The Revolutionary War was more brutal than you probably learned in school
Write to us at
. To subscribe,
.
TODAY'S STARTING POINT
On June 13, 1775, runaway horses smashed the carriage ferrying Faith Trumbull Huntington, her husband, and other members of her family to what is now Roxbury, where her brother John was stationed with a regiment fighting against the British during the first months of the Revolutionary War. The accident forced the party to hire another carriage, delaying their arrival.
For Faith, the delay would prove fatal.
She and her companions ended up reaching Boston just in time to witness the Battle of Bunker Hill from afar. The battle, which took place 250 years ago today, killed or injured about 1,500 British and American soldiers over a couple hours of bloody fighting. Instead of 'the pomp and circumstances of glorious war,' as John recounted, Faith ended up 'in the midst of all its horrible realities.' (An artist as well as a soldier, John later painted the above depiction of the battle.)
The experience triggered a deep depression. Despite the interventions of family and doctors, Faith hanged herself five months later.
Advertisement
Faith's story is a sobering object lesson about a conflict whose brutalities have sometimes been obscured by hindsight. 'Over 250 years, the Revolution has taken on kind of a faded sepia tone,' said Rick Atkinson, a Pulitzer Prize winning historian who published his latest book about the war, '
Advertisement
Today's newsletter explores the many ways in which the Revolution was more brutal for both combatants and civilians than many Americans today remember.
Horrors on both sides
The carnage that Faith Trumbull Huntington witnessed at Bunker Hill was only the start. The war ultimately claimed at least 25,000 American lives, about 1 percent of the population at the time.
Atkinson, who has also written histories of World War II, notes that the overall death toll was nowhere close to that of future conflicts. Still, some battles would have shocked even today's observers. British casualties at Bunker Hill exceeded 1,000 — all to recapture the comparatively small Charlestown Peninsula. 'That's a staggering figure even by 21st century standards,' Atkinson said.
Yet most deaths during the war
came not from combat but from illness. During a single winter at Valley Forge, typhoid fever, dysentery, and other diseases circulating among Patriot soldiers living in close quarters killed nearly 2,000. Poor medical treatment and malnutrition brought on by collapsing supply chains didn't help.
Other deaths resulted from what we would today consider war crimes. The British anchored
And then there was the anxiety. For many of the founders, the war itself came on top of more than a decade of civil strife. Until the decisive siege of Yorktown in 1781, battlefield fortunes seemed to swing back and forth. The fighting had disrupted the young country's economy, leaving George Washington struggling to lead an army full of disgruntled, poorly paid soldiers. In letters, Atkinson said, 'you find cries of despair from most of the founders at one time or another.'
Advertisement
'Brother against brother'
The Revolution wasn't just a war of independence; it was also a civil war that forced residents of the newly declared United States to choose sides.
During the war, as much as 20 percent of former colonials remained loyal to the British crown. Those who did faced property theft, imprisonment, threats, whippings, exile, and sometimes even execution — conduct we might today classify
Internecine atrocities weren't restricted to the rebels. During one 1780 battle in South Carolina, Patriot forces accused loyalists led by a British commander of
Native people also became embroiled in the violence. The war divided the six nations that made up the Iroquois Confederacy, a political alliance that had controlled swathes of present-day New York for many years. Four nations allied with the British and two with the Americans. In the summer and fall of 1779, Washington ordered the destruction of dozens of British-aligned Iroquois villages, burning crops and displacing women and children. Many of the refugees perished during the harsh winter that followed.
Advertisement
A chance to remember
This year's
Facing the war's horrors has the benefit of reflecting the historical record. But it also need not undermine the lessons in patriotism that many Americans have drawn from it, Atkinson said. 'It reminds us that we're made of pretty stern stuff, even in an age, in 2025, when we sometimes wonder.'
🧩
5 Across:
72°
POINTS OF INTEREST
Boxes of food at the Greater Boston Food Bank, which just published its annual food insecurity report.
Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff
Boston and Massachusetts
Karen Read retrial:
The jury didn't reach a verdict yesterday and
Going hungry:
For the second year in a row, about a third of Massachusetts families either
can't afford enough to eat or worry about the source of their next meal,
Boston mayoral race:
Josh Kraft, Mayor Michelle Wu's chief challenger,
What's changed?
Democrats promised a more efficient Legislature. So far, they've done a lot of infighting and
The other Pedro Martinez:
The state's new education commissioner has
Helping hand:
Companies aren't sure what to do as the Haitian workers they rely on
New England
Vermont detention:
Border Patrol agents violently detained
Litigating the past:
New Hampshire's Supreme Court will decide whether a man who alleges he was sexually abused at a Catholic camp in the 1970s can sue even though a statute of limitations at the time
Freedom to read:
Rhode Island's State House passed a bill meant to make it
Trump administration
'Have we no shame?'
A Ronald Reagan-appointed judge ordered the administration to restore more than 800 grants it terminated for research
Trump vs. Harvard:
A judge temporarily extended an order that
RFK Jr.:
All 17 members of the CDC advisory board Trump's health secretary fired last week accused Kennedy of making 'destabilizing decisions' that could limit vaccine access. (
The dance of legislation:
Senate Republicans unveiled parts of their version of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' which would more deeply cut Medicaid and more slowly eliminate clean-energy tax credits compared to the House's version. Several Republicans promptly criticized it. (
Reality check:
Trump's mass deportation efforts are colliding with the economic fact that many US businesses rely on undocumented labor,
Financial aid:
Trump and Republicans are proposing to cut federal student aid. These Massachusetts college students
The Nation
Sackler settlement:
States approved a new $7.4 billion settlement with Purdue Pharma, the maker of Oxycontin. If finalized, payouts would go to individuals and communities affected by opioid addiction. (
Diddy trial:
The judge dismissed and replaced a juror over 'concerns about his candor.' The music mogul's defense lawyers tried to keep the juror seated. (
BESIDE THE POINT
💍
The Big Day:
For these Newton newylweds, it was all about having the right moves —
⛔
Nightmare at the museum:
A tourist sat on and broke a crystal-covered chair at a museum in Italy where the work of art was on display. (
✈️
Sounds fly:
Boston's next live-music venue is…
💬
Brave new world:
They asked AI chatbots questions. The answers distorted their reality and sent some of them spiraling. (
🌯
Passing resemblance:
This Brooklyn dad won $50 and a year's supply of burritos for winning a Pedro Pascal lookalike contest in New York City. (
🍫
Secret ingredient:
The story of how this stay-at-home mom's chocolate cake went from family favorite to famous is sweet —
Advertisement
Thanks for reading Starting Point.
This newsletter was edited by
❓ Have a question for the team? Email us at
✍🏼 If someone sent you this newsletter, you can
📬 Delivered Monday through Friday.
Ian Prasad Philbrick can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A big, happy family
I grew up in what, by modern standards, is a pretty big family. I have four siblings, including two sisters — one older and one younger. At the moment, my older sister has four children. My younger sister and I are each in the process of welcoming our thirds. I honestly don't know how many we'll end up with between us because we're all still in our early-to-mid-30s, with a fair bit of time for more kids to enter the picture. Given that we're all millennials with graduate degrees, the childbearing trajectory my sisters and I have followed is already a bit unusual. These days, an American woman with a master's degree has an average of 1.4 kids, and won't have her first child until she is 30. At that age, my sisters and I already had two each. In my 60-some-odd-person graduate school cohort, there was only one other student with young kids. I found out I was pregnant with my eldest the day before my first semester of classes began, and I remember feeling almost embarrassed to tell my classmates about it, like I'd messed up somehow. When I finally did, everyone was kind, but many were utterly flummoxed. But in another sense, the earlier-and-more approach to parenthood my sisters and I have taken is entirely in step with a pattern demographers have observed in many countries: the 'intergenerational transmission of fertility.' That's just a big way of saying that people tend to mirror the older generations in their family tree when starting a family. Kids without a sibling are more likely than others to stay childless in adulthood. Those who grow up with a bunch of siblings are more likely to go on to have a lot of kids themselves. The more children that your aunts, uncles, grandparents and in-laws have, the more you're likely to have. Bigger families beget bigger families. The earlier-and-more approach to parenthood my sisters and I have taken is entirely in step with a pattern demographers have observed in many countries: the 'intergenerational transmission of fertility.' When I first learned about this phenomenon, it struck me as fairly intuitive, but also somewhat puzzling. There is a decent amount of evidence that kids from bigger families, and particularly those who fall later in the lineup, end up worse off in a variety of ways as adults. They tend not to go as far or do as well in school, for one thing. Having a lot of siblings often means sharing bedrooms, hand-me-downs and generally getting a smaller slice of your parents' resources, be that money or time. Surely those of us who grew up in big families (especially if we're, like me, not among the oldest) know better than anyone else of the sacrifices the lifestyle involves. What about the allure of having a big family of your own — with all the bills and bulk grocery shopping and crammed calendars — is bigger than the drawbacks? A childhood in a big family, for all its chaos and sacrifice, offers an answer for future generations. And it may provide a smoother on-ramp to future parenthood than exists elsewhere in modern American life. Studying how — and why — family sizes correlate across generations is a question that statisticians have been focused on 'for as long as their tools have existed,' says Tom Vogl, an associate professor of economics at the University of California, San Diego. It's been over a century of study, beginning with English statistician and eugenicist Karl Pearson estimating the continuity in family size for his own analysis using the correlation coefficient he developed and that's still widely used today. Despite 120-something years of statistical examination, there's still a lot we don't know about how family size is passed from one generation to the next. Generally speaking, the most prominent theories fall into three broad — and not entirely distinct — categories, Laura Bernardi, an associate professor of demography at the University of Lausanne, says. The first is genetic. 'You have the same genes of your parents,' Bernardi explains. Those genes may influence several aspects of a woman's life that, in turn, impact the number of kids she has. But arguably the best-evidenced explanation for the intergenerational transmission of fertility is what Bernardi refers to as status inheritance. 'We are born in families that have a given educational level, a given social status, a given residential outlook,' she says. As such, we share quite a few sociodemographic characteristics with our parents that are 'proven to be very much related to fertility levels, fertility timing and preferences.' Factors like these explain a good chunk of the link between siblings and fertility in the U.S., but not all of it, Vogl says. Tinkering with data from the General Social Survey, he couldn't get the association to disappear by accounting for such attributes, 'so there's a lot left that I don't know how to explain.' The children of college-educated Americans tend to go to college themselves, for example, and women with a college education tend to have fewer kids than their less-educated counterparts. Likewise, religion tends to be passed from parent to child, and religious folks tend to have more kids than nonreligious ones. (Unlike the educational component, which, as I alluded to above, doesn't appear terribly relevant in my particular family, the religious influence checks out. We're Catholic.) The last, and perhaps murkiest, of the possible causes of the big family to big family link is what Bernardi calls 'socialization.' This would include all the ways that growing up in a particular family shapes one's attitudes toward family formation. As our first reference, our families offer a model for what a family ought to look like. Likewise, parents may hold certain values that they impress upon their kids. 'Some people are more child-oriented or family-friendly,' Martin Kolk, an associate professor of demography at Stockholm University, says. 'In turn, their children are more child-oriented or family-oriented.' Or those of us growing up surrounded by children may simply come to 'like having children around,' Eva Beaujouan, an associate professor of demography at the University of Vienna, says. I grew up with a strong sense that raising kids was a good thing to do. Even beyond the 'be fruitful and multiply' outlook that is common to the sort of traditional Catholic community I was raised in, I always got the sense that my parents and extended family members truly believed that parenthood was a worthy use of one's talents. But when I reflect on what led me to launch myself into parenthood so much earlier than my peers, I find myself wondering if having so many siblings merely helped to demystify family life in a way that made it seem less daunting. This is not something that existing research can verify or refute, but there are tidbits of evidence that seem to give it credence. A study based in Poland found that so-called parentification — defined rather broadly as having 'early caregiving responsibilities' — is positively associated with the future decision to have a child, perhaps playing an important role in 'shaping childbearing motivations and desires,' the authors concluded. Parentification can, of course, be damaging for a child if taken to the extreme. But it seems that, where appropriate, the small-scale introduction to caregiving that life with siblings offers can function as a sort of apprenticeship for parenting down the road. The more children that your aunts, uncles, grandparents and in-laws have, the more you're likely to have. Bigger families beget bigger families. In another recent study, researchers in Finland found that those who grow up with more siblings tend to want more kids, but that the association is particularly strong for childless folks, which suggests that one's childhood family size has the strongest sway for people navigating the transition to parenthood, Kateryna Golovina, a psychologist at the University of Helsinki, says. To her, it seems plausible that growing up in a big family would provide experience with children that many young people these days lack, and in that way make raising kids seem less intimidating. In an environment in which the expectations of parenthood are so high, and the time that people spend as adults without kids stretches ever longer, the thought of having a child can feel like 'one big unknown.' Bernardi, the professor of demography in Lausanne, Switzerland, says that while studying the social forces that influence childbearing decisions for her dissertation, she picked up on one mechanism that was 'difficult to communicate,' but discernible in all of her interviews. In conversation with childless women about their fertility plans, many noted that something about watching a sister or friend become a parent provoked an almost emotional drive to have a child themselves. This could offer another potential explanation for why people with many siblings have more kids: They have more opportunities for such exposure. Research published in 2010 by the Population Association of America suggests you are more likely to become a parent if your sibling has a child. Perhaps one reason I went ahead and had a child in graduate school, despite being surrounded by baffled childless peers, is that my older sister was having kids, too. And then, of course, there's the simple fact that almost by necessity, parenting in a large family tends to be more relaxed. I'm convinced that having an extra couple of kids automatically sets your parenting style back a generation. There is simply no way for parents to maintain the same level of vigilance you might with one child when there are five. I imagine this helps to explain why those in larger families don't do quite as well in school as their peers from smaller families — I'm certainly open to the idea that I might have been a better student with a little more focused attention from my parents. But, given that my siblings and I all mostly turned out just fine, our less structured childhood didn't saddle me with resentment so much as it left me with the impression that parenthood simply isn't the tightrope walk that many make it out to be. Of course, the influence of one's family background on childbearing is complex. There's evidence, for example, that childhood experiences can shape people's views on families in unpredictable ways. In one paper, associate professor of demography Beaujouan looked at the impact of parental death in childhood on fertility in adulthood and found a polarizing effect: Some went on to be childless, while others swung in the other direction and had many kids. Other research suggests that whether someone goes on to replicate their childhood experience depends, to an extent, on how fondly they think of their parents. This finding aligns with Golovina's study, which found that in addition to the sibling effect, those who held a negative view of their childhood environment tended to want fewer kids. America would be a more family-friendly place if its culture more closely resembled that of a large family. And despite its persistence, the intergenerational transmission of fertility has not been enough to counteract the massive decline in fertility that has occurred across the world over the past couple of centuries. Whereas the average American woman had five or six kids in the 1850s, she'll have fewer than two today. Whatever upward pressure growing up with a lot of siblings has on a person's approach to family formation has been swamped by stronger cultural and economic shifts pushing American family sizes down. If that's the case, the tendency for people from big families to have more kids will not be enough to reverse our country's ongoing baby bust. But I suspect that America may still have something to learn from big families. America would be a more family-friendly place if its culture more closely resembled that of a large family. If the effort of raising children was more broadly valued, if parenthood was more relaxed, if kids weren't tucked away in gated playgrounds and schools, but were an ever-present aspect of daily life. Maybe then, even those who didn't grow up in big families might not hesitate so much to raise a family, small or big, themselves. For all the real challenges of modern parenthood, I am nevertheless grateful for the ways that growing up with many siblings seems to have primed me to pursue it. The simple fact is that, when I think about what sort of life this third baby of mine will have, I don't find myself worrying much about whether he will get enough love or attention or how he will fare in school. I think he'll get along fine, just like I did. This story appears in the June 2025 issue of Deseret Magazine. Learn more about how to subscribe.
Boston Globe
34 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
‘I'll never try again': For some Palestinians in Gaza, seeking aid is just too risky
Advertisement In a Nearly every day, large crowds of desperate and hungry Palestinians flock to the few aid distribution points left in Gaza, waiting for hours and jostling for a place in the line to get food before it runs out. Palestinians carried sacks and boxes of food and humanitarian aid that was unloaded from a World Food Program convoy in the northern Gaza Strip, on Monday. Jehad Alshrafi/Associated Press Some of the aid sites began operating a few weeks ago under a controversial new Israeli-backed system run by an American-led company, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. It replaces a system overseen by the United Nations, and Israel says its aim is to provide food to civilians without it falling into the hands of Hamas militants. Advertisement The United Nations and other international groups have said the amount of aid getting through is woefully inadequate. They have also condemned the new system for forcing civilians to pass Israeli soldiers on the perimeter of the sites to reach the food, putting them in greater danger. In recent weeks, Israeli forces have repeatedly used deadly force to control crowds on the approaches to the aid sites, forcing many Gaza residents to choose between letting their families go hungry or risking getting shot. 'The danger is too high for me to go to these centers,' Awni Abu Hassira, 38, from Gaza City, said in a phone interview. 'I don't want to face death this way.' Videos shared on social media and verified by the Times showed the aftermath of the violence Tuesday in Khan Younis, where crowds of people had gathered around the Tahlia traffic circle to wait for aid early in the day. In one video by a local photographer, at least 20 bodies are visible on darkened ground where blood is pooling. Two of the bodies are severely mangled, and two other people have bleeding head wounds. Other footage circulating on social media and reviewed by the Times shows people screaming and yelling as crowds run through the area. The Israeli military said that 'a gathering was identified adjacent to an aid distribution truck that got stuck in the area of Khan Younis' near Israeli forces operating in the area. The United Nations and other aid groups are still sending some aid into Gaza, and it was not immediately clear which aid group the truck was linked to. Advertisement Asked about the deadly incidents Monday and Tuesday, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation said in a statement that its distribution sites were not involved. Other aid organizations, the statement said, 'struggle to deliver aid safely' and are at risk of looting. Palestinians carried sacks and boxes of food and humanitarian aid unloaded from a World Food Program convoy on Monday. Jehad Alshrafi/Associated Press The Israeli statement, using the abbreviation for the Israel Defense Forces, said it was 'aware of reports regarding a number of injured individuals from IDF fire following the crowd's approach.' It said the military 'regrets any harm to uninvolved individuals.' Israel also said that two of its soldiers had been killed in combat in southern Gaza in recent days. On both Monday and Tuesday, some victims were taken to a hospital in Khan Younis. On Monday, Naseem Hassan, a medic at a hospital in Khan Younis, described the difficulty of aiding people who were shot as they tried to collect food from a nearby aid distribution point. He said scores of Palestinian victims had been rushed to his hospital. 'People who are injured have to crawl or be carried for over a kilometer to reach us,' said Hassan, who works at Nasser Hospital. 'We couldn't reach the aid centers; ambulances can't get there,' he said. The International Committee of the Red Cross said Monday that one of its field hospitals had treated more than 200 people after the shootings near the aid site. The United Nations has warned that Gaza's population is on the brink of famine, with thousands of children already severely malnourished. 'The facts speak for themselves,' said Volker Türk, the U.N. human rights chief. Speaking in Geneva on Monday, he called Israel's military campaign in Gaza a source of 'horrifying, unconscionable suffering.' Advertisement 'All those with influence must exert maximum pressure on Israel and Hamas to put an end to this unbearable suffering,' he said. Palestinians who were injured in Israeli fire near a food aid center receive care at Khan Yunis' Nasser hospital in the southern Gaza Strip on Tuesday. -/AFP via Getty Images This article originally appeared in .
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Family desperate for news after India plane crash
The family of a British man feared to have been on board the Air India flight that crashed in India say they are desperate for answers about what happened to him. Faizan Rafik was returning home to Leicester when the plane he was due to be travelling on crashed into a residential area in Ahmedabad on Thursday. The 25-year-old's family say they have not yet received official confirmation about whether he was on board or if so what has happened to his body. His cousin Sameer Rafik said his family had been left "completely stuck and don't know what to do". A spokesperson for the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) said an advice helpline and a support centre had been set up near the airport. On Tuesday, Sameer said his family had provided DNA more than four days ago, but had still heard nothing. "There's no update on him, we don't know if he's dead or alive," he said. "We are still hoping to hear some good news from India but unfortunately we aren't getting any update from anywhere. "Faizan's dad was asked to give DNA - it's been more than four days now. We were supposed to have heard from the hospital by Monday but we haven't heard anything. "We need to get some update about my brother. Was he there in the flight crash? If he wasn't on the flight where is he? If he is on the flight then what's the condition of the body?" The plane was carrying 242 people when it crashed shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad airport, in western India, including 53 Britons. There was a single passenger Vishwash Kumar Ramesh who survived the crash. Faizan was retuning the UK after visiting his wife in Bharuch, Gujarat for their first Eid celebration together. Sameer has backed calls for the UK government to provide more support to the families of the victims involved in the crash. He added: "We haven't had anything from the UK or India – it feels like he was the one paying tax to this country and the government doesn't bother about the person who has died. "It feels very awful. He's nothing to the government – just a piece of paper, feels like tearing it up and throwing it in the bin. "We don't know what to do because we're completely blank. We need some kind of support from someone, we need a guide about what to do but we don't have that at the moment." Over the weekend, doctors in India said 270 bodies had been recovered from the site of the crash. A statement from the FCDO said: "Our staff continue to work around the clock in the UK and India to support the families and loved ones of all those impacted by the crash." The BBC has contacted Air India for a statement and is awaiting a response. Follow BBC Leicester on Facebook, on X, or on Instagram. Send your story ideas to eastmidsnews@ or via WhatsApp on 0808 100 2210. Wait for bodies deepens pain of families after Air India crash Who are the victims of the Air India plane crash? Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
