logo
‘My father came to the UK to find safety – but he died alone in an asylum hotel'

‘My father came to the UK to find safety – but he died alone in an asylum hotel'

Independent2 days ago

Michael Pereira's father Victor was a 'man with a big heart', who was generous in his affection, and who loved to hug and kiss his family.
'He was a man full of passion, with a strong temperament, yet he had a unique way of making people laugh and feel at ease', Mr Pereira remembered.
Mr Pereira never knew why his father felt he had to flee his home country Colombia, eventually claiming asylum in the UK in August 2023. But he was certain his father had not had any mental health issues before he sought safety in Britain.
In testimony to his father's inquest, Mr Pereira detailed how he saw his father deteriorate from someone who was sociable and easy-going, to a person who was increasingly paranoid.
Victor Hugo Pereira Vargas, 63, killed himself in his room at a Home Office asylum hotel in Hailsham, Sussex on 13 October 2023. Just a few weeks earlier he had made a desperate attempt to leave the UK, turning up at Gatwick airport and asking immigration officers to put him on a plane out of the country.
He had even filled out a voluntary return form to express his interest in being returned to Colombia, and had told his son several times that he was afraid of being moved to the Bibby Stockholm barge – describing it as a 'maritime prison'.
An inquest into his death heard how he was repeatedly failed by staff at the hotel, and the officials in charge of managing the Home Office's large asylum contracts, who didn't know the full reality of how the hotel was being run.
Hotel staff missed signs of his deterioration despite conducting regular welfare checks, did not help him report to the police a robbery he suffered, and took two weeks to book him a GP mental health appointment.
While Clearsprings Ready Homes managed the overall contract, they subcontracted the running of Mr Pereira Vargas's hotel to another company Crown Lodge. Crown Lodge then outsourced the staff of the hotel to a third company, Becker Hoffman. Some staff were 'not appropriately' trained to deal with vulnerable people, the coroner found.
Clearsprings told the court it came to rely on subcontractors as an emergency measure to cope with an unforeseen rapid increase in small boat arrivals shortly after the pandemic.
Testimony from his eldest son Mr Pereira, who lives in the United States, detailed how his father would wake up in his hotel room drenched in sweat, unable to sleep, and how he felt isolated and had no one to talk to.
'He was a man who gave everything he had. One thing that always weighed heavily on him was his desire to give his children a better life than the one he had,' Mr Pereira said: 'He was always striving for that, but often he struggled to figure out the best way to achieve it.'
Speaking about his father's death, Mr Pereira said: 'I still haven't been able to process it to be honest because I don't understand what happened or why no one took care of him when he went there in the first place to find safety.'
On 9 August 2023, Mr Pereira received a voicenote from his dad in which he 'sounded really worried' after seeing news of the-then Conservative government 'putting people on a boat' – an apparent reference to the controversial Bibby Stockholm barge.
On 12 August, he received another message in which his father asked: 'What are they going to do with the people? Are they going to put them in jail? Because that was a maritime prison'.
According to incident reports, by 16 August, Mr Pereira Vargas was asking hotel staff how he could leave the UK, was visibly distressed, and asked the staff to call the police.
In mid-September, he told hotel staff that he had not slept for three days, but they did not book him a mental health GP appointment until two weeks later.
He again asked hotel staff if the Home Office could arrange for him to leave the country, according to the incident reports, and said he was hearing banging noises and was getting panicked.
In an act of desperation, he went to Gatwick Airport at the end of September and requested that an immigration officer put him on a flight out of the UK. He was apparently told to go to an immigration centre in Croydon, but having no money to travel there he slept overnight in the airport car park.
Vulnerable, panicked and without money, Mr Pereira Vargas encountered some other Columbians who said they could get him a plane ticket if he sold his watch to them, the inquest heard.
After being taken in, these people then reportedly stole his wallet and documents. He recounted what happened to hotel staff after managing to return back.
The last time Mr Pereira spoke to his father was a few days before he died. He told the inquest: 'I just remember that he sounded stressed about staying there and he was saying he wanted to find a way to go somewhere else but he didn't give me any details about his plans. I thought that he was just trying to figure out a way to sort out his asylum.'
If you are experiencing feelings of distress, or are struggling to cope, you can speak to the Samaritans, in confidence, on 116 123 (UK and ROI), email jo@samaritans.org, or visit the Samaritans website to find details of your nearest branch.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HAMISH MCRAE: Rules are rules when it comes to trade... until all the major players ignore them
HAMISH MCRAE: Rules are rules when it comes to trade... until all the major players ignore them

Daily Mail​

time19 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

HAMISH MCRAE: Rules are rules when it comes to trade... until all the major players ignore them

You cannot, Mr Bailey, get the toothpaste back into the tube. Last week the Governor of the Bank of England, Andrew Bailey, gave a speech to investment managers in Dublin on how important world trade was to global growth and how the system had to be reformed. So far, so good. But when you go through the detail it was all about trying to rebuild trading relations with Europe and how to make the so-called 'rules based' world trade system work better. And the problem there is that the world has changed. The UK will not go back to anything like a pre-Brexit relationship with Europe, and the US will not go back to a pre-Trump approach to global trade. The task for British political and financial leaders is to exploit the opportunities that have arisen, rather than hark back to a none-too-brilliant past. On Brexit, the Governor was careful to make the disclaimer that as a public servant he didn't take a position on it, but what he said had a clear spin. We had to 'minimise negative effects on trade' and that the changing relationship with Europe has 'weighed on the level of potential supply'. At least he didn't cite the Office for National Statistics' calculation that in the long run Brexit would cost 4 per cent of national output. On that figure I prefer the comment of one of his predecessors, Mervyn King, arguably the most notable UK economist of his generation: 'They can't possibly know that. They just make it up.' Nor did Bailey refer to the determined drive by Europe to make banks shift their business and people to EU centres, including Dublin. Instead it was all about trade in finance being 'a two-way street', failing to mention that the UK has a huge surplus on exports of financial services, or indeed that there were 678,000 jobs in the City of London at the end of 2023, some 30 per cent more than in 2016. Of course we need as good a relationship as possible with all trading partners, but we need to acknowledge that, insofar as the City has been successful post-Brexit, it is despite hostility from Europe. As the still bubbling row about transferring euro-derivatives clearing from London to the EU shows, realistically that hostility will continue. On world trade the Governor acknowledged that the system has come under too much strain 'and it is incorrect to dismiss those who argue for restrictions on trade as just wrong-headed'. And the blame for imposing that strain goes mainly to China, which as he noted, heavily subsidised key industries to help them dominate world markets. China imposed 5,400 'subsidy policies' between 2009 and 2022, two-thirds of the global total. He made the point, too, that it was reasonable for countries to seek security of supply, but suggested they do so by dealing with reliable partners rather than trying to bring production back home. These are sensible comments, in particular acknowledging that Donald Trump has a point and China has abused global trading rules. He notes the damage done to trade by Covid and Russia's invasion of Ukraine. He points out how important trade in services is, particularly for the UK. It's an interesting, thoughtful and conventional analysis, and maybe that is what we should expect from a central banker – but I fear it is a naive one. Why? Take Europe. There is a huge trading imbalance between the UK and EU. They sell far more goods to us than they buy, and we export more services to them. But they are not going to change their rules to increase their imports of services. Take China. It's not going to stop subsidising its industries for fear of getting ticked off by the World Trade Organization. As for the US, it has given up on the whole International Monetary Fund-WTO system, that's that. So instead we have to negotiate our way through a bilateral trading world. The UK has made a good start. There are lots of reasons to attack our Government's financial policies, but doing deals with the US, the world's largest economy, and India, soon to be the third largest, deserves to be welcomed. We seem to have a slightly better relationship with Europe, and I don't see why we shouldn't get on with China. Let's try to be nice, as Andrew Bailey was in Dublin, but let's be aware that the rules-based order is dead.

From celeb mouthwash to classic salt toothpaste – my smile-saving heroes for National Smile Month
From celeb mouthwash to classic salt toothpaste – my smile-saving heroes for National Smile Month

The Sun

time26 minutes ago

  • The Sun

From celeb mouthwash to classic salt toothpaste – my smile-saving heroes for National Smile Month

WHY do we have so many awareness days, weeks and months? Some of them seem utterly ridiculous. The health related ones, though, are a good idea. It is National Smile Month. One in three adults have tooth decay, so this campaign promotes eating less sugar and processed food, drinking more water and visiting the dentist. And I've put some products to the test to help you smile . . . MOUTHWASH 3 IF ever there was a man who says 'teeth' it is TV presenter Rylan Clark – his are gleaming! And he has teamed up with British oral care brand Waken. I am not always keen on products pushed by celebs, but Rylan believes in Waken and has invested in it. I like it too. I love their whitening toothpaste and the Waken Advanced Care Mouthwash. It is made with natural peppermint, strengthens enamel with fluoride, and comes in a recycled bottle. This is alcohol free and a 500ml bottle costs £5. The company has just started selling in major supermarkets. See CHEWING GUM I CHEW so much gum I could put a cow to shame – but not all gums are good for you thanks to the sweeteners, sugar and chemicals in them. But some do have health benefits. Peppersmith is one such example. It contains the plant-based sweetener xylitol and is approved by the Oral Health Foundation. Chewing sugar-free gum with xylitol after meals, is scientifically proven to reduce cavities, neutralise harmful acids, and keep breath fresh. Xylitol is a natural sugar alternative that bacteria cannot digest, meaning it actively fights tooth decay. Dentist explains risks of 'Turkey teeth' and other dentistry abroad It also helps to strengthen enamel – unlike sugary mints and gum that mask bad breath and contribute to cavities. The gum comes in mint, lemon and strawberry flavours. I wasn't keen on the fruity ones – but the mint is great and is £1.35 for 15g at Sainsbury's. See TOOTHPASTE SALT toothpaste made by Weleda has been around for more than 100 years, but has soared into the brand's list of bestsellers in the last two years. That's because it is a chemical-free, eco-friendly toothpaste popular with those looking to avoid additives – there are no detergents, bleaches, foam boosters or optical brighteners in the product. No fluoride either – some people are worried that too much can lead to dental fluorosis or skeletal fluorosis, which can damage bones and joints. While rare, fluorosis is a factor. This toothpaste uses sodium bicarbonate, which is a salt that breaks down to form sodium and bicarbonate in water. This helps to promote healing in the mouth, and to ease ulcers, cuts and sore patches. It is totally free from microplastics too. It tastes like bicarbonate of soda but my mouth felt really fresh after using. I liked it. It's priced at £5.95 for 75ml. See

RACHEL RICKARD STRAUS: I fear Labour is set to slap tough new rules on where you invest your Isa
RACHEL RICKARD STRAUS: I fear Labour is set to slap tough new rules on where you invest your Isa

Daily Mail​

time27 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

RACHEL RICKARD STRAUS: I fear Labour is set to slap tough new rules on where you invest your Isa

It is all but certain that Chancellor Rachel Reeves will slash the amount that we can put in cash Isas. She has repeatedly refused to deny that she will – and industry sources suggest the most likely limit will be £4,000 of our total £20,000 tax-free allowance – the rest to be used only for investing. But details hiding in official savings figures that have until now been overlooked make me fear that far more Isa restrictions are on the cards. Here's why. Reeves has stated two motivations for meddling with Isas. The first is helping people to get a better return on their savings. Her theory is that if she restricts the amount we can save tax-free in cash we will invest instead (whether this strategy will work is debatable: it is more likely that we will just divert our cash into ordinary savings accounts). The second motivation is the one underlying all of Reeves's decisions: to help drive economic growth. This ambition will not be fulfilled simply by restricting cash Isa limits. Even if it leads to a wave of cash flooding into financial markets, only a small pool of it will go into UK companies. New investors are likely to put money into popular stocks – such as Nvidia, Meta and Apple – rather than favouring the UK. The UK makes up only 4 per cent of the global stock market, so an investor opting for a well-diversified portfolio would be unlikely to put much into this country. That's why, if Reeves wants to achieve her aims, she will have to force us to invest in assets that would boost UK growth. She may insist that a portion of stocks and shares Isas must be directed at UK companies. She made a similar demand of pension funds last week – and sources tell me this is being discussed for Isas as well. It wouldn't be the first time such an idea was mooted – the previous government considered something similar when it tried to launch a British Isa that savers could use to invest in UK companies. The next clue that Reeves will force – or incentivise – savers to invest part of their Isa allowance in the UK is in the Premium Bond figures. Premium Bonds hold so much of our cash that if encouraging us to invest more was her sole priority, she'd be slashing the amount we can put in them too. From a saver's point of view, Premium Bonds offer an even poorer return than cash Isas. At least in an Isa you earn interest. With Premium Bonds you're simply holding out for a prize. There are millions more holders of Premium Bonds than cash Isas – around 24 million versus just 14 million – and we hold a stonking £127.7 billion of cash in them. As many as 1.2 million savers hold the maximum permitted amount of £50,000 in Premium Bonds. No doubt plenty of that cash could be earning a better return if invested instead. If her priority was to get better returns for savers, she would slash that maximum. But, of course, she won't. Not just because it would be unpopular – that has not stopped her in the past. But because, unlike cash Isas, money saved in Premium Bonds does help drive economic growth. Premium Bonds are one of the products sold by NS&I to bring in billions for the Government for it to spend. It is a form of government borrowing – but one that doesn't appear on the books like other types of debt. Her willingness to overlook poor returns for savers in Premium Bonds shows where her priorities lie: economic growth first, savers' wealth second. The third clue lies in the official Isa figures from HMRC. They reveal that restricting the amount we can save in cash to encourage us to invest more will not work. Until 2015, Isa allowances were restricted just as Reeves is currently planning. You could only put a proportion of your Isa allowance in cash – the rest had to go in stocks and shares. If Reeves is right that savers need to have their cash Isa allowance curbed to get them to invest, you would expect that savers might have flocked to cash as soon as the rules were abolished in 2015. But they did not. In fact, when they were permitted to save as much of their allowance in cash as they liked, they chose to invest more. Before 2015, for every £10 going into a cash Isa, £4.10 went into a stocks and shares Isa. After 2015, for every £10 going into cash, £5.90 went into stocks and shares, analysis by investment platform XTB shows. The proportion going into stocks and shares has ballooned – we hold £431 billion in stocks and shares Isas, compared with £294 billion in cash Isas. So the Chancellor can't use the excuse that she needs to restrict cash Isas to get savers to buy more stocks and shares – they are already investing more. But that won't matter to her. The real motivation is to drive growth – and in this plan cash savers are merely a pawn. So what comes next? I fear the freedom to save and invest within our Isa however we choose is about to be clobbered on all fronts. Savers need to prepare for a regression back to 1999, before the Isa was even launched. Back then, savers were reliant on Personal Equity Plans. These were the predecessor of the Isa and offered tax-free investing but required you to put a proportion of your allowance into UK companies. That is where we're heading – back where we started, with our freedoms restricted, as if nothing had been learned.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store