logo
Fort Hare University: Lies and xenophobia distract from the jobs crisis

Fort Hare University: Lies and xenophobia distract from the jobs crisis

Mail & Guardian21-05-2025
Fort Hare University, along with the Centre University of Technology, Free State, has been subjected to xenophobia accusations spread on social media. Photo: Supplied
In the digital age, disinformation spreads faster than truth and when it cloaks itself in nationalism, the results can be toxic.
In recent weeks, South Africa has witnessed a troubling convergence of events stoking xenophobic sentiment in the higher education sector. While MPs raised questions about the appointment of a foreign national to a senior position at the
Though the two incidents are distinct, their timing has fed into a broader, dangerous narrative that scapegoats foreign academics for the structural failings of South Africa's labour market.
This past week, a fabricated list naming supposed 'foreigners' in senior posts at the University of Fort Hare sparked xenophobic outrage online. Despite the university's
The jobs crisis: Neoliberalism's legacy since 1996
To understand the current scapegoating of migrants, we must return to the government's 1996 shift to neoliberal economic policy through the Growth, Employment and Redistribution (Gear) strategy. Marketed as a plan to stabilise the economy and attract investment, Gear 1996 effectively abandoned the Reconstruction and Development Programme's (RDP) redistributive ambitions. In practice, Gear slashed public sector employment growth, reduced state intervention in the economy and privatised key assets contributing significantly to the collapse of local industries and job losses.
The consequences are plain today. South Africa's unemployment rate as of 2025 sits at about 32.1%, if we go with the narrow official unemployment rate, which looks at people actively looking for work and are available to work. The expanded broad unemployment rate, which includes discouraged job seekers, sits at about 41.1%.
The broad unemployment rate reflects the realities of South Africa today. That almost half of South Africans who are able to work, want to work and those who have given up on the hopes of finding work are unemployed.
These are not the outcomes of an invasion of foreign workers, they are the legacy of a political class that outsourced development to the market and walked away from industrial planning and job creation. Yet instead of interrogating this economic betrayal, opportunists both in parliament and online have opted for the easier path: scapegoating.
Contrary to the narrative that foreigners are 'stealing jobs', the data tells a very different story. According to Statistics South Africa and international estimates, foreign nationals make up only about
Even among those in the formal economy, international employees are not the driving force behind job losses.
In the higher education sector, where qualifications and global collaboration are critical, foreign nationals are often recruited specifically for their niche skills and research expertise. The University of Fort Hare, for example, reported that In 2024, it initiated a comprehensive organisational redesign to strengthen their academic mission. A total of 87 priority academic positions were identified and advertised, and 37 appointment letters were issued, all to South African scholars. For 2025, a further 59 posts were identified and are either currently being filled or advertised.
Once filled, the institution said this would bring them closer to a 15% target of international academic staff and 85 South African nationals in line with best practices of establishments of higher education in emerging markets.
To claim that this small demographic is blocking South Africans from employment is to confuse anecdote with analysis, and ideology with evidence.
A manufactured moral panic
What makes the xenophobic attack on Fort Hare so egregious is its complete detachment from institutional reality. The viral list circulated online contained names of people who no longer work at the university, never worked there or had already retired years ago. The university's official response debunked the list entirely, pointing out that its hiring policies follow South African labour law to the letter.
Furthermore, the idea that universities are circumventing immigration law or encouraging 'illegal' migration is absurd. Universities are not immigration authorities and must abide by department of home affairs regulations when hiring foreign nationals.
Yet this disinformation campaign gained traction, not because it was credible, but because it tapped into an existing undercurrent of resentment and nationalism, fuelled by real economic pain. Populist politicians and influencers exploit this pain not instead of healing it, they weaponise it offering a moral panic as a substitute for a political programme. But the higher education sector is not the enemy.
Universities have suffered from austerity, budget cuts and declining public investment. It was at the beginning of the year when the same social media platforms showed the difference between the number of students with bachelor passes from their matric who applied to universities versus the number of applicants the universities across South Africa could actually accept given space constraints.
There is a desperate need for the state to invest in more higher education institutions. They are being asked to do more with less: produce world-class research, grow student numbers and maintain international standards, all while salaries are frozen and staff are overburdened. Under such constraints, foreign scholars often take on work that locals avoid because of underpay, relocation or administrative burdens.
Moreover, South African academics are increasingly leaving the country for better opportunities abroad particularly in the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Thus, demonising those who stay, or who arrive to contribute to our institutions, is self-defeating and irrational.
Solutions: Economic reconstruction, not ethnic blame
What we're witnessing is not new. South Africa has a long and violent history of xenophobic scapegoating, from the 2008 riots to the more recent Operation Dudula campaign. What is new is the growing complicity of political elites in fuelling these flames under the guise of 'patriotism' or 'transformation'.
This is dangerous. It erodes social cohesion, distracts from the real issues and weakens the working class by dividing it. It also undermines South Africa's standing as a regional leader and progressive democracy. A country that attacks migrants for political gain cannot credibly claim to stand for Pan-Africanism, solidarity or justice. Blaming foreign nationals is not only analytically false it is morally bankrupt.
If MPs and social commentators are truly concerned about unemployment, there are better ways to do so. Why isn't there a dedicated parliament committee investigating the Gear promise of 1996, where are the jobs the state is meant to be producing, the state being the biggest employer in the country, biggest landowner in the country?
South Africa must reimagine a developmental path that focuses on: public-led job creation through expanded infrastructure, social services and industrial policy. As we speak right now a part of the country is obsessed with the effect of artificial intelligence technologies, and the rush into the fourth industrial revolution, yet the other part of the country is experiencing deindustrialisation, which causes unemployment, and incomplete phases of past industrial revolutions specifically the second and third industrial revolution.
Job creation under such economic conditions will not be an easy task even if South Africa only had well wishing politicians. There is a growing need for support for informal workers and small traders, both migrants and locals working side by side.
A need for investments in skills training, technical education and green economy industries; worker protections that promote decent work for all, regardless of origin; and a regional migration policy that treats migrants as contributors, not criminals.
It is also time to revisit and critique the neoliberal consensus itself. Gear and its successors have failed to produce growth with equity. This was inevitable. New thinking must emerge that places redistribution, democratic planning and solidarity at the centre of economic policy. This is not naive idealism; it is the only path left if we are to avoid further instability, resentment and reaction.
South Africa's jobs crisis is not a foreign problem, it is a domestic failure. It is the result of policy decisions that privileged capital over people, profits over livelihoods and market logic over justice.
The enemies of progress right now are disinformation, austerity and the political cowardice that refuses to name the real culprits: decades of failed economic policy, elite enrichment and state neglect.
Leroy Maisiri is a researcher and educator focused on labour, social movements and emancipatory politics in Southern Africa, with teaching and publishing experience in industrial economic sociology.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Born Free: #kilometersforher: Running 100KMs for GBV survivors with Yanga Ngcayisa
Born Free: #kilometersforher: Running 100KMs for GBV survivors with Yanga Ngcayisa

Mail & Guardian

timean hour ago

  • Mail & Guardian

Born Free: #kilometersforher: Running 100KMs for GBV survivors with Yanga Ngcayisa

This week on Born Free , Khumo Kumalo sits down with Yanga Ngcayisa to unpack his bold initiative #KilometersForHer . On 30 August , Yanga will run 100KM in a single day to raise awareness for survivors of Gender-Based Violence. We dive into why this mission matters to him, how fitness and mental health fuel his journey, and what it takes to push beyond limits. This isn't just about running—it's about stepping up, breaking cycles, and proving that change starts with us. As Born Free, we're joining the challenge: our community goal is to hit 1000KM collectively by 29 August . Run. Share. Post your progress with #KilometersForHer —and let's turn awareness into real action. Khumo Kumalo is the visionary behind Misunderstood and the dynamic co-host of Born Free . Named one of the Mail & Guardian's Top 200 Young South Africans of 2024 , he is a bold voice in the country's evolving political discourse. As the author of Newsletter 94 (formerly Misunderstood), Kumalo delves into South Africa's complex history and shifting political landscape, reflecting on the dreams and realities of a post-apartheid nation. His passion for debate and current affairs was ignited at St John's College , later taking him to Morehouse College in Atlanta, Georgia , where he continued to sharpen his perspective on leadership and social change. Kumalo isn't just asking questions—he's challenging narratives, sparking conversations, and pushing South Africa's youth to rethink what it truly means to be Born Free . Otsile Nkadimeng is a published author, policy writer, and changemaker , balancing his role as a second-year university student with a deep commitment to youth empowerment. Recognized by News24 for his impact and awarded the Young Nelson Mandela Award in 2023 , he is shaping conversations on democracy, governance, and sustainability. As the Executive Director of SoWeVote , a platform he co-founded, Nkadimeng is making it easier for young South Africans to access critical information about politics and democracy. His advocacy extends beyond borders—he serves as a Youth Advisor to the Embassy of Sweden in Pretoria and is a fellow at the International Youth Think Tank , where he contributes to global youth policy discussions. Passionate about sustainability, he has co-founded and led multiple initiatives aimed at environmental and social progress across South Africa. Whether in civic engagement, international diplomacy, or grassroots activism, Nkadimeng is at the forefront of youth-led change, proving that young voices aren't just part of the conversation—they're leading it. Disclaimer: 'Born Free' is an opinion-based podcast and does not represent the views of M&G Media (PTY) LTD, its owners, affiliates, employees, or partners. The opinions expressed by the hosts and guests are their own and do not reflect the editorial stance of the Mail & Guardian.

Life Esidimeni families urge swift prosecution of those responsible
Life Esidimeni families urge swift prosecution of those responsible

The Herald

time3 hours ago

  • The Herald

Life Esidimeni families urge swift prosecution of those responsible

The Life Esidimeni families have expressed concern that almost 10 years after the deaths of 144 mental healthcare users and more than a year since an inquest judgment into their deaths, there is still no decision on the prosecution of those responsible. The patients who died were among the 1,711 mentally ill people who were transferred from Life Esidimeni facilities in 2015 and 2016 to ill-prepared non-governmental organisations. The families on Tuesday met the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), represented by acting director of public prosecutions Marika Jansen van Vuuren. The families said the meeting followed years of delays in the decision to prosecute those responsible for the deaths. The NPA told the families it had received a legal opinion that recommended prosecution of former Gauteng health MEC Qedani Mahlangu and former director of mental health Dr Makgabo Manamela. 'However, the legal opinion recommends prosecutions for the deaths of only two people: Mr Terence Chaba and Ms Virginia Machpelah,' the families said. The NPA informed the families that a team of prosecutors had been formed to assess both the legal opinion and the extensive evidence already presented at the inquest to make a final decision on prosecution. The meeting this week comes after the NPA announced last year it was in the process of making a thorough, well-informed decision on the matter. The announcement last year was made in response to a demand for justice and accountability for Life Esidimeni victims made by public interest law centre Section27. The families said a decision to criminally prosecute all those whose actions caused the deaths was what they had demanded all along. 'In this regard we feel vindicated and welcome the NPA's movement towards a decision. However, almost 10 years after the deaths and over a year since the inquest judgment, there is still no decision on prosecution, even after a legal opinion.' They said by limiting accountability to only two deaths, it felt as if the NPA was sending a message that the other 142 deaths did not matter, and said that was not justice. 'It reflects a failure to honour the pain of the families and the dignity of those who died. It amounts to protecting those responsible, rather than holding them fully accountable.' The families said they believed there was overwhelming evidence that had been presented in multiple formal processes to charge more people. These included the health ombudsman's report in 2017 which exposed the gross human rights violations, unlawful transfers and neglect that led to the tragedy. There was also an arbitration presided over by former deputy chief justice Dikgang Moseneke who found that the government had acted unlawfully, recklessly and with disregard for human life. Moseneke ordered compensation for families while affirming the state's liability. The families said the inquest presided over by judge Mmonoa Teffo established in July last year that there was prima facie evidence linking Mahlangu and Manamela to multiple unlawful deaths, highlighting systemic negligence and criminal liability. 'Taken together, these processes, combined with the unrelenting calls from and evidence provided by families over nearly a decade, constitute an undeniable body of evidence.' The families demanded that the NPA immediately consider not only the inquest judgment and legal opinion but the mountain of evidence that formed part of the inquest record, including from the arbitration, and recognise the urgent need for a prosecution that reflected the full scale of the tragedy. TimesLIVE

Gauteng agriculture MEC pushes for legislation to ban food waste
Gauteng agriculture MEC pushes for legislation to ban food waste

The Herald

time3 hours ago

  • The Herald

Gauteng agriculture MEC pushes for legislation to ban food waste

Gauteng MEC for agriculture and rural development Vuyiswa Ramokgopa says Rise Mzansi is determined to take the fight against food waste to parliament by sponsoring legislation that would ban the practice and hold companies accountable. 'Really taking on the issue of food waste is a big one for us,' Ramokgopa said at a Rise Mzansi press briefing on Monday. She noted that millions of tonnes of food are dumped in landfills every year, despite widespread hunger and food insecurity across South Africa. 'We've made the statement and there is enough data that shows that we're wasting millions of tonnes of food every year that is landing up in landfills rather than in communities that can use that food,' she said. According to the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), South Africa produces about 31-million tonnes of food annually, of which 10-million tonnes go to waste. Fruits, vegetables and cereals make up 70% of this wastage, most of which occurs early in the food supply chain. WWF has warned that with diets shifting towards processed foods, malnutrition will only worsen unless food waste is curbed. 'One of our key initiatives is to work with organisations on the ground, support the work they are doing to minimise food waste and really take it to the next level. Through my colleagues in parliament we'd like to move to sponsoring legislation that bans food waste and prohibits companies who are involved in food production from wasting food,' said Ramokgopa. Ramokgopa added that Rise Mzansi is in a research phase, looking at global precedents on food waste legislation and how these could be adapted for South Africa. 'One of our priorities has been about ending hunger — not to simply speak about it at a high level but to work closely with organisations who are active on the ground,' she said. The MEC said the party's approach focuses on boosting food security by localising production through community and backyard gardens as well as subsistence farming. 'It is also really about looking at the food systems that drive affordability [and] availability of food in our communities,' she said. Beyond food security, Ramokgopa linked agriculture to sustainable job creation. 'This is a phrase that gets bandied about excessively in the political space but for us it's really about how we re-energise the Gauteng economy so that we are better capacitated to create jobs. Agro-processing is one such avenue that we believe holds a lot of possibilities,' she said. Earlier this year Ramokgopa hosted the inaugural Gauteng Agro-processing Convention and Expo at Gallagher Convention Centre in Midrand under the theme 'driving inclusive growth through agro-processing'. The two-day event brought together industry leaders, SMMEs, financiers, investors and policymakers to shape the future of the sector. 'Through that we managed to sign an agreement with the National Empowerment Fund wherein we are establishing jointly blended financing of R100m to support microprocessors all over the province,' she said. Ramokgopha said 32 projects had already gone through due diligence and are ready for funding. She said youth involvement and education remained central to her vision. 'We have been focused on a schools' programme driving agriculture industry awareness, getting young people energised and activated about the possibilities in this sector. These included planting food gardens and working with school leaders,' she said. TimesLIVE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store