South Korea gets first civilian defence minister in 60 years
It comes after a failed martial law attempt in December that led to the impeachment of ex-president Yoon Suk Yeol.
Veteran lawmaker Ahn Gyu-back is "the first civilian to lead the ministry in 64 years", said presidential Chief of Staff Kang Hoon-sik at a news conference on Monday.
"He is expected to push reforms in the military, particularly in response to its involvement in the martial law," he added.
During his election campaign, President Lee Jae Myung had promised to appoint a defence minister from the "civilian circle", responding to widespread public calls for control of the military in the wake of the martial law crisis.
South Korea's former president Yoon was impeached and suspended by lawmakers over his Dec 3 attempt to subvert civilian rule, which saw armed soldiers deployed to parliament.
Kim Yong-hyun, who served as defence minister under Yoon, has been under arrest since December and is currently on trial for insurrection, accused of recommending martial law to the former president and drafting the decree.
Previous liberal administrations have attempted to appoint a "civilian" defence minister, but have failed to do so, many citing the growing threat of North Korea's nuclear programme.
Ties between the two Koreas deteriorated under the hardline administration of the hawkish ex-president.
They technically remain at war because the 1950-53 conflict ended in an armistice, not a peace treaty.
Lee has vowed to improve relations with the North and reduce tensions on the peninsula, halting the loudspeaker broadcasts Seoul had begun last year in response to a barrage of trash-filled balloons flown southward by Pyongyang.
In response, a day after, North Korea stopped broadcasting strange and unsettling noises along the border which the ministry hailed as "a meaningful opportunity to ease inter-Korean military tensions and restore mutual trust".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
42 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Boeing in talks to sell as many as 500 planes to China: Sources
Boeing is heading closer toward finalising a deal with China to sell as many as 500 aircraft, according to people familiar with the matter, a transaction that would end a sales drought that stretches back to US President Donald Trump's last visit in 2017. The two sides are still hammering out terms of the complex aircraft sale, including the types and volume of jet models and delivery timetables, according to one of the people, who asked not to be identified discussing confidential matters. The mega sale to China, years in the making, is contingent on the two nations defusing the trade hostilities that hark back to Mr Trump's first term in office – and could still fall apart, they said. Chinese officials have already started consulting domestic airlines about how many Boeing aircraft they'll need, the people said. The transaction taking shape is similar in scope to the order for as many as 500 jets that China's central planners have struck with Airbus, but haven't yet announced, they added. The Boeing order is expected to be the centerpiece of a trade agreement that would benefit both Mr Trump and China's President Xi Jinping, the culmination of long-running and sometimes contentious negotiations. The nation's leaders were close to a similar announcement in 2023, but then-President Joe Biden and Xi left a San Francisco summit without consummating an aircraft sale. Complicating matters for Boeing is a leadership void in China. Mr Alvin Liu, its top executive in China and a fluent Mandarin-speaker with extensive government contacts, left the company in recent weeks. Carol Shen has been named interim president of Boeing China, said people familiar with the matter. Boeing declined to comment on any potential deal or management changes. Shares of the US planemaker advanced less than 1 per cent in New York on Aug 21 following Bloomberg's report, as most members of the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined. The stock had risen 27 per cent this year amid a turnaround under Chief executive officer Kelly Ortberg. Aircraft orders for Boeing have figured large in US diplomacy since Trump returned to the White House in January, with nations touting new, tentative and existing deals for airplanes, which are as expensive as skyscrapers, to narrow trade imbalances with the US. The US and China have engaged in several rounds of talks since de-escalating tit-for-tat tariffs that soared to as high as 145 per cent, but have yet to reach a final trade deal. Earlier in the summer, Mr Xi, in a phone call, invited Mr Trump to China at an unspecified date. One opportunity for the pair to meet is in late October, ahead of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in South Korea. For China, the deal would secure aircraft delivery slots that are hard to come by at both Boeing and Airbus, which are largely sold out into the 2030s. The world's second-largest aviation market is expected to more than double its commercial fleet to 9,755 airplanes over the next 20 years, by Boeing's estimation, far more than China's homegrown planemaker Comac could manufacture. While Boeing slots are scarce, the company likely has some flexibility in its delivery schedule to accommodate strategic customers, Jefferies analyst Sheila Kahyaoglu said in a research note. The country's top economic planning agency, the National Development and Reform Commission, recently sought input from Chinese carriers about how many jets they want, one of the people said. Talks centred on the 737 Max series of aircraft, Boeing's popular single-aisle jet, in a sign Beijing is laying the groundwork for a major order. Boeing's last Chinese deal was unveiled in November 2017 during Mr Trump's first state visit to China. The deal amounted to orders and commitments for 300 single-aisle and twin-aisle planes valued at US$37 billion (S$47.7 billion) at the time. The next year, Boeing's China deliveries peaked, when a quarter of its jets ended up in the mainland. Airbus has dominated sales and deliveries to China since 2019, when the nation's regulators were the first to ground the 737 Max after two fatal accidents. Boeing has notched only 30 orders with Chinese carriers and leasing companies since the start of 2019, according to the company's website. In an interview with Bloomberg in January, CEO Ortberg was optimistic that years of talks with Beijing would finally pay off. 'We certainly hope that there's an opportunity for some additional orders in the next year with China,' he said. BLOOMBERG
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Commentary: Online spaces should be built with children, not for them
SINGAPORE: At this year's National Day Rally, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong highlighted the growing concern of excessive screen time for children. Mr Wong emphasised the need to strike a balance between protecting youth and empowering them to leverage technology, noting that Singapore is observing the experience of countries that have restricted children's access to social media platforms. Australia's recent decision to block YouTube for users aged 16 years and younger has reignited debate over age-based social media bans. Exempted originally because of its educational value, the platform will now be grouped with TikTok, Instagram and other platforms that, according to the Australian government, need tighter controls to keep children safe. What prompted the reversal? A survey by Australia's internet regulator, in which four in 10 children reported seeing harmful content on YouTube. NOT JUST CONTENT, BUT SYSTEMS However, harmful content is only one part of the problem. What shapes a child's digital experience is the underlying infrastructure: autoplay, algorithmic recommendation and infinite scroll. These systems are designed to keep users engaged, nudge behaviours and maximise screen time. They trap users into doing things they didn't mean to: spend longer on an app, consume harmful content from autoplay or make purchases. When 'risky-by-design' features undermine online safety, age-based bans begin to look less convincing. A hard stop at age 16 might simplify enforcement, but it obscures the more complex reality. Current design does not care whether a user is 15 or 16; the algorithms work the same. Tech companies must be held to higher standards of safety especially when their platforms shape how children learn, socialise and play. LEARNING HOW TO SWIM SAFELY In Singapore, researchers from the National Institute of Education recently weighed in on a related question: Should schools ban digital devices? The researchers argued that denying students access to digital devices out of fear is akin to refusing to teach them to swim for fear of drowning. This echoes what Mr Wong said at the National Day Rally – that Singapore must help children build digital resilience, not shelter them indefinitely. Instead of denying access, we should be equipping young people with skills to self-regulate their digital use and to swim safely. Regulatory momentum is growing in the Asia-Pacific region. Governments are trialling technology that keeps underaged children out of restricted sites, and requiring greater transparency in the form of safety audits. Platforms like YouTube are rolling out AI-driven tools to verify user age and reduce exposure to certain content. These are steps in the right direction. But the pattern remains familiar: a reactive cycle of restrictions, appeals and patchwork solutions. When one platform is regulated, another emerges. Rules are drawn up in response to high-profile incidents, not guided by long-term strategy. There is no denying the need for safeguards. But if bans and age restrictions are all we have, we are playing a game of catch-up that cannot be won. We need a different approach. We should not treat children as victims requiring protection, but as participants in policy design. PLANNING WITH, NOT ONLY FOR, CHILDREN AND YOUTH Children and youth are the largest group of online users. But when UNICEF engaged adolescents around the world on AI, one noted that 'most of the technologies that exist are not made with children in mind'. The message from the teens was clear: They want to be engaged in AI's development and future. Consulting with youth will help us better anticipate and shape a fast-changing digital environment. For instance, UNICEF is currently engaging children from Spain to Sierra Leone on how governments, tech companies, and caregivers can better uphold their best interests online. Through a series of hands-on workshops, children are being invited to explore how digital systems influence their lives, and how they want those systems to function. Closer to home, the National Youth Council is collaborating with youth through the #TechHacks youth panel to examine how online harm can be mitigated and digital well-being, enhanced. Of course, co-designing with children and young people is not without challenges. Power asymmetries, varying cognitive development stages and implementation complexity must be managed with extra care. But these are not reasons to avoid participation. With the right support and structure, young people can meaningfully participate in shaping systems that will shape them in return. CHANGING THE FRAME If we are to match the pace of digital change, we must update not just our policies, but our posture – from gatekeeping to partnering youth. We will need to rethink what digital maturity looks like. Instead of asking, 'How do we keep children off these platforms?', we could ask: 'What would these platforms look like if children had a say in how they worked?' Instead of measuring safety by access restrictions, we could consider: What skills, values and supports help young people flourish in a world shaped by intelligent systems? Instead of building around children, we could try building with them. Regulation is an important start, but it's not enough. What is needed now is a longer view – one that begins with the recognition that children will not just live in the digital future. They will build it. As Mr Wong reminded us, every generation faces anxiety over new technologies and some of those fears, like those levelled at comics and rock and roll, have faded with time. The goal is not to dismiss concerns, but to respond with insight rather than instinct.
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
What price US protection? A question South Korea's president will face in summit with Trump
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The pressure is on not just payment for American forces based in the country, but also changes in their deployment in the event of a conflict with China. Washington wants Seoul to embrace 'strategic flexibility', the idea that US forces based in South Korea could engage in conflict scenarios. South Korean President Lee Jae Myung faces a daunting challenge as he prepares for his first in-person meeting with Donald Trump on Aug 25: How to reshape a security alliance that both are unhappy with without paying too steep a price? At the upcoming summit in Washington, Mr Lee will undertake a geopolitical high-wire act, trying to stay the course while buffeted by cross-cutting winds from the US President as well as China. He has to be careful of local tempests as well, given the deep political divisions within South Korea.
