logo
As Trump pushes Texas takeover in fight for House, Democrats plot their counterpunch

As Trump pushes Texas takeover in fight for House, Democrats plot their counterpunch

CNN6 days ago
House Democrats are actively preparing for political trench warfare against the GOP in next year's midterm battle, with talks taking shape behind the scenes to mount a counterattack against President Donald Trump's power play in Texas that aims to cement GOP control of Washington for the rest of his second term.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and his political team have begun privately shaping a legally risky — and likely expensive — strategy to redraw House maps in several Democratic-controlled states, according to Democrats briefed on the effort. They are exploring their plans in California, New York, New Jersey, Minnesota and Washington state in hopes of flipping at least a handful of Republican seats next November.
It's a clear attempt to retaliate against the GOP's aggressive redistricting effort to boot out as many as five Democrats in Texas — a move that will get publicly underway this week and one with the potential to give Republicans a major leg up in their fight to keep control of the House.
In an interview at Democratic National Committee headquarters in Washington, Jeffries made clear that his party was ready to respond in-kind to the GOP.
'We have a responsibility of making sure that we look at every single state of the union and do what we can to ensure that we maximize fairness in those jurisdictions,' the New York Democrat said. 'Some of the best and brightest lawyers in the country are looking at every single aspect of what's possible in these states.'
It's an extraordinary push from top Democrats, who could soon embrace the kind of GOP tactics that Jeffries described as 'part of a scheme to rig the midterm elections' — especially since the redrawing of congressional maps typically happens only at the beginning of a decade to reflect changing populations and demographics.
Even House Democrats privately acknowledge their emerging plan may all be moot if it's fully blocked in court, according to more than a dozen Democratic lawmakers and campaign operatives involved in the discussions. Others are wary of eschewing their party's decadeslong push for fair voting rights and commissions in states that attempt to draw their congressional boundaries free from partisan politics.
But plenty more Democrats say they have no choice but to try to fight Trump as they face immense pressure from their base and can't risk being relegated to the minority for two more years — especially since only a handful of seats could determine the next majority.
'We got to fight fire with fire, so I support anything the governor [Gavin Newsom] wants to do,' said Rep. Eric Swalwell, who is part of the California delegation that's been meeting privately with Jeffries on the matter. 'We shouldn't just admire the problem.'
Texas Republicans and the Justice Department argue that the move is necessary over concerns that the current maps are unconstitutional and racially gerrymandered.
Asked about Jeffries' accusation that the GOP was attempting to 'rig the election,' Speaker Mike Johnson fired back.
'That's ridiculous. Hakeem Jeffries is also playing political games,' the Louisiana Republican told CNN when asked about the Democratic leader's comments.
In the interview with CNN, Jeffries specifically called out three states: California, New York and New Jersey. But the party is also looking closely at Minnesota and Washington state, Democratic sources said.
And when asked about the push to redraw New Jersey's boundaries, Jeffries said it is 'incumbent upon all of us to take a close look at, how do we ensure that the congressional map, writ large, is as fair as possible in advance of the midterm election?'
Jeffries said he plans to sit down with his governor, Kathy Hochul, sometime in August about the maps in New York. The state just redrew its lines last year without any drastic changes to seven seats currently held by Republicans, but Jeffries suggested that more could be done to help Democrats there: 'Let me just simply say the maps in New York are not as fair as they could be.'
Rep. Greg Meeks, a fellow New Yorker and a Jeffries ally, was blunter: 'You can't go to a fight where they have a gun and you have a knife.'
The Democratic leader and his members have also been in close contact with the California governor, who says he is moving ahead with an expedited push to redraw his state's congressional maps before next November, according to two people involved with the discussions. Behind the scenes, their focus has been on how California can overcome its own law that hands over map-drawing power to a nonpartisan redistricting commission.
It's a hurdle that Democrats face in some blue states across the country: Governors and legislatures have awarded power to independent commissions to limit partisan gerrymandering — unlike in Texas, where Gov. Greg Abbott and state lawmakers have full control. Democrats privately acknowledge this is legally complicated and likely extremely costly, but suggest it is not insurmountable.
'If Republicans want to play by these rules, then I think that we shouldn't have one set of rules for one and the other set of rules for another. I think we need to even the playing board,' New York Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez told CNN.
Such discussions in Democratic circles all began in the last two weeks after Abbott declared that he would move forward with asking the state legislature to redraw Texas' maps, at the request of the White House. Trump and his team have said they believe they can squeeze five more seats out of the state — something he conveyed to the Texas GOP delegation last week. (Republican leaders believe it is more likely they can get two or three, according to two people familiar with those discussions.)
New seats in Texas — plus an additional two or three seats that could come out of the GOP's separate map-drawing effort in Ohio — may be enough to hinder Democrats' chances of reclaiming the House.
Rep. Marc Veasey, who is one of the Democrats being targeted in Texas, told CNN that if Republicans are successful in his state, his party will face an uphill battle to flip the House.
'Obviously it would make it much harder,' Veasey said. 'I think the biggest thing that keeps Trump up at night is losing the majority in the US House of Representatives and having to answer to Democrats and be held accountable.'
The Texas Democrat said his party has no choice but to try to make up ground in California, New York and anywhere else it can: 'Hell yeah, I would encourage us to do that. … I think you have to.'
Many California Democrats feel the same.
'I don't take anything off the table,' former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told CNN, adding that the state can get its voters to approve the change. 'We would not have any majority in the Congress without that big, vast number [of Democratic seats in California], but we always want more, so one way or another. So I don't take anything off the table.'
Rep. Lou Correa of California said the stakes are 'too high' not to try to squeeze out more seats, adding: 'It's gonna be a knockout midterm election like you haven't seen in a long time.'
But there are some members — particularly progressives, who have long championed voting rights — who are uncomfortable with the Democratic push.
'I think it is unacceptable and dangerous for essentially what people marched during the Civil Rights Movement for,' Rep. Greg Casar, a Texas Democrat who leads the Congressional Progressive Caucus, told CNN when asked whether states like California and New York should consider the same approach as his own state.
And some Democrats who sit in swing districts worry about the fallout.
New York Rep. Tom Suozzi, a Democrat whose district includes parts of Long Island, said changing the maps now is 'probably not' a good idea.
'Traditionally people do this every 10 years after the census, so that seems like the normal thing to me,' Suozzi said.
But Jeffries predicted that it's the Republican push that is a risky one, contending that changing solidly red districts in Texas — in order to make Democratic districts more competitive — could have the effect of putting more swing voters in GOP strongholds.
'We believe it may actually backfire, and that they may draw lines that endanger their Republican incumbents, who we will have a better chance of defeating in the 2026 midterm election,' Jeffries said.
So far, Texas GOP leaders and the White House have shared few details about their soon-to-be-unveiled maps with the state's House delegation. That will change in the coming days, with the state legislature returning for a special session this week to consider them.
Texas Republicans are now largely on board with the White House's plan, though one member of the delegation told CNN last week that there is a real fear the White House may overreach and end up creating ultra-competitive seats that Democrats can win.
Texas Rep. Pete Sessions — who lost his seat in Trump's first midterm in 2018, just before state Republicans redrew their map to better protect GOP incumbents — is taking a cautious approach. He's been in touch with the White House personally, though he declined to share details of those conversations.
'As you recall, New York did this a year or two ago,' Sessions said, referencing the Democratic effort that ended up costing their party seats after the map faced legal challenges. 'Just because the legislature does something, it's still subject to the law.'
Other Texas Republicans are encouraging Trump's team to be even more aggressive.
'I support the governor in his effort because we need to make sure we keep the House. We got to keep the House,' Rep. Troy Nehls told CNN. 'If we can get five, let's get five. Yeah, I'd like to try to get six.'
Rep. Richard Hudson of North Carolina, who leads the House GOP campaign arm, said he's staying out of the redistricting fight. But he acknowledged that it could bolster his party's chances of keeping the chamber next year.
'Any seats that we gain before Election Day would be nice,' Hudson said. While he said any Democratic gerrymandering effort would be 'out of my control' he also stressed that states like California have vastly different laws than Texas.
'I'll deal with the battlefield that I'm presented, and right now it looks really good for Republicans.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Japan says $550 billion package in trade deal could finance Taiwanese chipmaker in US
Japan says $550 billion package in trade deal could finance Taiwanese chipmaker in US

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Japan says $550 billion package in trade deal could finance Taiwanese chipmaker in US

By Makiko Yamazaki TOKYO (Reuters) -Japan's $550 billion investment package agreed in this week's U.S. tariff deal could help finance a Taiwanese firm building semiconductor plants in the U.S., Japan's top trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa said on Saturday. Japan agreed to the sweeping U.S.-bound investment initiative, which includes equity, loans and guarantees, in exchange for lower tariffs on its exports to the U.S. However, the structure of the scheme remains unclear. "Japan, the United States, and like-minded countries are working together to build supply chains in sectors critical to economic security," Akazawa told public broadcaster NHK. To that end, he said projects eligible for financing under the package are not limited to U.S. or Japanese firms. "For example, if a Taiwanese chipmaker builds a plant in the U.S. and uses Japanese components or tailors its products to meet Japanese needs, that's fine too," he said, without specifying companies. The U.S. is significantly reliant on Taiwan's TSMC for advanced chip manufacturing, raising economic security concerns due to geographic proximity to China. TSMC announced plans for a $100 billion U.S. investment with U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House in March, on top of $65 billion pledged for three plants in the state of Arizona, one of which is up and running. Japan will use state-owned Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) and Nippon Export and Investment Insurance (NEXI) for the investments. A recent law revision has enabled JBIC to finance foreign companies deemed critical to Japan's supply chains. Akazawa told NHK that equity investment would account for just about 1-2% of the $550 billion, suggesting that the bulk will come in the form of loans and guarantees. When asked about the White House statement that the U.S. would retain 90% of the profits from the package, he clarified that the figure refers only to returns on equity investment, which would represent a small fraction of the total. While Japan initially hoped to secure half of the returns, a loss from the concession on the profit-sharing would be marginal compared to the roughly 10 trillion yen ($67.72 billion) in tariff costs that could be avoided under the deal, he said. He added that Japan aims to deploy the $550 billion investments during Trump's current term. ($1 = 147.6600 yen) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

How redistricting in Texas and other states could change the game for US House elections
How redistricting in Texas and other states could change the game for US House elections

Chicago Tribune

time9 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

How redistricting in Texas and other states could change the game for US House elections

WASHINGTON — Redistricting usually happens after the once-a-decade population count by the U.S. Census Bureau or in response to a court ruling. Now, Texas Republicans want to break that tradition — and other states could follow suit. President Trump has asked the Texas Legislature to create districts, in time for next year's midterm elections, that will send five more Republicans to Washington and make it harder for Democrats to regain the majority and blunt his agenda. The state has 38 seats in the House. Republicans now hold 25 and Democrats 12, with one seat vacant after the death of a Democrat. 'There's been a lot more efforts by the parties and political actors to push the boundaries – literally and figuratively – to reconfigure what the game is,' said Doug Spencer, Rothgerber Jr. Chair in Constitutional Law at the University of Colorado. Other states are waiting to see what Texas does and whether to follow suit. The rules of redistricting can be vague and variable; each state has its own set of rules and procedures. Politicians are gauging what voters will tolerate when it comes to politically motivated mapmaking. Here's what to know about the rules of congressional redistricting: Every decade, the Census Bureau collects population data used to divide the 435 House seats among the 50 states based on the updated head count. It's a process known as reapportionment. States that grew relative to others might gain a seat at the expense of those whose populations stagnated or declined. States use their own procedures to draw lines for the assigned number of districts. The smallest states receive just one representative, which means the entire state is a single congressional district. Some state constitutions require independent commissions to devise the political boundaries or to advise the legislature. When legislatures take the lead, lawmakers can risk drawing lines that end up challenged in court, usually for violating the Voting Rights Act. Mapmakers can get another chance to resubmit new maps. Sometimes, judges draw the maps on their own. By the first midterm elections after the latest population count, each state is ready with its maps, but those districts do not always stick. Courts can find that the political lines are unconstitutional. There is no national impediment to a state trying to redraw districts in the middle of the decade and to do it for political reasons, such as increasing representation by the party in power. 'The laws about redistricting just say you have to redistrict after every census,' Spencer said. 'And then some state legislatures got a little clever and said, well it doesn't say we can't do it more.' Some states do have laws that would prevent midcycle redistricting or make it difficult to do so in a way that benefits one party. Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., has threatened to retaliate against the GOP push in Texas by drawing more favorable Democratic seats in his state. That goal, however, is complicated by a constitutional amendment that requires an independent commission to lead the process. Texas has done it before. When the Legislature failed to agree on a redistricting plan after the 2000 census, a federal court stepped in with its own map. Republican Tom DeLay of Texas, who was then the U.S. House majority leader, thought his state should have five more districts friendly to his party. 'I'm the majority leader and we want more seats,′′ he said at the time. Statehouse Democrats protested by fleeing to Oklahoma, depriving the Legislature of enough votes to officially conduct any business. But DeLay eventually got his way, and Republicans replaced Democrats in five seats in 2004. In 2019, the Supreme Court ruled that federal courts should not get involved in debates over political gerrymandering, the practice of drawing districts for partisan gain. In that decision, Chief Justice John Roberts said redistricting is 'highly partisan by any measure.' But courts may demand new maps if they believe the congressional boundaries dilute the votes of a racial minority group, in violation of the Voting Rights Act. Washington Rep. Suzan DelBene, who leads House Democrats' campaign arm, indicated at a Christian Science Monitor event that if Texas follows through on passing new maps, Democratic-led states would look at their own political lines. 'If they go down this path, absolutely folks are going to respond across the country,' DelBene said. 'We're not going to be sitting back with one hand tied behind our back while Republicans try to undermine voices of the American people.' In New York, Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul recently joined Newsom in expressing openness to taking up mid-decade redistricting. But state laws mandating independent commissions or blunting the ability to gerrymander would come into play. Among Republican-led states, Ohio could try to further expand the 10-5 edge that the GOP holds in the House delegation; a quirk in state law requires Ohio to redraw its maps before the 2026 midterms. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said he was considering early redistricting and 'working through what that would look like.'

Paramount, Skydance expected to close deal on Aug. 7
Paramount, Skydance expected to close deal on Aug. 7

The Hill

time9 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Paramount, Skydance expected to close deal on Aug. 7

Paramount and Skydance announced Friday that, with the Trump administration's approval, the highly anticipated merger between the entertainment giants is expected to take place next month. The Aug. 7 date, unveiled in a press release, comes after the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on Thursday allowed Skydance's acquisition of Paramount to move forward after the merger was first proposed last year. FCC Chair Brendan Carr in announcing the decision said he welcomed Skydance's commitment to remaining 'unbiased' in its journalism and willingness to promote 'a diversity of viewpoints across the political and ideological spectrum.' 'Americans no longer trust the legacy national news media to report fully, accurately, and fairly,' Carr added. 'It is time for a change.' The move caps off months of turmoil between Paramount Global, the parent company of CBS, and President Trump. Trump sued CBS's '60 Minutes' last year after he argued an interview it aired with former Vice President Harris was altered in her favor during the 2024 presidential election cycle. While the company fought the claims, including releasing a full transcript from the episode, it ultimately settled with the administration for $16 million. Those funds are set to go to Trump's eventual presidential library. The news outlet has also faced criticism in recent days after CBS made the decision to sunset 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' next May, after more than 30 years on air. Paramount said the move was based on finances, but critics have argued the settlement and Skydance deal were likely involved — and bribery allegations have been floated. Comedian Stephen Colbert, who has hosted the show since 2015, has been openly critical of the merger. Colbert blasted the network earlier this week for choosing to axe the show and thanked those who have reached out in support, including Democrats, press freedom advocates and many of his late-night counterparts. He added that 'one key mistake' the network made when moving forward with the plan is that 'they left me alive.' Colbert also lashed out at Trump after the president said in a post online that he 'absolutely' loved that the comedian was getting 'fired.' 'How dare you, sir,' the host responded. 'Would an untalented man be able to compose the following satirical witticism: 'Go f‑‑‑ yourself.'' Under the terms of the $8 billion merger, the company will become 'New Paramount' and will be led by Trump-ally and billionaire David Ellison, the son of tech tycoon and Oracle founder Larry Ellison.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store