After teachers union's concerns, Va. education dep't. extends deadline for grading system committees
A cup of pencils sit on top of a classroom desk in Virginia (Photo by Nathaniel Cline/Virginia Mercury)
On Thursday, Virginia's largest teachers organization cautioned that the Department of Education could be short of teachers to sit on the agency's committees tasked with adjusting the state's grading system. State education leaders pushed back, asserting that teachers would still be pivotal participants on the committees and extended the period they could apply to participate to May 2.
The concerns surfaced after the agency announced the committees' application process on April 17, a day before the Virginia Education Association (VEA) office and some schools closed for Good Friday. The original deadline for teachers to apply to participate was April 24, but the interest the agency received prompted the pushed-back cut off date, according to VDOE Superintendent of Public Instruction Emily Anne Gullickson.
Historically in Virginia, teachers have been central to adjusting cut scores to determine whether K-12 students meet proficiency levels, by reviewing assessment questions and determining the minimum score needed to be considered passing. Educators must apply to serve on the committees to demonstrate their understanding of grade-level content and assessments.
However, this year's process will include educators, instructional specialists, and community stakeholders such as parents and business leaders. Community members will undergo a selection process led by the board and the governor's office. Committee meetings will begin next month.
The VEA, which was also closed Easter Monday, had said the short application period left them scrambling to notify teachers about the opportunity to serve on the committees.
'Why would you let teachers know about something like this with only days to do something about it?' asked Carol Bauer, VEA president. 'We wouldn't do that to our students. The paperwork involved in this process can take an hour or more. It begs the question — does VDOE really want teachers' input on this?'
Bauer said teachers' presence on the assessment committees is essential because they work with students every day and they know them better than anyone else in Virginia's school systems.
'They understand their students' needs and how to meet them,' Bauer said. 'Not having teachers involved in important decisions that affect their students' futures would be an injustice. It wouldn't make sense.'
However, state education board President Grace Creasey, an appointee of Gov. Glenn Youngkin and former educator, said teachers will continue to be key contributors on the committees.
'These committees are generally made up of more teachers than other stakeholders,' Creasey said. 'I have personally participated in them during my 12 years in the classroom and understand the importance of ensuring teacher voice in this process. I'm excited for the standard setting committee work to begin.'
Creasey also defended the application process, stating there have been 'several rounds' of internal and external reviews with stakeholders, testing provider Pearson and the agency's Technical Advisory Committee.
Gullickson said in a statement to the Mercury that as of Wednesday, the agency received 231 applicants with 71% of those being educators.
The Virginia Board of Education will take a final vote on the updated performance standards in July, after staff presents the proposals for review in June.
If approved, the overhauled standards will not take effect until spring 2026.
Raising academic benchmarks in public education are part of a broader push by Youngkin's administration to 'restore excellence in education,' which includes hiking standards in core subjects, increasing transparency and accountability and overhauling the state's assessment system.
The administration's goal is to adjust the cut scores to better align with the rigor of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). The administration has often referred to the NAEP data to show the 'honesty gap,' or the disparity between state-level proficiency standards and the more stringent NAEP standards.
Between 2017-2022, Virginia's fourth-grade reading and math results showed a stunning 40-percentage-point gap between the state's Standards of Learning assessment tests and NAEP assessments.
The governor has asserted that the state's current proficiency standards are the result of the previous Board of Education lowering cut scores and altering school accreditation standards.
However, Anne Holton, a former state education secretary and a current Board of Education member appointed by former Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam, defended the previous board's approach.
Holton, the only board member not appointed by Youngkin, has stated that Virginia's pass rates aligned with the NAEP's 'basic' achievement level, which reflects, according to NAEP, 'partial mastery of the knowledge and skills that are fundamental for proficient work at a given grade.'
Instead, the Youngkin administration wants Virginia to meet NAEP's 'proficient' standard — defined as a student demonstrating a deeper understanding of complex topics and the ability to apply them in real-world situations.
Holton said the process of shifting to the NAEP's higher standard would bring about a dramatic change for the commonwealth.
'There are arguably good reasons to do it, but it's not gonna make any kids smarter,' Holton said. 'No kid can jump higher because the hoop got raised.'
Instead, the state's focus should remain on what helps kids learn better, Holton said, such as implementing the Virginia Literacy Act, 'which has been strong and has helped to make kids smarter, but we needed more of that.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Feds release delayed infrastructure grants, sending $8.6 million to Virginia
A railroad crossing in Virginia. (Sarah Vogelsong/Virginia Mercury) After years of bureaucratic limbo, Virginia is set to receive $8.6 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation to support a slate of infrastructure projects that were first announced three years ago. The funding comes as part of a national effort by the administration of former President Joe Biden to clear a backlog of 3,200 unobligated grants that had stalled 'critical investments' in communities nationwide, according to the agency. The department said Tuesday it has now cleared 1,065 of those projects but did not explain why the grants were delayed in the first place. Six awards are headed to Virginia, benefiting Ashland, Smithfield, Petersburg, Richmond and Salem. The Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation also received $5 million for Phase II of the Jamestown Scotland Ferry Facility Rehabilitation Project. 'While cynics in the press hysterically warned of doomsday delays, USDOT has been hard at work to get America building again,' U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said in a statement. 'We've done this by refocusing the department on core infrastructure – not enacting a radical political agenda. With a third of the last administration's unprecedented backlog cleared, we will continue to rip out red tape roadblocks to get dirt moving.' Duffy said the agency is working 'diligently' to distribute these 'long-overdue' funds and prioritize core infrastructure projects. As part of the shift, the agency said it has eliminated several policies supported by the previous administration, including requirements tied to racial equity, climate change, and social justice. 'Removing these requirements will save taxpayers millions,' the agency stated, citing increased road construction costs and mandates to report greenhouse gas emissions. Among the Virginia recipients, the city of Richmond will receive $2 million — the second largest award in the state — for the Broad Rock Boulevard Grade Separation Study and Development. The project focuses on improving rail crossings with the goal of enhancing mobility by eliminating delays caused by blocked crossings. Town of Ashland – Ashland At-Grade Crossing Study – $421,200 City of Richmond – Broad Rock Boulevard Grade Separation Study and Development – $2,704,000 Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation – Jamestown Scotland Ferry Facility Rehabilitation Project (Phase II) Revised – $5,048,650 City of Petersburg – Petersburg's Safety Action Plan – $200,000 City of Salem – SS4A Safety Action Plan – $100,000 Town of Smithfield – Smithfield Safety and Connectivity Plan – $136,000 SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kilgore, Va. House GOP members slam Spanberger's newly unveiled energy plan
Democratic candidate for Virginia governor Abigail Spanberger. (Photo by Ned Oliver/Virginia Mercury) After Democratic gubernatorial candidate Abigail Spanberger released her energy plan for the state this week, Virginia House GOP members wasted no time bashing it. Her plan emphasizes fair cost share, efficiency projects, and supporting a pilot program to handle peak energy consumption times. 'Her plan leans heavily on demand-side management: programmable thermostats, weatherization programs, utility subsidies, and incentives to reduce consumption during peak hours. That might sound reasonable in theory, but here's the problem: managing scarcity isn't a solution — it's a symptom of failure,' an op-ed penned by House GOP leaders and members read. The demand-side management they referenced is a recently-passed pilot program that requires utility companies to petition the State Corporation Commission to consider how to optimize energy use during peak times, by using virtual power plants, peak-shaving, and other incentives. Dominion is set to go before the Commission on July 15 to present its electric distribution grid plans for the pilot program. The pilot allows homes and businesses to opt in to have their thermostats, appliances and solar arrays controlled during high-demand times. Spanberger's plan also emphasizes weatherization of homes to limit energy waste and aims to reduce the need for additional power plants and transmission lines. Republican House lawmakers pushed back against those measures. 'No one wants to sit through a July heatwave hoping their A/C unit is grid-compliant, or that their A/C won't be the one that someone in Richmond decides that it needs to shut off to save the grid. No one should have to worry that peak-hour surcharges or remote-control thermostats are going to make their daily life harder and more expensive,' the Republican legislators' letter read. Ten of the GOP House members who signed on to the letter voted in favor of Senate Bill 1100 in this year's legislative session, which allowed the pilot program to move forward. Dels. Michael Webert, R-Fauquier, Wren Williams, R-Patrick, Chris Obenshain, R-Montgomery, Ian Lovejoy, R-Prince William, Geary Higgins, R-Loudoun, Paul Milde, R-Stafford, Mark Earley, R-Chesterfield, Rob Bloxom, R-Accomack, Chad Green, R-York, and Anne Ferrell Tata, R-Virginia Beach, added their signatures to House GOP Leader Del. Terry Kilgore's. Kilgore, recently selected as House Republicans' caucus leader, sponsored a bill in 2023 that capped Dominion's profit margin, and this year, will allow the SCC to manage the profit margin rates. The General Assembly has also recently passed legislation aimed at expanding the state's market for Small Modular Reactors, a nuclear energy source that's still being developed and hasn't yet been deployed anywhere in the United States. Virginia lawmakers pass competing proposals to encourage small modular reactor development A House GOP spokesperson said the members who voted in favor of SB 1011 are more interested in ramping up energy production in the state to meet increasing energy needs. Spanberger's plan doesn't rule out new energy projects coming to the state to help meet demand, and touts the use of 'advanced energy technologies' like 'modular nuclear reactors, fusion, geothermal, and hydrogen.' The framework also states her administration will 'ensure regulatory agencies in Virginia such as DEQ and VDOT are adequately staffed to deliver timely responses to permit applications.' The GOP letter said they are in favor of speeding up permitting for all energy sources, not just renewable ones. Spanberger's energy outline doesn't go into details on plans to expand natural gas, nuclear, wind, or solar energy sources. It does lay out ideas to ensure the SCC works with stakeholders on efficiency methods to cut back on energy use – something the GOP members took issue with. 'You don't solve an energy shortage by asking people to get used to less. You solve it by building more power,' the letter said. Utility rates in the PJM markets have steadily increased in recent years as brownouts in the summer months have become a growing concern. Virginia was rated as the state that received the most electricity from other states in 2023, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. GOP House members want to shift away from this heavy import of energy and boost Virginia as a player in the energy production market. In 2020, the General Assembly passed the Clean Energy and Community Flood Preparedness Act that put the commonwealth into the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. Participating states can buy allowances of carbon emissions, and the proceeds are returned to the state for flood and energy projects. Gov. Glenn Youngkin pulled Virginia from RGGI, framing the additional cost to consumers for the program as a hidden tax. The withdrawal was later found to be unlawful by the courts. The state's inclusion in the program is on hold while appeals play out in the legal system. Spanberger's plan suggests negotiating a deal to get the state back in on RGGI and use funding for efficiency projects. Judge deems Youngkin's actions to withdraw Virginia from RGGI 'unlawful' 'Abigail consistently hears from Virginians who are facing high energy bills, and she knows affordable energy is essential for driving economic growth. That's why her plan to make Virginians' energy bills more affordable includes increasing local electricity generation and speeding up the timeline to bring new projects online,' a spokesperson for Spanberger said in a statement. 'As Governor, Abigail will be focused on making Virginia more affordable — and she looks forward to working with both Democrats and Republicans alike to make it happen.' Last week, Republican candidate for governor Winsome Earle-Sears said on the campaign trail that she wants to bolster the state's energy profile through expanding fossil fuels and nuclear energy, according to the Prince William Times, to meet the state's surging energy needs. Data centers in Virginia have 'substantially driven up energy demand in the state, and demand is forecast to continue growing for the foreseeable future,' a 2024 Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission report found. Earle-Sears didn't mention data centers specifically, but acknowledged that Virginia's electricity demands have led the commonwealth to import 40% of its electricity from other states. Her administration, she said, would push for an all-of-the-above energy approach, an echo of Youngkin's energy platform. Earle-Sears did not respond to the Mercury's request to elaborate on her energy platform. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Miyares breaks with Trump over pardon of convicted ex-Culpeper sheriff
Culpeper Sheriff Scott Jenkins speaks to the crowd at the pro-gun rally in 2020. (Ryan M. Kelly for the Virginia Mercury) Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares is pushing back against President Donald Trump's decision to pardon former Culpeper County Sheriff Scott Jenkins, saying the ex-lawman's federal bribery conviction was well-founded and the pardon misguided. 'I have to authorize any state investigation into any elected official. And so I was aware of a lot of the facts at that time,' Miyares told The Mercury in an interview Tuesday. 'Given what I know, I would not have pardoned him.' The rare public break from Miyares, a Republican and rising star in Virginia politics who is seeking a second term this year, comes just weeks after Trump issued the controversial pardon in late May. The president portrayed Jenkins — a longtime supporter who campaigned for Trump in both 2016 and 2020 — as the victim of political persecution. 'Sheriff Scott Jenkins, his wife Patricia, and their family have been dragged through HELL,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post announcing the pardon. He blamed the case on 'an overzealous Biden Department of Justice' and claimed Jenkins had been 'left for dead' by 'Radical Left monsters.' But prosecutors, a jury and residents in Jenkins's own hometown paint a far different picture. In March, Jenkins was sentenced to 10 years in federal prison after a jury found him guilty of accepting over $75,000 in bribes in exchange for issuing auxiliary deputy sheriff appointments and law enforcement credentials to wealthy businessmen and undercover agents. None of the recipients were trained, vetted, or expected to perform any actual law enforcement duties. They offered Jenkins cash and campaign contributions. The appointments came with official Culpeper County Sheriff's Office badges, identification cards, and in some cases, the ability to carry concealed weapons in jurisdictions where they otherwise may not have had permission to do so. Jenkins, 53, was convicted in December 2024 on 12 federal counts — including conspiracy, four counts of honest services wire fraud, and seven counts of bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds. 'Scott Jenkins violated his oath of office and the faith the citizens of Culpeper County placed in him when he engaged in a cash-for-badges scheme,' said Acting U.S. Attorney Zachary T. Lee in a statement after sentencing. 'We hold our elected law enforcement officials to a higher standard of conduct … and this case proves that when those officials use their authority for unjust personal enrichment, the Department of Justice will hold them accountable.' FBI officials echoed that assessment. Stanley Meador, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's Richmond Division, called Jenkins's actions a betrayal of his badge. 'Every law enforcement officer takes an oath to serve and protect the community — that includes following the law they've sworn to uphold,' Meador said. 'I am proud of the diligent work our investigative team did on this case to bring Jenkins to justice.' Court documents showed that Jenkins accepted bribes from at least eight individuals, including co-defendants Rick Rahim, Fredric Gumbinner, and James Metcalf — all of whom pleaded guilty — as well as two undercover FBI agents posing as wealthy donors. In return, Jenkins appointed them as auxiliary deputy sheriffs and issued official law enforcement credentials. In one instance, Jenkins pressured Culpeper County officials to support a petition falsely claiming that Rahim — a convicted felon — resided in the county, in order to have his firearm rights restored. The petition, later revealed to contain misleading information, was central to the government's case in proving Jenkins's abuse of power. Assistant U.S. Attorney Melanie Smith, along with Trial Attorneys Celia Choy and Lina Peng from the Department of Justice's Public Integrity Section, led the prosecution. Despite the evidence and jury verdict, Trump's decision to intervene and grant clemency to Jenkins sparked outrage — even in conservative Culpeper County, where Trump won more than 60% of the vote in the 2024 presidential election. According to NPR, which interviewed more than two dozen Culpeper residents following the pardon, all but one person expressed disapproval of the pardon — and the lone supporter refused to go on record. 'That's a terrific mistake,' Ken Green, a retired entrepreneur and three-time Trump voter, told the reporter as he sat at the counter of Frost Café on Culpeper's Main Street. 'It's a failure of our justice system. He was guilty as could be. He needed to go to jail, and he didn't. So what kind of signal does that send?' For Miyares, the issue isn't Trump's constitutional authority — which he acknowledges — but whether that authority was exercised responsibly. 'I think it is clear the Constitution gives the president incredibly broad pardon powers, as we have seen,' Miyares said in the interview. 'And regardless of who's in the White House, these pardons can be controversial at times.' He added, 'Clearly the White House is privy to facts that I'm not aware of, but with the facts that I am aware of, I would not have pardoned him.' Miyares's criticism adds to a growing chorus of Republicans what they view as Trump's increasingly personal use of the pardon power. While presidents have long granted clemency for controversial figures, Jenkins's case stands out because of the sheer volume of evidence, the jury's unanimous verdict and the betrayal of public trust by a sitting sheriff. 'You're scared. Honestly, you're scared,' Jenkins said of his sentencing. 'You may have been a cop all your life but you're sitting here going, 'They want to put me in prison for life.'' Whether Trump's decision will have political consequences remains to be seen, but the fallout in Virginia — especially among conservative voters who also value law-and-order policy— is still unfolding. As Miyares put it, 'I don't agree with that.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE