logo
How rogue jumping genes can spur Alzheimer's, ALS

How rogue jumping genes can spur Alzheimer's, ALS

Yahoo13 hours ago

Back in 2008, neurovirologist Renée Douville observed something weird in the brains of people who'd died of the movement disorder ALS: virus proteins.
But these people hadn't caught any known virus.
Instead, ancient genes originally from viruses, and still lurking within these patients' chromosomes, had awakened and started churning out viral proteins.
Our genomes are littered with scraps of long-lost viruses, the descendants of viral infections often from millions of years ago. Most of these once-foreign DNA bits are a type called retrotransposons; they make up more than 40 percent of the human genome.
Many retrotransposons seem to be harmless, most of the time. But Douville and others are pursuing the possibility that some reawakened retrotransposons may do serious damage: They can degrade nerve cells and fire up inflammation and may underlie some instances of Alzheimer's disease and ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or Lou Gehrig's disease).
The theory linking retrotransposons to neurodegenerative diseases — conditions in which nerve cells decline or die — is still developing; even its proponents, while optimistic, are cautious. 'It's not yet the consensus view,' says Josh Dubnau, a neurobiologist at the Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University in New York. And retrotransposons can't explain all cases of neurodegeneration.
Yet evidence is building that they may underlie some cases. Now, after more than a decade of studying this possibility in human brain tissue, fruit flies and mice, researchers are putting their ideas to the ultimate test: clinical trials in people with ALS, Alzheimer's and related conditions. These trials, which borrow antiretroviral medications from the HIV pharmacopeia, have yielded preliminary but promising results.
Meanwhile, scientists are still exploring how a viral reawakening becomes full-blown disease, a process that may be marked by what Dubnau and others call a 'retrotransposon storm.'
A retrotransposon is a kind of 'jumping gene.' These pieces of DNA can (or once could) move around in the genome by either copying or removing themselves from one spot and then pasting themselves into a new spot. Retrotransposons are copy-and-pasters.
Many retrotransposons are old companions: Some predate the evolution of Homo sapiens or even the split between plants and animals, Dubnau says. Their predecessors may have alternated between riding along stitched into a host chromosome and existing outside of it, he suggests.
Some retrotransposons, after all that time, retain their ability to hop around human DNA. To do so, they copy themselves with the enzyme reverse transcriptase, which is also used by some viruses like HIV to copy RNA sequences into DNA. Once they're copied, the remnant viruses can pop into new locations on chromosomes.
If it's terrifying to think of a genome littered with retroviral genes, some capable of bouncing around the genome, don't fret, says Douville, now at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg. Remarkably, some retrotransposons have taken on helpful jobs, assisting the body with tasks like maintaining stem cells and development of the embryo and nervous system.
And many retrotransposons are dormant or broken, and the cell has means to keep them (mostly) quiet. One technique is to stash them in DNA regions that are wound up so tight that the molecular machines needed to copy genes can't get near them.
In essence, the cell shoves them into a closet and slams the door shut.
But evidence is building that as people age, that closet door can creak open, letting retrotransposons spill out. Exactly what they do then isn't certain. Some scientists think it's not so much that they are jumping around and mutating DNA, but that their viralesque RNAs and proteins can screw up normal cellular activities.
'I think what's actually driving toxicity when transposons are activated is they're making all these factors that look like a virus to the cell,' says Bess Frost, a neurobiologist at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island. The cell reacts, quite reasonably, with defensive inflammation, which is commonly associated with neurodegeneration.
Retrotransposons also seem to team up with rogue proteins classically linked to neurodegeneration, damaging or killing nerve cells, and perhaps even setting off the disease in the first place.
Scientists long suspected a link between viruses and ALS, which causes degeneration of the motor neurons that control movement. But the connection, when it was finally found, wasn't quite what anyone predicted.
In the early 2000s, scientists reported that some people with ALS had the viral enzyme reverse transcriptase in their blood and, more rarely, spinal fluid. Some had as much reverse transcriptase as a person with an HIV infection.
But at the time, says Dubnau, 'Nobody could find a virus.'
Finally, Douville and colleagues discovered evidence for one of those leftover viruses, a kind of retrotransposon called HERV-K, in the brains of some people who had died of ALS. From there, scientists began to build a case linking jumping genes to ALS in people, lab animals and cells in dishes. A team reported in 2017 that numerous jumping genes had been activated in the brains of certain people with ALS.
Douville's colleagues also documented damage inflicted by HERV-K: When they put a gene from the retrotransposon into mice, the animals' nerve cell projections shriveled and they exhibited ALS-like symptoms.
As the scientists zeroed in on what might be waking up HERV-K, a familiar protein turned up. Called TDP-43, it had already been linked to ALS. But even before that, it was found to be involved in cells' responses to the retrovirus HIV.
Scientists discovered in the 1990s that TDP-43 works in the cell's nucleus, where it hinders activation of HIV genes. It also regulates human genes there. But in the neurons of people with ALS or a related condition, frontotemporal dementia (FTD), TDP-43 departs the nucleus and goes on to form abnormal clumps in the cytoplasm. The globs have been associated with a number of neurodegenerative conditions and can spread from cell to cell. And when TDP-43 vacates the nucleus, it also creates a gap in gene regulation, throwing off the activity levels of many genes.
TDP-43 gone bad is sufficient to cause neurodegeneration, but studies indicate its desertion of its nuclear role can also wake up retrotransposons. When TDP-43 leaves the nucleus, tightly coiled DNA next to certain retrotransposons starts to loosen up and unravel, a study of cells from the brains of people who died of ALS or FTD revealed. And researchers saw that in cultured cells, this loss of TDP-43 freed certain retrotransposons from their restraints. The closet door was now ajar, in other words, allowing the retrotransposons to jump out and around.
Meanwhile, Dubnau and collaborators, were looking at data on TDP-43 and the genes it controls in rats, mice and people. They found that TDP-43 can naturally stick to the RNAs of a variety of jumping genes, suggesting a way that normal TPD-43 might continue to corral them, even if they've managed to get copied into RNA. That interaction was altered in people with FTD and in rodents with abnormally high or low amounts of TDP-43 — very much as if TDP-43 was unable to control the jumping genes anymore.
The Dubnau group also turned to fruit flies. Both old age and the human TDP-43 gene caused retrotransposons in the fly brain to sneak out of the chromosomal closet, inducing brain cells to kill their neighbors and prompting neurodegeneration, the group reported in a series of papers from 2013 to 2023. Moreover, activation of certain retrotransposons also caused TDP-43 to clump together outside of the nucleus, creating a vicious cycle whereby TDP-43 and the retrotransposons reinforce each other's abnormal behaviors. Past a certain point, says Dubnau, 'It just takes off.'
Based on the sum of all these findings, Dubnau suggests a possible way that ALS could develop: Normally, TDP-43 in the nucleus helps to repress retrotransposons. But if aging or some other disturbance causes TDP-43 to decamp, those once-silenced retrotransposons spring to life, producing virus-like RNAs and proteins. While the retrotransposons might induce disease on their own, by jumping into new DNA locations or spurring inflammation, they also act on TDP-43. They force more TDP-43 to leave the nucleus and clump in the cytoplasm, causing further neurodegeneration that spreads to neighboring cells.
This isn't the cause of all kinds of ALS, which is a complex disorder with many possible triggers. But in a 2019 study of postmortem brain samples, Dubnau and colleagues found that about one in five people with ALS had high levels of retrotransposon activation and TDP-43 dysfunction.
Stay in the KnowSign up for the Knowable Magazine newsletter today
As that ALS story was developing, other scientists were pursuing a connection between retrotransposons and another toxic protein in neurodegeneration: the tau protein, which twists into unruly tangles in the brain cells of people with Alzheimer's disease. It affects retrotransposons because it, like TDP-43, plays a role in keeping retrotransposons quiet, says Frost.
That maintenance is a downstream effect of tau's association with the cell's interior skeleton. That skeleton is physically linked to the nucleus's skeletal structure, which in turn anchors the tightly wound-up DNA that silences retrotransposons. When tau goes bad, it changes the structure of the cell's main skeleton, making it more rigid. Frost and colleagues found that this structural defect propagates all the way to the nuclear skeleton and the chromosomes, just like tightening the strands on one side of a net could change the shape of the other side.
This structural effect can unlock the tightly wound bits of chromosome in fruit flies, which damages their neurons, Frost reported in 2014. By 2018, she'd shown that tau problems unleashed jumping genes in the flies.
'They were legitimately jumping,' she says, going from their original chromosomal locations to other ones in the fly's brain cells. And the jumping genes contributed to the death of nerve cells.
Frost and colleagues also studied mammals — mice — and in 2022 they reported that retrotransposons were also activated in mice with dysfunctional tau.
Meanwhile, Frost and others examined brain cells from people who'd died of tau-related diseases such as Alzheimer's, which also revealed activated retrotransposons.
'They were legitimately jumping.'
— BESS FROST
This awakening of retrotransposons appears to happen early in the disease, according to the work of another team published in 2022. In blood samples from people on their way to developing Alzheimer's disease, the copying of retrotransposon genes into RNAs spiked, creating a 'retrotransposon storm,' just before their symptoms got bad enough to be labeled Alzheimer's.
This growing body of evidence suggests that reactivating once-quiet retrotransposons, whether via dysfunctional tau or TDP-43, can create havoc. A potential treatment quickly comes to mind: Since these retrotransposons are a lot like viruses, scientists reason that antiviral drugs could help.
Handily, doctors already have medications that stymie retroviruses: Millions of people take antiretroviral drugs to keep HIV in check or prevent it from gaining a foothold in their cells.
Indeed, multiple studies over several years have investigated drugs from the HIV treatment playbook that block the enzyme reverse transcriptase. And in cells, flies and mice the drugs have dialed down retrotransposon activity and neurodegeneration.
These medications are well understood and generally safe, and are already in trials for neurodegenerative disease. For example, researchers have tested the safety of a 24-week antiretroviral course in 40 people with ALS. Not only did most people safely complete the trial, but the levels of HERV-K in their blood went down, and they seemed to have a delay in progression of their ALS symptoms, the researchers reported in 2019.
Frost recently published results from a small trial in which 12 people with early Alzheimer's disease took a reverse transcriptase inhibitor for 24 weeks. Her main goal was to determine if the treatment was safe, and it was — but the researchers also observed a drop in signs of inflammation in the participants' spinal fluid.
Both Dubnau and Frost serve on the scientific advisory board for Transposon Therapeutics, which tested its own reverse transcriptase inhibitor in 42 people with ALS and/or FTD. The company says the drug was tolerable and yielded signs of less neurodegeneration and inflammation, plus a delay in the inevitable worsening of symptoms. The company is planning a larger trial; it also plans to test its drug in people with ALS, Alzheimer's and a related tau-based disease, progressive supranuclear palsy.
Neither Frost nor Dubnau, who together recently summarized the field for the Annual Review of Neuroscience, believes that antiretroviral drugs alone are the solution to transposon-fueled Alzheimer's or ALS. As Douville notes, the drugs were designed to act only on specific target enzymes — they won't do anything to other retrotransposon genes, RNAs or proteins, which could also spur nerve-damaging inflammation.
Meanwhile, scientists are looking beyond ALS and Alzheimer's as evidence accumulates that retrotransposons may contribute to other neurodegenerative and inflammatory conditions, such as Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis.
'It's really picking up speed,' Frost says.
This article originally appeared in Knowable Magazine, an independent journalistic endeavor from Annual Reviews. Sign up for the newsletter.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Longevity Paradox: Medicine Meets Silicon Valley
The Longevity Paradox: Medicine Meets Silicon Valley

Medscape

time33 minutes ago

  • Medscape

The Longevity Paradox: Medicine Meets Silicon Valley

'For without friends, no one would choose to live.' - Aristotle Jeffrey Benabio, MD, MBA Last year, Bryan Johnson, a 46-year-old tech founder, spent 2 million dollars on a regimen that included monthly plasma transfusions from his teenage son. Why? Well, we live in an age when the wealthy inject themselves with young blood, undergo elaborate hormone replacement protocols, get infusions of NAD+, and gobble metformin pill-packs to optimize their biological age. The sell is seductive: Death is evitable. Aging is curable. And with enough money, one can live to be old and healthy. The venture capital bets might be recent, but the yearning is ancient. Herodotus wrote in the 5th century BCE about special waters the long-lived Macrobians drank and bathed in — waters that not only extended life but left their skin "glossy and smooth." Later, Alexander the Great, in his conquests, was said to have been on a quest to find the "Water of Life." He died at 32, which is probably why his product isn't a popular supplement on Amazon today. Lucas Cranach's "The Fountain of Youth," painted in the late Medieval period, shows old and infirm patrons swimming in magical waters and emerging vibrant and young on the other side. Perhaps those waters had rapamycin-producing Streptomyces growing in it — which is a top seller today. The Fountain of Youth by Lucas Cranach d.Ä. Behind the tempting pitch to live forever lies an uncomfortable question: Is this medicine? Should we be testing testosterone on an athletic 23-year-old? Or continuously monitor glucose for a healthy adult with no signs of diabetes? Few doctors would order these for patients, and fewer payors would pick up the tab if they were ordered. This is the disconnect between medicine and entrepreneurs. "The medical system is so patronizing," said a young venture capitalist on a popular startup podcast I was listening to. He was complaining about how doctors resist ordering MRIs or specialized tests because we doctors "think patients are idiots." We do not. He's missing the point that, as a healthy 30-something, medicine is not resourced to help him with wellness requests. Who should pay for his requested MRI? Who would interpret the results? We physicians cannot keep up with the demand for services from those who need us acutely. We've no plan for absorbing a new generation of the "worried well" — better named the "ambitious well" — while also caring for their boomer grandparents. We have a critical shortage of primary care physicians; one that will only worsen as our population ages. The Association of American Medical Colleges projects a shortage of up to 40,400 primary care doctors by 2036. What happens if a portion of that workforce begins dedicating their time to monitoring biomarkers and fine-tuning supplement regimens for patients who are not sick? Healthcare resources — physicians' time, diagnostic equipment, laboratory services — are finite. Every hour we spend with a healthy person seeking optimization is an hour not spent with a patient who is ill. For every primary care physician giving up their practice for a cash-paying longevity clinic, there will be 2000 or so patients who now have to be redistributed onto already burdened practices. When healthy 35-year-olds can get same-day MRIs at boutique practices while my father-in-law waits nearly 2 months for an MRI to characterize a renal mass seen on ultrasound, we've failed. Caring for cash-paying patients who can sit with you for an hour is preferable to the daily grind of 15-minute appointments for patients who actually need an hour of your time. Why shouldn't docs get to choose? For one thing, our training is publicly funded. Taxpayer dollars pick up the tab for more than $20 billion in graduate medical education every year. It seems not quite right that this education doesn't at least in part serve the public who funded it. Despite these concerns, we should acknowledge the import of the longevity movement. Prevention is indeed better than cure. Early intervention can avert costly medical problems. And individuals have a right to pursue health optimizations they value, using their own resources. The question is, how should longevity medicine relate to our broader healthcare system and societal priorities? I think transparency is essential. Longevity interventions should be clearly labeled based on the strength of supporting research. It's the standard we adhere to every day in practice. We also need to be clearer about necessity versus enhancement. Insurance coverage and public resources should prioritize interventions that address or prevent disease. Enhancement services should be demarcated as distinct from necessary medical care. Physicians working in longevity medicine might also acknowledge some societal obligations. Perhaps consider devoting a portion of their practice to underserved populations or contributing to research that benefits the broader public, not just those who can afford boutique services. We also surely must address the structural factors that push physicians toward concierge practices. If doctors are fleeing due to administrative burden and time constraints, improving those would help ensure care remains accessible to all. Lastly, we might recognize that the best determinants of longevity operate at the population not the individual level. Clean air and water, safe neighborhoods, access to nutritious food, and strong social connections likely do more to improve the health and longevity of a population than any supplement or monitoring device. Realizing the promise of longevity medicine requires more than scientific breakthrough; it demands clarity about how these advances should be distributed and what values should guide their application. As physicians we face a choice: Should we allow longevity to become another domain where privilege determines outcomes? Or could we build a system where the benefits of extended healthy life are available to all? Since Herodotus and after nearly 2500 years of searching, we still haven't found the water of life. Or maybe Aristotle actually discovered it just a few years later: gymnastics, moderation in food and drink, and good friends. It's hard to raise a series A with that pitch though.

Fast Five Quiz: The Presentation and Diagnosis of LOPD
Fast Five Quiz: The Presentation and Diagnosis of LOPD

Medscape

time39 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Fast Five Quiz: The Presentation and Diagnosis of LOPD

In LOPD, respiratory muscle involvement, particularly diaphragmatic weakness, can be an early manifestation. This can include symptoms such as exertional dyspnea, orthopnea, and sleep-disordered breathing. Recognizing these signs is crucial, as they might precede limb-girdle muscle weakness, providing an opportunity for early diagnosis and treatment. Other respiratory symptoms, such as chronic cough with sputum production, wheezing that is responsive to bronchodilators, or hemoptysis associated with pulmonary embolism, are not as likely characteristic of LOPD and more likely suggest alternative diagnoses, such COPD, asthma, or pulmonary infarction, respectively. Learn more about respiratory involvement in LOPD. A recent systematic review reported that patients with Pompe disease have lower GAA activity in skeletal muscles than healthy patients. More specifically, researchers found there is significantly lower GAA activity in patients with IOPD compared to those with LOPD. As a result of the lower GAA activity, patients with IOPD tend to accumulate more glycogen in the skeletal muscles and have higher glycogen content levels than those with LOPD. Learn more about the presentation of LOPD. Editor's Note: This article was created using several editorial tools, including generative AI models, as part of the process. Human review and editing of this content were performed prior to publication. Lead image: UCSF/Science Source

What's the Difference Between Seborrheic Keratosis and Actinic Keratosis?
What's the Difference Between Seborrheic Keratosis and Actinic Keratosis?

Health Line

timean hour ago

  • Health Line

What's the Difference Between Seborrheic Keratosis and Actinic Keratosis?

Actinic keratosis and seborrheic keratosis are two skin conditions that often show up around middle age. Since actinic keratosis lesions can become cancerous, it's best to get prompt treatment. Keratosis refers to an overgrowth of the protein keratin in the skin. This excess keratin can appear in skin lesions that resemble patches, warts, or moles. These two conditions may have similar names, but there's one major difference between the two: Actinic keratosis can become cancerous, while seborrheic keratosis cannot. This makes it important to know how to tell these lesions apart. If you have a hard time recognizing the difference between the two, here's a quick rundown: Actinic keratosis lesions often appear as rough, scaly patches that may show up in clusters. You'll often notice these patches in areas that get a lot of sun exposure, like your arms, hands, or face. Seborrheic keratosis tends to show up as a single lesion. These growths tend to be small, oval, thick, and raised. They can have a mole- or wart-like appearance. Learn more about these two conditions, along with a few key signs you may want to connect with a dermatologist for diagnosis and treatment. Actinic keratosis Since actinic keratosis is considered precancerous, it's important to identify and treat it. Signs and symptoms Actinic keratosis lesions: may appear as thick, rough, or crusty patches; sometimes, you might feel the change in skin texture rather than see it are usually smaller than 2 centimeters (cm) often appear on body parts that get a lot of sun (like your face, neck, scalp, arms, or hands) often appear as the same color as surrounding skin, if you have darker skin may appear pink on lighter skin, or have a tan, brown or gray hue might burn or itch may show up as a horn-like growth can appear as scaly or colorless patches on your lips Causes Actinic keratosis usually develops as a result of sun exposure over time. Your chances of developing this skin condition increase if you: are 50 or older have light skin and eyes tend to sunburn easily have a history of frequent sun exposure or tanning bed use have a weakened immune system Treatment options In the early stages, actinic keratosis is very treatable. Your options for treatment include: Electrocauterization: Electrocauterization involves burning the lesion with an electric current, which kills the affected skin cells. Cryotherapy: Also called cryosurgery, this treatment involves applying a solution like liquid nitrogen to the affected area. This process freezes and kills the cells so the lesion scabs and falls off. Curettage: This procedure involves scraping off the growth with a curette (a specialized surgical instrument). A dermatologist may recommend this in combination with electrosurgery. Chemical peels: A dermatologist may apply a medical-grade chemical peel in-office to help remove the top layers of affected skin. Topical medical therapy: Treatments like 5-fluorouracil can inflame and destroy the lesions. Photodynamic therapy: This treatment involves the application of a photosensitive prescription medication solution (such as aminolevulinic acid) to the affected area. A dermatologist will then direct a red or blue laser light over the treated area to help destroy the actinic keratosis cells. Seborrheic keratosis These skin lesions are the most common form of benign lesion. If you notice them on your body, you might think they're just another mole or wart. In some cases, though, they can resemble precancerous or cancerous growths, such as melanoma. Here's how to recognize this type of skin growth. Signs and symptoms Seborrheic keratosis lesions: may appear as round or oval-shaped, slightly raised growths may seem 'stuck on' to your skin often have a waxy or scale-like texture generally show up on the face, chest, back, stomach, or shoulders typically won't appear on the palms of your hands or the soles of your feet often grow larger and thicker over time and can reach about 1 inch in diameter often appear brown, black, white, or tan on light or dark skin may cause itchiness or irritation, though these lesions usually aren't painful Causes Researchers still don't know exactly what causes seborrheic keratoses. The lesions don't seem to be viral, bacterial, or contagious. That said, the following risk factors may increase your chances of developing these growths: Age: Seborrheic keratosis is uncommon in people under age 20. It often shows up in middle age, and more lesions may appear as you get older. Family history: They seems to run in families — the more relatives you have with these lesions, the more likely you may develop them yourself. Pregnancy or hormone therapy: Seborrheic keratoses may appear during pregnancy or estrogen replacement therapy. Frequent sun exposure: Some evidence suggests these lesions may appear more often on sun-exposed skin, but they can also develop on skin not regularly exposed to sun. Lighter skin: These lesions more commonly affect people with lighter skin, but it's possible to still get them if you have darker skin. Treatment options Seborrheic keratosis often doesn't require treatment. But if you dislike the way your lesion looks or feels, you can always speak with a dermatologist or other doctor about removal. If your lesion is actually a precancerous or cancerous growth, you'll need to have it removed. Your healthcare professional may recommend one of these procedures: Cryosurgery Electrosurgery and curettage Shave excision: Your dermatologist may shave off a sample of the growth to send it to a lab for analysis. Ablation: This procedure involves using a specialized laser to vaporize the growth. Nitric acid-zinc solution: This treatment involves using a topical solution called nitrizinc complex. Emerging evidence suggests this treatment can safely shrink or totally eliminate the lesion, often within about 6 months. When to get medical help Any time your skin changes unexpectedly or you're concerned about a lesion, a good next step involves getting an assessment from a dermatologist or other medical professional. Since actinic keratosis can sometimes turn into skin cancer, being vigilant about check-ups can help you lower your risk of skin cancer. And even though seborrheic keratosis may not pose any danger to your health, it never hurts to have a professional confirm that your skin growth isn't cancerous. As a general rule, you'll want to have a healthcare professional inspect your skin if: You have a new growth. The appearance of an existing growth changes. A growth appears purple, blue or reddish or changes colors. A growth has blurred or irregular borders. A growth irritates you, bleeds, or causes pain. Prevention tips Frequent sun exposure can increase your chances of skin cancer, but these tips can help lower your risk: Wear sunscreen every day — rain or shine, indoors or out. Opt for sunscreen that has a SPF rating of at least 30, with broad spectrum protection to block both UVA and UVB rays. Avoid tanning beds. Avoid spending time outside between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. UV rays are strongest in the middle of the day. Protect your skin from UV rays by wearing hats, long sleeves, and pants. Bottom line Both actinic keratosis and seborrheic keratosis are skin conditions that show up as growths. Since actinic keratosis lesions can potentially become cancerous, it helps to know how to tell the difference between the two. Seborrheic keratosis are raised lesions that tend to have a round or oval shape, while actinic keratosis typically shows up as dry patches in areas of skin that get frequent sun exposure.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store