logo
mRNA Technology Transfer Programme's Phase 2.0 discussed with partners on the sidelines of G20 Summit

mRNA Technology Transfer Programme's Phase 2.0 discussed with partners on the sidelines of G20 Summit

Associated Press5 hours ago

With the G20 Health Working Group, global health leaders are coming together to set the foundation for a new phase of the mRNA Technology Transfer Programme
'This is a unique opportunity, driven by the pandemic. The foundations are in place — but without sustained political will, the promise of equitable mRNA access could slip through our fingers.'— Charles Gore, Executive Director of the Medicines Patent Pool
JOHANNESBURG, GAUTENG, SOUTH AFRICA, June 20, 2025 / EINPresswire.com / -- In parallel with the G20 Health Working Group, global health leaders are coming together in Johannesburg to set the foundation for a new phase of the mRNA Technology Transfer Programme – a pioneering initiative transitioning from proof of concept to sustainable, commercially viable manufacturing, while enhancing pandemic preparedness and regional health security.
Launched in 2021 by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Medicines Patent Pool (MPP), with the support of the Government of South Africa, France, Belgium, Canada, the European Union, Germany and Norway, the Programme has successfully enabled 15 Partners across Latin America, Africa, Eastern Europe and Asia to receive foundational mRNA technology. Now, it is moving into Phase 2.0 (2026–2030), with the aim of empowering regional manufacturers to scale up commercially sustainable production of mRNA-based vaccines and therapeutics at Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)-grade.
'The mRNA Technology Transfer Programme is delivering on its promise to build capabilities in low- and middle-income countries,' said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General. 'The Pandemic Agreement adopted by the World Health Assembly also includes legally-binding commitments to strengthen local production. We must now translate those commitments into capacity on the ground, so that when the next pandemic strikes, we meet it more equitably and more effectively.'
'This is a unique opportunity, driven by the pandemic. The foundations are in place — but without sustained political will, the promise of equitable mRNA access could slip through our fingers.' said Charles Gore, Executive Director of the Medicines Patent Pool. 'What we need now is the courage to build on our investment to date, to align, and to realise the full value and impact of what we started.'
From technology access to market-ready solutions
The Programme is moving from focus on technology acquisition to defining how each partner will translate it into real-world impact. Each manufacturer is now focused on developing an economic case for long-term, flexible, and commercially viable manufacturing — with the capacity to produce mRNA vaccines in inter-pandemic periods and pivoting rapidly in response to future health emergencies.
Product focus areas include:
mRNA vaccines – for pandemic and priority diseases (e.g., influenza, TB, HIV, malaria, dengue, leishmaniasis);
mRNA therapeutics – such as oncology and monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatments; and
Biologicals beyond mRNA – including near-term commercial products to support facility viability.
'We have successfully progressed with the technology transfer to eight Partners — a testament to the strength and openness of this platform,' said Prof. Petro Terblanche, CEO of Afrigen Biologics. 'What comes next is even more exciting: Afrigen is on the cusp of receiving GMP accreditation, positioning us not only as a technology originator but as a sustainable manufacturing and innovation partner for the Global South. We will continue to work with local and global partners on the development of new vaccines prioritizing the burden of disease in LMICs.'
A diversity of models, one global goal
The Programme's Phase 2.0 recognises that there is no one-size-fits-all model. Manufacturers will develop tailored business strategies based on national health needs and policy, regulatory maturity and regional market dynamics. Some, like Bio-Manguinhos and Sinergium in Latin America, BioFarma in Indonesia, and Biovac in South Africa, are already piloting investment roadmaps with detailed market, regulatory, and COGS (cost of goods sold) modelling. Others will receive bespoke support to develop their investment cases.
Crucially, sustainability will depend on country and regional-level procurement commitments, pooled purchasing mechanisms, and cross-border alignment — especially in Africa and Asia, where national markets alone may be insufficient to support GMP-level manufacturing scale.
'We need to back science with smart policy,' said Dr Mmboneni Muofhe of South Africa's Department of Science, Technology and Innovation. 'This is about creating a new ecosystem for public health security, grounded in regional ownership, long-term strategy and investments.'
Rising demand meets structural barriers
While market opportunities for mRNA vaccines and therapeutics are growing — from seasonal influenza and HPV to innovative cancer treatments — the Programme acknowledges structural hurdles:
Misinformation and vaccine hesitancy;
Shifting donor funding priorities that reduce funding availability;
High clinical trial costs; and
Need for supportive policies and well-defined procurement pathways.
The mRNA Programme highlights both the growing interest in regional R&D consortia focused on target diseases of regional relevance like leishmaniasis and malaria, and the drive to advance next-generation technologies focusing on dose sparing, reduced cost of goods and thermostability.
Edwin Reichel
Flow Communications
+27 114404841
email us here
Legal Disclaimer:
EIN Presswire provides this news content 'as is' without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exceptional Use Recommendation for Nuclear Emergency Drug
Exceptional Use Recommendation for Nuclear Emergency Drug

Medscape

time41 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Exceptional Use Recommendation for Nuclear Emergency Drug

The European Medicines Agency's (EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended an exceptional circumstances marketing authorization for Imreplys. The drug — active ingredient sargramostim and manufactured by Partner Therapeutics Ltd — is intended to treat people with hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS) following acute exposure to myelosuppressive doses of radiation. H-ARS occurs when radiation suppresses bone marrow hematopoiesis, leading to an increased risk for infection and bleeding. It occurs after whole-body radiation doses of about 1-6 Gy, most often associated with acute exposure following radiologic or nuclear emergencies. Sargramostim, a granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, counteracts H-ARS by inducing the bone marrow to produce immune-protective leukocytes, including granulocytes, macrophages, and monocytes, as well as red blood cells and platelets. The positive opinion means that Imreplys is now indicated for treatment of patients of all ages with H-ARS following acute exposure to myelosuppressive doses of radiation. It has also been used in the US in patients aged 2 years or older to prevent serious infection in conditions such as leukemia, bone marrow transplant, and prechemotherapy blood cell collection. As well as the infection risk, symptoms of H-ARS may include those of anemia, petechiae, and prolonged bleeding, starting 1-6 hours after exposure and lasting up to 2 days. Exceptional Circumstances Authorization Recommended Medicines can be authorized under exceptional circumstances, subject to certain specific obligations where the applicant was unable to provide comprehensive data on the efficacy and safety of the medicine under normal conditions of use. This may be because the condition that the drug is to be used for is too rare for extensive data gathering; because of limited scientific knowledge in the area concerned; or because collection of full information is not possible or is unethical. Exceptional circumstances authorization must be reviewed annually. The CHMP said that three randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled studies in rhesus monkeys who received H-ARS-inducing total body irradiation showed that Imreplys increased 60-day survival rates compared with placebo. Studies had also shown faster recovery of absolute neutrophil counts and platelets, reduced infection rates, and fewer signs of sepsis. The most common side effects with Imreplys include fever, diarrhea, vomiting, skin reactions, rash, asthenia, metabolic laboratory abnormalities, malaise, high glucose, abdominal pain, weight loss, low albumin, pruritus, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, chills, pharyngitis, bone pain, chest pain, hypomagnesemia, hematemesis, arthralgia, anxiety, and eye hemorrhage. Use Governed by Radiologic/Nuclear Emergency Recommendations The EMA said that Imreplys will be available as a 250 μg powder for solution for injection and should be used in accordance with official radiologic/nuclear emergency recommendations. Detailed recommendations for the use of the product will be described in the summary of product characteristics (SmPC), which will be published on the EMA website in all official European Union languages after the marketing authorization has been granted by the European Commission.

Alarm raised over plans for state-run lottery
Alarm raised over plans for state-run lottery

News24

timean hour ago

  • News24

Alarm raised over plans for state-run lottery

Government plans to nationalise the South African lottery when the current private operator's licence expires in 2034. The new Sizekhaya Consortium must help the state develop skills and infrastructure to run the lottery itself from 2034. Critics warn that a state-run lottery could lead to more corruption, given the billions lost at parastatals and government entities. The government plans to introduce a state-run national lottery instead of using a private operator, as has been the case since the Lotto was launched 25 years ago. Details of the intention to effectively nationalise the lottery were revealed in a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the latest operator licence, which has been awarded to the Sizekhaya Consortium. If a state lottery were to be implemented, it would only happen in 2034, when Sizekhaya's eight-year licence, which commences 1 June 2026, expires. The concept of a state-run lottery was first introduced in a 2013 amendment to the Lotteries Act but was never implemented. National Lotteries Commission (NLC) commissioner Jodi Scholtz told GroundUp that the provision for a state-run national lottery in the amendment 'was in part a response to the disruption experienced in 2007, when the country found itself without an active lottery operator for several months' due to litigation. 'This legislative provision was intended to ensure continuity of the lottery and protect public interest and revenue streams designated for good causes, should similar challenges arise in the future,' she said. The issue of a state-run lottery was hotly debated by the trade and industry portfolio committee during the previous, sixth Parliament. There were disagreements among MPs about the wisdom of nationalising the lottery, with some arguing that in light of the corruption at state entities that this could lead to further misappropriation of funds. Those who were for nationalisation said it would reduce profiteering by the licence holder. One of the champions for nationalisation was former National Lotteries Commission (NLC) board member Dr Muthuhadini Madzivhandila, who argued for a state-run lottery when he unsuccessfully applied for the post of NLC chairperson. Madzivhandi, who subsequently died, corruptly benefited from lottery grants. Since the amendment, several policy and legal review processes have been conducted 'to explore the practical implementation of this provision,' said Scholtz. Yamkela Fanisi, spokesperson for trade, industry and competition minister Parks Tau, failed to respond to questions about the prospect of a state-run lottery and the reasons for the possible change. Transition to state lottery In terms of the RFP, bidders for the fourth lottery licence were 'required to commit to positioning the state to transition from privately operated National Lottery and National Sports Pool operations to a state-owned and operated National Lottery'. Applicants were informed that they had to 'demonstrate their ability to capacitate the state to prepare for and ultimately become the operator of the National Lottery and the National Sports Pool at the expiry of the Licence Period'. They were also required to provide a plan for how they would 'support the state in developing the necessary infrastructure, skills, and capacity to operate the National Lottery and Sports Pool'. A key part of the RFP deals with the transfer of rights to technology to operate the lottery. Responding to questions, Sizekhaya sent an unsigned written reply: 'Genlot [its Chinese tech partner] has assigned intellectual property rights for its lottery software to its 51% locally owned subsidiary, Genlot SA.' In terms of its agreement, Genlot SA is authorised to transfer this intellectual property (IP) to 'the South African state if it decides to operate the lottery in the future', Sizekhaya responded, declining to disclose details of the terms and conditions of such a rights transfer. Opening the door to corruption and waste The prospect of a state-run lottery opening the door to corruption and inefficiencies in light of what had happened at many parastatals and government entities, where billions of rands have been lost, was raised by some critics. The DA's Mat Cuthbert. who played a key role in Parliament in helping expose the endemic corruption that overwhelmed the NLC under its previous leadership, said, 'At the time, the NLC only had access to approximately 34% of all revenue generated by the National Lottery, housed under the NLDTF (National Lottery Distribution Trust Fund.) One can only imagine how much more public funding would have been stolen had they had access to the approximately R7 billion generated in ticket sales revenue per annum.' Professor Alex van den Heever of the Wits School of Governance was also sceptical of a state-run lottery. The wide discretion granted to the Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition to appoint the board, commissioner and distributing agencies 'has been a recipe for corruption as a single person appoints all the strategic decision makers', he said. The move to a proposed 'state-led approach failed to address the corporate governance flaws of the original configuration,' Van den Heever said. 'Ministerial discretion, the likely driver of structural corruption to date, is retained at the same levels as before. There is therefore a high likelihood of ministerial overreach, exacerbated by a general absence of independent supervision, institutional safeguards, added to the uncertain capabilities of state structures. 'It is my expectation that this approach is designed to facilitate state capture and corruption of various forms - improper appointments, corruption in procurement and the selection of distributing agencies. The new provisions specify that certain accountability structures need to be implemented, which are inadequate, with their design and implementation vulnerable to the wide discretion of the minister. This discretion enables the minister to circumvent any implemented formal structures. 'When power is concentrated, circumvention is relatively straightforward. In my assessment, the same levels of corruption as before are likely to persist into the future. Nothing is cured by this change.'

The Low-Hanging Fruit That Can Transform Healthcare Today
The Low-Hanging Fruit That Can Transform Healthcare Today

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

The Low-Hanging Fruit That Can Transform Healthcare Today

Kamal Anand, chief product officer of TeleVox and Mosaicx, part of West Technology Group. In conversations across the healthcare industry, I see many healthcare leaders rightly focused on AI's long-term potential. But in doing so, they may overlook high-impact automation and digital engagement tools that can improve efficiency, reduce administrative burden and enhance patient experience and outcomes right now. I believe in the power of automation and AI as augmentation tools. The most effective technologies currently in healthcare aren't designed to take over for humans; they're built to support them. They help care teams focus on what they do best while offloading the repetitive, routine and administrative work that weighs them down. As a pragmatic product leader, I've seen firsthand that incremental improvements, particularly those powered by responsible AI and automation, can drive real, measurable impact. These smaller wins build confidence, prove ROI and pave the way for more transformative change down the road. By reframing digital transformation as a process of enhancement rather than disruption, healthcare leaders can unlock value sooner and with less risk. And they don't need to wait for external technology partners or major capital investment to do it. The opportunity lies in optimizing underused capabilities and aligning existing systems around immediate pain points. Transformation doesn't always mean disruption; it often means prioritization. While disruption focuses on replacing existing processes, true transformation enhances what already works. Many healthcare organizations are stalled by complexity, under-resourced teams or the misconception that meaningful change requires a wholesale overhaul. The result is digital paralysis—a wait-and-see posture that slows progress and sidelines practical improvements. Leaders often feel pressured to make one big bet on AI or commit to large-scale electronic health record (EHR) upgrades, rather than sequencing more minor improvements that can demonstrate value quickly. However, incremental progress compounds. One study suggests that even a targeted workflow fix—automating a common task or reducing administrative rework—can deliver immediate returns and help teams build the momentum and trust needed to take on more ambitious projects. There's also a misperception that if a solution isn't revolutionary, it's not worth the investment. But in healthcare, efficiency and access are deeply intertwined. In many cases, existing platforms already contain the capabilities needed to drive meaningful change, provided they're activated and aligned effectively. Here are three areas healthcare organizations can win by adopting a "start small, scale smart" strategy, without tearing down and replacing existing systems. Giving patients the ability to manage their care experience—like scheduling, prescription refills or updating forms—can ease administrative burdens and improve satisfaction. However, many health systems still require patients to use a single channel, such as a web portal, which limits adoption. A better approach is to meet patients where they are by offering self-service across channels they already use, including voice, text and online. Starting small means identifying one high-volume task and then piloting automation with clear feedback loops. Use existing tools where possible and ensure staff workflows evolve alongside tech so that value isn't lost to confusion or duplication. Referrals to specialists often involve manual outreach, missed calls and follow-up delays. For large systems, only a minority of referrals, as low as 34.8%, turn into appointments. That's lost revenue—and worse, delayed care. One way to begin automating this flow is by building logic into your existing customer relationship management (CRM) system that triggers outreach once a referral is made. Let patients schedule through secure text, voice or online systems, and use reminders to reduce no-shows. Even partial automation can reduce leakage and free up scheduling staff. The key is to avoid changing everything at once. Focus on one specialty or location and scale from there. Conversational AI tools have evolved far beyond basic chatbots. Today's AI-powered messaging systems can do more than help answer questions—they can provide educational resources and help patients navigate their care journeys. These systems scale communication efforts while preserving the human touch. For example, a conversational AI system might guide a patient through pre-visit instructions, post-discharge care or insurance questions, only escalating to a live agent when needed. The study mentioned above indicates that AI-powered chatbots help reduce healthcare providers' workloads, allowing them to concentrate on more complicated cases that require their expertise. ​These tools minimize call center strain, improve response times and keep patients engaged throughout the care continuum by handling routine inquiries and providing around-the-clock support. Organizations don't need to build from scratch to get started. Many can pilot AI-powered messaging by extending their current patient communication platforms or integrating with existing CRM systems. A small-scale rollout, such as AI for pre-visit preparation or post-discharge follow-up, can help teams test effectiveness, gather feedback and gradually expand based on need and performance. Generative and agentic AI may be stealing the spotlight, but it's not the only form of intelligent technology delivering value in healthcare today. Leaders don't need to start with the most advanced capabilities to move the needle. Beginning with smaller, manageable steps sets the stage for faster adoption, clearer ROI and more substantial team alignment. Getting started doesn't require major system upgrades. Many teams already have the infrastructure they need to begin automating routine workflows, whether it's appointment reminders, referral scheduling or billing notifications. The key is to take a realistic inventory of current platforms, identify friction points and apply automation where it can quickly relieve pressure. Internal alignment matters just as much as the tech stack. Teams should be looped in early, with clear expectations around what automation will do and how it fits into their day-to-day responsibilities. Focus on projects that improve staff workflows, not just patient-facing touchpoints. Small efficiency wins—like reducing phone traffic or eliminating redundant data entry—can deliver measurable time savings and morale boosts. Ultimately, digital transformation doesn't have to feel disruptive. With the proper framing, small-scale automation projects become a proving ground for larger innovation. They help teams build confidence, develop governance practices and scale what works. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store