
Mayor of seaside town condemns his OWN council over plans to charge residents £70 to park outside their own homes
The mayor of a seaside town has condemned his own council over proposals to charge residents £70 to park outside their own homes.
George Farquhar claimed he knew nothing about the contentious plans which are in response to visitors to Bournemouth parking across driveways, on pavements, grass verges and even roundabouts.
The Liberal Democrat-led Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council argue that pirate parkers are happy to pay the existing £35 maximum fine so sterner measures are needed.
Miles of road are set to be littered with new meters under the scheme, including the residential areas of Sandbanks, Canford Cliffs, Branksome Chine, Westcliff, Boscombe and Southbourne.
But this means home owners will pick up the slack, paying £70 per car on their own streets.
Mr Farquhar, who is originally from Dunfermline, Scotland is leading the fight to stop the parking scheme in its tracks.
He said: 'This time next year we could all be paying between £70 to £252 for a pay-to-park permit.
'We only heard about this consultation a day before it was made public. As such we have had no approach made for our feedback on parking issues in the neighbourhood or how to tackle them.
'Since I moved from a Permit Zone in north London in 2011, I know the drawbacks, and I have been against parking permits here in Bournemouth, ever since I moved.'
The mayor insisted that neither the fines nor the new permits would put tourists off parking the car in disruptive places.
'Inconsiderate and illegal parking has occurred every hot summer weekend since I moved here and tickets are always issued,' he said.
'1000 plus tickets were issued last weekend, but not one of those 1000 plus parking tickets would or has deterred inconsiderate or illegal parking on hot weekends.
'£35 for a car-load of folk with beach gear is a bargain. To introduce permit parking would not change that selfish behaviour one iota.
'The fee for a parking ticket is the same if it is on a double yellow, across a driveway, on top of a roundabout, or on a piece of street with a permit scheme in place.
'However a Pay-to-Park street is a very lucrative revenue stream with the added bonus that it is low cost to administrate. A lucrative revenue stream all year round is the aim, nothing more, and it must be resisted.'
He added: 'The sun will continue to shine on just a few weekends every year, and a 1000 plus tickets will be issued to those who park inconsiderately or illegally regardless.
The mayor insisted that neither the fines nor the new permits would put the thousands of tourists, pictured on Bournemouth beach, off parking the car in disruptive places
Miles of road are to be littered with new meters under the scheme, including the residential areas of Sandbanks, Canford Cliffs, Branksome Chine, Westcliff, Boscombe and Southbourne
'But a permit parking scheme will have to be paid for by us residents every day of the year.'
The move has also sparked outrage among locals, who say they are being punished for people's bad behaviour, and businesses who fear the scheme will drive visitors away.
Peter Schroeder, the chairman of the Branksome Park Residents Association, called the plans 'stupid'.
He said: 'This proposal comes from the same council that is selling off key car parks. It is hypocrisy.
'We say no to residents paying to park their own cars on their own streets. We already have some of the highest council tax charges in the area.
'Charging residents and their guests and tradespeople doing work in houses and flats it a stupid idea.
'The council should give much stiffer penalties to those who do illegally park. £50 is probably nothing to them. If it was £1,000 they would think twice.'
Councillor Richard Herrett, portfolio holder for destination, leisure and commercial operations at BCP Council, said the extra revenue will pay for more tow-trucks to take away more illegally parked cars.
He said: 'We welcome more than 10 million visitors annually to our seafront.
'We know at busy times we have a significant issue with illegal or inconsiderate parking. This significantly impacts road safety and can affect the quality of life for local residents.
'These proposals to extend seafront paid-for parking could generate revenue for additional parking enforcement and give us the ability to better enforce illegal parking across a wider area including increasing the number of vehicles which could be towed away in the worst parking instances.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
33 minutes ago
- BBC News
Person killed and another seriously injured in A361 crash near Burford
A fatal crash has resulted in the closure of a main road in Oxfordshire. One person was killed and another seriously injured in the crash on the A361 near Burford at about 15:20 BST, police said. Their next of kin have been informed. Oxfordshire County Council said the A361, from north of Bradwell Village to just south of Burford, was shut and remained so into Thursday night. You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.


The Sun
40 minutes ago
- The Sun
Mum, 34, who vanished at church over a month ago is presumed dead as police make third arrest
A MUM who vanished at a church over a month ago is now presumed to be dead, say police. A third suspect, a 53-year old man, has been arrested on suspicion of kidnap and murder. 2 2 Reanne Coulson, 34, was last seen leaving a food bank near St Mary and Benedict Church in Coventry on May 21. Specialist search teams, including police dogs, have been searching Binley Woods and other areas of land in neighbouring Warwickshire since Wednesday. West Midlands Police say that "police intelligence" led them to the area. Her family had made an emotional plea for information earlier this week following her disappearance. They reported her missing when she didn't make contact on her birthday on June 17.


The Sun
41 minutes ago
- The Sun
Taxpayers will be left counting the cost for years to come if Labour rebels block welfare cuts
Taking the PIP FOR those Labour MPs excitedly plotting against the PM while virtue-signalling about the cruelty of cutting benefits, we have a reality check. According to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the welfare Bill would actually RISE by a further £8billion even if the changes were fully implemented. Spending on health-related benefits would reach a whopping £61billion by the end of the decade. That's up by £25billion on the figure in 2019-20, before Covid. If Labour rebels block the changes, this figure balloons to £66billion. It now looks inevitable Starmer will be forced to retreat, having abandoned his pledge to stand firm and instead offering 'conversations' with the rebels. Labour MPs might well feel better and pat themselves on the back on Twitter for being 'progressive' — once again the buzzword of the Left. But taxpayers will be left counting the cost for years to come. The PM, meanwhile, stands seriously weakened less than a year after winning a landslide. What a self-inflicted disaster. Angela Rayner says lifting 2-child benefit cap not 'silver bullet' for ending poverty after demanding cuts for millions Red-handed DO as I say, not as I do. They should carve that mantra in stone above the entrance to the Department of Energy. Ed Miliband loves telling ordinary folk to make expensive sacrifices to save the planet. Yet it's somehow no surprise that His Greenness flew at least one Net Zero official on a 10,000-mile round-trip to Brazil on a pointless mission to check whether hotels they considered booking for him and his team were suitable. Apparently we must all ditch the gas boilers that keep us warm. But pumping out tonnes of CO2 is completely fine if it's in pursuit of a perfect hotel suite for the minister. Miliband's hypocrisy will probably go down badly with the Climate Change Committee quango. It says his failure to lift expensive green levies from electricity bills means punters aren't buying enough electric cars or heat pumps. It seems even his eco warrior mates don't think he's up to the job. No to Nanny BRITS generally hate being told what to do — especially when it makes no sense. So why don't the busybodies presiding over our increasingly nanny state just leave us alone? Since when was having a pint or a flutter such a danger to society? Why must we constantly be told to watch where we're going, hold the handrail, mind our heads and our words — even our thoughts? No one asked for any of this. Nanny doesn't know best. We do.