Mercedes Vito Select, the versatile executive transport champion
Beate Mey, marketing manager for Mercedes-Benz Vans SA, highlights the significance of the launch, 'The Select marks a key milestone, offering private SA customers a versatile alternative alongside our luxurious V-Class. While the V-Class remains the ultimate in premium vans, the Select prioritises adaptability and leisure, delivering a dynamic yet refined experience at an attractive price point for the SA market.'
The Vito Select boasts a modern aesthetic with a striking front design and a contemporary cockpit, complemented by a comprehensive suite of advanced safety and driver assistance features, appealing to discerning SA buyers.
It is available in two distinct variants tailored for the SA market. Priced from approximately R1 264 200 (excluding VAT), this variant offers seating for up to five passengers while providing a generous 4.1 cubic metres of load space. Ideal for SA sports enthusiasts and adventurers needing ample room for equipment like bicycles, camping gear, and luggage.
Starting at approximately R1 360 000 (excluding VAT), the Tourer accommodates up to eight passengers with substantial luggage space. Perfect for larger SA families, social gatherings, or premium shuttle services. Flexible seating allows the first row to swivel, creating a lounge-like rear, and the back row is removable for increased luggage capacity with five occupants.
A key selling point for the SA market is the Select's impressive standard equipment. The redesigned instrument panel features the intuitive MBUX multimedia system with a 10.25-inch touchscreen and a 5.5-inch TFT display, along with seamless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity.
The cockpit also includes wireless smartphone charging, a heated multi-function steering wheel, and electric seat controls with memory function, which are all highly desirable features for SA drivers. Comfortable and practical faux black leather upholstery is standard on all seats. For added convenience, an electric tailgate and electric sliding doors ensure effortless access, particularly useful in busy SA environments.
Under the bonnet, the Select features a refined engine paired with the smooth and efficient 9G-TRONIC automatic transmission, a preferred choice for SA driving conditions. With ample power and torque, the Select delivers confident performance despite its size.
Safety is paramount, with standard features including active lane keeping assist, attention assist, blind spot assist, cruise control, and an anti-theft protection package, providing peace of mind on SA roads. The Mercedes-Benz emergency call system offers crucial assistance in emergencies. The parking package with a reversing camera simplifies parking and manoeuvring, especially in tight urban spaces.
Natasha Jardim, managing executive of Mercedes-Benz Vans SA, concludes: 'The Vito Select underscores our commitment to providing dynamic, high-quality vehicles that cater to diverse
SA lifestyles. We are confident that its blend of functionality, style, and versatility will set a new benchmark in its class, appealing strongly to families and businesses across SA.'
Source: MotorPress
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
7 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
If BEE goes, how do we address racialised inequality?
The past few months have seen an unprecedented attack on Black Economic Empowerment. Strangely, the voices that you would expect to defend it have been oddly muted. If we accept that BEE has too many problems to work properly, it is time for a proper national debate on what could replace it. As predicted several months ago, Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) is now under intense fire. This is partly because the ANC has been dramatically weakened, partly because the DA is now in government, and partly because of the Trump administration's attacks on it. Last week, even The Economist opined that it was time for our country to stop BEE. On Tuesday, Deputy President Paul Mashatile said in an answer to a parliamentary question that BEE was 'not discriminatory'. While he was trying to defend BEE, he clearly missed the point. BEE is absolutely discriminatory. That is why we have it. To reduce our racialised inequality. But, in a comment by Professor William Gumede that has been widely quoted, BEE has cost around R1-trillion and yet most black people have not benefited from it in any substantive way (this is likely to be hugely contested). BEE is intensely controversial. Not just because a small group of people have been made rich, but because of what it is: A deliberate attempt to empower one group of people at the expense of another group. No matter the moral legitimacy of such an aim, in any society, to take from one group to give to another leads to huge arguments. This is one of the reasons tax policy can be hugely controversial. The cost of scrapping As a starting point, it may be important to ask: if there is no BEE and no other measure of race-based redress, what would happen? The economy would probably grow a little more quickly than it is now. Companies could simply scrap all the measures they take to qualify for BEE points. This might make them, and their owners, richer. But there would be a huge cost. For example, some of the big banks insure the geysers of people they grant mortgages to (this is to protect the value of the property they are lending money against). As a BEE measure, they then use a long list of black-owned suppliers to repair those geysers if they break down. The big banks would probably find it much more efficient to use one big company to fix all these geysers. These suppliers, usually the first in their families to own a small business, would lose out dramatically. Most would probably have to close. The consequence of this is that all these people, and their extended families, who they support, would lose faith in the democratic project. This would be just one example of how inequality, both racialised inequality and general inequality, would be re-entrenched. That would lead to greater demands for political and economic change, and perhaps, more calls for some kind of radical, or even revolutionary change. The impact test The tools that the state has to really make a change for one group, but not for another, are essentially quite limited. And each tool would have to satisfy certain tests. The first is, would it work? In other words, does the policy really make a substantive difference for a large number of people? This is the test that BEE arguably fails. Another test is whether such a tool would be both legitimate and fair. Legitimacy is absolutely vital. It means you essentially have to convince white people that they must be treated differently from black people. It seems unlikely that even Siya Kolisi and Eben Etzebeth could convince most white people to accept this. There are alternatives to BEE, all of which have serious problems. Government could decide to radically change the tax system and essentially try to tax white people more than black people. One of the main arguments against that, apart from the fact that it would lead to intense debates about racial designations, is that there are obvious examples of some white people who were born into poorer homes than some black people. That would fail the fairness test. There could be other strategies. Government could decide that our geography, still defined by apartheid in so many ways, provides a proxy for race. Thus, as a deliberate strategy, the Basic Education Department could decide to spend more money per child in rural and township schools than on children in suburban schools. While this might seem unfair, the argument could be that communities in suburbs can just increase the contribution they already make to the education of their children (through what are often called 'Governing Body Teachers' – teachers paid by the parents, not government). Although that would be staggeringly unfair to black parents who have made huge sacrifices to get their children into these schools, and to keep them there. There are other problems, too. At least one would be that we would not know whether it had been effective for a full generation. Which might defeat the purpose, which is to show that there is a measure of race-based redress that actually works. From BEE to BIG? There are other ways to look at this problem. They could be controversial in themselves. It might be seen as legitimate by the vast majority of voters to remove the idea of race-based redress in favour of a different measure to help improve the lives of millions of the poorest people in our country. So, for example, BEE could be removed at the same time a substantive Basic Income Grant (BIG) is introduced. In other words, there would be a deal (sort of). Businesses would no longer have to comply with BEE, which would allow them to be more efficient and make more profit. Those profits would, in turn, help to fund a BIG that would make a real difference to the lives of millions of people. While there appears to be no public polling on this, it might be worth asking if the millions of people who receive the R370/month Social Relief of Distress Grant would prefer that money in their pockets to retaining the current model of BEE. Considering that these people clearly need more help than most of those who currently benefit from BEE, there may be a compelling moral argument in this direction. But that might be creating a false binary. And it would not satisfy the demand for race-based redress, although it would help to reduce inequality. The attacks on BEE will not stop. But the intensity of our inequality, as racialised as it still is, demands measures to address it. A window is now opening for a proper debate on what might be more effective. It's vital that we grab it. DM
The Herald
2 days ago
- The Herald
Ticad 9 ushers in new era of partnership
Twenty-five years ago, in 2000, I visited Senegal for the first time, marking my initial steps into Africa. I was overwhelmed by the dynamism of young students and the continent's vast potential, which convinced me that Africa has a bright future. Now that conviction is becoming a reality. Indeed, 2025 is essentially the year of Africa, highlighted by the dynamic synergy between two major international forums focusing on Africa: Japan hosting the ninth Tokyo International Conference on African Development (Ticad 9) in Yokohama from August 20-22, and SA taking the lead in the G20 presidency. Initially incepted in 1993, Ticad remains a pioneering conference focused on African development for the past three decades, distinguished by its unique emphasis on 'African ownership' and 'international partnership'. Furthermore, Ticad's inclusiveness and openness to engage a wide range of stakeholders — such as international organisations, third countries, businesses, academia and NGOs — highlight its unique strengths. Embracing this philosophy, Japan will remain a steadfast partner for Africa. Ticad 9 will be held under the theme 'Co-create innovative solutions with Africa', where Japan aims to explore innovative solutions to the challenges facing Africa by leveraging its cutting-edge technologies and expertise. It is mutually beneficial to combine home-grown solutions developed in Africa with these solutions presented by Japan. Africa possesses abundant resources, a vibrant, youthful population, and remarkable potential for innovation. At the same time it faces significant challenges: poverty, conflict, unemployment, infectious diseases and climate change. Ticad 9 will address these head-on by focusing on three key cross-cutting approaches: Driving sustainable economic growth through private sector leadership. Japan will accelerate Africa's economic transformation by fostering private sector investment. This includes improving the investment environment and leveraging cutting-edge technologies in such areas as artificial intelligence (AI), digitalisation, green transformation and the utilisation of satellite data. These will create new economic opportunities and enhance impacts. Japan's expertise and resources will be harnessed to support the growth of African businesses and the development of robust industrial ecosystems. Japan will accelerate Africa's economic transformation by fostering private sector investment. This includes improving the investment environment and leveraging cutting-edge technologies in such areas as artificial intelligence (AI), digitalisation, green transformation and the utilisation of satellite data. These will create new economic opportunities and enhance impacts. Japan's expertise and resources will be harnessed to support the growth of African businesses and the development of robust industrial ecosystems. Empowering youth and women. Africa's future rests on the shoulders of its young people and women. Japan is committed to empowering youth and women through comprehensive human resource development programmes, targeting skills development in high-growth sectors. By nurturing their potential we can drive inclusive growth and create a more sustainable society. Africa's future rests on the shoulders of its young people and women. Japan is committed to empowering youth and women through comprehensive human resource development programmes, targeting skills development in high-growth sectors. By nurturing their potential we can drive inclusive growth and create a more sustainable society. Strengthening regional integration and connectivity. Regional integration is crucial for Africa's prosperity. Japan will strongly support the implementation of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) through facilitating cross-border trade and investment, and building value chains. In line with the initiative of Free and Open Indo-Pacific announced by Japan at Ticad 6 in Nairobi, Japan will continue to enhance connectivity, resilient institutions and human resource development in Africa. To achieve sustainable development and inclusive societies through these approaches, promoting peace and stability is crucial. Japan continues to partner with African countries, vigorously supporting Africa's own initiatives to strengthen peace and stability in the continent. Ticad 9 is more than a conference; it's a vibrant and living platform for forging deeper partnerships, generating innovative solutions, and building a shared vision for a prosperous and sustainable future for Africa and the world. The significance of the Japan-Africa partnership reaches far beyond its impact on Africa alone. Japan would like to work with Africa to strengthen inclusive and responsible global governance that ensures peace and prosperity of the international community. • Ishiba is prime minister of Japan.
eNCA
3 days ago
- eNCA
Can SA's two transport giants share the road without blood spills
JOHANNESBURG - The murder of 27-year-old e-hailing driver Mthokozisi Mvelase in Soweto has once again highlighted the tension between South Africa's taxi industry and e-hailing services. Mvelase, who had just started in the new job, was shot outside Maponya Mall before his car was set alight, with him inside. This prompted protests, with many calling for taxi operations to be halted in Pimville. While his killing is being investigated, it has now raised a broader question: can e-hailing services and taxis co-exist in South Africa's transport system? Supplied Supplied Taxis's are the backbone of public transport For many South Africans, taxis remain the lifeline to work, schools, malls and government offices. From going to Home Affairs, to collecting SASSA grants and trips to the clinic. Theo Malele, spokesperson of the National Taxi Alliance cautions against stopping taxis from operating, saying ' it will create serious challenges for commuters.' Malele adds that while coexistence with e-hailing services is necessary, the industry faces problems of its own. 'E-hailing services are fragmented. There is a power struggle within the industry, and they need to sort themselves out,' he argues. Malele suggests that stronger regulation and law enforcement could create stability. "Currently they can travel anywhere and any how while taxi's are confined to a specific geographic network which is where they have to operate should they go beyond they would have transgressed. This needs to be addressed.' E-Hailing drivers daily struggle The e-hailing association has admitted to facing their own obstacles. Chairperson of the Western Cape e-hailing association Siyabonga Hlabisa, says taxi marshals restrict them from working in certain areas, while sometimes taxi drivers impound cars and charge fines of up to R1,000 for their release. He argues that taxi associations believe they rule the industry and this needs to be addressed. He says they do not view taxi operations as a treat nor should they be viewed as such as both operate in their own way. Overall these tensions are more than just a business dispute, they affect everyday commuters. Social media claims that the South African National Taxi Council has ordered motorists not to carry more than one passenger in private cars, but the council has denied this.
