
America the Evil Mastermind? Not So Fast, Russians Are Told
Five weeks ago, Russia's foreign minister, Sergey V. Lavrov, delivered a routine speech blasting the 'hegemonic, egoistic' United States at the helm of the 'collective West.' The worldview of the 74-year-old veteran diplomat has since undergone some head-spinning changes.
In an interview on Russian state television on Sunday, Mr. Lavrov listed the ills that Europe — not America — had brought upon the world. The United States, in his telling, had gone from evil mastermind to innocent bystander.
'Colonization, wars, crusaders, the Crimean War, Napoleon, World War I, Hitler,' Mr. Lavrov said. 'If we look at history in retrospect, the Americans did not play any instigating, let alone incendiary, role.'
As President Trump turns decades of U.S. foreign policy upside down, another dizzying swing is taking place in Russia, both in the Kremlin and on state-controlled television: The United States, the new message goes, is not that bad after all.
Almost overnight, it's Europe — not the United States — that has become the source of instability in the Russian narrative. On his marquee weekly show on the Rossiya-1 channel Sunday night, the anchor Dmitri Kiselyov described the 'party of war' in Europe as outmatched by the 'great troika' of the United States, Russia and China that will form 'the new structure of the world.'
For more than a decade, the United States was the Kremlin propaganda machine's main boogeyman — the 'hegemon,' the 'puppeteer' and the 'master across the ocean.' It was seeking Russia's destruction by pushing Europeans, Ukrainians and terrorists into conflict with Moscow.
After Mr. Trump's return to the White House, Russian officials first said not much would change.
'The difference, other than terminology, is small,' Mr. Lavrov said in that Jan. 30 speech, comparing the Trump and Biden administrations.
But then came the phone call on Feb. 12 between Mr. Trump and President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, the talks between the White House and the Kremlin in Saudi Arabia, the vote at the United Nations in which America sided with Russia, and the berating of President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine at the Oval Office last week.
In a matter of weeks, it became clear that the second Trump presidency had the potential to deliver far more of a pro-Russian foreign policy than the first one did.
Mr. Putin has led the shift in tone. The leader who used to castigate the American-led West for seeking to 'dismember and plunder Russia' last week proposed that the United States mine Russian rare earth metals and help develop aluminum production in Siberia. It was part of Mr. Putin's outreach to Mr. Trump as he dangled the potential for vast wealth from Russian resources.
On Friday, hours before Mr. Trump harangued Mr. Zelensky at the White House, Mr. Putin sounded his new, pro-American message in the unlikeliest of places: the annual meeting of Russia's domestic intelligence agency, the F.S.B., which has been at the vanguard of Russia's shadow war against the West.
Mr. Putin said talks with the Trump administration 'inspire certain hopes,' praised it for its 'pragmatism' and called on the spies in attendance to resist attempts 'to disrupt or compromise the dialogue that has begun.'
The whiplash in ties with Washington was so stark that Russian state television on Sunday showed a reporter asking the Kremlin's spokesman how it was possible that 'a couple of months ago we were publicly saying that we were almost enemies.'
'This, indeed, couldn't have been imagined,' the spokesman, Dmitri S. Peskov, replied, marveling at the shift. American foreign policy, he added, now 'coincides with our vision in many ways.'
The Kremlin's message makers are struggling to help Russians make sense of it all. Some commentators are dredging up historical precedent, going as far back as Catherine the Great's refusal to help Britain put down the American Revolution. Others say it's the American voter who changed.
'The American people got tired of global empire,' a state TV talk-show stalwart, the filmmaker Karen Shakhnazarov, explained last week.
In an interview with The New York Times, Yevgeny Popov — whose show, '60 Minutes,' is the most popular daily political program on Russian state TV — insisted that talk of cooperating with the United States was not extraordinary because American companies had done business in the Soviet Union even in the depths of the Cold War.
'These are quite natural processes happening here,' Mr. Popov said. 'We want peaceful, constructive and pragmatic and, most importantly, equal relations with the U.S.'
Still, Mr. Popov pointed out that American weapons were killing Russian soldiers on Ukraine's battlefields, and that he did not believe there could soon be a friendly relationship with a country whose 'tanks were firing on our people.'
Some guests on his show have gone further. Aleksei Zhuravlyov, a firebrand lawmaker known for threatening the United States with nuclear annihilation, said on '60 Minutes' last week that Russia could 'make friends with America and rule the world.'
'Trump needs us,' Mr. Zhuravlyov said. 'Do we need Trump? We do. Do our interests coincide? They do. Against whom? Against the European Union.'
Underlying Russia's interest in rapprochement with the United States are a grudging respect for the country and extensive personal ties, especially among the cultural and commercial elite. Ivan I. Kurilla, a scholar of U.S.-Russia relations at Wellesley College, said Russian and Soviet rulers long saw the United States as a nation worth emulating — whether in its economic prowess or its swagger on the world stage.
'This duality of the view of America — it's been like this for a long time,' said Mr. Kurilla, who was a professor at the European University at St. Petersburg until last year.
Mr. Popov, who used to be a Russian state television correspondent in New York, ticked off some of the things he believed Russia and the United States have in common: a strong executive, protectionist policies, large armies, market economies 'plus or minus' and powerful law enforcement agencies.
'We both have a police state in the good sense of the word,' Mr. Popov said in a video call last week as he made his way through Moscow traffic. He concluded, addressing Americans, 'If you want to understand what the Russians think, look in the mirror.'
The sudden prospect of improved ties with the United States cheered the Russian public, which pollsters say is increasingly eager for an end to the war in Ukraine and sees negotiations with Washington as a prerequisite.
The Levada Center, an independent pollster based in Moscow, found in February that 75 percent of Russians would support an immediate end to the war, the highest reading since 2023, and that 85 percent approved of talks with the United States. Hopes of sanctions relief and the return of American investment helped drive up the Russian stock market by as much as 10 percent after the Trump-Putin call on Feb. 12.
To some of the most fervent supporters of Russia's war, the embrace of Washington has smacked of betrayal, given that Mr. Putin has long described the invasion as a proxy war against American aggression. On the Telegram social messaging app, Russia's pro-war bloggers expressed surprise over Mr. Putin's proposal last week for cooperating with American companies to extract the country's natural resources.
A nationalist Telegram blog with more than a million followers, Two Majors, wondered how talk of 'the evil desire of the damned Yankees to steal Russia's natural resources' had morphed into discussion of 'mutually beneficial cooperation with American partners.'
But for Mr. Putin himself, there may be a wisp of internal consistency in the swing toward Washington. He has generally avoided labeling the United States as a whole as Russia's enemy.
Rather, Mr. Putin has said it is the Western 'neoliberal elite' that tries to impose its 'strange' values on the world and seeks Russia's destruction, while depicting American conservatives as Russia's friends. It's a mirror image of the propaganda tropes of the Soviet Union, when American progressives were cast as Moscow's allies.
'In the United States,' Mr. Putin said in 2022, 'there's a very strong part of the public who maintain traditional values, and they're with us. We know about this.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
26 minutes ago
- CNN
Venezuelans in Florida react to Trump's new travel ban
President Donald Trump signed a proclamation to ban travel from several countries to the US, citing security risks, with one of the countries being Venezuela. Venezuelans in Florida reacted to the ban, with one worrying about their visa.

26 minutes ago
Detained Columbia graduate claims ‘irreparable harm' to career and family as he pleads for release
NEW YORK -- A Columbia graduate facing deportation over his pro-Palestinian activism on campus has outlined the 'irreparable harm' caused by his continued detention as a federal judge weighs his release. Mahmoud Khalil said in court filings unsealed Thursday that the 'most immediate and visceral harms' he's faced in his months detained in Louisiana relate to missing out on the birth of his first child in April. 'Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone,' the 30-year-old legal U.S. resident wrote. 'When I heard my son's first cries, I buried my face in my arms so no one would see me weep.' He also cited potentially 'career-ending' harms from the ordeal, noting that Oxfam International has already rescinded a job offer to serve as a policy advisor. Even his mother's visa to come to the U.S. to help care for his infant son is also now under federal review, Khalil said. 'As someone who fled prosecution in Syria for my political beliefs, for who I am, I never imagined myself to be in immigration detention, here in the United States,' he wrote. 'Why should protesting this Israel government's indiscriminate killing of thousands of innocent Palestinians result in the erosion of my constitutional rights?' Spokespersons for the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment. Khalil's 13-page statement was among a number of legal declarations his lawyers filed highlighting the wide-ranging negative impacts of his arrest. Dr. Noor Abdalla, his U.S. citizen wife, described the challenges of not having her husband to help navigate their son's birth and the first weeks of his young life. Students and professors at Columbia wrote about the chilling effect Khalil's arrest has had on campus life, with people afraid to attend protests or participate in groups that can be viewed as critical of the Trump administration. Last week, a federal judge in New Jersey said the Trump administration's effort to deport Khalil likely violates the Constitution. Judge Michael Farbiarz wrote the government's primary justification for removing Khalil — that his beliefs may pose a threat to U.S. foreign policy — could open the door to vague and arbitrary enforcement. Khalil was detained by federal immigration agents on March 8 in the lobby of his university-owned apartment, the first arrest under Trump's widening crackdown on students who joined campus protests against .

26 minutes ago
Peruvian migrant acquitted in the first trial over the new militarized zone at US-Mexico border
EL PASO, Texas -- A Peruvian woman who crossed the U.S. border illegally was acquitted Thursday of unauthorized access to a newly designated militarized zone in the first trial under the Trump administration's efforts to prosecute immigrants who cross in certain parts of New Mexico and western Texas. Adely Vanessa De La Cruz-Alvarez, 21, was arrested last month near the West Texas town of Tornillo after she entered the U.S. from Mexico by walking across the riverbed of the Rio Grande, court documents show. In addition to being charged with entering the country illegally, she was charged with accessing a military zone. She is among several other immigrants who have been charged under the law since President Donald Trump's administration transferred oversight of a strip of land along the border to the military. It is as part of a new approach the Department of Justice is taking to crack down on illegal immigration. The Associated Press left messages Thursday with De La Cruz-Alvarez's attorney, Veronica Teresa Lerma. The lawyer told The Texas Tribune the acquittal is significant. 'Hopefully, this sets the tone for the federal government,' Lerma said, 'so they know what the El Paso community will do with these charges.' Even before the woman's case went to trial, federal magistrate judges in neighboring New Mexico had dismissed similar cases, finding little evidence that immigrants knew about the zones. Lerma was convicted of entering the country illegally and was already facing deportation, but could have faced up to 18 months in prison for entering the militarized zone. Despite the verdict, U.S. Attorney Justin Simmons of the Western District of Texas said his office will continue to aggressively prosecute National Defense Area violations. 'At the end of the day, another illegal alien has been found guilty of illegally entering the country in violation of the improper entry statute and will be removed from the United States,' Simmons said in a statement. "That's a win for America." The administration wants to sharply increase the removal of immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally as Trump seeks to make good on his pledge of mass deportations. The administration has deployed thousands of troops to the border, while arrests have plunged to the lowest levels since the mid-1960s.