logo
Daily subject-wise quiz : Science and Technology MCQs on genome-edited rice, Shiv Shakti point and more (Week 109)

Daily subject-wise quiz : Science and Technology MCQs on genome-edited rice, Shiv Shakti point and more (Week 109)

Indian Express07-05-2025

UPSC Essentials brings to you its initiative of subject-wise quizzes. These quizzes are designed to help you revise some of the most important topics from the static part of the syllabus. Attempt today's subject quiz on Science and Technology to check your progress.
1. They are climate-resilient.
2. These varieties have been developed by the SAARC Agriculture Centre.
3. The variety 'Kamala' targets the Drought and Salt Tolerance (DST) gene to improve the plant's resilience to harsh soil and climate conditions.
4. The variety 'Pusa DST Rice 1' has been developed using genome editing technology targeting the Cytokinin Oxidase 2 (CKX2) gene.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
(a) Only one
(b) Only two
(c) Only three
(d) All four
— The Agriculture Minister announced the introduction of two genome-edited rice varieties, the first of their kind in the country. The Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) produced these two climate-resilient types, which conserve water and increase yields, utilising cutting-edge genome editing technology. Hence, statement 1 is correct.
— The Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) produced these two climate-resilient types, which conserve water and increase yields, utilising cutting-edge genome editing technology. Hence, statement 2 is not correct.
— DRR DHAN 100 (KAMALA): Developed by the ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research (ICAR-IIRR) in Hyderabad, this variety offers much higher yields, better drought tolerance, and earlier maturity than its parent variety, Samba Mahsuri (BPT 5204).
— According to the ICAR, DRR Dhan 100 (Kamala) was developed utilising genome editing techniques to improve grain numbers per panicle by targeting the Cytokinin Oxidase 2 (CKX2) gene (also known as Gn1a). Hence, statement 4 is not correct.
— PUSA DST RICE 1: The ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR-IARI) in Delhi created this novel genome-edited variety from the widely grown fine-grain variety known as MTU1010.
— The new variety, Pusa DST Rice 1, was created by Site Directed Nuclease 1 (SDN1) genome editing and targets the Drought and Salt Tolerance (DST) gene to increase the plant's resistance to harsh soil and climate conditions. Hence, statement 3 is not correct.
1. It is located at the southern high-latitude highlands of the nearside of the Moon.
2. It is the point where India's Chandrayaan 3 facilitated the world's first lunar landing.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Explanation
— The Shiv Shakti point, where India's Chandrayaan 3 made the world's first lunar landing in 2023, could be a good location for scientists to explore the lunar surface's most primordial mantle samples. Hence, statement 2 is correct.
— Shiv Shakti point is located in the southern high-latitude highlands of the Moon's nearside. Scientists from the Physical Research Laboratory (PRL) used data from the Pragyan rover's Alpha Particle X-ray Spectrometer. They compared metal remains to elemental quantities of sulphur, potassium, and sodium, among others, near the Shiv Shakti location where Chandra-yaan 3 landed on August 23, 2023. Sulphur, potassium, and sodium can help us understand the mantle's composition and chemistry. Hence, statement 1 is correct.
— 'There is an anomalous depletion of sodium and potassium at the site, whereas there is an enrichment in sulphur found in the soils at the highland landing site,' according to the study published in the journal Nature Communications Earth and Environment.
— The South Pole-Aitken basin is one of the largest known impact craters on the moon.
With reference to the spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), consider the following statements:
1. It is a debilitating genetic condition which affects motor neurons that control movement.
2. The condition is caused by mutations which cause a deficiency of a protein.
3. For the treatment, scientists used an oral drug called risdiplam.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 3 only
(c) 2 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3
Explanation
— SMA is a debilitating genetic disorder that damages motor neurons, causing gradual muscle weakness. 'About one in every 10,000 births has some form of the condition, making it a leading genetic cause of death in infants and children,' according to Nature's article. Hence, statement 1 is correct.
— Mutations in the survival motor neurone gene (SMN1) produce a deficit of a protein required for the survival of motor neurones in the spinal cord. 'This keeps muscles from getting messages from the brain, leading them to deteriorate. According to a New Atlas research, in its most severe form, SMA-1, motor abilities degrade rapidly and patients often live only two to three years. Hence, statement 2 is correct.
— Scientists utilised an oral medication called risdiplam, which is prescribed to patients to delay the course of SMA. Risdiplam is normally administered to a patient shortly after birth; the earlier the intervention, the better the outcomes appear to be, according to the New Atlas analysis. As a result, in the current trial, scientists chose to administer the medication before birth for the first time. Hence, statement 3 is correct.
1. It is the process by which single atomic nuclei diffuse to form two or more smaller nuclei.
2. The sun, along with all other stars, is powered by Nuclear fusion.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Explanation
— An experimental nuclear fusion reactor in China triggered a lot of excitement by keeping its operational state maintained for more than 1,000 seconds, or over 17 minutes, which is a new record. Nuclear fusion is what produces the energy in the Sun, or any other star.
— Nuclear fusion is the process by which two light atomic nuclei merge to produce a single heavier nucleus, releasing enormous amounts of energy. Hence, statement 1 is not correct.
— Fusion reactions occur in a state of matter known as plasma, which is a hot, charged gas composed of positive ions and free-moving electrons that differs from solids, liquids, and gases.
— Nuclear fusion powers the sun and all of the other stars. To fuse in our sun, nuclei must contact at extraordinarily high temperatures, perhaps 10 million degrees Celsius. Hence, statement 2 is correct.
Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer.
(Other Source: http://www.iaea.org)
QUESTION 5
Which of the following launches was the ISRO 's 100th rocket launch?
(a) NVS-02
(b) XPoSat
(c) SPADEX
— ISRO's 100th Rocket Launch: With the first launch of 2025, the Indian Space Research Organisation reached a historic milestone by carrying out 100 launches. The GSLV-F15 launched the navigation satellite NVS-02.
— The space agency evolved from the Indian National Committee for Space Research, which was established in 1962 by the Department of Atomic Energy. The Indian Space Research Organisation that we know today was established in 1969, the same year that the United States sent men to the moon. A distinct space department was established in 1972.
— Isro has created at least six versions of launch vehicles, four of which are still operational. The first two generations of launchers are no longer being used. The four-stage, solid fuel vehicle SLV-3, capable of carrying 40 kg to low earth orbit, flew three times during development and once during operation. There were only four development flights of its upgraded variant, which could lift 150 kg into low earth orbit.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

High-density multi-species cropping system helps in boosting net income of farmers: CPCRI
High-density multi-species cropping system helps in boosting net income of farmers: CPCRI

The Hindu

time25 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

High-density multi-species cropping system helps in boosting net income of farmers: CPCRI

A cropping model of combined cultivation of coconut, black pepper, banana, and pineapple developed by the Central Plantation Crops Research Institute (CPCRI), Kasaragod, Kerala, has shown a net return of ₹3.5 lakh to ₹4 lakh per hectare per year, a release issued by director K. Balachandra Hebbar stated. 'When this model was adopted, the net return was two to three times higher than that from a sole coconut crop. At present, it is adopted in 10% of the 22 lakh hectares of area under coconut cultivation. But there is huge scope to expand it to other areas,' the release, issued on the occasion of Vikasit Krishi Sankalp Abhiyan observed in the country from May 29 to June 12, said. The release said that the CPCRI, under the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), has developed several effective coconut and arecanut-based cropping/farming system models that significantly enhance farm productivity, profitability, and climate resilience. Another successful model developed by the institute, as per the release, is the combined cultivation of arecanut, black pepper, coca and banana system. 'It provides a steady income throughout the year, with net returns reaching ₹4.4 lakh to ₹10 lakh per hectare per year,' the release mentioned. The CPCRI, having its regional station at Vitla and a research centre with International Coconut Genebank - South Asia and Middle East (ICG-SAME) at Kidu near Kukke Subrahmanya in Karnataka, is actively leading efforts to empower the farming community for enhancing crop productivity, farmer profitability, and environmental sustainability through field-level engagement and science-backed interventions, the director stated in the release. With the adoption of scientific technologies, it is possible to increase the yield of plantation crops to the tune of 10%, which would ultimately position India as the 'food basket of the world'. 'In coconut alone, with 22 lakh hectares under cultivation, even a 10-nut increase per palm from the current average of 60 could yield 385 crore additional nuts annually, translating to an estimated ₹3,850 crore boost in farmer revenue,' the release said. The release stated that a major thrust of the CPCRI's initiative is encouraging farmers to replace low-yielding varieties with high-yielding, climate-resilient varieties of coconut, arecanut, and cocoa. Improved varieties Kalpa Ratna, Kera Keralam, Chandra Kalpa, Kalpa Mitra, Kalpa Dhenu, Kalpatharu, and hybrids: KalpaSamrudhi, Chandra Laksha, Kera Sankara in coconut, Shatamangala, Madhuramangala, Swarnamangala in arecanut, and VTLCH 3, VTLCH 4, VTLCC 1 in cocoa are being promoted for their superior yield potential and stress tolerance. It further said that the abhiyan, launched under the Union government's broader vision to transform agriculture into a climate-resilient, technology-driven sector, involves collaboration between CPCRI scientists, nearby ICAR institutes, State agriculture department, ATMA, other line departments and KrishiVigyanKendras (KVKs).

CPCRI to empower farmers through science-driven plantation farming
CPCRI to empower farmers through science-driven plantation farming

Time of India

timea day ago

  • Time of India

CPCRI to empower farmers through science-driven plantation farming

Mangaluru: As part of the nationwide Vikasit Krishi Sankalp Abhiyan being held from May 29 to June 12, the ICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute (CPCRI) is leading efforts to empower the farming community to enhance crop productivity, farmer profitability, and environmental sustainability through field-level engagement and science-backed interventions. Dr K Balachandra Hebbar, director of ICAR-CPCRI, Kasaragod, said that the campaign involves collaboration between CPCRI scientists, nearby ICAR institutes, the state department of agriculture, ATMA, other line departments, and Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVKs). Outreach teams are covering 80 to 90 villages per district, with each team engaging with two to three panchayats daily to provide farmers with practical solutions on crop management, soil health, and resource use. It is also highlighted that with the adoption of scientific technologies, it is possible to increase the yield of plantation crops by 10%, which would ultimately position India as the Food Basket of the World. In coconut alone, with 22 lakh hectares under cultivation, even a 10-nut increase per palm from the current average of 60 could yield 385 crore additional nuts annually, translating to an estimated Rs 3,850 crore boost in farmer revenue. A major thrust of the initiative is encouraging farmers to replace low-yielding varieties with high-yielding, climate-resilient varieties of coconut, arecanut, and cocoa. CPCRI has developed several effective coconut and arecanut-based cropping/farming system models that significantly enhance farm productivity, profitability, and climate resilience. One notable model is the coconut + black pepper + banana + pineapple system, the adoption of which has shown a net return of Rs 3.5 to Rs 4 lakh per hectare per year, which is two to three times higher than that from a sole coconut crop. At present, it is adopted in 10% of the area, but there is a huge scope to expand it to other areas. Another successful model is the arecanut + black pepper + cocoa + banana system. It provides a steady income throughout the year, with net returns reaching Rs 4.4 to Rs 10 lakh per hectare annually. Making trenches between coconut rows and incorporating organic waste like husks and leaves to conserve moisture and improve soil health results in a 20–30% yield increase. This system is more resilient to dry spells and contributes to sustainable production with minimal external inputs, making it especially beneficial for smallholder farmers in dry regions. Microbial consortium and customised nutrient mixtures like Kalpa Poshak and Kalpa Vardhini for young and mature palms, respectively, contribute to balanced plant nutrition, which is essential for sustained yield and biotic and abiotic stress tolerance.

India has developed two genome-edited rice varieties – but some experts are concerned
India has developed two genome-edited rice varieties – but some experts are concerned

Scroll.in

timea day ago

  • Scroll.in

India has developed two genome-edited rice varieties – but some experts are concerned

In a significant stride towards bolstering food security amid escalating climate challenges, researchers at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute and the Indian Institute of Rice Research, both operating under the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, have developed two innovative genome-edited rice varieties, named DRR Dhan 100 (Kamala) and Pusa DST Rice 1. These varieties aim to enhance yield and resilience against environmental stresses. Developed by Indian Institute of Rice Research in Hyderabad, DRR Dhan 100 or Kamala is based on the popular Samba Mahsuri (BPT-5204) and exhibits high yield potential along with improved drought and salinity resistance. Pusa DST Rice 1 is developed by Indian Agricultural Research Institute in New Delhi from Cotton Dora Sannalu (MTU 1010) and is engineered for enhanced DST or drought and salt tolerance. Both varieties were developed using the CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technique, which allows for precise modifications in the plant's DNA without introducing foreign genes. This, according to the scientists, is a very different method from genetic modification of the plant. Genome editing accelerates the breeding process and enables the development of crops with desired traits more efficiently. Genome editing vs genetic modification While both genome editing and genetic modification involve altering an organism's genetic material, they differ fundamentally in approach and outcome. Genome editing uses specific tools to make targeted changes to the organism's own DNA without introducing genes from other species. In contrast, genetic modification typically involves inserting foreign genes into an organism's genome, often resulting in transgenic organisms. Viswanathan C, joint director (research) at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute, explains, 'In genome editing, mutations are induced at specific sites where change is needed. These are internal and guided changes – a modern, targeted way to induce genetic mutations that also occur in nature, but with precision for specific outcomes.' Genetic modification, on the other hand, can result in unintended genetic changes and has been subject to stricter regulatory scrutiny. Scientists have used Site-Directed Nuclease 1 and Site-Directed Nuclease 2 (SDN-1 and SDN-2) genome editing techniques to develop the seeds. Vishwanathan highlights that genome editing in rice is being pursued to address agricultural challenges such as low yields, drought, and soil salinity, which are increasingly prevalent due to climate change. For instance, Pusa DST Rice 1 and DRR Dhan 100 (Kamala) were developed to tolerate harsh conditions such as drought and saline soils, which are common in many Indian farming regions. Kamala, derived from the popular Samba Mahsuri rice, also has improved grain numbers and reduced environmental impact, according to the scientists. Biosafety concerns The release of these genome-edited rice varieties has garnered attention from various stakeholders in the agricultural sector. While many experts view this development as a positive step towards sustainable agriculture, some have raised concerns about the long-term implications and regulatory oversight of genome editing technologies. The Coalition for GM-free India, in a press conference held in Bengaluru, put forward the concerns around the safety of genome editing of crops such as rice. They alleged that both SDN-1 and SDN-2 techniques used for the rice varieties are illegal and unsafe. Kavitha Kuruganti, a member of the coalition says, 'Published studies such as Sukumar Biswas et al. in their paper say that SDN-1 technology, using CRISPR/Cas9 system is not precise in rice. Early and accurate molecular characterisation and screening must be carried out for many generations before the edited rice varieties are handed over to the farmers.' In a rebuttal, Indian Council of Agricultural Research scientists responded to these allegations saying that genome editing techniques, (SDN-1/SDN-2) are comparable to natural or chemical-induced mutations used safely for more than 75 years. They explain that these techniques require specific tests to confirm absence of foreign DNA. 'More than 30 agriculture-based countries have exempted SDN1 and SDN2 genome editing from stringent biosafety regulations. India too joined the progressive nations and notified the exemption of SDN1 and SDN2 genome edited plants in 2022,' the rebuttal sourced by Mongabay India says. While Kurnganti questions the need for a better yielding paddy, considering India is one of the largest rice producers in the world, second only to China, and the country could do better with better distribution of paddy produced, Vishwanathan says that rice plays a central role in the country's food security and cannot be overlooked. He adds that similar research is ongoing in millets and other crops as well.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store