logo
How Medicaid Cuts Could Impact Early Intervention for Young Children

How Medicaid Cuts Could Impact Early Intervention for Young Children

Yahoo27-05-2025

The first warning sign Rebecca Amidon spotted was when her 1-year-old daughter wasn't walking on her feet. 'She would only walk on her knees, and her coordination seemed really off,' Amidon recounted. Then physical therapists noticed tremors, a sign of a neurological condition that affects balance and coordination. Medicaid covered a brain MRI, which led to a proper diagnosis as well as orthotic ankle braces and weekly physical therapy appointments at the local hospital to support her development.
'Medicaid is there to catch us all when we fall,' said Amidon, who lives in Manistee, Michigan. 'It's not just for people who've always needed it; it's for people like my family as well, who never thought that we would be in a position to rely on it. Without Medicaid and these early intervention services, our family would be facing a much different reality.'
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
As plans for cutting hundreds of billions of dollars in Medicaid take shape in Congress and President Donald Trump's proposed budget, parents and child health advocates are warning about collateral damage. Namely, the healthy development of young American children.
Nationwide, 31 million children rely on Medicaid, and experts such as Julie Kashen, senior fellow and director for women's economic justice at The Century Foundation, have sounded the alarm, saying, 'Reductions in coverage could worsen the health of those children and their communities.'
While Congressional debate is largely focused on cutting coverage for low-income adults and limiting states' ability to raise taxes for healthcare spending, the impact could well cause children to lose services and access to health care.
'There's not a lot of fat to cut in Medicaid,' Elisabeth Wright Burak, senior fellow at the Georgetown University Center for Children and Families said on a recent webinar. 'Cuts would put states in a very difficult position of making hard decisions between spending more or rolling back existing coverage or services.'
Medicaid, a state-federal partnership, supports American families in many different ways. The health coverage it provides to low-income children has been shown to improve health and boost educational attainment. Nearly three in 10 child care workers are covered by Medicaid, and it is a major funder of community health workers.
Medicaid also helps fund part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which provides early intervention screening and services. Established by Congress in 2004, the program is designed 'to enhance the development of infants and toddlers with disabilities, to minimize their potential for developmental delay and to recognize the significant brain development that occurs during a child's first three years of life.' The program provides early intervention screening and services with resources that vary by state.
Nationwide, about 540,000 children under age 3 receive Part C services, and about half of them are enrolled in Medicaid, according to a report from the Infant and Toddler Coordinators Association. Part C saves taxpayers money by minimizing long-term costs for children with disabilities, promoting school readiness and reducing the prevalence of severe disabilities in adulthood. These benefits have been extensively documented:
These services are proven to support outcomes for infants and toddlers with developmental delays.
As a result of early intervention services, 42% of young children served did not need special education by the time they reached kindergarten.
Infants and toddlers with disabilities who receive services under Part C demonstrate improved social-emotional skills, knowledge and behaviors — with two-thirds substantially improving and about one half catching up to a level appropriate for their age.
Every state has different Medicaid policies and protocols, which can limit the support that children receive. In Texas, 75% of the state's Medicaid enrollees are children, said Adriana D. Kohler, policy director of Texans Care for Children, a children's advocacy nonprofit. About 2.8% of the state's children under age 3 receive Part C services compared to 7% nationwide, the latest data show 'It's pretty complicated for the early intervention providers,' Kohler said. 'We leverage over a dozen different funding sources, and Medicaid is a critical source of funding.'
Related
Owing to drastic cuts in Medicaid that Texas lawmakers enacted in 2011, the number of early intervention providers dropped from 58 to 40, while enrollment in the Part C program dropped by 20% to 30% in some areas, according to Kohler. 'You had to be a more severe case or have higher needs in order to qualify,' she said. 'These programs are having to do more with less.'
Texas is also one of 10 states that has not agreed to the Medicaid expansion approved in the Affordable Care Act, meaning that uninsured adults living under the poverty line cannot access Medicaid unless they are pregnant, gave birth in the past year, have a disability or live in a nursing home.
Burak underscored the particular risks for children's health care in states that did not expand Medicaid and rely on taxing managed care organizations to pay for services. A proposal now before Congress would prohibit such provider taxes, meaning states like Texas would likely be forced to cut back on coverage or services for kids.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Junk Fees, Airport Security, No Tax on Tips: 7 Travel Bills in Congress We're Tracking
Junk Fees, Airport Security, No Tax on Tips: 7 Travel Bills in Congress We're Tracking

Skift

time12 minutes ago

  • Skift

Junk Fees, Airport Security, No Tax on Tips: 7 Travel Bills in Congress We're Tracking

Although travel isn't at the top of Congress' agenda, lawmakers in Washington are discussing several bills that would impact the industry. Travel and tourism isn't at the top of Congress' agenda, which this month is dominated by debate over the President Donald Trump-backed 'big, beautiful' tax and spending bill. But that doesn't mean that lawmakers aren't attempting to make laws that would directly affect the hotel, lodging, air travel, and cruise industries. Here are seven such federal bills to watch heading into the summer: 1: Hotel Fees Transparency Act of 2025 Introduced by Rep. Young Kim (R-Calif.), this bipartisan bill targets 'unfair and deceptive advertising of prices for hotel rooms and other places of short-term lodging.' Bill co-sponsors include Reps. Kathy Castor (D-Fla.), Russell Fry (R-S.C.), Kevin Mullin (D-Calif.), Craig Goldman (R-Texas), Eugene Vindman (D-Va.) and André Carson (D-Ind.). The bill mandates that hotels and short-term rental providers must: Display the 'total services price, if a price is displayed, in any advertisement, marketing, or price list wherever the covered services are displayed, advertised, marketed, or offered for sale.' Disclose 'the total services price at the time the covered services are first displayed to [an] individual and anytime thereafter throughout the covered services purchasing process.' Disclose before a final purchase 'any tax, fee, or assessment imposed by any government entity, quasi-government entity, or government-created special district or program on the sale of covered services.' The bill passed the U.S. House on a voice vote in April. The U.S. Senate is now considering the measure. There, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) has introduced a Senate version of the Hotel Fees and Transparency Act of 2025, which is co-sponsored by Sens. Jerry Moran (R-Kansas), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) and Shelley Moo

How Can Congress Keep American Jews Safe?
How Can Congress Keep American Jews Safe?

Wall Street Journal

time16 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

How Can Congress Keep American Jews Safe?

Your editorial 'The Intifada Comes to Boulder' (June 3) rightly states that the recent violent attacks against American Jews, in Colorado and Washington, 'are intended to terrorize the Jewish diaspora.' You advise that this will get worse 'if it isn't denounced by all political sides.' That's true, but it mustn't be the end of the discussion. Republican and Democratic politicians have condemned these heinous attacks. What the American Jewish community needs now are concrete steps to keep us more safe and secure. Congress has underfunded the Nonprofit Security Grant Program—the largest federal program to support security at synagogues and other Jewish sites—administered by the Department of Homeland Security. For 2025, Congress appropriated $275 million for NSGP grants. Last year more than $900 million in applications were submitted. Congress should appropriate at least $500 million for NSGP grants for the coming year.

Trump budget bill would kill subsidies that made home solar mainstream
Trump budget bill would kill subsidies that made home solar mainstream

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump budget bill would kill subsidies that made home solar mainstream

By Nichola Groom (Reuters) -A last-minute tweak to the Republican budget bill passed by Congress last month would immediately end subsidies for solar leasing companies that help make rooftop systems affordable to homeowners, likely leading to a massive drop in the pace of installations, according to industry representatives. President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill," now being taken up by the Republican-controlled Senate, would eliminate a 30% tax credit for solar leasing companies that charge homeowners a monthly fee for panels - one of numerous cuts directed at clean energy subsidies passed by former President Joe Biden. That provision, inserted shortly before the bill passed the House of Representatives on May 22, risks stifling a sector that buys American-made equipment, employs thousands of people and relieves strain on the grid, according to industry backers. "That's one of the harsher components of the one big, beautiful bill currently," said Gabe Rubio, a principal in the business incentives and tax credits practice at professional services firm BDO. Tax credits for homeowners who own their own rooftop systems would also be eliminated. The changes could result in as much as 40% less residential solar capacity being installed over the next five years, according to energy research firm Wood Mackenzie. Solar companies are lobbying the Senate to make changes to the bill before it becomes law. "America's home solar and storage industry is a powerful economic growth engine," Sunrun CEO Mary Powell said in a statement. "Senate Republicans now have an opportunity to advance the administration's energy independence agenda by amending this bill to keep American energy prices low and create well-paying U.S. manufacturing jobs." Trump campaigned on a promise to repeal the clean energy tax credits in Biden's 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, arguing they are expensive, unnecessary and harmful to business. Republican backers of the bill say the subsidy cuts would free up billions of dollars for other priorities. More than 5 million U.S. homes have solar panels, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association. LAST MINUTE CHANGE An earlier version of the bill had protected the credit for leased solar systems, but fiscal hawks including Representative Chip Roy of Texas have said publicly that they pressed for deeper cuts to clean energy credits at the eleventh hour. Roy's office did not respond to a request for comment. Solar leasing was pioneered two decades ago by companies including Sunrun and SolarCity, which is now owned by Elon Musk's company Tesla, and quickly became the primary way home solar panels were financed. Under the model, solar installers partner with financiers that own the rooftop panels and offset their federal tax bills by claiming the credit. Homeowners either pay a monthly fixed fee to lease the equipment or pay for the electricity the system generates under a power purchase agreement (PPA). In what some analysts have said could be a loophole, the House bill directly references leased systems but does not mention PPAs. About 44% of residential systems sold today are under such arrangements, according to EnergySage, an online solar marketplace. Solar installers say undermining the subsidies could have a ripple effect on U.S. manufacturers that supply them. Freedom Forever, a top privately-held installer based in Temecula, California, said in two years it has gone from using no U.S.-made equipment to now sourcing 85% of it from American facilities. That is thanks to another IRA subsidy that provides bonus 10% tax credits for using American-made equipment. "The administration wants to bring manufacturing back to the United States, and that's what our industry has been doing for the last two to three years," Freedom Forever CEO Brett Bouchy said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store