Feds release delayed infrastructure grants, sending $8.6 million to Virginia
After years of bureaucratic limbo, Virginia is set to receive $8.6 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation to support a slate of infrastructure projects that were first announced three years ago.
The funding comes as part of a national effort by the administration of former President Joe Biden to clear a backlog of 3,200 unobligated grants that had stalled 'critical investments' in communities nationwide, according to the agency. The department said Tuesday it has now cleared 1,065 of those projects but did not explain why the grants were delayed in the first place.
Six awards are headed to Virginia, benefiting Ashland, Smithfield, Petersburg, Richmond and Salem. The Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation also received $5 million for Phase II of the Jamestown Scotland Ferry Facility Rehabilitation Project.
'While cynics in the press hysterically warned of doomsday delays, USDOT has been hard at work to get America building again,' U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said in a statement. 'We've done this by refocusing the department on core infrastructure – not enacting a radical political agenda. With a third of the last administration's unprecedented backlog cleared, we will continue to rip out red tape roadblocks to get dirt moving.'
Duffy said the agency is working 'diligently' to distribute these 'long-overdue' funds and prioritize core infrastructure projects.
As part of the shift, the agency said it has eliminated several policies supported by the previous administration, including requirements tied to racial equity, climate change, and social justice.
'Removing these requirements will save taxpayers millions,' the agency stated, citing increased road construction costs and mandates to report greenhouse gas emissions.
Among the Virginia recipients, the city of Richmond will receive $2 million — the second largest award in the state — for the Broad Rock Boulevard Grade Separation Study and Development. The project focuses on improving rail crossings with the goal of enhancing mobility by eliminating delays caused by blocked crossings.
Town of Ashland – Ashland At-Grade Crossing Study – $421,200
City of Richmond – Broad Rock Boulevard Grade Separation Study and Development – $2,704,000
Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation – Jamestown Scotland Ferry Facility Rehabilitation Project (Phase II) Revised – $5,048,650
City of Petersburg – Petersburg's Safety Action Plan – $200,000
City of Salem – SS4A Safety Action Plan – $100,000
Town of Smithfield – Smithfield Safety and Connectivity Plan – $136,000
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Appeals court rules Trump clamp-down on spending data defies Congress' authority
A federal appeals court panel shot down a Trump administration bid to make secret a public database of federal spending that researchers say is crucial to ensure the administration is not flouting Congress' power of the purse. In an order issued Saturday evening, the three-judge D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals panel voted unanimously to give the administration until Friday to put the data back online. Two of the three appeals judges assigned to the matter also signed onto a forceful opinion declaring that the administration's bid to conceal the data was an affront to Congress' authority over government spending, one that threatened the separation of powers and defied centuries of evidence that public disclosure is necessary for the public good. 'No court would allow a losing party to defy its judgment. No President would allow a usurper to command our armed forces,' Judge Karen Henderson, a George H.W. Bush appointee, wrote in support of the decision to deny the Trump administration's request to keep the data under wraps while litigation over the issue goes forward. 'And no Congress should be made to wait while the Executive intrudes on its plenary power over appropriations.' The Trump administration ignited the legal battle when it decided in March to abruptly shut down the database, claiming the widely available public data threatened the president's ability to manage federal spending. Henderson noted that the decision came amid a torrent of lawsuits questioning whether the administration was preparing to illegally 'impound' — or withhold — congressionally mandated spending required by law to disburse. The administration claimed the database also forced the disclosure of information meant to be shielded from public view. U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan rejected that view out of hand last month, in a lawsuit brought by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and the Protect Democracy group. The Clinton-appointed judge ordered the administration to immediately restore the website. The Justice Department quickly appealed and won a short-term pause of Sullivan's decision. But Saturday's ruling by the appeals court panel ends that pause. Henderson agreed with Sullivan, saying Congress' power is 'at its zenith' when it comes to both approving federal spending and requiring details of that spending to be publicly disclosed. In other words, only Congress — not the administration — could decide to shut down the database. Judge Robert Wilkins, an Obama appointee, joined Henderson's 25-page opinion. The third judge on the panel, Biden appointee Bradley Garcia, voted with Henderson and Wilkins but did not join her opinion. The ruling lands just as a simmering fight over Trump's authority to dictate federal spending has been ramping up on Capitol Hill. Trump has long flirted with the notion that the president has the power to impound funds that he views cut against Executive Branch priorities, and courts have eyed warily his administration's decision to mass-terminate federal grants and contracts representing billions of dollars in congressionally required spending. The Justice Department has argued that the funds for those terminated programs could be reissued in plenty of time to satisfy Congress' requirements, but Trump budget officials have floated workarounds that have made some lawmakers uncomfortable. The decision Saturday is not a final ruling on the underlying legal question about whether the administration is obliged to make the data public. But unless the full bench of the appeals court steps in or the administration gets relief from the Supreme Court, the ruling means the data is likely to be public within days. The panel agreed to give the administration until Aug. 15 to restore the database.
Fox News
20 hours ago
- Fox News
Trump caps off 29th week in office with peace deal, celebrating 200th day second presidency
President Donald Trump has capped off his 29th week back in the Oval Office, which included celebrating his 200th day as the 47th president, completing revamps to the White House's Rose Garden and an overall focus on the U.S. economy and international diplomacy that unfolded at a break-neck pace this week. "In just 200 days, President Trump has turned America into the hottest country in the world," White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers told Fox News Digital, reflecting on Trump's 200th day in office Thursday. "Under Joe Biden's failed leadership, families and businesses were struggling, and America was dead — but President Trump has quickly restored American greatness. The historic trade deals and peace deals he secured on behalf of the American people made President Trump's second 100 days just as successful as the first." The first 100 days of a new administration have commonly been viewed as a symbolic benchmark to measure a president's early successes. A White House official told Fox Digital that Trump's measure of success was not only seen in the first 100 days, but also in the timeframe between the 100th day and Aug. 7 — the 200th day. Trump's 29th week in office included an overall and ongoing focus on new business investments in the U.S. and new tariffs on foreign nations as the administration looks to bring parity to the U.S.' historic trade deficit with other nations. The White House teased Trump would make a major announcement on Wednesday, which ultimately revealed Apple had increased its U.S. investment commitment by $100 billion to $600 billion. "Today Apple is announcing that it will invest $600 billion — that's with a B — in the United States over the next four years. That's $100 billion more than they were originally going to invest. And this is the largest investment Apple has ever made in America and anywhere else," Trump said on Wednesday from the Oval Office, where he was joined by Apple CEO Tim Cook. Trump's announcement on the deal was one facet of this week's focus on the U.S. economy. The president signed a pair of executive orders on Thursday allowing Americans to invest their 401(k) retirement plans in cryptocurrency, private equity and real estate, as well as another EO that works to ensure banks do not "deny or restrict services based on political beliefs, religious beliefs, or lawful business activities," according the EO. Trump kicked off the week by announcing he would increase tariffs on India over the country's continued purchase of Russian oil, with goods from India now facing a 50% tariff. The tariff hikes followed months of the U.S. and India holding trade negotiations that appeared to be all but solidified in July, but fell to pieces by August. "Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country," Trump wrote on social media on Wednesday. "Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE — ALL THINGS NOT GOOD! INDIA WILL THEREFORE BE PAYING A TARIFF OF 25%, PLUS A PENALTY FOR THE ABOVE, STARTING ON AUGUST FIRST. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER. MAGA!" he continued. Trump's tariff plans aim to increase the amount of American-built products and U.S.-based companies, and the president said he would also impose a 100% tariff on imports of semiconductors and chips. Companies "building in the United States," however, will be exempt from the tariffs, he said. "100 percent tariff on all chips and semiconductors coming into the United States, but if you've made a commitment to build or if you're in the process of building as many are, there is no tariff," he said on Wednesday. Trump wrapped up the working week by holding a trilateral meeting with the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan to sign a peace agreement after the two nations have battled one another since the 1980s over a territorial conflict. The White House said Friday that the two nations agreed to build a road connecting Azerbaijan and an autonomous enclave currently separated by Armenian territory. The road will be called the "Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity," according to the White House. "The roadmap they are agreeing to will build a cooperative future that benefits both countries, their region of the South Caucasus and beyond," White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said Friday of the peace deal. The peace deal comes as Trump continues working to reach a ceasefire agreement between Russia and Ukraine as the war that broke out in 2022 continues raging between the nations. Armenia and Azerbaijan are both former constituent republics of the Soviet Union. Trump said earlier this week that he is open to meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, which would mark the pair's first meeting since Trump was sworn back into office this year. "As President Trump said yesterday, the Russians expressed their desire to meet with President Trump, and the President is open to this meeting. President Trump would like to meet with both President Putin and President Zelensky because he wants this brutal war to end. The White House is working through the details of these potential meetings and details will be provided at the appropriate time," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement on Thursday. Trump confirmed on Friday that he would meet with Putin on Aug. 15 in Alaska. "The highly anticipated meeting between myself, as President of the United States of America, and President Vladimir Putin, of Russia, will take place next Friday, August 15, 2025, in the Great State of Alaska. Further details to follow. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" he posted to Truth Social on Friday. Trump announced in March that he planned to renovate the historic garden with pavers, citing the grass "doesn't work," citing how the soft grass terrain was difficult for some visitors to navigate. "We're getting great reviews of the Rose Garden, and we had to do it," Trump told reporters on Sunday of the update. The area was officially paved over with a bright white patio boasting the White House's emblem on its perimeter. "When we had a press conference, you'd sink into the mud. It was grass and it was very wet, always wet and damp and wet and if it rained it would take three, four, five days to dry out, and we couldn't use it really for the intended purpose," he added. "It's a beautiful white stone, and it's a stone that's the same color as the White House itself," Trump said. "And because it's very white, it's going to reflect the heat, and it's not going to be very hot. Yeah, we've got great reviews of the Rose Garden." On Tuesday, the president made a surprise appearance on the White House roof, surveying the area from roof of the West Wing and the press briefing room. Reporters on the ground gathered near the president while shouting questions at him. The appearance comes just days after Trump announced that he and private donors will fund an estimated $200 million cost of a new ballroom at the White House.
Fox News
a day ago
- Fox News
Trump sends military after the cartels and it's long overdue
On Friday, Aug. 8, President Donald Trump ordered the U.S. military into action against Mexican and other Latin American drug cartels, taking an anticipated step after declaring these violent groups to be foreign terrorist organizations less than a month into his second term. Sending the military to our southern border, and potentially beyond, is a much-needed step for national security. Because the problem is worse than most Americans realize. Evidence shows that corrupt Mexican military and law enforcement officials are aiding the cartels on U.S. soil. Trump has succeeded in securing the border where former President Joe Biden failed — unless failure was the objective. But securing the border is about more than stemming illegal entrance into America — it also encompasses interdicting deadly drugs and preventing or catching criminals, terrorists and hostile agents from entering, as well. From May to July, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released no illegal immigrants from the border to the nation's interior. In 2024, over the same three-month period, Biden released 212,000 illegal aliens into the interior with a simple promise to report to an immigration judge at some point. Most didn't bother to report and simply disappeared. Border security isn't just an immigration problem — it's a national security imperative. Six years ago, the Texas Public Policy Foundation filed a Freedom of Information Act request with DHS for reports of Mexican military or law enforcement operating on U.S. soil or in U.S. airspace. The DHS responded in July 2025, after the Biden administration suppressed the response for years. We carefully reviewed 190 pages of Serious Incident Reports that detailed Mexican incursions into America over the six-year period of 2014 to 2019, covering the last three years of the Obama administration and the first three years of the first Trump administration. The reports detailed 78 separate incidents, of which 39 appeared significant and 39 benign. The latter included police in hot pursuit of suspects, or training aircraft taking off from airports close to the border and briefly straying into U.S. airspace. The remaining 39 reports indicated something more troubling: Mexican authorities purposefully violating U.S. territory, likely in corrupt service of the Mexican drug and human trafficking cartels. Of particular interest, of the 39 incidents confirmed on U.S. territory, only four happened during the night. That only one in 10 incidents happened during the cover of darkness appeared odd. Of this, Ammon Blair, a colleague and former Border Patrol agent, told me that, "The cartels owned the night," he went on to remark that nighttime was "Gotaway Central," referring to those whom the Border Patrol saw or had evidence of, but did not apprehend. This means that there could have been hundreds of instances where either the Mexican military or law enforcement crossed the border under cover of darkness to aid the cartels, but that the lack of a positive ID prevented DHS from logging the incursion as being by Mexican government personnel. Further, Border Patrol's rules of engagement are very risk-adverse. If it's determined that a heavily armed force is operating in the area, Border Patrol teams — often just two agents — are ordered to pull back. Blair told me of an incident where he and his partner, armed only with handguns, were urgently ordered back to their vehicles. They were told that national intelligence methods had picked up radio traffic that indicated that a Mexican army squad, "Has you in their sights." Ten with rifles against two with sidearms are not good odds. But that was then. Today, after significant investments initiated during the first Trump administration and boosted under the One Big Beautiful bill, both Customs and Border Protection at our ports of entry, and Border Patrol at points in between, have better technology. Autonomous Surveillance Towers with night thermal technology and aerostat surveillance balloons provide far better nighttime coverage than was the case six years ago. Border security isn't just an immigration problem — it's a national security imperative. That said, not every property owner along the border will allow a tower packed with sensors on their property, leaving dead spaces in ravines and low spots uncovered. About one-third of cameras are broken at any given time. And there are still only about two Border Patrol agents covering each mile of the southern border. Unfortunately, in war, the enemy gets a vote. In 190 pages of reports covering six years there was only one mentions of a quadcopter flown by Mexican police over U.S. soil. Last year, DHS reported that 60,000 drones were sighted within a few hundred yards of the border — that's 330 a day. Whether employed by the cartels or Mexican officials, these drones serve two main purposes: counter surveillance — figuring out where Border Patrol, law enforcement or military personnel are; and area denial — Border Patrol won't fly its helicopters in areas where drones are operating. Even today, we still don't know the reason for the crash of a National Guard reconnaissance helicopter with the loss of three aboard in March 2024 near Rio Grande City, Texas, on the border. And now there are reports that not only have Mexican cartels sent people to fight in Ukraine to learn drone tactics, but they've also deployed fiber optic-controlled drones in Mexico. These drones are resistant to jamming. Second to the threat from China, the rise of the Mexican narco-state on our southern border presents a grave national security challenge, one that DHS can't handle alone — they lack the personnel, the equipment, the training and the doctrine to do so. Instead, only targeted military operations can interdict armed incursions into America — something the U.S. military was built to do. Applying the lessons of past conflicts, using the military to ambush and capture armed border infiltrators will raise the costs of violating American sovereignty while sending a powerful message to Mexico City.
