logo
Long advantageous, Harvard's China ties become a political liability, World News

Long advantageous, Harvard's China ties become a political liability, World News

AsiaOne25-05-2025

WASHINGTON - Harvard University's links to China, long an asset to the school, have become a liability as the Trump administration levels accusations that its campus is plagued by Beijing-backed influence operations.
On Thursday (May 22) the administration moved to revoke Harvard's ability to enroll foreign students, saying it fostered antisemitism and coordinated with the Chinese Communist Party. Among them are Chinese nationals who made up about a fifth of Harvard's foreign student intake in 2024, the university said.
A US judge on Friday temporarily blocked the administration's order after the Cambridge, Massachusetts, university sued.
The concerns about Chinese government influence at Harvard are not new. Some US lawmakers, many of them Republicans, have expressed worries that China is manipulating Harvard to gain access to US advanced technology, to circumvent US security laws and to stifle criticism of it in the United States.
"For too long, Harvard has let the Chinese Communist Party exploit it," a White House official told Reuters on Friday, adding the school had "turned a blind eye to vigilante CCP-directed harassment on-campus."
Harvard did not respond immediately to requests for comment.
The school has said the revocation was a punishment for Harvard's "perceived viewpoint," which it called a violation of the right to free speech as guaranteed by the US Constitution's First Amendment.
Harvard's links to China, which include research partnerships and China-focused academic centres, are longstanding. The ties have yielded major financial gifts, influence in international affairs and global prestige for the school.
Former Harvard President Larry Summers, who has at times been critical of the university, called the Trump administration's move to block foreign students the most serious attack on the university to date.
"It's hard to imagine a greater strategic gift to China than for the United States to sacrifice its role as a beacon to the world," he said in an interview with Politico. Health training
In a statement, the Chinese embassy in Washington said: "Educational exchanges and co-operation between China and the United States are mutually beneficial and should not be stigmatised."
The presence of Chinese students at Harvard and the school's links to the country are not evidence of wrongdoing. But the complexity and overlapping nature of the connections have been opaque enough to attract attention and criticism.
The China-related issues cited by the Trump administration echo the work of the Republican-led House of Representatives' Select Committee on China.
For example, Harvard provided public health-related training to Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC) officials after 2020. That year the US imposed sanctions on the Chinese paramilitary organisation for its role in alleged human rights abuses against Uyghurs and other Muslim ethnic groups in Xinjiang.
The Department of Homeland Security said those engagements with XPCC continued "as recently as 2024."
China vehemently denies any accusations of wrongdoing in Xinjiang, but both the Trump and Biden administrations have defined Beijing's policies in the region as "genocide."
In another episode that has drawn questions, US business intelligence firm Strategy Risks said that Ronnie Chan, who facilitated a US$350 million (S$450 million) donation to Harvard in 2014 that led to its school of public health being named for his father, property developer T.H. Chan, is a member of the China-United States Exchange Foundation.
The Hong Kong-based organisation, which says its aim is to foster dialogue between the two countries, has been classified as a foreign principal under US law, requiring US lobbyists working for it to disclose that work to the US government. Former professor convicted
Former Harvard Professor Charles Lieber was scrutinised by a Trump programme started in 2018 called the China Initiative, which was focused on fighting Chinese espionage and intellectual property theft and investigated researchers and universities over whether they disclosed financial ties to Beijing.
He was convicted in 2021 of lying about his ties to China in connection with federally funded research. In April, he became a full-time professor at a Chinese university.
The initiative was halted under the Biden administration after critics said it led to racial profiling and a culture of fear that chilled scientific collaboration.
US lawmakers from both parties have expressed worries about the efforts by Beijing-linked student associations to monitor political activities. In April 2024, a Harvard student activist was physically ejected from an event by a Chinese exchange student - not faculty or security staff - for interrupting a speech by China's Ambassador Xie Feng.
Pressure has mounted on Harvard in Trump's second term, with the Education Department in April asking the university to provide records on its foreign funding after it said a review of required reporting on large foreign-source gifts and contracts revealed incomplete and inaccurate disclosures.
The Trump administration's moves against Harvard have nonetheless alarmed some China experts.
Yaqiu Wang, a US-based human rights researcher who came to the US from China as a student, said the Trump administration's move to ban foreign students at Harvard was "completely counterproductive."
"The concerns over the Chinese government's transnational repression attempts to silence critics are very legitimate, and also espionage concerns are legitimate." Wang said. "But to try to address that by banning, not only Chinese students, but foreign students, is just beyond comprehension."
[[nid:718349]]

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says US justice department, not him, made decision to bring back Abrego Garcia
Trump says US justice department, not him, made decision to bring back Abrego Garcia

Straits Times

time4 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Trump says US justice department, not him, made decision to bring back Abrego Garcia

Kilmar Abrego Garcia is a 29-year-old Salvadoran whose wife, Ms Jennifer Vasquez Sura (above), and young child are US citizens. PHOTO: REUTERS Trump says US justice department, not him, made decision to bring back Abrego Garcia WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump said on June 7 it was the Department of Justice, not him, that made the decision to bring back to the US a man mistakenly deported from Maryland to El Salvador. Kilmar Abrego Garcia was flown back to face criminal charges of transporting illegal immigrants within the US, Attorney-General Pam Bondi said on June 6. His return marked an inflection point in a case seized on by critics of Mr Trump's immigration crackdown as a sign that his administration was disregarding civil liberties in its push to step up deportations of migrants. 'Well, that wasn't my decision. The Department of Justice decided to do it that way, and that's fine,' Mr Trump told NBC News in an interview, when asked about Abrego Garcia's return. Mr Trump added that he had not spoken to El Salvador President Nayib Bukele about the move. Abrego Garcia, a 29-year-old Salvadoran whose wife and young child in Maryland are US citizens, appeared in federal court in Nashville on the evening of June 6. His arraignment was set for June 13, when he will enter a plea, according to local media reports. Until then, he will remain in federal custody. If convicted, he would be deported to El Salvador after serving his sentence, Ms Bondi said. The Trump administration has said Abrego Garcia was a member of the MS-13 gang, an accusation that his lawyers deny. Abrego Garcia was deported on March 15, more than two months before the charges were filed. He was briefly held in a mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Centre in El Salvador, despite a US immigration judge's 2019 order barring him from being sent to the Central American nation because he would likely be persecuted by gangs. Mr Trump said he thought it would be 'a very easy case' against Abrego Garcia, who he accused of having a 'horrible record of abuse' of women. Abrego Garcia's lawyer, Mr Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, has called the criminal charges "fantastical." REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Poles march for LGBTQ+ equality after presidential vote raises fears
Poles march for LGBTQ+ equality after presidential vote raises fears

Straits Times

time6 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Poles march for LGBTQ+ equality after presidential vote raises fears

GDANSK, Poland - Thousands of Poles took part in a Pride march in the northern port city of Gdansk on Saturday, showing their support for the LGBTQ+ community amid fears for its future after nationalist candidate Karol Nawrocki won a presidential election. Participants waved rainbow flags and the blue, pink, and white banners representing the transgender community. Many carried placards bearing messages such as "Love is love" and "12 years together - when civil partnership?". A parallel Pride event was also held in the western city of Wroclaw. Nawrocki, supported by the conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party, has raised alarm among LGBTQ+ advocates. During its time in power from 2015 to 2023, PiS made opposition to what it termed "LGBTQ+ ideology" a central part of its platform, framing it as a threat to traditional values in the predominantly Catholic country. "I was devastated to be honest," 23-year-old student Agata said when asked about Nawrocki's victory. "I am scared. I don't know what our future looks like." Although LGBTQ+ issues were less prominent in Nawrocki's campaign than in that of his PiS-backed predecessor Andrzej Duda in 2020, his platform included commitments to resist "ideology in schools" and to oppose adoption by same-sex couples. He has stated that marriage should remain between a man and a woman and, while rejecting civil partnerships, expressed a willingness to discuss legal recognition for a "close person", regardless of sexual orientation. In contrast, a pro-European coalition that came to power in 2023 introduced a draft bill to legalise civil partnerships. However, with the presidency holding veto power, the bill's future remains uncertain. Agata said that she hoped a law on civil partnerships could come into effect, but that it was unlikely during Nawrocki's presidency. "I want more equality in our society, in our country," she said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Trump says Musk to face ‘very serious consequences' if he funds Democrats
Trump says Musk to face ‘very serious consequences' if he funds Democrats

Straits Times

time7 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Trump says Musk to face ‘very serious consequences' if he funds Democrats

US President Donald Trump (left) told NBC News he had no desire to repair his relationship with billionaire Elon Musk. PHOTO: AFP Trump says Musk to face 'very serious consequences' if he funds Democrats BEDMINSTER, New Jersey - Donald Trump said on June 7 there would be 'serious consequences' if Elon Musk funds US Democrats running against Republicans who vote for the president's sweeping tax-cut and spending Bill and said his relationship with his billionaire donor is over. In a telephone interview with NBC News, Mr Trump declined to say what those consequences would be, and went on to add that he had not had discussions about whether to investigate Mr Musk. Asked if he thought his relationship with the Tesla and SpaceX chief executive officer was over, Mr Trump said, 'I would assume so, yeah.' 'No,' Mr Trump told NBC when asked if he had any desire to repair his relationship with Mr Musk. Mr Musk and Mr Trump began exchanging insults this week, as Mr Musk denounced Mr Trump's Bill as a 'disgusting abomination.' Mr Musk's opposition to the measure is complicating efforts to pass the Bill in Congress, where Republicans hold a slim majority in the House of Representatives and Senate. The Bill narrowly passed the House in May and is now before the Senate, where Mr Trump's fellow Republicans are considering making changes. Nonpartisan analysts estimate the measure would add US$2.4 trillion (S$3 trillion) to the US debt over 10 years. Mr Trump said on June 7 he was confident the Bill would get passed by the US July 4 Independence Day holiday. 'In fact, yeah, people that were, were going to vote for it are now enthusiastically going to vote for it, and we expect it to pass,' Mr Trump told NBC. Mr Musk had deleted some social media posts critical of Mr Trump, including one that signalled support for impeaching the president, appearing to seek a de-escalation of their public feud, which exploded on June 5. Mr Trump late on June 6 suggested a review of federal government contracts held by Mr Musk. People who have spoken to Mr Musk said his anger has begun to recede and they think he will want to repair his relationship with Mr Trump. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store