
First Nations Angered at Being Elbowed Out as Provinces Fast-Track Projects
New legislation to fast-track infrastructure projects in British Columbia, Ontario, and Nova Scotia has Indigenous organizations questioning the provinces' commitment to reconciliation. They say the push to accelerate project approvals risks violating treaty rights and undermining Canada's 2021 law to implement the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP).
Indigenous people need to be involved early in the process, Ken Coates, program chair for Indigenous governance at Yukon University, told the Aboriginal People's Television Network (APTN). "The government is already sending out the agenda and deciding what the priorities are going to be."
Coates added that the federal government's promise to render decisions on major projects within a two-year timeline was unrealistic, given there are "hundreds and hundreds of Indigenous people-First Nations, Metis, Inuit-and they are very different."
In this week's Speech from the Throne-written by the Prime Minister's Office and read by King Charles III-Mark Carney's newly-elected government promised faster approvals for major infrastructure as a top priority. The speech also pledged up to $10 billion in loan guarantees for Indigenous communities to gain ownership in large projects. But First Nations leaders warn that unless governments at all levels honour treaties and uphold the UNDRIP principle of free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC), they risk triggering protests, blockades, and litigation.
UNDRIP requires governments to involve Indigenous people in a way that is "free from manipulation or coercion, informed by adequate and timely information, and occur(s) sufficiently prior to a decision so that Indigenous rights and interests can be incorporated or addressed effectively as part of the decision-making process."
A wave of unprecedented moves to strip environmental protections, skip Indigenous consent requirements, and give governments more power is uniting Indigenous people across Canada, much the way Trump's threats united Canadians.
In Ontario, Premier Doug Ford's Progressive Conservative government is yielding to some First Nation demands by amending its controversial mining bill to include duty to consult provisions throughout, reported The Canadian Press.
Bill 5, the Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act, is being reviewed and almost certain to pass with the majority government. It revises or repeals a number of other laws, including the Ontario Heritage Act, the Mining Act, and the Endangered Species Act, among others. Prior to news of the coming amendment, Chiefs of Ontario First Nations opposed the bill in a statement and said they wanted it immediately withdrawn so that meaningful consultation with First Nations could begin. APTN News reported the bill creates "special economic zones," exempt from many laws and regulations, a move being viewed by many Indigenous peoples as an attack on First Nations lands, rights, and legal agreements with the Crown.
After testifying at the standing committee reviewing the bill, Indigenous representatives spoke to reporters from a lectern with the message "Our rights are not for sale." That language echoed Ford's baseball cap slogan, popularized prior to this year's provincial election, with its message that "Canada is not for sale."
"Ontario is trying to legislate us out of the conversation," Chief Shelly Moore-Frappier of the Temagami First Nation said of the original bill. "They are about to learn what happens when a nation has nothing left to lose and everything to defend."
The amendment to Bill 5 would create a new category of zones, adding in "special Indigenous economic zones" at the request of First Nations for projects they want fast-tracked.
But Indigenous peoples across Canada fear that special economic zones are being considered by other provinces and at the federal level, Chief Alvin Fiddler, Grand Chief of Nishnawbe Aski Nation, told the news conference. He predicted "conflict on the ground," adding that First Nations will do "anything and everything that will make this government listen to us," reported the Toronto Star.
In British Columbia, First Nations leaders said proposed legislation to fast-track resource projects would likely lead to "conflict, protests, and litigation" unless the government engaged with First Nations on potential amendments.
Bill 15, the Infrastructure Projects Act, was tabled May 1 by Premier David Eby's New Democratic government, which holds a narrow majority in the legislature. The Globe and Mail reported that Eby hoped to pass the bill by the end of the month, promising "none will be built without First Nations' consent-and financial benefits."
In a statement, Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, president of the Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs (UBCIC), said the province did not consult or cooperate with First Nations in developing the bill and didn't follow its own rules for aligning with UNDRIP.
"While we support the Province taking action to counter Trump's erratic behaviour, such action must be principled, respect First Nations' basic human rights, and be done in consultation and cooperation with First Nations," said Phillip.
BC Assembly of First Nations Regional Chief Terry Teegee called the bill "overreaching" in the statement, adding that "it enables the Province to bypass permitting processes and expedite environmental assessment for any project they deem a priority."
According to the Globe, Eby "was forced to apologize in person" to the First Nations Leadership Council of the UBCIC. Eby has since said that if First Nations oppose a particular project, his government will look to other proposals.
The Nova Scotia Assembly of Mi'kmaw Chiefs told the legislature's natural resources committee this week that Indigenous communities should not be hearing about important developments, including policy or legislative changes proposed for the mining sector, from the evening news, CBC News reported.
Chief Tamara Young of Pictou Landing First Nation said her community has serious concerns about recent decisions, including the adoption of legislation lifting the province's ban on hydraulic fracturing and rescinding a prohibition on uranium mining.
Bill 6, An Act Respecting Agriculture, Energy and Natural Resources, was tabled February 18 in the Nova Scotia legislature by Premier Tim Houston's Progressive Conservative supermajority government. It became law on March 25 and the First Nations backlash was immediate.
The Halifax Examiner reported that a letter signed by Chiefs Carol Potter, Cory Julian, and Tamara Young said it was "unacceptable that this government is fast-tracking the extraction of natural resources that will permanently devalue and damage our unceded lands and adversely impact the exercise of our Section 35 rights."
Section 35 of Canada's 1982 Constitution Act protects Aboriginal and treaty rights.
Source: The Energy Mix
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vancouver Sun
19 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
More Americans are driving to Canada than Canadians to the U.S., report finds
More American travellers drove to Canada in July than Canadians did to the United States, according to a new report by Statistics Canada . This is the first time such a reversal has taken place since before the COVID-19 pandemic. The dramatic decline of Canadians travelling to the U.S. was sparked last year, with U.S. President Donald Trump's heated rhetoric about Canada becoming the 51st state that led to an ongoing trade war and lingering tension between the two countries. The data for last month shows that 1.8 million American residents drove to Canada, compared to the 1.7 million Canadian residents who made a return trip from the U.S. by car. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Both countries saw a decline at land border crossings last month. For Americans driving to Canada, there was a slight dip of 7.4 per cent compared to the same month last year. It was also the sixth consecutive month of year-over-year declines. However, the decline was much steeper for Canadians returning from the U.S. this July compared to the previous year, at nearly 37 per cent. Last month marked the seventh consecutive month of year-over-year declines, StatCan said. 'In 2024, Canadian-resident trips to the United States totalled 39 million, representing 75 per cent of all Canadian-resident travel abroad,' according to another StatCan report published earlier this summer about travel to the U.S. 'However, recent data on foreign travel suggest that Canadians' travel sentiment toward their southern neighbour has been shifting in early 2025.' Although the data reflects a 'notable change in travel patterns,' StatCan said it is 'unclear whether the change is temporary or part of a more permanent shift.' As for air travel, the number of non-resident visitors who flew to Canada increased in July. There were 1.4 million of them — up by just over 3 per cent since the same time last year. While the bump was largely due to residents who came from overseas (up 5.6 per cent this year), American travellers were also up by just under 1 per cent. The highest number of U.S.-resident arrivals by air was 31,600 Americans on July 3, before the Independence Day long weekend in the U.S. Meanwhile, the number of Canadians returning home from abroad by air last month was down by 5.3 per cent compared to the previous year. In particular, Canadians flying back from the U.S. also decreased by nearly 26 per cent since the same time last year. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .


Edmonton Journal
19 minutes ago
- Edmonton Journal
More Americans are driving to Canada than Canadians to the U.S., report finds
Article content More American travellers drove to Canada in July than Canadians did to the United States, according to a new report by Statistics Canada. This is the first time such a reversal has taken place since before the COVID-19 pandemic. Article content The dramatic decline of Canadians travelling to the U.S. was sparked last year, with U.S. President Donald Trump's heated rhetoric about Canada becoming the 51st state that led to an ongoing trade war and lingering tension between the two countries. Article content Article content The data for last month shows that 1.8 million American residents drove to Canada, compared to the 1.7 million Canadian residents who made a return trip from the U.S. by car. Article content Article content However, the decline was much steeper for Canadians returning from the U.S. this July compared to the previous year, at nearly 37 per cent. Last month marked the seventh consecutive month of year-over-year declines, StatCan said. Article content 'In 2024, Canadian-resident trips to the United States totalled 39 million, representing 75 per cent of all Canadian-resident travel abroad,' according to another StatCan report published earlier this summer about travel to the U.S. 'However, recent data on foreign travel suggest that Canadians' travel sentiment toward their southern neighbour has been shifting in early 2025.' Article content Article content Article content Although the data reflects a 'notable change in travel patterns,' StatCan said it is 'unclear whether the change is temporary or part of a more permanent shift.' Article content Article content As for air travel, the number of non-resident visitors who flew to Canada increased in July. There were 1.4 million of them — up by just over 3 per cent since the same time last year. While the bump was largely due to residents who came from overseas (up 5.6 per cent this year), American travellers were also up by just under 1 per cent. Article content Meanwhile, the number of Canadians returning home from abroad by air last month was down by 5.3 per cent compared to the previous year. In particular, Canadians flying back from the U.S. also decreased by nearly 26 per cent since the same time last year. Article content


The Province
an hour ago
- The Province
B.C. Hydro's 2024 call for power on rocky road through B.C. Utilities Commission review
Questions about whether consultations with First Nations not involved in projects have been adequate are coming up in the Utilities Commission's process Energy Minister Adrian Dix said the 'BCUC is taking an appropriate level of time, but I don't expect any delay in the timeline.' Photo by NICK PROCAYLO / PNG B.C. Hydro opened its second call for new sources of electricity barely two weeks ago, but the projects in its 2024 call for power remain under review by the B.C. Utilities Commission, with questions raised about cost and overlapping claims of First Nations during the process. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by top sports columnists Patrick Johnston, Ben Kuzma, J.J. Abrams and others. Plus, Canucks Report, Sports and Headline News newsletters and events. Unlimited online access to The Province and 15 news sites with one account. The Province ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles and comics, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by top sports columnists Patrick Johnston, Ben Kuzma, J.J. Abrams and others. Plus, Canucks Report, Sports and Headline News newsletters and events. Unlimited online access to The Province and 15 news sites with one account. The Province ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles and comics, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors The province has promised to expedite the addition of new, renewable power sources to B.C. Hydro's inventory, using Bill 14 to exempt projects from environmental review processes. Last December, B.C. Hydro picked 10 such projects to add up to 4,800 gigawatt hours per year of electricity, with some starting to deliver electricity by 2028. However, the Utilities Commission's panel reviewing the energy purchase agreements has extended the timetable for the written review seven times, from an initial closing date for submissions of May 1 to a final closing date of July 8. The BCUC's role is to review B.C. Hydro's energy purchase agreements 'to determine whether they are in the public interest,' said BCUC spokesperson Kelsey Newsham Baerg. Stay on top of the latest real estate news and home design trends. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Extensions to this review were granted to give B.C. Hydro more time to respond to issues raised in letters sent by affected parties, such as overlapping land claims in relation to several proposed projects. Newsham Baerg said there is no set deadline for a decision, which has reached the 'deliberations phase,' but that could come as early as Oct. 6, based on the commission's aim to issue results within 90 days of the close of proceedings. On Tuesday, Energy Minister Adrian Dix said the 'BCUC is taking an appropriate level of time, but I don't expect any delay in the timeline.' 'In fact, we've moved forward very quickly on all of these projects,' Dix added, pointing to government's Bill 14, which was drafted specifically to streamline approval of renewable energy projects such as the projects selected in the 2024 call for power. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Executive director for the Clean Energy Association of B.C., Cole Sayers, who goes by his Nuu-chah-nulth name Kwatuuma, said his group is 'following this proceeding closely and have no concerns at this time.' However, a think-tank that has been critical of the energy policies in government's CleanBC program does see a delay in the proceedings and questions whether B.C. Hydro will be able to hit the ambitious deadlines set in the 2024 call for power. B.C. Hydro needs to acquire 3,700 gigawatt hours per year of electricity before 2033 to meet forecast increases in electricity demand and wants to put the first 700 gigawatt hours per year on the grid before 2029. B.C. Hydro spokesperson Saudamini Raina, in and email response to Postmedia questions, said the private producers have committed to 'a guaranteed commercial operation date' in their agreements. Critic Barry Penner, however, noted the timelines are tight. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'Delay is not your friend when you want projects built on time and on budget,' said Penner, executive director of the Energy Futures Institute, an offshoot of the pro-resources think-tank Resource Works. Penner, a former B.C. cabinet minister and lawyer who has represented independent power producers, said the projects in the 2024 call for power align with the needs that B.C. Hydro spelled out in the last integrated resource plan that the utilities commission has already approved. 'So this process, I would have normally thought would be fairly routine,' Penner said. From previous experience, Penner said independent power producers run into problems securing financing for the next steps of developing proposals, including the detailed permitting that projects still face. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Government has promised to streamline permitting for such projects, but Penner noted that detailed permits for things such as road building, stream crossing or siting facilities require time. 'Governments of every colour have made promises to reduce permitting time, but permitting has actually got longer, despite whatever commitments have been made,' Penner said. Penner believes one reason the review process is taking longer is the objections of First Nations to half of the IPP locations. Government made a minimum 25 per cent First Nations ownership of the power projects a requirement of the call for power to help speed them along, and in nine of the 10 projects, the Indigenous share is 51 per cent. However, neighbouring First Nations have raised objections based on overlapping claims to their territories in five of the projects. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Dix said 'there are always challenges with projects on the ground, but we're confident in these projects.' B.C. Hydro, in the final argument that it filed with the Utilities Commission, said the permitting process will provide ample opportunity to consult and accommodate Indigenous Nations with overlapping claims. However, former BCUC commissioner Richard Mason, in his blog Just and Reasonable, said the claims of some First Nations likely won't end with a Utilities Commission decision. 'First Nations rights are constitutionally protected and if the Crown's duty to consult is not fulfilled, the Supreme Court of Canada has said that a regulator's decision to approve a project 'should be quashed on judicial review,'' Mason wrote in the post. depenner@ Read More Local News Vancouver Whitecaps News Homes Vancouver Whitecaps