
As Trump pushes Texas takeover in fight for House, Democrats plot their counterpunch
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and his political team have begun privately shaping a legally risky — and likely expensive — strategy to redraw House maps in several Democratic-controlled states, according to Democrats briefed on the effort. They are exploring their plans in California, New York, New Jersey, Minnesota and Washington state in hopes of flipping at least a handful of Republican seats next November.
It's a clear attempt to retaliate against the GOP's aggressive redistricting effort to boot out as many as five Democrats in Texas — a move that will get publicly underway this week and one with the potential to give Republicans a major leg up in their fight to keep control of the House.
In an interview at Democratic National Committee headquarters in Washington, Jeffries made clear that his party was ready to respond in-kind to the GOP.
'We have a responsibility of making sure that we look at every single state of the union and do what we can to ensure that we maximize fairness in those jurisdictions,' the New York Democrat said. 'Some of the best and brightest lawyers in the country are looking at every single aspect of what's possible in these states.'
It's an extraordinary push from top Democrats, who could soon embrace the kind of GOP tactics that Jeffries described as 'part of a scheme to rig the midterm elections' — especially since the redrawing of congressional maps typically happens only at the beginning of a decade to reflect changing populations and demographics.
Even House Democrats privately acknowledge their emerging plan may all be moot if it's fully blocked in court, according to more than a dozen Democratic lawmakers and campaign operatives involved in the discussions. Others are wary of eschewing their party's decadeslong push for fair voting rights and commissions in states that attempt to draw their congressional boundaries free from partisan politics.
But plenty more Democrats say they have no choice but to try to fight Trump as they face immense pressure from their base and can't risk being relegated to the minority for two more years — especially since only a handful of seats could determine the next majority.
'We got to fight fire with fire, so I support anything the governor [Gavin Newsom] wants to do,' said Rep. Eric Swalwell, who is part of the California delegation that's been meeting privately with Jeffries on the matter. 'We shouldn't just admire the problem.'
Texas Republicans and the Justice Department argue that the move is necessary over concerns that the current maps are unconstitutional and racially gerrymandered.
Asked about Jeffries' accusation that the GOP was attempting to 'rig the election,' Speaker Mike Johnson fired back.
'That's ridiculous. Hakeem Jeffries is also playing political games,' the Louisiana Republican told CNN when asked about the Democratic leader's comments.
In the interview with CNN, Jeffries specifically called out three states: California, New York and New Jersey. But the party is also looking closely at Minnesota and Washington state, Democratic sources said.
And when asked about the push to redraw New Jersey's boundaries, Jeffries said it is 'incumbent upon all of us to take a close look at, how do we ensure that the congressional map, writ large, is as fair as possible in advance of the midterm election?'
Jeffries said he plans to sit down with his governor, Kathy Hochul, sometime in August about the maps in New York. The state just redrew its lines last year without any drastic changes to seven seats currently held by Republicans, but Jeffries suggested that more could be done to help Democrats there: 'Let me just simply say the maps in New York are not as fair as they could be.'
Rep. Greg Meeks, a fellow New Yorker and a Jeffries ally, was blunter: 'You can't go to a fight where they have a gun and you have a knife.'
The Democratic leader and his members have also been in close contact with the California governor, who says he is moving ahead with an expedited push to redraw his state's congressional maps before next November, according to two people involved with the discussions. Behind the scenes, their focus has been on how California can overcome its own law that hands over map-drawing power to a nonpartisan redistricting commission.
It's a hurdle that Democrats face in some blue states across the country: Governors and legislatures have awarded power to independent commissions to limit partisan gerrymandering — unlike in Texas, where Gov. Greg Abbott and state lawmakers have full control. Democrats privately acknowledge this is legally complicated and likely extremely costly, but suggest it is not insurmountable.
'If Republicans want to play by these rules, then I think that we shouldn't have one set of rules for one and the other set of rules for another. I think we need to even the playing board,' New York Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez told CNN.
Such discussions in Democratic circles all began in the last two weeks after Abbott declared that he would move forward with asking the state legislature to redraw Texas' maps, at the request of the White House. Trump and his team have said they believe they can squeeze five more seats out of the state — something he conveyed to the Texas GOP delegation last week. (Republican leaders believe it is more likely they can get two or three, according to two people familiar with those discussions.)
New seats in Texas — plus an additional two or three seats that could come out of the GOP's separate map-drawing effort in Ohio — may be enough to hinder Democrats' chances of reclaiming the House.
Rep. Marc Veasey, who is one of the Democrats being targeted in Texas, told CNN that if Republicans are successful in his state, his party will face an uphill battle to flip the House.
'Obviously it would make it much harder,' Veasey said. 'I think the biggest thing that keeps Trump up at night is losing the majority in the US House of Representatives and having to answer to Democrats and be held accountable.'
The Texas Democrat said his party has no choice but to try to make up ground in California, New York and anywhere else it can: 'Hell yeah, I would encourage us to do that. … I think you have to.'
Many California Democrats feel the same.
'I don't take anything off the table,' former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told CNN, adding that the state can get its voters to approve the change. 'We would not have any majority in the Congress without that big, vast number [of Democratic seats in California], but we always want more, so one way or another. So I don't take anything off the table.'
Rep. Lou Correa of California said the stakes are 'too high' not to try to squeeze out more seats, adding: 'It's gonna be a knockout midterm election like you haven't seen in a long time.'
But there are some members — particularly progressives, who have long championed voting rights — who are uncomfortable with the Democratic push.
'I think it is unacceptable and dangerous for essentially what people marched during the Civil Rights Movement for,' Rep. Greg Casar, a Texas Democrat who leads the Congressional Progressive Caucus, told CNN when asked whether states like California and New York should consider the same approach as his own state.
And some Democrats who sit in swing districts worry about the fallout.
New York Rep. Tom Suozzi, a Democrat whose district includes parts of Long Island, said changing the maps now is 'probably not' a good idea.
'Traditionally people do this every 10 years after the census, so that seems like the normal thing to me,' Suozzi said.
But Jeffries predicted that it's the Republican push that is a risky one, contending that changing solidly red districts in Texas — in order to make Democratic districts more competitive — could have the effect of putting more swing voters in GOP strongholds.
'We believe it may actually backfire, and that they may draw lines that endanger their Republican incumbents, who we will have a better chance of defeating in the 2026 midterm election,' Jeffries said.
So far, Texas GOP leaders and the White House have shared few details about their soon-to-be-unveiled maps with the state's House delegation. That will change in the coming days, with the state legislature returning for a special session this week to consider them.
Texas Republicans are now largely on board with the White House's plan, though one member of the delegation told CNN last week that there is a real fear the White House may overreach and end up creating ultra-competitive seats that Democrats can win.
Texas Rep. Pete Sessions — who lost his seat in Trump's first midterm in 2018, just before state Republicans redrew their map to better protect GOP incumbents — is taking a cautious approach. He's been in touch with the White House personally, though he declined to share details of those conversations.
'As you recall, New York did this a year or two ago,' Sessions said, referencing the Democratic effort that ended up costing their party seats after the map faced legal challenges. 'Just because the legislature does something, it's still subject to the law.'
Other Texas Republicans are encouraging Trump's team to be even more aggressive.
'I support the governor in his effort because we need to make sure we keep the House. We got to keep the House,' Rep. Troy Nehls told CNN. 'If we can get five, let's get five. Yeah, I'd like to try to get six.'
Rep. Richard Hudson of North Carolina, who leads the House GOP campaign arm, said he's staying out of the redistricting fight. But he acknowledged that it could bolster his party's chances of keeping the chamber next year.
'Any seats that we gain before Election Day would be nice,' Hudson said. While he said any Democratic gerrymandering effort would be 'out of my control' he also stressed that states like California have vastly different laws than Texas.
'I'll deal with the battlefield that I'm presented, and right now it looks really good for Republicans.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
WKRG News 5 to host Mobile mayoral debate: How to watch and submit questions
MOBILE, Ala. (WKRG) — The four candidates running for mayor of Mobile have agreed to participate in a live, primetime debate on WKRG News 5. The debate will take place on Monday, Aug. 4, from 7-8 p.m. Viewers can watch the debate on WKRG-TV or the WKRG+ app, stream it on or watch on WKRG's Facebook page. Former District Judge Spiro Cheriogotis, State Rep. Barbara Drummond, County Commissioner Connie Hudson and former Police Chief Paul Prine are vying for the seat currently held by Sandy Stimpson. Stimpson is not running for a fourth term in office. will moderate the debate. Questions will be formulated by News 5 and submitted by viewers and the candidates themselves. Ask your question here: Submit a form. Interest in the mayor's race is intense, as this is the first election in 20 years without an incumbent running. Election Day is Aug. 26. If no candidate receives a majority of votes, the top two vote-getters will meet in a runoff election on Sept. 23. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump struggles with facts as Fed Chair Jerome Powell corrects him in real time
To an unprecedented degree, Donald Trump has lobbied his handpicked Federal Reserve chairman, Jerome Powell, to lower interest rates. The heavy-handed tactics, which have unfolded in recent months in public and private, haven't had much of an effect, which in turn has generated no shortage of frustration in the Oval Office. Indeed, the president has resorted to juvenile taunts and name-calling, publicly condemning Powell as, among many other things, a 'moron' for failing to follow Trump's misguided demands. Having exhausted his usual bullying tactics, the Republican and his team began exploring alternative ways to gain leverage over the largely independent Fed chair. Recently, this led the White House in an unexpected direction: Team Trump decided to focus on building renovations at the Federal Reserve, with the president suggesting that cost overruns might constitute grounds to fire Powell, who has ignored calls to resign. So on Thursday Trump made a historically unusual visit to the Fed's headquarters in Washington, D.C., presumably to add a fresh round of pressure. This did not go as well for the president as it could have. During the visit, for example, Trump flubbed basic details about developments at the European Central Bank, which he pretended to know something about. Around the same time, the Republican made specific boasts about the impact of a rate cut, which were quickly discredited. But those comments only set the stage for the pièce de résistance. As The New York Times reported: The chair of the Federal Reserve closed his eyes and shook his head. He was about to do something that few senior government officials ever do, at least in public: fact-check President Trump in real time. This is one of those stories in which watching the video is necessary to fully appreciate what transpired. During brief remarks with reporters, the president, with Powell standing just inches away, declared that cost overruns on the project have reached 'about $3.1 billion.' The Fed chair could be seen immediately and rapidly shaking his head, making clear to those in attendance that Trump was citing a number that wasn't true. 'I'm not aware of that,' Powell interrupted. The figure, the Republican responded, 'just came out.' Moments later, Trump tried to justify his claim, pulling a document from his jacket pocket and handing it to the Fed chair. Powell quickly reviewed the data and noticed an important flaw. 'You just added in a third building,' Powell said. 'It's a building that's being built,' Trump replied. 'No, it was built five years ago,' the Fed chair reminded him. 'It's not new.' Oops. It was not a flattering moment for a president who routinely makes up figures but who is rarely fact-checked by his own appointees on camera. Indeed, one of the more notable elements of the exchange was that Powell didn't seem to care at all about Trump's delicate ego or fear of public humiliation. As for the underlying issue, it's true that the renovation project is over budget, but as The Associated Press reported last week, it was Trump appointees, not Powell, who pushed for elements that raised costs. This article was originally published on


CNN
27 minutes ago
- CNN
Exclusive: ‘A more vulnerable nation': FEMA memos lay out risks of plan to cut $1B in disaster and security grants
Federal agenciesFacebookTweetLink Follow The Federal Emergency Management Agency has proposed cutting nearly $1 billion in grant funding that communities and first responders nationwide use to better prepare for disasters and to bolster security for possible terror or cyberattacks. The proposed cuts, which still require approval from the White House budget office and Congress, would zero out funding for more than half of FEMA's emergency management and homeland security grant programs, according to internal memos and two FEMA officials familiar with the plans. This comes amid an overhaul of the disaster relief agency at the hands of the Trump administration, which seeks to drastically shrink FEMA's footprint and shift more responsibility for disaster preparedness, response and recovery onto states. The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees FEMA, has looked at slashing grant funding as part of that effort. In one memo signed by acting FEMA Administrator David Richardson, the cuts are described as a way to 'focus on appropriate spending for the Agency's core mission in emergency management.' But the memos – signed by Richardson and approved by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem – also acknowledge in stark terms the potential risks of eliminating the programs. The loss of one program that helps communities plan and train for disasters would 'leave state and local governments more vulnerable to catastrophic incidents,' one memo states. Ending another that bolsters transportation infrastructure and terrorism protections would 'contradict the administration's commitment to a safer and more secure country,' the memo says. Terminating the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) – the largest FEMA program on the chopping block, providing more than $500 million to prepare major cities for catastrophic emergencies – would create 'a less secure nation, especially at the border and in some of the nation's most targeted cities, including Miami, Washington DC, and Dallas,' the memo states. The agency also plans to eliminate funding for the Next Generation Warning System initiative, which is designed to modernize and improve the nation's public alert and warning capabilities for severe storms and other emergencies, after pausing the program earlier this year. According to the memo, FEMA staff had suggested that instead of terminating the program, the money could be allocated 'to high-risk flooding areas including Texas and New Mexico.' But Richardson signed off on eliminating it earlier this month. Among the other impacts from the potential cuts, as outlined by FEMA, would be 'undertrained firefighters,' 'poor wildfire readiness,' more risk at '120 critical United States ports' and less homeland security training for cities hosting World Cup games. Axing another program 'could increase the risk of terror attacks on passenger rail,' the memo says, and cutting off a violence and terrorism prevention program 'results in a more vulnerable nation.' DHS said the memos referenced in this story are 'cherry-picked,' but acknowledged the department is looking to cut 'unaccountable programs.' 'Secretary Noem and this Administration are focused on ending waste, fraud, and abuse across the federal government - and FEMA is no exception,' a DHS spokesman said in a statement to CNN. 'For years, taxpayer dollars have flowed to bloated grants, political pet projects, and groups with questionable ties. That ends now.' This comes after FEMA shut down the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program, halting more than $600 million intended to help communities prepare for natural disasters, prompting 20 states to sue the agency. Due to the ongoing litigation, the memos state, FEMA will address the future of the BRIC program at a later date. The cuts to disaster and security grants could have wide-ranging consequences for communities that depend on these funds. The National League of Cities, an advocacy group representing cities, towns and villages across the US, 'strongly opposes' the proposed cuts, according to a statement provided to CNN by a spokesperson. 'Reducing or eliminating these programs would severely undermine the preparedness of our first responders and compromise the ability of local governments to effectively ensure the core capabilities necessary for prevention, protection, mitigation, response, and recovery efforts,' the NLC spokesperson wrote. Congress allocated a total of more than $4 billion this fiscal year for FEMA to support these national preparedness programs, which state and local governments, emergency management agencies, and fire and police departments depend on for essential staffing, equipment, and training. But in recent months, the disaster relief agency, at the direction of DHS, has largely halted the selection of new grant recipients so it could review the programs. That has left emergency managers across the country waiting for FEMA to issue Notices of Funding Opportunities, or NOFOs, which allow local jurisdictions and organizations to apply for grants and are now more than two months behind schedule. 'We've been ghosted by FEMA,' a North Carolina official recently told CNN, expressing frustration over the lack of guidance on whether states can expect funding in the coming months. Now federal and state emergency managers are increasingly concerned that large portions of this year's funds will go unspent, as the funding streams expire unless allocated by the end of September. At a hearing on Capitol Hill Wednesday, Richardson told concerned lawmakers, 'We're getting the NOFOs out the door as we speak.' The acting FEMA chief did not mention the looming cuts he had authorized in the memo he signed days before the hearing, though he criticized the agency's grant programs. 'A lot of the grants sound good, and then you dig into them, and they're not so good,' Richardson said, citing resilience projects 'used for things like bike paths and shade at bus stops.' During Wednesday's hearing, Rep. Dina Titus, a Nevada Democrat, pressed Richardson about the status of UASI funding, emphasizing its importance for protecting Las Vegas from potential terror threats. Richardson responded: 'What I can commit to is that we've been doing due diligence on all of the grants.' He did not mention the program's potential termination. Responding to CNN's new reporting Thursday, Titus said the plan to cut UASI is 'deeply irresponsible and endangers our public safety.' 'These grants played a significant role in the response to the Harvest Festival shootings and are critical to protecting the public in all major cities and at big events such as the Super Bowl, Formula One races, and golf tournaments,' Titus said in a statement to CNN. 'I implore Secretary Noem to administer these public safety grants as Congress directed and ensure that our first responders and emergency personnel have the tools they need to address future threats in our communities.'