The Trump-Musk feud shows Republicans are in a prison of their own making
President Trump has a Tesla he would like to sell to you.
That is only a minor consequence of the spectacular fallout between Donald Trump and Elon Musk in recent weeks. Their exchanges on their respective social media platforms certainly did not lack entertainment value.
Last week, there were signs of reconciliation, with Musk saying, 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far.' But that was after much damage had been done.
Among the bitter recriminations was Musk's endorsement of Trump's impeachment and his replacement with Vice President JD Vance.
He then wrote that it was 'time to drop the really big bomb. @realDonald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT.' Musk later deleted this tweet and put out his remorseful statement.
Trump, who never ignores an insult, quickly responded in kind: 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts.' Trump's threat was no idle one. The Washington Post estimates that Musk's business empire is built on a staggering $38 billion in federal contracts.
Still, the threat to his business empire caused Musk in the moment to take the gloves off. Writing on his social media platform X, Musk accused Trump of ingratitude, claiming: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election. Democrats would control the House, and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.'
It was Musk's opposition to Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax bill that had sparked his initial outburst. 'I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote to his 220 million followers on X. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.'
It wasn't just the projected $2.4 trillion deficits that Trump's legislation would create that angered Musk. It was also Trump taking direct aim at one of Musk's most prized companies, Tesla, by eliminating the tax credits contained in Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act that reduced the cost of these expensive vehicles.
But the Trump-Musk feud represents something more than pettiness between two bilious billionaires with gigantic egos. Today, Trump, Musk, the Republican Party and even Trump's supporters find themselves locked in an elaborate prison which each has helped construct.
Deconstructing this prison would be an impossible task. For example, any tearing apart of Musk's intertwining web of financial and security relationships with federal agencies poses its own security risks.
SpaceX, to take one example, received $3.8 billion in federal contracts in 2024. Ending that relationship would jeopardize the Pentagon's ability to conduct classified missions and provide support for NASA's astronauts.
Musk also has his own hold on the Republican Party. At one point, he threatened to create and fund a third party, which he dubbed 'America's Party,' that he claimed would 'represent 80 percent in the middle.' For Republicans, any third-party effort sponsored by Musk could spell the difference between victory and defeat.
But Musk represents not merely a threat to Trump but to the long-term interests of the Republican Party. As Musk wrote on X: 'Some food for thought: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years.'
For his part, Trump countered that any funds Musk might contribute to Democratic candidates would have 'serious consequences.' Still, the threat remains.
The feud also highlights the imprisonment in which congressional Republicans find themselves. While Musk is highly disliked by the general public, substantial majorities of Republican voters approve of both men. Not surprisingly, Republicans called for a truce. Rep. Beth Van Duyne (R-Texas) posted: 'WE ARE STRONGER TOGETHER!! CEASE FIRE FOR GOD'S SAKE.' Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) likened the situation to a bitter divorce 'where you're just saying, 'I really wish mommy and daddy would stop screaming.''
Ironically, Trump finds himself locked in his own form of self-imposed imprisonment. While Trump's core supporters share his grievances, no deviation can be tolerated.
For example, when Trump bragged in 2020 that his Operation Warp Speed produced a 'miracle' with the development of the COVID-19 vaccine, Trump urged his supporters to get it.
But Trump's supporters resisted. In 2021, Trump was booed (in Alabama of all places) when he urged his rallygoers to become inoculated. By 2024, Trump opposed virtually all vaccine mandates, telling his incoming Health and Human Services Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., to 'go wild' on health, a comment sure to please his most devoted supporters.
The Republican Party's acceptance of the alternative universe created for it by Trump means that any chance of executing a jail break is unlikely to succeed. Discomfort with the facts and adherence to founding principles are to be avoided at all costs.
In 1962, John F. Kennedy highlighted our uneasiness with the truth. Addressing the graduates of Yale University, Kennedy said: 'The great enemy of truth is very often not the lie — deliberate, contrived and dishonest — but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.'
He continued: 'Too often we hold fast to the cliches of our forebears. We subject all facts to a prefabricated set of interpretations. We enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.'
Trump and his acolytes have constructed a comfortable imprisonment. Any discomfort created by an electoral loss is comforted by a belief that elections are stolen. The discomfort of nominating a convicted felon is comforted by a belief that the judicial or prosecutorial system is controlled by a corrupt 'deep state.'
Any discomfort of losing the popular vote is comforted by an unwieldy electoral college that skews in the Republican Party's favor. And any discomfort elected Republicans show toward Trump in private is comforted by their continued hold on power.
John Kenneth White is a professor emeritus at the Catholic University of America. His latest book is titled 'Grand Old Unraveling: The Republican Party, Donald Trump, and the Rise of Authoritarianism.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
7 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: U.S. tells allies it won't join war unless Iran targets Americans
The Trump administration has told several Middle Eastern allies it doesn't plan to get actively involved in the war between Israel and Iran unless Iran targets Americans, two sources from countries that received that U.S. message tell Axios. The big picture: The U.S. has helped Israel intercept missiles, but made clear Israel is acting alone in attacking Iran. The U.S. message is that if Iran attacks Americans in response, it will be crossing a red line. The intrigue: The U.S. sent a similar message to the same countries about an hour between Israel launched the war last Thursday, telling them the U.S. would not participate. In both cases, the U.S. seemed to expect the countries to pass that message to Iran to discourage any retaliation against U.S. forces or interests in the region. The White House didn't respond to a request for comment. Between the lines: While Iranian leaders have accused the U.S. of complicity in Israel's war effort, and threatened for weeks to respond to any Israeli attack by targeting U.S. bases in the region, no such attacks have taken place. "The Iranians are very careful so far not to do anything that can push the U.S. to get involved," an Arab diplomat with direct knowledge of the thinking in Tehran said. Friction point: Israel has asked the Trump administration to join the war in order to eliminate Iran's nuclear program. A U.S. official told Axios on Saturday that the Trump administration was not actively considering it. U.S. officials also claimed that over the weekend, Israel had an operational window to assassinate Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, but President Trump made clear to Israel that he opposed that step. A U.S. official said that was because the Iranians haven't killed Americans — a statement Israeli officials saw as a threat to Iran that if Americans are targeted, the Trump administration could support killing Khamenei. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told ABC News on Monday that killing Khamenei would "end the war," and was still a possibility. State of play: Trump demurred Monday when asked whether the U.S. could join the war. But while the U.S. is stating in public and in private that it's not getting involved, the U.S. military is taking steps to prepare for such a contingency. The Nimitz aircraft carrier strike group is moving to the Middle East, and 28 strategic refueling planes left the U.S. on Sunday for the region. Netanyahu said in a press conference on Monday that he speaks to Trump almost every day, including on Sunday. He said he appreciates U.S. assistance in defeating Iranian attacks but stressed that President Trump will do what he thinks is best for America. "We will welcome any U.S. contribution," he said. In the ABC interview, Netanyahu said that Trump and the American people understand the need to "take a stand against evil." He said: "Look, I understand 'America First.' I don't understand 'America Dead.' That's what these people want." What to watch: Trump said on Monday during a meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney at the G7 summit that the Iranians want to talk to the U.S. about the situation. "They should have done that before. They had 60 days and on the 61st day I said, 'We don't have a deal.' Iran is not winning this war they should talk immediately before it is too late," Trump said. An Arab diplomat said the Iranians have communicated to the U.S. that they will be willing to discuss a ceasefire and resume nuclear talks after they conclude their retaliation and after Israel stops its strikes.
San Francisco Chronicle
8 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
NAACP won't invite Trump to its national convention. He will be 1st president excluded in 116 years
The NAACP announced Monday the group will not invite President Donald Trump to its national convention next month in Charlotte, North Carolina, the first time the prominent civil rights organization has opted to exclude a sitting president in its 116-year history. NAACP President Derrick Johnson announced the move at an afternoon press conference, accusing Trump of working against its mission. 'This has nothing to do with political party,' Johnson said in a statement. 'Our mission is to advance civil rights, and the current president has made clear that his mission is to eliminate civil rights.' A message to the White House seeking comment was not immediately returned. In recent months, the NAACP has filed multiple lawsuits against Trump. In April, for example, the group sued to stop the Department of Education from withholding federal money for schools that did not end diversity, equity and inclusion programs, arguing the department was prohibiting legal efforts to provide equal opportunity to Black students. NAACP officials noted that the decision was weighty in that the organization had long invited presidents with whom it disagreed. Notably, Republican President George W. Bush addressed the group's convention in July 2006, after months of criticism for his administration's handling of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, which had a disproportionate impact on Black residents in New Orleans and the Gulf Coast region. —————————————— Beaumont reported from Des Moines, Iowa. Chris Megerian contributed from Washington.
Axios
8 minutes ago
- Axios
California could get hit hardest by Trump's NASA budget cuts
NASA spends an average of $3 billion annually in California on scientific missions — the highest of any state, per data from The Planetary Society, a pro-space nonprofit. Why it matters: NASA's science efforts bear the brunt of cuts to the agency in the Trump administration's proposed budget, which would slash science funding by nearly 50% to $3.9 billion. State of play: Science represents roughly 30% of NASA's budget, supporting missions like space telescopes, robotic probes and satellites that gather data about Earth's changing climate. While not always as headline-grabbing as human spaceflight, NASA's science activity has greatly enhanced our scientific understanding of both Earth and our celestial neighborhood. Threat level: Trump's proposed cuts could lead to 13,975 job losses, $1.4 billion less in science spending for California and $3.9 billion of lost economic activity. By the numbers: NASA supported 33,600 jobs in California and generated $8.3 billion per year in economic output between fiscal years 2022-2024, per a recent report. Zoom in: Missions on the chopping block include the Mars Sample Return, an ambitious joint American-European plan to collect Martian soil samples and bring them to Earth for further study. Nearly 20 active science missions would be canceled in total, representing more than $12 billion in sunk taxpayer costs, per the Planetary Society. Zoom out: Besides California, Maryland ($2 billion) and Texas ($614 million) saw the most average annual NASA science spending across fiscal 2022-24, the data shows. The big picture: Trump's proposed NASA cuts fit into a broader pattern of pulling resources away from scientific endeavors and data collection, especially involving climate change.
