
Menendez brothers resentencing: Los Angeles DA asks for delay before high-stakes hearing
District Attorney Nathan Hochman's office said in the filing that the resentencing hearings, set for Thursday and Friday, should be put on hold until the court obtains copies of comprehensive risk assessments for the brothers that were completed by state prison and parole officers, NBC News reported.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom's office told Fox News in response that the comprehensive risk assessment is ongoing and will be completed on June 13, 2025. Per California legal regulations, one component of it has been released to the involved parties for their review 60 days before the clemency hearing and is subject to correction, his office said. Newsom's office said it notified Judge Michael Jesic of the status of this report, which is not a stand-alone risk assessment, and offered to share it with the court if he requests it.
It was not immediately clear if the DA's filing would affect Thursday's hearing, which is scheduled to start at 9:30 a.m. local time.
The Menendez brothers' discussed their push for freedom, decades after their parents' brutal murders, in a recent interview with TMZ.
In the feature, "TMZ Presents: The Menendez Brothers: The Prison Interview," both brothers were interviewed and discussed how prison has changed them and how they envision life outside of prison walls.
"We're very hopeful, we've done what we can with the time we've had," Lyle Menendez said in the interview.
"Hope for the future is kind of a new thing for us," he continued.
The scenes then show a young Erik and Lyle and the grisly crime scene they left behind in their Beverly Hills mansion in 1989 after killing their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez.
"It was almost the perfect murder," said former Beverly Hills Police Detective Tom Linehan.
Now, more than 35 years later, the fate of the brothers lies in the hands of a Los Angeles County judge, who legal experts say will have to answer two simple questions: Do Erik and Lyle pose an unreasonable risk to the public, and does he believe they have rehabilitated?
Linehan unequivocally said he would not trust them and what they did was the "worst, most heinous murder case" he has ever seen.
"They are two of the most skilled liars and their notary is what sets them apart from other inmates in similar situations," Linehan said. "If things weren't going their way, they could do this again."
Hochman has also said he does not agree with the resentencing but is prepared to move forward.
Hochman has said that it is up to the court to factor in whether the "lack of acceptance of responsibility for their murderous actions" is enough to decide whether the Menendez brothers pose an unreasonable risk of danger to the community.
"Though this pathway to resentencing has been offered to the Menendez brothers, they have chosen to stubbornly remain hunkered down in their over 30-year-old bunker of lies, deceit and denials," Hochman said.
However, family and other supporters of the Menendez brothers argued they have paid their dues and have changed.
A former inmate, rapper X-Rated, who served 18 years with Lyle and Erik, said they do not belong in prison, even claiming his neighbor's dog was more dangerous than the Menendez brothers.
He added that they have helped him and many others get out of prison and rehabilitate in society, showing selflessness, knowing they had "no chance" of getting out while they were helping others.
GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB
"The fact they did all this without getting anything in return says a lot," the rapper said.
Lyle said that he and Erik have developed a peace and patience that most people would not understand.
Erik admitted they were "spoiled brats" and that he suffered from severe insecurity issues. He added that he wants to be an advocate for other sexually abused victims, saying that "no one should have to be trapped" like he was.
Both Lyle and Erik Menendez have come forward in documentaries and on social media claiming their father sexually abused them, offering a different narrative of the killings than the story their attorneys told in the 1990s.
They maintain they killed their parents in self-defense.
Their first trial ended in a mistrial, when jurors could not agree on their fate. After a second trial in the mid-1990s, in which some of their evidence about the alleged sexual abuse was excluded, jurors agreed with prosecutors that their motive was greed.
If the judge decides to resentence the Menendez brothers, it will then be up to the state parole board to consider their release.
SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTER
Because they were under 26 years old at the time of the murders, under current California law, new sentences of 50 years to life would immediately make them eligible for a parole hearing.
They are already scheduled to appear before the board on June 13 as part of a comprehensive risk assessment report ordered by Newsom, who is considering the brothers' clemency request – a separate potential path out of prison.
Stepheny Price is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business. She covers topics including missing persons, homicides, national crime cases, illegal immigration, and more. Story tips and ideas can be sent to stepheny.price@fox.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Jeanine Pirro targets guns and immigration in D.C.
Jeanine Pirro got Senate confirmation to be U.S. Attorney for D.C., and she's zeroing in on criminal defendants' immigration status and illegal firearms. Why it matters: A longtime Trump ally is stepping into one of the highest-profile prosecutor roles — the two go back decades in Republican New York circles, per the Washington Post. Catch up fast: Pirro, a former judge and Fox News host, got the interim job after Ed Martin's nomination blew up, with some Republican senators unable to stomach his leniency toward Jan. 6 rioters. The Senate confirmed Pirro with a 50-45 vote on Saturday. Pirro served as a judge in Westchester County, New York, and then later as its district attorney in the 1990s and 2000s. "Because she was so good, they drafted her into show business," said President Trump, marveling at her ratings as co-host of Fox's "The Five." In weekly videos, media-savvy Pirro recites criminal cases with the cadence of a news anchor, announcing"here's what we tackled this week," including an "armed robbery spree on Capitol Hill." "We will not only aggressively prosecute violent felons who illegally possess firearms, but also those who carry illegal firearms into our district," she said last Friday. Zoom in: The unique nature of Pirro's position — which prosecutes both federal offenses and street-level local crime in D.C. — gives her power to scrutinize the immigration status of a wide swath of people who are in her office's custody. Her office prosecutes more than 7,000 people annually in D.C. Superior Court, per the Washington Post. "In line with President Trump's directive to 'Make D.C. Safe and Beautiful,' my office will determine every defendant's legal status as soon as a matter is brought here," Pirro announced last week. Between the lines: The police union, which has been at loggerheads with the D.C. Council over some of its progressive police reform, congratulated Pirro on her confirmation.


CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
Pam Bondi orders grand jury probe of Obama administration review of 2016 election
Attorney General Pam Bondi has directed Justice Department prosecutors to launch a grand jury investigation of whether Obama administration officials committed federal crimes when they assessed Russia's actions during the 2016 election, a senior Trump administration official said. National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard claimed at a White House news conference last month that top Obama administration officials carried out a "treasonous conspiracy" against Donald Trump. Gabbard said she was sending criminal referrals to the Justice Department. A former senior Justice Department official condemned the move as "a dangerous political stunt." And a former senior national security official pointed out that multiple past reviews, including ones conducted by Republicans, found no such crimes. "There's no logical, rational basis for this," said the official, who asked not to be named. The senior Trump administration official said that there is no exact timetable for when the grand jury will meet and that it could take months for the proceeding to begin. Fox News first reported Bondi's letter. The official said a letter signed by Bondi instructs an unnamed federal prosecutor to begin presenting evidence to a grand jury to secure potential federal indictments. But the letter does not say what the charges would be, whom the grand jury will investigate or where it will meet. A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment. Democratic lawmakers have accused the administration of seeking to distract attention from the Jeffrey Epstein case. Conservative media and influencers have criticized how Trump, Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel have handled the case and demanded the release of more documents. Democrats contend that Gabbard's talk of a treasonous Obama-era plot is patently false and a diversion. A 2020 bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee review contradicted the idea that there was a conspiracy by Obama administration officials against Trump, finding significant evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election. Then-Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., the acting chair of the committee at the time, signed off on the report. The committee found no evidence of "collusion" between the Trump campaign and Russia, Rubio said in a statement at the time. But he added: "What the Committee did find however is very troubling. We found irrefutable evidence of Russian meddling." The plans for a grand jury investigation are the latest in a series of actions by the Trump administration apparently designed to rewrite the history of the 2016 election. Democrats say Trump is improperly using the levers of government to seek retribution against his political rivals and exercise sweeping powers. Trump and his supporters have long claimed that intelligence and law enforcement officials sought to undermine his first term by overstating Russia's interference in the 2016 election and investigating Trump's aides for potential collusion with Moscow. They have accused former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan of using the probes to damage Trump. A lawyer for Comey did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Comey and Brennan, who is a paid contributor to NBC News and MSNBC, have denied wrongdoing. The intelligence community's analysis of the 2016 election and subsequent government investigations failed to satisfy the far-right and far-left sides of the American political divide. A probe by special counsel Robert Mueller found that Russia intervened in 2016 to undercut Hillary Clinton. But it did not find evidence that the Trump team colluded with the Kremlin, as some voices on the left had suggested. At the same time, the special counsel Trump appointed in his first term, John Durham, disappointed far-right activists with his three-year investigation. Durham found no criminal conspiracy among Obama administration officials to fabricate intelligence about Russia's actions in 2016. He also filed no charges against the intelligence officers who oversaw a 2017 assessment that found Russia had tried to skew the election outcome in Trump's favor. But Trump, as president and candidate, has depicted former President Barack Obama and other former administration officials in prison garb and called for their imprisonments. Last month, he posted an artificial intelligence video of himself smiling as a fake depiction of Obama is arrested by FBI agents in the Oval Office and taken to jail.


Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Inside The Idaho Murders: Part 3
In May of 2023, a grand jury indicted Bryan Kohberger on four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. The following month, prosecutors announced their intent to seek the death penalty against Kohberger. Over the next two years, the prosecution and the defense engaged in a back-and-forth battle over alibis, evidence, and other matters. But on July 2nd, 2025, Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty to the charges against him, a decision that spared him the death penalty. Criminal Defense Attorney and FOX News Contributor Joshua Ritter provides his legal analysis of the lengthy courtroom battle. Follow Emily on Instagram: @realemilycompagno If you have a story or topic we should feature on the FOX True Crime Podcast, send us an email at: truecrimepodcast@ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit