SC raps Delhi private schools for fee hike without govt nod
The Supreme Court on Thursday pulled up private unaided schools in Delhi for sharply hiking tuition fees without prior government approval, questioning how institutions receiving land at concessional or no cost could unilaterally raise fees.
'If land is allotted free of cost or at a concessional rate, how can you exorbitantly increase fees without the government's nod?' asked a bench comprising Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud (note: original says CJI B R Gavai, but verify with source) and Justice A G Masih, reported
The Times of India.
The court was hearing a petition filed by the
Naya Samaj Parents Association
, which challenged two Delhi High Court orders that had permitted such fee hikes by unaided private schools without prior approval from the Directorate of Education (DoE). The petitioner argued that schools were penalising students who couldn't afford the fees, causing distress among students and parents.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
'They Want This Joint Relief Gummy Gone—Here's Why Seniors Love It'
Joint Fuel 360
Click Here
Undo
The SC bench directed the Action Committee Unaided Recognised Private Schools and the Delhi government's education directorate to file their responses within three weeks.
The petition contended that the HC orders contradicted previous Supreme Court rulings—particularly the 2004
Modern School
case—that mandated schools situated on government-allotted land must obtain prior approval from the DoE before increasing tuition fees.
Live Events
Quoting the earlier SC verdict, the plea said: 'The quantum of fees to be charged by unaided private schools is subject to regulation by DoE under Section 17(3) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973.' The court had also emphasised that private schools must not engage in profiteering or commercialisation of education.
The current challenge comes amid broader concerns over affordability and transparency in fee structures in Delhi's private school sector.
With inputs from ToI
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Colorado firebomb suspect planned attack on pro-Israeli protesters for a year, says official
Boulder attack suspect Mohamed Sabry Soliman confronting with the crowd. The man suspected of an attack on pro-Israeli protesters in Colorado, who is facing federal hate crime charges, had planned the attack for a year, according to the the official. Mohammed Sabry Soliman, an Egyptian national staying in the US even after his visa expired, has allegedly thrown the fire bombs and sprayed burning gasoline at a group of people who had gathered on Sunday in support of Israeli hostages held by Hamas, injuring 12 people. J Bishop Grewell, acting US Attorney for the District of Colorado, told reporters the 45-year-old suspect had been planning the attack for a year. Soliman attacked a group of elderly protesters with "Molotov cocktails at a group of men and women, some of them in their late 80s, burning them as they peacefully walked on a Sunday to draw attention to Israeli hostages held in Gaza." "When he was interviewed about the attack, he said he wanted them all to die. He had no regrets, and he would go back and do it again." During questioning, Soliman revealed his unsuccessful attempt to purchase a firearm, which was prevented due to his non-US citizenship status.' Responding officers discovered 16 unused Molotov cocktails at the scene, along with a backpack weed sprayer containing petrol, which authorities believe was intended as an improvised flamethrower. The accused faces potential life imprisonment under federal hate crime charges, alongside state attempted murder charges that could result in centuries of incarceration. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo US President Trump criticised Joe Biden regarding the incident. "Yesterday's horrific attack in Boulder, Colorado, WILL NOT BE TOLERATED in the United States of America," Trump posted on Truth Social, describing it as a "terrible tragedy." He attributed the incident to "Biden's ridiculous Open Border Policy" for Soliman's entry. "This is yet another example of why we must keep our Borders SECURE, and deport Illegal, Anti-American Radicals from our Homeland," he stated. Marco Rubio, his Secretary of State, issued a stern warning. "All terrorists, their family members, and terrorist sympathizers here on a visa should know that under the Trump Administration we will find you, revoke your visa, and deport you," he posted on social media. T he incident took place on Sunday afternoon during a demonstration supporting hostages captured during Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel. Footage shows a bare-chested individual clutching bottles, walking back and forth near burning grass. The individual was heard shouting "End Zionists!" and "They are killers!" at several people wearing red T-shirts who were attending to someone on the ground. Additional footage captured dark smoke rising into the air. Recently, the attacks against Israel have increased in the US. Few weeks back, a fatal shooting took place outside a Jewish museum in Washington, where a 31-year-old arrested suspect, who shouted "Free Palestine," killed two Israeli embassy staffers.
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Finding Gen XX among GenAI leaders
There are nearly 7,000 active women-led startups in India. The number may seem huge, but it is only 7.5% of the total pool, according to data from Tracxn. In the tech space, these startups have so far collectively raised $26.4 billion, with 2021 attracting the most funds at $6.3 billion. Since then, the number of women-led startups and capital raised by them has consistently declined. The gaps in the tech landscape being headlined by GenAI are already visible. A recent BCG Report said that in India, there are 65% more male executives in GenAI at the head or director level than female. At the junior level, women's representation is 33%, which drops to 19% at the senior level. But there are signs of a shift. Experts say that GenAI may have the potential to correct the imbalance to some extent, as it democratises software and web to Nasscom, 30% of startups in its GenAI foundry already have women founders. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo Breaking the glass ceiling Kunal Bahl, cofounder of Snapdeal and Titan Capital, said historically, tech innovation has been male-dominated—driven by risk-taking, access to capital, and networks that favoured men. Live Events 'But, more women are founding companies, especially in sectors like consumer tech, fintech, healthtech, and increasingly in core tech as well,' he told ET, calling it a meaningful shift. Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories Several initiatives such as AI Kiran, led by Kirthiga Reddy, founder, Verix, CXXO led by Vani Kola, founder and MD, Kalaari Capital, and Peak XV's Spark Fellowship, are fueling growth platforms for women leaders. For instance, the AI Kiran initiative aims to build a community of a million women leaders in AI. The first cohort of 250 AI Kiran women had 27% founders or CEOs of AI-driven companies. 'History has shown the importance of early adoption–else like the gender equity gap, we'll again be looking at 134 years to close the gender AI gap,' said Reddy who was also the first managing director of Facebook India and the first female investment partner at the $130-billion SoftBank Vision Fund. She said gender representation is crucial in AI that must reflect diverse perspectives to ensure fairness, inclusivity and ethical innovation. ETtech GenAI – an open canvas Meghana Jagadeesh, founder and chief executive of GoCodeo, has taken a bold leap to compete with the world's leading companies in the AI-assistive coding space. She explained that GenAI has democratised human interaction with machines. 'Time is ripe for women to shape tech businesses. We don't need to be expert coders, web developers or data scientists to build AI use-cases,' she said, adding that she herself emerged to be an AI founder from doing sales and marketing roles in her early career. Ritu Mehrotra, founder, United We Care (UWC), a mental health and emotional wellness company said that her inclusive team has played an instrumental role in designing empathy in the tech stack. 'Empathy is something women are naturally wired for.' Backed by Cred's Kunal Shah, UWC has broken the world record for intent-detection, automated speech recognition, she said. 'Building reasoning on top of emotional intelligence was not easy because today's AI models are not sensitised for gender, cultural, linguistic and regional diversity,' she pointed out adding that building inclusive tech is more important now than ever. Every woman is a data point which is reshaping the AI models trained for tomorrow, she explained. AI is also enabling founders like Angana Saikia of early-stage Chittoo, an AI platform for English learners, to set up companies for societal upliftment. 'GenAI as a technology has unlocked language learning for the deepest pockets of India…We have signed up users from remote villages which are unheard of,' said Saikia. As a female entrepreneur, Saikia said she often struggled for attention in male-dominated boardrooms, but that didn't deter her from setting up three ventures after quitting a job. Silent biases A Harvard Business School study showed that female founders raise seven times less funding than their male counterparts. Societal biases around maternity, lack of confidence in visionary leadership and access to resources have weighed down the progress of women entrepreneurs. In a fast-evolving technology like GenAI, gender equity is not only seen as an economic prospect but also a strategic need. And being the only woman in a room doesn't help. The need for bridging the gap is now when the ecosystem is still shaping up. Nasscom highlighted how generative AI could be a driver to this change. As per its survey, 90% of women leaders view it as crucial for career advancement, with 95-100% willing to invest extra time in mastering these technologies.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Supreme Court defers Batla House plea, declines stay on demolition
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the impending demolition of homes and shops in Delhi's Batla House area, observing that its earlier order of May 7 – directing action against unauthorised construction, did not warrant any interference at this stage. A bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma, hearing a plea filed by over 40 residents, declined interim protection against the demolition drive being undertaken by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and the Uttar Pradesh Irrigation Department, but agreed to list the matter in July, once the court resumes full functioning after the summer vacation. 'It is our order and we have seen it… You take instructions if you would want us to simply adjourn this,' the bench told senior advocate Sanjay Hegde, appearing for the residents, while referring to the earlier direction of the apex court from May 7. 'We are telling you that we have seen the papers. We can adjourn it. That is all we can do,' said the bench, making it clear that the court was not inclined to examine the issue substantively during the summer vacation. Hegde urged the bench to at least clarify that no demolitions should be carried out in the interim. 'Let nothing happen in the meantime,' he said. But the court stood firm. 'You will be taking a risk if you want to argue this,' the bench warned, reiterating that it would not hear the matter during the vacation and asking Hegde to 'take instructions.' After consulting his clients, Hegde asked that the matter be listed in the week after the summer recess. The court agreed. The partial working schedule of the Supreme Court ends on July 13, after which regular hearings resume. Hegde informed the bench that the petitioners would approach the appropriate appellate authority to challenge the demolition notices. The dispute stems from a May 7 ruling by another bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan, which directed that unauthorised constructions outside the boundaries of colonies regularised under the 2019 Pradhan Mantri-Unauthorized Colonies in Delhi Awas Adhikar Yojana (PM-UDAY) be demolished. The order said residents should be given 'at least 15 days' notice' and allowed to 'adopt appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.' Acting on the order, DDA issued eviction notices dated May 26, which were pasted on several buildings in Batla House. The notices, marked by large red Xs, stated: 'This building/structure has been found to be an illegal/unauthorised structure falling in khasra number 279, village Okhla, outside PMA-UDAY colony boundary… occupants are hereby directed to vacate the premises within 15 days… the demolition programme shall be carried out from 11-06-2025 without any further notice.' With the demolition set to begin just days before Eid-ul-Adha, anxiety has spread through the predominantly Muslim neighbourhood. Many residents, in their plea, said they have lived in the area for decades and view the notices as arbitrary and unjust. In their plea before the top court, residents argue that the 15-day notice was not meaningfully served. Instead of individual communication or clear deadlines, the notices were simply pasted on buildings, offering no scope for redress. They claim the demolition drive is arbitrary, illegal, and in breach of the protections under the PM-UDAY scheme. While DDA and the UP Irrigation Department claim the affected area lies outside the scheme's boundary, residents insist they qualify for regularisation or at the very least deserve a chance to be heard. The petitioners say they are legitimate homeowners with long-standing possession, and that no individualised assessment of legality was made before marking homes for demolition. The residents had first approached the Supreme Court on May 29. At the time, the court advised them to move Delhi High Court. But the petitioners pointed out that the authorities were relying on the Supreme Court's May 7 order to justify the imminent demolitions, leaving them with no choice but to return to the top court. The bench then directed the registry to list the matter this week. Batla House, part of the Jamia Nagar locality, has long been a densely populated working-class enclave. It first drew national attention in 2008 after a controversial police encounter resulted in the deaths of two alleged terrorists and a Delhi Police inspector. Now, the looming demolition has brought it back into the spotlight. With Monday's development, the matter now rests in limbo until July. Meanwhile, the 15-day notice period, expiring on June 10, leaves affected families facing an uncertain and anxious wait, coinciding with one of the year's biggest religious festivals.
