
New IRA had planned earlier attack on detective John Caldwell, court told
Police have uncovered what they believe was a failed attempt to murder detective John Caldwell in the weeks before he was seriously wounded in a gun attack by dissident republicans, a court has heard.
The details were revealed as two men appeared at Dungannon Magistrates' Court on charges linked to the attempted murder of the senior Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) officer in Omagh, Co Tyrone, on February 22 2023.
Mr Caldwell was shot several times while he was off duty and with his young son, packing up after coaching a youth football team.
The attack was claimed by the New IRA.
Forensic officers at the scene of the shooting in 2023 (Liam McBurney/PA)
Mr Caldwell has since retired from the PSNI on medical grounds.
A number of people have previously appeared in court charged with offences linked to the shooting attack.
Caoimhin Murphy, 25, from Altowen Park, Coalisland, and Liam Robinson, 45, of Ardstewart, Stewartstown, are both charged with preparation of terrorist attacks and perverting the course of justice.
Both men appeared in court on Wednesday via videolink from Musgrave Street police station in Belfast.
Neither responded when asked if they understood the charges.
A detective sergeant told the court he could connect both men to the offences.
After the court was told there was a challenge to the connections, a prosecution barrister said the investigation into the shooting of Mr Caldwell had been a 'complex, circumstantial case,' pointing out that several people had already been charged.
She said: 'When the original individuals were charged that was subsequent to the attempt on DCI Caldwell on the 22nd February of 2023.
'Investigations obviously continued and through those investigations it was ascertained the case is there was a prior attempt on the 1st February 2023.'
She said of the first attempt on the detective's life an Audi and a Volkswagen vehicle had been used and when he was later shot, two Ford Fiestas had been used.
She told the court the case against Murphy is that it is alleged he had moved a vehicle involved in the first failed attack, moved a vehicle involved in the later attack and had been involved in burning a car after the detective was shot.
The case against Robinson is that it is alleged he assisted in the recovery of a vehicle used in the first attempt, moved a vehicle in the second attempt and assisted in burning a car.
The detective sergeant told the court: 'The investigation has identified what is believed to have been a failed attempt to attack DCI Caldwell on the 1st February.
'On this occasion DCI Caldwell wasn't at Youth Sport, which would have been his usual routine.
'At that time a Volkswagen Tiguan on false registration plates was observed on CCTV entering the youth sports site in similar fashion to the movements of the Fiesta number one on the 22nd, the evening of the attempt.'
The officer laid out elements of the police investigation which stretched over events on a number of dates in February 2023 and included phone and CCTV evidence and what police believe are suspects taking place in 'walk and talk' conversations.
He said the shooting of the detective is believed to have been 'a joint venture between a number of active service units', including Belfast and Tyrone New IRA.
The officer told the court that on the night Mr Caldwell was shot, he had arrived at football training earlier than usual.
He said police believe the attack had been planned to take place when he arrived at the sports complex, but was delayed because of his early arrival.
He added: 'He was not shot until 8 o'clock that night, an hour and a half after what we would suggest was the planned attack.'
Murphy's defence solicitor Peter Corrigan told the court there was 'not one iota' of surveillance evidence linking his client to any of the vehicles used in the shooting.
Robinson's solicitor Gavin Booth said it was not part of the prosecution case that his client had taken part in the shooting of Mr Caldwell and had been in Coalisland at the time of the attack.
The prosecuting barrister said it was a 'circumstantial case in its truest form'.
She said: 'One strand may be weaker than the other, that is what a circumstantial case is.
'But when they are all layered on top of the other the consequences of those meetings, the prosecution says that there is sufficient material before the court to connect both accused to the charges.'
Mr Corrigan: 'It is a circumstantial case, but it is a circumstantial case which fails at connection because there are alternative explanations.
'It is all based on speculation and conjecture and does not close alternative explanations.'
John Caldwell's life is still under threat, a court was told (David Young/PA)
District Judge Rafferty said he was satisfied both could be connected to the offences.
Police objected to a bail application for Robinson, with the detective sergeant stating it is believed he has a 'trusted role' in the IRA.
He added: 'The New IRA have made a claim of responsibility for this terrorist attack.
'In addition to trying to justify the shooting of DCI Caldwell as a senior Crown forces member, the group further claimed that Irish Republican Army intelligence are now in possession of security information regarding the out of bounds movement of Crown force personnel.'
He added: 'The threat to the life of John Caldwell continues to this day with his name appearing on a bonfire in the Creggan estate as we speak along with cross-hairs indicating he continues to be a target.'
He said the threat posed by the group was 'real and imminent'.
The judge denied bail to Robinson.
Both defendants were remanded in custody.
Robinson will appear in court again on September 2 and Murphy will appear on August 20 to make a bail application.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sunday World
3 hours ago
- Sunday World
Lithuanian men appear in court after four cannabis factories discovered
The court how the raids were the culmination of four months of police surveillance The Organised Crime Branch recovered a quantity of suspected cannabis from a property in Tandragee on Wednesday (PSNI/PA) A wide-spread police surveillance operation resulted in five Lithuanian men appearing in court today charged in relation to a number of cannabis factories. While all five appeared at Ballymena Magistrates Court, the charges disclose the growing operations were as far apart as Coleraine and Banbridge and the court heard the police were trawling through the defendants' mobile phones in an effort to identify further cannabis factories. The five defendants and their charges are: Ftasys Matevicius, who turns 38 today, from Castleton in Templepatrick - cultivating cannabis, dishonestly using electricity and entering the UK illegally; Nerikus Navickas, 41, Cairnhill in Coleraine - cultivating cannabis and dishonestly using electricity; Radas Vitkus, 43, Collingwood Avenue in Lurgan - cultivating cannabis, possessing Class B cannabis with intent to supply and entering the UK illegally; Paulius Micavicius, 33, Richmond Court in Newry - cultivating cannabis, dishonestly using electricity, conspiring to supply cannabis and conspiring to cultivate cannabis, all at Market Street in Tandragee; Mindaugas Syvokas, 34, Richmond Court in Newry - conspiring to cultivate cannabis at Market Street, Tandragee and conspiring to supply the Class B drug, cultivating cannabis at Seapatrick Avenue in Banbridge, dishonestly using electricity and causing criminal damage. While Matevicius and Navickas appeared in the dock, the other three appeared by video link from police custody and speaking through an interpreter, each of the men confirmed they understood the charges. Only Syvokas mounted an application for bail so accordingly District Judge Nigel Broderick remanded the other four into custody, adjourning their cases to Antrim, Coleraine and Craigavon Magistrates Courts respectively. Giving evidence to the court, a detective constable outlined how a police operation on 13 August, resulted in police searches at five different addresses in NI and uncovering four cannabis cultivation operations. The court how the raids were the culmination of four months of police surveillance. He described how the raids resulted in officers discovering more than 400 matures plants as well as 250 seedlings and that overall, police estimate the maximum street value of the hauls is £500,000. 'At three locations there were Lithuanian nationals who, on appearance, were gardeners,' said the detective. He added however, that due to evidence and police surveillance, investigators believe that Syvokas 'is part of an Organised Crime Gang involved in the cultivation of cannabis with this defendant involved at a logistical level.' The officer said while he could not divulge many aspects of the investigation, he outlined how officers recorded Syvokas at the growing operations in Templepatrick and Coleraine, driving vehicles to and from grow houses, parked in a vehicle at a store which sells hydroponic equipment and driving with his co-accused. The court heard that while exhibits from the recent seizures have been sent for examination, police forensics hit two 'fingerprint hits' for Syvokas on items seized in a cultivation operation in Banbridge last February. Objecting to bail, the detective said police had concerns that as part of an OCG, Syvokas could flee the jurisdiction and also that as police strive to identify further growing operations, his release could interfere with the investigation by alerting others who are involved or disposing of evidence. Under cross examination from defence counsel Neil Moore, the officer conceded that while it is a circumstantial case at the moment, police are awaiting forensic results. Highlighting that 'there is nothing to link him to the growing rooms' which were upstairs in all but one of the properties, the barrister submitted that bail conditions could be put in place so that Syvokas could be granted bail. District Judge Nigel Broderick said however, that he was concerned on all three statutory grounds in that there was risk further offending, a risk of absconding and a risk to the investigation being obstructed. Bail was refused and Syvokas was remanded into custody to appear at Craigavon court on 5 September.


Sunday World
3 hours ago
- Sunday World
44-year-old dies after falling from e-scooter
The man died in hospital from injuries A man has died after falling from an electronic scooter at the weekend. Police said the 44-year-old died in hospital from his injuries following the single-vehicle collision in Lisburn. A spokesperson said police received a report that a man had fallen from the vehicle at roughly 6.45pm on Saturday in the Ravernet Road area. They confirmed no other vehicle was involved. Police attended the incident (Stock Image) News in 90 Seconds - August 14th Police said officers attended the scene with other emergency services before the casualty was taken to hospital. PSNI Roads Policing Inspector Cherith Adair from the Collision Investigation Unit confirmed the man passed away from his injuries. 'Our officers are continuing to investigate the circumstances of the collision, and would like to hear from witnesses or anyone who may have captured dash-cam or other footage which could assist with our enquiries,' a PSNI spokesperson added.


Irish Post
4 hours ago
- Irish Post
Child victim of convicted online groomer Max Hollingsbee speaks out
A TEENAGER who was targeted by convicted online groomer Max Hollingsbee when she was just 15 years old has spoken out about the impact the abuse had on her. Immy, which is not her real name, is now 18 years old. Lurgan-based Hollingsbee used the so-called 'catfish' method to groom and coerce teenage girls into sending him indecent images over a period of almost two years. In May he was sentenced to five years and two months behind bars after pleading guilty to a total of 42 charges against him, They included blackmail, possessing indecent images of children, distributing indecent images of a child, sexual communication with a child, inciting a child to engage in sexual activity and unauthorised access to computer material. Including Immy, the offences involved 14 female victims in total, mostly from England, which Hollingsbee carried out when he was aged between 17 and 19. Immy was the first person to report the abuse to police, which launched an investigation uncovering the rest of his victims. She is now speaking out publicly to support a PSNI campaign which seeks to raise awareness of predators in online spaces. Max Hollingsbee (Image: PSNI) 'When I got added on Wizz from someone I didn't know personally I thought nothing of it, it is pretty normal for young people to add people from 'suggested friends' lists,' she explains. 'At the time I was a relatively awkward 15-year-old girl, I struggled to make friends and didn't have much self-confidence. 'When this good-looking guy my age showed interest in me and complimented me, I felt special. But, it went zero to 100 within one day of chatting. 'The compliments quickly turned sexual, and he suggested sending intimate images of each other. He made me feel like he would lose interest if I didn't, he promised it was only between me and him. 'Once I sent him an image, he switched. Started blackmailing and threatening to share them with my friends if I didn't send him more and do more for him.' She added: 'He had convinced me prior to the blackmailing that I should allow him to enter my snapchat account without reporting him and I did because of his grooming however he did end up sending my images to a close female friend of mine. I felt like the world was collapsing around me, I blacked out during this time and have holes in my memory. 'I ran into my mum's room and just remember collapsing into her arms and crying. I showed her what was going on and just remember crying on a ball on the floor of her room. I didn't really know what was happening or what to do. If I hadn't of told my mum, I dread to think what would have happened next.' Immy says once she told her mum what had been happening she 'never regretted it'. 'Although I was so embarrassed to show my mum I have never regretted for a second speaking out and getting help,' she admits. 'Both her and the police were incredible, not judgmental at all. By being the first of his victims to speak out, others were discovered and came forward and I feel like we prevented more children from being targeted. 'When I found out he'd been arrested, charged and then later sentenced, I felt a huge wave of relief and I was proud of myself for being brave.' The PSNI's Detective Chief Inspector Claire Gilbert, from the force's Public Protection Branch, said groomers 'operate in a very similar way, concealing their identity online pretending to be the same age as a child'. 'They use fake profile pictures, pretending to have similar interests to gain the trust of the child before steering the conversation to a sexual nature. 'Once trust in established, they use power and control to make, force, blackmail, guilt or trick a child into doing what the groomer wants. 'They may persuade a child to take part in online sexual activity including sharing explicit images and videos and livestreaming sexual acts.' She added: "Recognising the signs of online grooming can be hard as often child predators are incredibly manipulative and tell children not to talk to anyone about it. Sometimes children don't realise they've been groomed and may believe they are in a 'relationship'." DCI Gilbert explained: 'It is a crime for anyone to possess, make, distribute or show anyone an indecent image of a child under 18 years of age. "This offence can be committed by an adult or a child. It is also a crime for an adult to send a sexually explicit image of themselves to a child. 'We have specialist detectives within the Child Internet Protection Team who are dedicated to robustly investigating those who contribute to the cycle of child abuse and bringing those responsible before the courts. "We use specialist technology to examine digital devices and trace any digital interaction right back to the person, making it difficult for offenders to hide evidence from us. 'If a person is downloading, viewing or making indecent images of children, you are leaving a digital footprint and we are actively looking for you. "I would encourage anyone with concerns or information to get in contact us on 101 or 999 in an emergency.' See More: Max Hollingsbee, Northern Ireland, Online Grooming