Carney to begin talks on NATO spending target as summit starts today in The Hague
THE HAGUE – Prime Minister Mark Carney begins a two-day stop Tuesday in the Netherlands, where NATO alliance members are prepared to decide whether to more than double the defence spending target.
The main talks in The Hague won't happen until Wednesday, with Carney first set to take part in several bilateral meetings.
Carney will meet with the President of Latvia Edgars Rinkēvičs and the Prime Minister of the Netherlands Dick Schoof. He will also meet with leaders of Nordic countries for talks focused on Arctic and transatlantic security.
The prime minister will also meet with King Willem-Alexander and Queen Máxima of the Netherlands.
Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand is set to speak to reporters twice today, first in The Hague at around 7:15 a.m. ET and then virtually at 8:30 a.m. ET.
U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and NATO secretary-general Mark Rutte have both said they expect alliance members to commit to a new target to spend the equivalent of five per cent of GDP on defence, up from the current two per cent target set in 2014.
None of NATO's 32 members spent that much on defence in 2024, according to the alliance's own data. All of them are pledging to meet the two per cent figure this year, including Canada for the first time since the target was created.
A Canadian government official who briefed reporters on background before the trip said the spending target and its timeline are still up for discussion. Some allies have indicated they would prefer a seven-year timeline, while others want a decade to reach the five per cent target.
Canada's defence spending hasn't reached five per cent of GDP since the 1950s. NATO estimates that Canada spent $41 billion in 2024 on defence, or 1.37 per cent of GDP. In 2014, Canada spent $20.1 billion, or 1.01 per cent of GDP, on defence.
In 2014, when the current two per cent target was first set, only three NATO members hit the mark — the U.S., the U.K. and Greece.
Any new spending guidelines have to be made with the consensus of all 32 NATO member states, and no member is currently anywhere close. The U.S., at 3.38 per cent in 2024, was the highest, but President Donald Trump has said the figure shouldn't apply to the United States — only to its allies.
The plan Rutte is expected to put forward at the summit contains some wiggle room to help allies reach that high figure.
It would commit members to spending 3.5 per cent of annual GDP on core defence needs — like jets and other weapons — and 1.5 per cent on defence-adjacent areas like infrastructure, cybersecurity and industry.
Internal divisions have emerged in the lead-up to the summit.
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said Sunday that Spain reached a deal with NATO to be excluded from the new spending target. Like Canada, Spain has long struggled to meet the two per cent target and has rejected the new proposal.
Rutte warned Monday that no country can opt out of the target and that progress made toward the new target will be reviewed in four years.
NATO's defence buildup is also controversial in Italy, where defence minister Guido Crosetto said recently the alliance 'no longer has a reason to exist.'
Countries much closer to Russia, Belarus and Ukraine all have agreed to reach the target, as have nearby Germany, Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands, which is hosting the two-day summit starting Tuesday.
Canadian Defence Minister David McGuinty said 'stay tuned' when asked earlier this month if Canada would agree to the five per cent plan.
Jan Techau, a senior fellow with the transatlantic defence and security program at the Center for European Policy Analysis, said the overall level of ambition in Europe on defence has 'massively' increased over the last several years in response to Russian aggression.
'The closer to Russia you are, the more ambitious you are,' he said.
Speaking to reporters at a military cemetery in Antwerp Monday, Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever said that while he isn't comfortable with the five per cent target, it's important that the country remain in NATO. He also said the proposed 3.5 and 1.5 per cent breakdown 'helps a bit.'
Lauren Speranza, a fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis, said the NATO summit is coming at a 'very precarious moment,' marked by uncertainty about the U.S. commitment to Europe, the grinding conflict between Russia and Ukraine and ongoing tensions over transatlantic trade.
Speranza said the meeting will offer some insights into how the Trump administration will approach the alliance going forward, following its criticisms of NATO and calls for Europe to take more responsibility for its own defence.
On Monday, Rutte said recent U.S. strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities were not a violation of international law.
Prime Minister Carney, who has called for a diplomatic solution to the crisis, said Monday that Iran has pursued nuclear weapons while expressing a desire to eliminate the state of Israel.
In a statement Sunday, Carney said Iran's nuclear program is a 'grave threat' to international security and that Canada has been 'consistently clear' that Iran 'can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon.'
Tuesday's schedule also includes a reception and a social dinner hosted by the king and queen of the Netherlands.
— With files from Kyle Duggan in Ottawa and The Associated Press
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 24, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada Standard
15 minutes ago
- Canada Standard
2/3 of Canadians Give Clean Energy Higher Priority, 3/4 Want Climate Policy Linked to EU's
With Prime Minister Mark Carney pledging to develop all forms of energy, both clean and conventional, two-thirds of Canadians want the federal government to prioritize clean, and three-quarters want Canadian climate policy aligned with Europe rather than the United States, according to new public opinion data released this week by Clean Energy Canada. The research by Abacus Data found that, assuming both were priorities, 67% of Canadians "would generally favour clean energy projects such as critical minerals, renewable power and transmission, and energy storage," Clean Energy Canada explains. "The remaining 33% would prefer conventional fossil fuel projects like oil and gas, including [liquefied natural gas] development." View our latest digests Among the 2,585 Canadians who took place in an online panel between June 2 and 5, 87% said clean energy will be "very" or "pretty" important, and 83% said the same of fossil fuels. Some 45% said clean energy would be "very" important, compared to 36% for fossil fuels. The research uncovered overwhelming support-a margin of 76 to 24%-for shifting Canadian climate policy to align more with Europe, rather than the United States. And "as Canadians face another summer of wildfires, support for continued climate action remains extremely strong, with only 14% of Canadians saying the federal government should do less to combat climate change and transition the country to clean energy," Clean Energy Canada writes. But while a large plurality of respondents, 44%, wanted Canada to do more on climate, 41% said governments are doing about the right amount. The European Union is currently far ahead of Canada in its efforts to drive down climate pollution and shift to renewable energy technologies, and analysts have pointed out that Canada would be by far the biggest per capita emitter in any new trade relationship with the EU. The Abacus research also found that Canadians support building new homes with lower-carbon, sustainable materials by a margin of 64 to 15%, while 70% definitely or likely want to see EV hookups and heat pumps in new homes as long as the cost is minimal. "It's easy to wonder whether views on important issues have shifted as Trump, tariffs, and national security dominate headlines and the worried minds of Canadians," Clean Energy Canada Director of Communications Trevor Melanson said in an online statement. "And yet the consensus on climate action and the transition to clean energy remains overwhelmingly positive. What's more, as Canada forges stronger trade relationships with the likes of Europe and Asia, we may see a growing economic and values alignment with jurisdictions that are all-in on clean energy." Source: The Energy Mix
Canada Standard
15 minutes ago
- Canada Standard
Hundreds of people took to the streets of Montreal as the Americans attacked Iran
panarmenian 22 Jun 2025, 02:25 GMT+10 The diplomatic efforts between Iran, France, Germany, and Great Britain failed to reach an agreement regarding Iran's uranium enrichment program on Friday. But according to Wadephul, the German Foreign Minister, the Iranian side was fundamentally ready to continue talking about all the important issues. Both sides have held v ery serious talks and there is a two-week window where they could seek a diplomatic solution, said Wadephul. ( The Globe and Mail ) According to the Canadian the Globe and Mail newpaper, Iran foreign minister agreed to put all the issues on the table and was hoping to seek for a diplomatic solution. Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons, but defends its right to a civilian nuclear program. The US President, who had assured that Iran could under no circumstances have nuclear weapons, said on Friday that he was giving Iran a maximum two weeks to avoid possible US strikes, decided to move forward alongside his Israeli ally on Saturday and attack Iran's nuclear sites. On Saturday afternoon, thousands of people took to the streets downtown Montreal to support diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict and to denounce the American attack on Iran and the genocide in Gaza. Source: Pressenza
Canada Standard
15 minutes ago
- Canada Standard
Banks Reverse Course, Pour More Money Into Fossil Fuels
A comprehensive report released this week shows that after two years of decline in fossil fuel financing, the global banking industry reversed course in 2024, sharply increasing fossil loans and underwriting. The turnaround is dramatic, Eugene Ellmen writes for Corporate Knights. After a previous high of US$922 billion in fossil financing in 2021, lending and underwriting to the industry fell to $787 billion in 2022 and then again, in 2023, to $707 billion. Last year, this downward trend reversed, and financing increased to $869 billion, according to the report , Banking on Climate Chaos (BOCC). Jessye Waxman, senior adviser for sustainable finance for the U.S. Sierra Club, one of the report's partner organizations, said strong oil and gas production and weak economic conditions sent fossil fuel prices lower last year, creating a need for greater external financing. At the same time, lower interest rates made it more attractive for fossil fuel companies to seek bank financing. "The fossil fuel industry is really trying to shoehorn their way in, trying to push out alternative energy sources, and so are looking for external funding to help their expansion," she said in a BOCC media briefing. The report, prepared by the Rainforest Action Network with other climate advocacy organizations, is an annual assessment of fossil fuel financing by the world's 65 largest banks. View our latest digests The ramp-up comes at a time when the International Energy Agency (IEA) forecasts that investment in clean technologies (renewables, nuclear, grids, storage, low-emission fuels, efficiency, and electrification) is on course to reach $2.2 trillion in 2025, double the investment in oil, natural gas, and coal at $1.1 trillion. The increase is due to the cost advantage of green energy as well as concerns over climate change and energy security. A decade ago, fossil fuels attracted 30% more investment than clean energy, the IEA said in its annual World Energy Investment report. Yet, 45 of the 65 banks covered in the BOCC report increased their fossil fuel financing in 2024. The United States was the largest region for fossil financing at 33% of the global total, and Canada was second at 15%, a reflection of the large size of the North American oil and gas industry and the close ties between the industry and North American banks. JPMorgan Chase, the largest bank in the United States, was the top fossil fuel bank in the world, with $53.4 billion in oil, gas, and coal financing in 2024, an increase of 39% from a year earlier. Bank of America, the second-largest fossil fuel bank, increased its fossil commitments to $46 billion, 38% more than in 2023. Third-ranked Citigroup had $44.7 billion in fossil financing, nearly 50% higher than the previous year. Among Canadian banks, Royal Bank of Canada ranked eighth highest at $34.3 billion, 16% higher than in 2023. Toronto-Dominion Bank was ninth at $29 billion, 45% higher than in 2023. Several large and expanding fossil companies consumed significant shares of the banks' fossil financing. These include Diamondback Energy, a major Texas-based oil and gas developer, and Calgary-based Enbridge, a large oil pipeline operator and North America's largest gas utility. Three other companies are among the banks' top five fossil fuel clients: State Grid Corporation of China, developing large coal power plants; Saudi Aramco, the largest oil producer in the world; and BP, a leading oil and gas supplier. The report looks only at fossil fuel lending and underwriting and does not include low-carbon financing, which has also been increasing in recent years. For example, JPMorgan Chase estimates that in 2023 it provided more funding to clean energy than to oil, gas, and coal, directing $1.29 in green energy for every dollar in fossil fuels. But it's not clear whether that ratio will increase or decrease in 2024 given the sharp rise in fossil financing last year. And even if clean energy finance improves marginally, JPMorgan Chase's energy supply ratio (the clean-to-fossil-energy financing metric) of 1.29:1 is significantly below the 4:1 clean/fossil level that BloombergNEF has established as the level needed worldwide for the climate to stay within 1.5C of global warming. JPMorgan did not respond to a request for comment fromCorporate Knights. The BOCC report authors maintain that no new oil, gas, or coal financing is needed. They point to a 2021 IEA assessment called for no new investments in fossil fuel projects if the world is to limit global warming to 1.5C. Recently, the IEA has revised its position, saying new investment is needed in existing infrastructure to replace declining production but that new fossil infrastructure is still not needed. Bank financing of fossil fuels is expected to become even more contentious in coming years, Corporate Knights writes. In the last six months, all major U.S. and Canadian banks have left the Net-Zero Banking Alliance, the global climate coalition originally launched by now-Prime Minister Mark Carney. Political conditions have also changed, with U.S. President Donald Trump's call for fossil fuel companies to "drill, baby, drill" and Carney pushing for Canada to become a clean and conventional energy superpower. This has set the stage for a new round of oil, gas, and coal expansion. TheBOCC report estimates that companies engaged in fossil fuel expansion received $429 billion in 2024, an $84-billion increase from 2023 and about half the total fossil financing of $869 billion. The BOCC authors say this expansion is reckless for global warming and increases the risk that banks will be left holding loans and bonds on declining fossil fuel assets. They are calling on regulators to require banks to establish climate plans limiting oil, gas, and coal financing. "To see the numbers jump so high just means that the financial sector is at odds with the [climate] commitments that world governments have made," said Allison Fajans-Turner, head of bank policy for the Rainforest Action Network. "They are still prioritizing short-term profits over the long-term stability of the financial system." Eugene Ellmen writes on sustainable business and finance. He is a former executive director of the Canadian Social Investment Organization (now the Responsible Investment Association). This article originally appeared on Corporate Knights. Republished by permission. Source: The Energy Mix
