Jane Goodall chimpanzee conservation project in Tanzania hit by USAid cuts
USAid has been subjected to swingeing cuts under Donald Trump, with global effects that are still unfolding. Now it has emerged that the agency will withdraw from the Hope Through Action project managed by the Jane Goodall Institute (JGI). USAid had pledged $29.5m (£22m) over five years to the project, which was designed to protect endangered chimpanzees and their habitats in western Tanzania.
Launched in November 2023, the project is intended to protect endangered chimpanzees through reforestation and 'community-led methodology' in order to conserve biodiversity conservation and improve local livelihoods.
Its work is built upon Jane Goodall's research.She 'redefined species conservation' by highlighting the importance of cooperation between local people and the natural environment to protect chimpanzees from extinction.
According to JGI figures, chimpanzees have become extinct in three African countries, and overall population numbers have fallen from millions to below 340,000.
Goodall criticised Trump during his first term in office when he signed an executive order dismantling Barack Obama's clean power plan. She called Trump's climate agenda 'immensely depressing'.
In collaboration with JGI Austria, Ecosia – a Berlin-based search engine that donates 100% of its profits to climate action – has offered $100,000 over the next three years to further TGI Tanzania's Gombe reforestation project. The donation far from covers the original funding amount, but it is intended to pay for the planting of 360,000 seedlings, work put at risk after the project was defunded.
The director of JGI Austria, Diana Leizinger, said: 'We refuse to abandon people and nature. Where hope could have been destroyed, we are helping it grow again.'
An analysis in April by Refugees International found that 98% of USAid's awards related to the climate had been discontinued.
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
USAid was approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Mali arrests dozens of soldiers over alleged coup attempt against junta
Dozens of soldiers have been arrested in Mali accused of plotting to topple the country's military leaders, sources wave of arrests, which reportedly went on overnight and are expected to continue, reflect increased tensions within the military government, with reports that a jihadist insurgency in the north is gaining ground. The authorities have not commented on the reports indicated that Gen Abass Dembele, the former governor of the Mopti region and Gen Nema Sagara, one of the few women at the highest levels of the Malian army, were among those a source close to Gen Dembele told the BBC that neither of them had been arrested. The source, who confirmed the ongoing arrests, told a BBC reporter in Bamako that he had just left Gen Dembele's house and he was "doing well".The AFP news agency reported that the detained soldiers were allegedly planning to overthrow the government, citing multiple sources within the military and junta-backed transitional council."All are soldiers. Their objective was to overthrow the junta," it quoted an unnamed lawmaker in the National Transition Council as said there had been about "50 arrests", while a security source said there were at least 20 arrests, linked to "attempts to destabilise the institutions," AFP arrests have reportedly been going on over a number of come amid political tension heightened by the junta's crackdown on former Prime Ministers Moussa Mara and Choguel Maiga over accusations of harming the reputation of the state and a recent outspoken critic of the military government, has been in detention since 1 August, while Maiga is facing judicial May, the junta dissolved all political parties following rare anti-government protests, which Mara described as a severe blow to reconciliation efforts initiated by the military leaders last junta leader Gen Asimi Goïta, who seized power through two coups in 2020 and 2021, had promised elections last year, but these have never been July, the transition period was extended by five years, clearing him to continue leading the country until at least has been fighting an Islamist insurgency since 2012 - one of the reasons given for the military takeover but attacks by jihadist groups have continued and even its neighbours Niger and Burkina Faso, it has enlisted the help of Russian allies to contain the jihadist attacks in the region after breaking ties with France - but there has been no significant improvements in security. You may also be interested in: The region with more 'terror deaths' than rest of world combinedWhy young Africans are celebrating military takeoversThree military-run states leave West African bloc - what will change?Mali coup leader granted five-year term in powerMali signs trade deal with Russia as ties strengthen Go to for more news from the African us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Times
9 hours ago
- Times
Idi Amin — why ‘Big Daddy' is popular in modern Uganda
Uganda is in election campaign mode, so it came as no surprise on a recent trip to Kampala to see the face of the opposition leader Bobi Wine, complete with signature red beret, gazing out from walls and shopfronts. What I hadn't anticipated was the number of times I'd glimpse another, burlier face: that of Idi Amin. You see the stickers on taxi-buses and lampposts. 'Big Daddy' is enjoying something of a 'moment' in this east-central African nation, a reappraisal unthinkable in 1979, when an invasion by the Tanzanian army prompted his flight into exile, ending eight years of increasingly violent rule. One veteran Ugandan journalist, who has spent years researching the man once labelled 'Black Hitler' and the 'Butcher of Africa', disconcerted a group of visitors I was travelling with by arguing that the death toll attributed to Amin was massively exaggerated by racist British officials who had spotted the perfect bogeyman in the swaggering, loudmouth president. The group's response was incredulous, but his views were echoed by our tour guide who, while acknowledging far too much blood was shed, quietly insisted that Amin wasn't all bad, pointing to a portfolio of infrastructural investment — a hospital, barracks, embassy buildings at home and abroad. As the days passed I realised that this arguably romanticised 'take' on the past was rooted in worry about the future. There's mounting exasperation among Ugandans, who know exactly what to expect in the January 2026 presidential election. Another win for President Yoweri Museveni, who once preached the danger of 'overstaying', but will have been at the helm for four decades. So it's a good moment for a revisionist history of Amin, although this one may leave some readers slightly nonplussed. For Derek Peterson, a history professor at the University of Michigan, shows no interest in confirming or disproving the lurid, severed-heads-in-the-fridge stories that have clung to Amin. Nor does he attempt to deliver a standard cradle-to-grave account. His interest lies instead in the little people, the 'commoners', the marginal players who buzz around any Big Man in search of advancement or who merely try — as society crumbles around their ears — to keep their heads below the parapet and do their duties. The core argument of this intriguing, always readable work is that far from being imposed on Ugandans at the point of a gun, as is commonly suggested, Amin's regime, which lasted from 1971-79, was built on a firm base of genuinely popular appeal. Peterson sets out to explain 'why so many earnest, knowledgeable people placed themselves in the service of a military dictatorship whose violence was widely known'. The stage seems set for a Ugandan version of Daniel Goldhagen's controversial Hitler's Willing Executioners, which argued that the Holocaust, often portrayed as the work of a Nazi elite that kept its crimes hidden from ordinary citizens' eyes, was made possible by the profound antisemitism of the German population, which therefore bore collective guilt for the slaughter. But Peterson doesn't do that. He does, though, make the case that Amin was a leader whose soaring aspirations far outstripped his country's economic and geographical limitations. Despite being dismissed by Henry Kissinger as an 'ape without education', Amin was a man of restless vision, regarding Uganda as a frontline African state in a global war against racism and imperialism. It was fascinating to learn that Amin volunteered three million Ugandans to fight against the state of Israel and offered Uganda as a base for training up an all-African army to take on apartheid South Africa. Amin not only called for the UN's headquarters to be transferred to Kampala, he wrote to the Commonwealth offering to replace Queen Elizabeth II as its head. 'Amin's diplomacy made Kampala into a centre of the global left,' Peterson writes. In a precursor of Trump's style of diplomacy, 'there were no secret overtures, no private dialogues, no circumspection or politesse or tact' — all this was done in public. And where today's demagogues use X and Instagram to bypass 'the legacy media' and speak direct to the public, radio allowed Amin to beam straight into Ugandans' homes and minds. Just coming into its prime in Africa, the new technology meant Amin no longer needed civil servants, MPs or journalists as go-betweens. 'Radio helped make [Amin] a dictator.' • The 21 best history books of the past year to read next So in many ways Amin was a thoroughly modern demagogue, with an anti-imperial message likely to appeal to post-independence Africans. But when it comes to demonstrating widespread support on the part of ordinary Ugandan citizens — solid and sustained enough to offset mounting public horror at the atrocities committed by Amin's army — Peterson is less convincing. The official archives that he and teams of Ugandan researchers valiantly saved from heat, rain, mould and wasps are a treasure trove of quirky insights and vignettes. But what comes across is not so much the equivalent of a nation of 'willing executioners' as a nation of wary civil servants and local officials — interlaced with the odd, genuine eccentric — dutifully going through the motions, either to retain their salaries or because there was no obvious alternative to Amin. Peterson and his Ugandan colleagues deserve praise for their dogged work of salvage and restoration. However, documentation can present both an opportunity and a trap. An archivist delighted by a file's mere survival can forget to ask himself the key 'so what?' question that every historian should retain at the back of their mind. Peterson disappears down a few too many rabbit holes. Towards the end he focuses on a community that did the opposite of working 'to make the Amin regime function'. There's something almost magnificent about the contempt in which the inhabitants of the Rwenzururu kingdom, on Uganda's mountainous western border with the Democratic Republic of the Congo (then called Zaire), held central government, and their defiant determination to remain independent. It's an intriguing, under-reported tale that highlights the complexity of Ugandan history. • Read more book reviews and interviews — and see what's top of the Sunday Times Bestsellers List By the time Amin fled, Uganda's economy was in a state of collapse. If the tales of cannibalism were almost certainly fabrications and the death toll massively inflated — more Ugandans died during Milton Obote's second presidency — thousands of citizens including prominent churchmen, politicians and government ministers had certainly been tortured, killed or disappeared. The country was regarded abroad as a blood-soaked basket-case, rather than an appropriate venue for the UN headquarters. As Uganda gears up for next year's polls, the citizens and leadership of this linchpin African nation, which rarely gets the international attention it deserves, will need to shed their rose-tinted glasses and reassess the past in all its multilayered richness. A Popular History of Idi Amin's Uganda by Derek R. Peterson (YUP £25). To order a copy go to Free UK standard P&P on orders over £25. Special discount available for Times+ members
The Guardian
16 hours ago
- The Guardian
Court overrides Trump officials' rollback and blocks fishing in Pacific Islands monument
A federal judge in Hawaii has ruled that commercial fishing is illegal in the Pacific Islands Heritage marine national monument, a federally protected area in the central Pacific Ocean. The decision from judge Micah WJ Smith overturns an April letter released by the National Marine Fisheries Service's (NMFS) – also known as National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa) Fisheries – that allowed fishing in parts of the monument that Barack Obama had protected during his presidency. The letter came about a week after Donald Trump's presidential proclamation to reverse fishing regulations across the national monument, a world heritage site that includes archeological treasures, marine mammals, seabirds and coral reefs. Regulations banning commercial fishing in the area remain in effect, according to Friday's ruling. The court said 'no commercial fishing operators may reasonably rely on' the April letter, meaning fishing in waters 50 to 200 nautical miles around Johnston Atoll, Jarvis Island, and Wake Island must halt immediately. 'The Fisheries Service cannot ignore our perspectives as the native people who belong to the islands and to the ocean that surrounds us,' said Solomon Pili Kaho'ohalahala, founding member of the non-profit group Kāpaʻa, the Conservation Council for Hawaii and the Center for Biological Diversity. 'The law guarantees a process where we can advocate for protecting the generations of our children's children who are yet to be born.' The environmental conservation group Earthjustice, representing the non-profits in Hawaii, filed its lawsuit in May and argued NMFS violated federal law by bypassing the formal process for changing fishing rules, which requires public notice and comment. 'The court forcefully rejected the Trump administration's outrageous claim that it can dismantle vital protections for the monument's unique and vulnerable species and ecosystems without involving the public,' Earthjustice attorney David Henkin said. Then president George W Bush created the marine monument in 2009. It consists of about 500,000 sq miles (1.3m sq km) in the remote central Pacific Ocean south-west of Hawaii. Obama expanded it in 2014. As part of his push to make the US the 'world's dominant seafood leader', Trump called the regulations 'so horrible and so stupid' – and claimed they force US fishers 'to go and travel four to seven days to go and fish in an area that's not as good'. The Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument is about 370,000 sq nautical miles (1,270,000 sq km), or nearly twice the size of the state of Texas. It is managed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service, the Noaa and the defense department. The monument is home to one of the largest collections of deep ocean coral reef, seabird, and shorebird protected areas on the planet. It provides refuge for species threatened by the climate crisis and other stressors caused by humans. Kingman Reef, considered one of the most pristine coral reefs in US waters, is also part of the monument. Unesco reports it has the highest proportion of apex predators of any studied coral reef worldwide. Its waters are home to several shark species, including grey reef, oceanic whitetip, hammerhead and silky sharks, all of which play an important role in maintaining ecological balance. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Along with the ecological value, the islands and ocean areas in and adjacent to the monument hold great value to Indigenous Pacific Islanders and researchers. The lawsuit says allowing commercial fishing in the monument expansion would harm the 'cultural, spiritual, religious, subsistence, educational, recreational, and aesthetic interests' of a group of Native Hawaiian plaintiffs who are connected genealogically to the Indigenous peoples of the Pacific. 'This is a huge win for the Pacific's irreplaceable marine life and for the rule of law,' Maxx Phillips, staff attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, said about Friday's ruling. 'These sacred and irreplaceable ecosystems are home to endangered species, deep-sea corals, and rich cultural heritage.' Associated Press contributed to this report
