50 envoys to get briefing on landmine breaches
The briefing comes ahead of site visits scheduled for tomorrow.
Thailand will present documented evidence of mine-related incidents to the international community and push for stronger pressure on Phnom Penh to end the repeated use of anti-personnel landmines, said government spokesman Jirayu Houngsub, speaking on behalf of the government's Ad-Hoc Centre for the Thailand-Cambodia Border Situation.
"The use of anti-personnel landmines is a serious breach of the Ottawa Convention, as well as basic humanitarian principles," he said.
In a bid to increase international scrutiny, Thailand's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has invited over 50 diplomatic missions, primarily from countries that are signatories to the Ottawa Convention, to visit the affected provinces of Ubon Ratchathani and Si Sa Ket tomorrow.
The delegation will be briefed by Thai demining teams operating in the border zone and taken to inspect mine clearance activities at Phu Makua, as well as damage sites at Ban Nong Mek and Phum Saron Witthaya School in Si Sa Ket's Kantharalak district, said Mr Jirayu.
Ahead of the planned field visit tomorrow, Thailand will today host a closed-door briefing for foreign ambassadors and military attachés in Bangkok to outline its position and share details of recent incidents, he said.
Russ Jalichandra, vice minister for foreign affairs, said the move follows a fresh incident on Tuesday, in which Thai paramilitary forces encountered Cambodian-laid mines while patrolling near Chong Chub-Tamok in Surin's Phanom Dong Rak district, about which formal protests have been lodged through diplomatic channels.
The Cambodian government has been urged to cooperate immediately.
Mr Russ also revealed that Cambodia rejected Thailand's proposal during previous General Border Committee (GBC) meetings to jointly remove landmines from disputed zones.
"This refusal shows a lack of sincerity and undermines regional peace efforts. It also violates the United Nations Charter and the Ottawa Convention," he said.
The Royal Thai Armed Forces have confirmed that an Interim Observer Team, composed of military representatives from neutral countries, will conduct independent inspections between Aug 18–20, said Mr Jirayu.
Thailand's Ministry of Defence and Ministry of Foreign Affairs are also coordinating with international mine clearance organisations to evaluate whether humanitarian support to Cambodia should be reassessed in light of Phnom Penh's perceived non-cooperation, said Foreign Ministry spokesman Nikorndej Balankura.
He also took aim at Cambodia's domestic information controls, accusing its government of suppressing public access to external media, particularly Thai news outlets.
"Cambodian citizens are not the enemy. But they are being denied their right to independent information. The spread of misinformation and fake news by Cambodian state media infringes on previous GBC ceasefire agreements, which committed both sides to reducing tensions," Mr Nikorndej said.
He also called on Cambodia to allow open access to global news sources so its citizens "can form their own judgements based on facts".
The Thailand-Cambodia Regional Border Committee (RBC) will meet tomorrow to discuss the implementation of the 13-point ceasefire agreement reached on Aug 7 in Malaysia. It will also discuss clearing landmines in disputed areas and cracking down on cross-border scam gangs, said Capt Pharis Wongpensri, commander of the Royal Thai Marine Corps' Trat Task Force.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bangkok Post
4 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
A difference of opinion
When the moment of truth came -- that Thailand had been slapped with a 19% tariff by the US, down from the originally threatened 36% -- several implications for the government were spelt out by experts, both positive and cautionary. The fact that the government successfully negotiated the tariff rate down to 19% allows it to claim a diplomatic and economic victory. It positions the government as competent in international negotiations and responsive to economic threats, especially after an extended period of vulnerability from the Trump administration's tariffs, according to supporters. Public and business confidence in the government, particularly among exporters and investors, may temporarily improve. The government can exploit this as protecting national economic interests in a fragile post-pandemic and post-border conflict environment, experts said. Government supporters insisted the outcome of the negotiations has enhanced the stature of noted technocrats like Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira or government adviser Dr Prommin Lertsuridej as effective economic stewards, and shored up the beleaguered government's image. It has, in turn, helped stabilise an increasingly fragile coalition government under heavy scrutiny for lacking strong economic leadership or a long-term plan. Also, the concessions made to the US -- elimination of import duties on more than 10,000 American products -- may trigger criticism from domestic industries that now face heightened foreign competition. This includes agriculture and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) at risk of being undermined by cheaper US imports. Critics have framed the deal as capitulating to American pressure, portraying it as a win for Washington but a loss for Thailand's long-term competitiveness. The tariff issue also indicates a tilt towards the US at a time when Thailand must perform a careful diplomatic balancing act amid the Thailand-Cambodia border conflict, where regional alliances are under scrutiny. Pro-Beijing elements, or nationalist factions, are questioning the wisdom of relying too heavily on Western markets, according to observers. The tariff deal still requires parliamentary approval, which means the legislative process could revive political tensions if the opposition exploits the deal to question the government's transparency or economic strategy. At the same time, intra-coalition differences could emerge over how the tariff concessions align with broader industrial and agricultural policies. The experts agreed that while the lower US tariff is a strategic, diplomatic and economic relief, it is not without political cost. The government must play its cards right and manage the domestic industrial fallout, sell the deal politically, and prepare for parliamentary scrutiny -- all while navigating geopolitical sensitivities in a shifting regional order. Meanwhile, former finance minister Korn Chatikavanij has warned of long-term risks from the US tariff, urging the government to invest more in sharpening the country's competitive edge. Mr Korn has issued a sobering analysis of the 19% import tariff, which directly impacts Thai exporters. While acknowledging that Thailand avoided harsh penalties with the 36% tariff, he noted the compromise came at a high price and that urgent domestic reforms are needed to prevent the country falling further behind in a hostile global trade environment. In a post titled "What Will 19% Mean?", published on his Facebook page, Mr Korn expressed some relief that Thailand secured a tariff rate comparable to other Asean countries, despite the diplomatic challenges that led up to the outcome. "The 19% came at the cost of Thai people's blood and sweat," Mr Korn wrote. "There had been no indication that Trump saw value in our proposals -- until he seized the opportunity to play the hero in ending the [Thai-Cambodian] standoff. That's why some have called the outcome a 'Peace Dividend'." Notably, Mr Korn pointed out that the US did not distinguish between Thailand and Cambodia in assigning tariff rates, despite Cambodia initially facing a 49% rate. Both now face the same 19%, showing Washington's strategic rather than moral calculus. While Thailand managed to hold its ground diplomatically, Mr Korn stressed that international perceptions remain a concern and that there is more work to be done in communicating Thailand's position to the global community. The former finance minister warned that Thai exporters will inevitably suffer lower profit margins under the new tariff structure. The added costs, compounded by the potential drop in American consumer demand due to rising prices, could dampen Thailand's export performance. He also highlighted the indirect consequences of the US tariffs on global trade dynamics. With China facing growing difficulty rerouting its exports via transshipments to evade tariffs, Thailand may see a surge of cheap Chinese goods flooding into its domestic market, posing an additional hardship for local manufacturers. Mr Korn applauded Mr Pichai for outlining the correct policy direction -- preparing relief measures through low-interest credit packages for affected businesses and pushing for long-term competitiveness enhancements. He also hammered home the importance of transparency, urging the government to disclose the terms of its negotiations with the US under Section 178 of the Constitution, which requires parliamentary oversight of international agreements. "Trump is the clearest winner," Mr Korn concluded. "He has succeeded in extracting US$300–500 billion annually in tariffs from global trade partners. The message is clear: in this era, friendship is irrelevant -- only mutual interests matter." Mr Korn closed his analysis with a warning: Thailand must not rely on diplomatic luck or external protection. The only sustainable path forward is internal development, reform, and innovation. "If we don't adapt," he warned, "we'll only become more disadvantaged." Waiting in the wings? With tensions along the Thai-Cambodian border showing no sign of easing and the prospect of a general election looming, observers now see the possible rise of a new political force. They envisage a fresh conservative party capable of tackling political, economic and security problems while putting forward a prime ministerial candidate who can stand shoulder-to-shoulder with those from existing political parties. Such a candidate need not be a career politician, but must possess an unblemished record, free of any links to Cambodia's leadership. And with many in the conservative camp increasingly dissatisfied with existing conservative parties, speculation is rife that any new party aligning itself with the armed forces could have an advantage at the polls. Stithorn Thananithichot, a political science lecturer at Chulalongkorn University, said a great deal of public support is directed towards the armed forces for its handling of the border conflict with Cambodia. And while such a party and candidate have yet to step up, existing political parties are likely to court the military and position themselves as its allies to capitalise on public sentiment as they prepare for the polls, he noted. While Bhumjaithai appears to be the most trusted option for conservative voters -- as opposed to the ruling Pheu Thai Party -- the party, as well as the United Thai Nation Party (UTN) and the Palang Pracharath Party (PPRP), have fallen short of expectations despite having been in the government for the past two years, he said. He said Bhumjaithai has seen a slight increase in popularity after withdrawing from the coalition government, which suggests that there are still millions of conservative voters up for grabs if the right strategy is in place. "When they see this significant voter base, all conservative parties will scramble for a strong prime ministerial candidate and economic policy, as well as a military reform plan that the public actually wants. But so far, no one has emerged," the analyst said. However, he said that outgoing central bank governor Sethaput Suthiwartnarueput appears to fit the bill. He is widely considered capable, committed to national interests, and did not bow to political pressure to safeguard the central bank's independence and maintain the country's international fiscal credibility. "Even if he is politically inexperienced, I don't think that voters will look at it as a problem. They're all too familiar with smooth-talking politicians with vested interests. The only question is whether Mr Sethaput has any interest in politics," he said. Mr Sethaput's five-year term at the central bank ends on Sept 30, and he will be succeeded by Vitai Ratanakorn, currently president and CEO of the state-owned Government Savings Bank (GSB). Thanaporn Sriyakul, director of the Political and Public Policy Analysis Institute, said a new conservative party will need figures like Mr Sethaput or former central bank governor Veerathai Santiprabhob to win over voters. Both have earned a lot of trust from technocrats and have shown that they have had no vested interests while in the jobs they occupied. This is in stark contrast to some towering figures who pull strings in politics, he said. However, he said if conservative voters feel deeply attached to the military, the chief of the defence forces, Gen Songwit Noonpakdee, who is scheduled to retire at the end of September, could be among their top choices for prime minister. Gen Songwit is regarded as a forward-thinking individual, as illustrated in his handling of Thai-Cambodian tensions, he said. "He's the first and only supreme commander to unify all branches of the armed forces under a strategic plan. In the past, each branch operated separately," he said. Whether the general harbours any political ambitions will only become clear after his retirement, he said. As for the Bhumjaithai Party, which is the most popular among the existing conservative parties, it still has much work to do if it wants to secure substantial support, according to Mr Thanaporn. First and foremost, it will have to come up with a military reform proposal to streamline the armed forces to make them lean, yet effective. However, Bhumjaithai will be competing with the People's Party (PP), which is reportedly devising its own ambitious reform platform, he said. According to the analyst, the PP's military reform plan is said to include trimming excess military spending and restructuring the armed forces to address not only the Cambodian border situation but also other potential flashpoints.
Bangkok Post
10 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Tensions over landmines mount
Foreign Affairs Minister Maris Sangiampongsa has accused Cambodia of persistently violating the Ottawa Convention and Thailand's sovereignty through repeated incidents involving anti-personnel landmines. Mr Maris, attending the 10th Mekong-Lancang Cooperation (MLC) Foreign Ministers' Meeting in Anning, China, delivered a video briefing on Cambodia's recent anti-personnel landmine incidents. The session held at the Foreign Affairs Ministry on Friday addressed member states of the Ottawa Convention. A total of 67 participants from 41 countries, one organisation, and four international agencies participated. Mr Maris reaffirmed Thailand's full commitment to its legal obligations under the convention. Over the past two decades, Thailand has cleared and returned more than 99% of areas contaminated by anti-personnel landmines -- equivalent to approximately 2,500 square kilometres -- back to Thai communities. He also highlighted Thailand's continued efforts to assist landmine survivors, enabling them to live with dignity and reintegrate into society. These efforts are part of the broader international community's progress in addressing the humanitarian impact of landmines. In this context, the recent landmine incidents along the Thai-Cambodian border have caused grave concern, he said. The minister stressed that there should be no justification or place for the use of such weapons in the region or anywhere in the world. Mr Maris further said that on Aug 7, during the extraordinary session of the General Border Committee (GBC) held in Kuala Lumpur, both sides had reached an agreement on a ceasefire. Thailand has fully adhered to this agreement. However, "within just five days following the meeting, two additional incidents occurred in which Thai soldiers stepped on landmines. Clear and credible evidence confirms that these landmines had been newly laid by Cambodian forces", he said. "The repeated landmine incidents clearly demonstrate Cambodia's continued deliberate violations of Thailand's sovereignty and territorial integrity. These actions are serious breaches of international law and of the recently agreed ceasefire." Moreover, Cambodia has wilfully contravened its core obligations under the Ottawa Convention, he said. As such, Thailand strongly condemns these actions in the strongest possible terms, asserting that they undermine both the integrity of the convention and the spirit of the Siem Reap-Angkor Declaration, which was endorsed under Cambodia's chairmanship in November 2024. Mr Maris further said that Cambodia's actions also constitute a grave violation of international humanitarian law principles, which he firmly believes are upheld by the diplomatic community of states present at the briefing. He noted that these concerns are not only of direct importance to Thailand, but also to the broader international community, particularly to donor countries that have supported Cambodia in good faith. He therefore called upon the international community to take all necessary measures to ensure that Cambodia ceases its inhumane use of anti-personnel landmines and fully complies with its legal obligations under the convention and international humanitarian law. Thailand has formally raised this matter with the UN Secretary-General and requested an explanation from Cambodia under Article 8, paragraph 2 of the convention. Meanwhile, Maj Gen Winthai Suwaree, spokesman of the Royal Thai Army, said that Cambodia has repeatedly denied and distorted landmine attacks against Thai forces, which have injured personnel in five incidents, including two after the ceasefire. Cambodia claims mines are leftover from past wars, but the Thailand Mine Action Centre has cleared 1,300 old explosives, none of which were the PMN-2 type recently found.
Bangkok Post
21 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Malaysian pavilion leads Asean peers at Osaka Expo
Malaysia leads all Asean founding countries in drawing the most visitors to its pavilion at Expo 2025 in Osaka, which has two more months to run. More than 2.2 million people had visited the Malaysian pavilion as of early August, shattering the country's target of 1.5 million for the event, the Bernama news agency reported. The pavilion was created to demonstrate the diversity of culture in the multi-ethnic country dominated by Malays and a mission to use innovations to drive the future. Indonesia recorded the 1 millionth guest at its pavilion in July, according to Antara, its official news agency, while Thailand surpassed the same figure last month. Indonesia has used its pavilion to show visitors what its society would look like 20 years from now, when it wants to be an advanced economy with an emphasis on sustainability. Singapore welcomed its 1 millionth visitor last month, the Singapore Tourism Board said, while visitors to the Philippine booth hit 600,000, according to GMA News. Brunei tradition and art are among the showcases of the Philippines. There were no records of the number of visitors at the Vietnamese pavilion. The Thailand Pavilion has been seeing about 10,000 visitors on average since the Expo opened on April 13. The number was 1.25 million as of Wednesday. The Expo in Japan ends on Oct 13. The Thai pavilion and all displays were built with a budget of 973 million baht, with the Ministry of Public Health the lead agency responsible. It mainly shows the kingdom as a hub of wellness and health-related attractions, from food to massage. The pavilion was criticised by some Thais when the Expo opened in April. They said the country missed an opportunity to show the world how Thailand views the future, which after all was the theme of Expo 2025. Construction of the Thai booth and all the displays was funded by a fixed budget covering three fiscal years starting in 2024. The final instalment of the requested budget, 247 million baht, was scrutinised in parliament in the second reading of the fiscal 2026 budget on Friday, before it sailed through. Sahassawat Kumkong and Sakon Soontornvanichkit, two MPs of the opposition People's Party, opposed the request, saying it was too much money for too little return for the public. 'The structure is beautiful but the content looks bureaucratic,' Mr Sahassawat said.
