit becomes an input. The boundary becomes an edge to cut against. Most organizations don't work this way. Most teams treat constraints as temporary inconveniences. They lobby around them, litigate them, or wait them out. Yet the firms that keep outmaneuvering their peers treat constraint as a forcing function for clarity, speed, and differentiation. Leadership is difficult even in the best of times. And these aren't the best of times. Markets are unsettled, geopolitics shows up inside product roadmaps, and investors ask for discipline and outsized growth at the same time. Teams are stretched. Wanting more room is understandable. The task is to find clarity inside the room that actually exists. The Power of Constraints Psychologists and designers have long understood the power of limits. If you were asked to name as many white objects as you could, many of us would stop after five or six: clouds, snow, paper, teeth... But narrow the frame to white objects in the refrigerator and people's lists grow quickly: milk, eggs, yogurt, cauliflower, sour cream, leftover rice... The boundary doesn't reduce imagination; it directs attention and sharpens perception. Amazon's two‑pizza team rule was introduced as that kind of structural discipline. Teams were capped at the size that could be fed with two pizzas, not as a gimmick but as a principle. It was a deliberate constraint on group size that encouraged accountability, clear ownership, and speed. With a small enough team, there's little room for ambiguity. Decisions are made closer to the work. Apple, often discussed as a company of boundless ambition, operates with an unusual level of internal constraint. Consider the number of SKUs and the narrowness of the design language. With artificial intelligence, privacy is prioritized, on-device processing is preferred, and partnerships are introduced cautiously and selectively. A peculiar paradox now defines strategy work. Many leaders face too much of everything: too many tools, data, priorities, and meetings to align too many stakeholders. In that context, additional resources often slow the system down. The surface area of indecision expands, and momentum leaks away. Seen through that lens, Nvidia's move is instructive. Instead of lamenting what can't be built or sold, the question shifts to what must be built to win inside the boundary. Constraint ceases to be the bottleneck. It becomes the clarifier. Reacting to Constraints Most businesses face three kinds of constraints. There are imposed constraints: regulators, geopolitics, macro shocks, activist boards. Nvidia's China strategy sits here. The boundary is hard, public, and rarely negotiable on the timelines that matter to product and go‑to‑market teams. There are structural constraints: legacy tech stacks, capital availability, brittle supply chains, outdated incentive systems, operating‑model debt, and talent gaps. These constraints are rarely acknowledged because they feel like the water the organization swims in every day. But there are chosen constraints, too: limits leaders set deliberately to produce sharper strategy and faster execution. Amazon's team size rule and Apple's SKU discipline fall into this category. The distinction matters. An imposed constraint demands adaptation. A structural constraint demands redesign. A chosen constraint demands leadership. When it's no longer plausible that more is the answer, it becomes easier to see that less often can be. Operating Inside a Boundary Many companies have intricate criteria for funding projects and almost none for killing them. Under a constraint, the kill criteria are built into the brief from the outset. The team knows what would cause them to stop. That clarity accelerates learning. Of course, constraints amplify accountability only if it's obvious who holds the pen. If a project has five sponsors and ten reviewers, the constraint turns into politics. If it has one owner, it turns into progress. And make no mistake: the narrative matters. There's a psychological cost when constraint is framed as austerity. People feel punished and hide their ambitions. Framed as concentration, the same constraint invites professionalism rather than martyrdom. Trust builds when leaders say no to expansion, but then protect the teams working inside the smaller mandate. Constraints work best when people understand the game they're playing. Telling an organization to do more with less generates anxiety. Explaining where the line sits, why it exists, and how the team intends to win inside it generates focus. Budget becomes a design instrument when it's fixed early and defended. Teams turn time into a forcing function when they announce a release date before work begins. When Netflix decided to start developing its own content, it didn't launch into it with a sprawling studio and Game of Thrones budgets. It began with House of Cards, a show free of expensive CGI dragons. Still, the company had a focused, data‑informed thesis of what would appeal to its audience. Working inside limitations led to sharper choices and a stronger debut. Getting Started with Constraints Leadership under constraint tends to follow a recognizable sequence. The boundary conditions are frozen. The rule, the regulator, the budget, or the headcount is treated as an input rather than a grievance. The design brief then makes explicit what must be true to win inside that line, what has to ship, and what will be deliberately cut. Ownership is concentrated in a small, fast team rather than diluted across a large coalition. Decisions are time‑boxed so that momentum is protected. The constraint is narrated so the organization understands why the wall exists, what it's teaching, and how the team intends to win inside it. One initiative that truly matters can be selected and treated with the same clarity Nvidia is applying to its China strategy. The central constraint can be written in a single sentence—regulation, budget, timeline, talent, compute, attention—and held fixed. That constraint can then be translated into a specification: what has to be true to succeed inside it, and what will be cut. A small team can be appointed, given no more than sixty days, and asked to deliver something concrete rather than something perfect. To be sure, not every constraint produces clarity. Some are arbitrary, performative, or so severe that they starve the work rather than focus it. The task is to decide which boundaries are worth accepting, which must be redesigned, and which should be chosen on purpose—and to move faster once that difference is clear. The Deeper Challenge for Leaders In a zero-interest-rate environment, conversations tended to revolve around removing limits: more funding, more hiring, more time. All of that signaled ambition, yet it often spread attention thinner. But there's another way to view the game. A small, focused mission signals that the work matters and that the organization trusts the team to move with speed and clarity. Constraint, in this reading, isn't a penalty. It's a commitment to coherence. When leaders embrace constraint, they force prioritization. They grant permission to be decisive. They encourage a kind of moral clarity: this is the thing being built, for these people, at this moment. Everything else is noise. That clarity shows up in shorter feedback loops, in smaller teams making bigger calls, and in an organization that tells a consistent story about what matters. So the brief can be frozen. The timebox can be set. The constraint can be named. The final step is to help the team see that the work isn't about operating with less, but about discovering what's essential and executing against it with speed and care. The future won't be won by the company with the most room to run. It will be won by the companies that know how to find the wall and run up against it. To use it not as a limit, but as
Bloomberg
39 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Uber Shares Decline Even As Gross Bookings Top Expectations
Uber Technologies Inc.'s upbeat forecast and better-than-expected quarterly gross bookings failed to boost the rideshare and food-delivery company Wednesday, with shares handing back some of their impressive year-to-date gains. Wolfe Research Managing Director of Global Internet Shweta Khajuria has more on the story. (Source: Bloomberg)
