Letters to the Editor: Blame tax cuts, not entitlements, for GOP megabill's expansion of the deficit
To the editor: Virtually every commentary about the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' that passed the House notes the significant expansion of the deficit it creates. Few of them, however, acknowledge the fact that it's the tax cut part of the bill that is largely responsible for it. Columnist Jonah Goldberg is the latest in a long line of commentators to blame entitlements (i.e. Social Security and Medicare) as the main drivers of the deficit and to make no mention at all of the tax cuts ('Baby boom, baby bust and the 'Big Beautiful Bill,'' May 27).
The last time there was a balanced budget in the U.S. was when Bill Clinton was president. That budget was the result of the tax increases he got through Congress during his first year. Funny how no one seems to remember that, instead crediting Newt Gingrich and Republicans for it.
Deficits are the result of the difference between revenue and expenditures. Increasing revenue would reduce or eliminate the deficit but few people are willing to acknowledge that.
Rick McClure, Fontana
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
11 minutes ago
- Forbes
AMA: Doctors And Patients Hurt By ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
The American Medical Association says legislation wending its way through the Republican-controlled ... More Congress would 'take us backward' as a country by cutting health benefits for poor and low-income Americans, the group's president said Friday, June 6. In this photo, the US Capitol in Washington, DC, US, on Tuesday, June 3, 2025. Photographer: Eric Lee/Bloomberg The American Medical Association says legislation wending its way through the Republican-controlled Congress would 'take us backward' as a country by cutting health benefits for poor and low-income Americans. Meeting for its annual policy-making House of Delegates this weekend in Chicago, the AMA is rallying physicians to thwart the legislation now before the U.S. Senate. Legislation known as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' that narrowly passed the Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives two weeks ago 'would reduce federal Medicaid spending by $793 billion and that the Medicaid provisions would increase the number of uninsured people by 7.8 million,' a KFF analysis shows. 'We have to turn our anger into action,' AMA President Bruce A. Scott, M.D. said in a speech to AMA delegates Friday. 'I know our patience is being tested by this new administration and Congress.' The AMA said it has launched a 'grassroots campaign targeted at the Senate' in hopes of making changes to the legislation. The AMA is the nation's largest physician group with more than 200,000 members. 'The same House bill that brings us closer to finally tying future Medicare payments to the rising costs of running a practice, also takes us backwards by limiting access to care for millions of lower-income Americans,' Scott said. 'Medicare, Medicaid, and the Affordable Care Act are literal lifelines for children and families for whom subsidized health coverage is their only real option. We must do all we can to protect this safety net and continue to educate lawmakers on how best to target waste and fraud in the system without making it tougher for vulnerable populations to access care.' Scott, an otolaryngologist from Kentucky, said the Medicare physician payment system is broken and Congress hasn't addressed – as an increasing number of states have – prior authorization, the process of health insurers reviewing hospital admissions and medications. Prior authorization delays needed treatment and puts patient health in jeopardy, doctors say. 'I'm angry because the dysfunction in health care today goes hand in hand with years of dysfunction in Congress,' Scott added. 'I'm angry because physicians are bearing the brunt of a failed Medicare payment system. And while our pay has been cut by more than 33 percent in 25 years, we see hospitals and even health insurance companies receiving annual pay increases.' Meanwhile, the AMA says cuts to physician payments are pushing more physicians away from private practice and exacerbating the nation's doctor shortage. A recent analysis by AMN Healthcare shows only two in five physicians are now in doctor-owned private practices. And Americans in most U.S. cities face waits of at least one month before they can see certain specialists. 'Congress needs to know there is no 'care' in Medicare if there are no doctors," Scott said.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sen. Ted Cruz proposes withholding broadband funding from states that regulate AI
The Brief Senator Ted Cruz proposed that states attempting to regulate AI should lose federal broadband funding. This proposal is an addition to a House-passed bill aiming for a 10-year ban on state AI regulation. Critics argue Cruz's plan is "undemocratic and cruel," forcing states to choose between broadband access and AI consumer protection. WASHINGTON - U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) proposed on Thursday an alternative punishment for planned legislation that would set a 10-year ban on state regulation of Artificial Intelligence model learning. Under Cruz's budget reconciliation proposal, an attempt to regulate AI would be prohibited from collecting federal funding provided by the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program. The Proposal The U.S. House of Representatives passed their version of House Resolution 1, the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," on May 22. In part, the budget bill would ban state regulation on AI for 10 years. As chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Cruz authored a budget reconciliation that he says is intended to "fulfill President Trump's agenda." In a summary of the proposal, he refers to state regulation as "strangling AI deployment," comparing it to EU precautions against tech development. Cruz's proposal adds $500 million to the BEAD program, which has already administered $42.45 billion to the states in order to expand high-speed internet access across the country. It also prevents states from receiving any of that funding if they attempt to regulate AI. Dig deeper Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) has recently spoken out against HR 1, saying the anti-regulatory section alone will cost Congress her vote. Greene explained that she discovered the controversial provision, located on pages 278-279 of the bill, only after the House had already passed the legislation. Once the bill returns to the House following Senate deliberations, Greene says she will change sides based on the matter of AI. What they're saying Advocacy group Public Citizen released a commentary on Cruz's proposal, referring to it as a "display of corporate appeasement." In the article, J.B. Branch, a Big Tech accountability advocate, included the following statement: "This is a senatorial temper tantrum masquerading as policy. Americans have loudly rejected Senator Cruz's dangerous proposal to give tech giants a decade of immunity from state regulation. State legislatures, attorneys general, and citizens across all 50 states have demanded that Congress step away from overhauling consumer protections put in place in the absence of federal leadership. But instead of listening to the American people, Senate Republicans threw a fit and tied vital digital funding to corporate impunity. "With this move, Republicans are telling millions of Americans: 'You can have broadband but only if your state gives up the right to protect you from AI abuses.' It's undemocratic and cruel. Republicans would rather give Big Tech a 10-year hall pass to experiment on the American people unchecked, rather than give underserved rural and urban communities the ability to compete in the digital economy. Congress must reject this corporate giveaway and refocus their energy on representing the public interest." In her statements criticizing the anti-regulation portion of HR 1, Greene expressed concerns about developing rapidly evolving tech without checks and balances. "No one can predict what AI will be in one year, let alone 10," Greene said. "But I can tell you this: I'm pro-humanity, not pro-transhumanity. And I will be voting NO on any bill that strips states of their right to protect American jobs and families." What's next HR 1 is expected to continue undergoing changes in the Senate before returning to the House for another vote. Cruz's proposal has yet to be officially added to the legislation. The Source Information in this article comes from public U.S. Congress filings, Public Citizen, and previous FOX 4 coverage.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Vance Says ‘Trump Didn't Do Anything Wrong With Jeffrey Epstein'
Elon Musk, who has not been taking so much ketamine that he can't pee right, had a meltdown about his former bromance partner Donald Trump on his website, X, this week. Vice President J.D. Vance, caught up in the petty feud, has naturally taken Trump's side, including when it comes to allegations about Trump's ties to notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. As he railed against Trump, Musk escalated his attacks: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' He added: 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' The posts have since been deleted. Vance, who was speaking with podcaster Theo Von, reacted to the social media broadside in real time. When Von read that post aloud, Vance first responded, 'Man.' 'First of all, absolutely not,' Vance continued. 'Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein… Whatever the Democrats and the media say about him, that's totally BS.' The vice president added that his 'loyalties are always gonna be with the president.' Trump and Musk spent part of the week publicly feuding, just days after the world's richest man and head of Trump's so-called Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, departed the administration. Musk, who spent about $290 million to support Trump and Republicans in the 2024 election, started the attacks by calling Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' a 'disgusting abomination' and 'pork-filled.' 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election… such ingratitude' Musk posted. Trump, famous for his own social media insults, wrote on Truth Social, 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago.' Musk took it further, bringing up Trump's well-known ties to Epstein. Trump had a long friendship with Epstein and has appeared in multiple photos with him. Musk also appears in a notorious photo with Epstein's accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, at the Vanity Fair Oscars party in 2014. The image is frequently circulated on X. Musk has claimed that Maxwell, who was sentenced to 20 years in prison for her role helping Epstein, 'photobombed' him. Trump's Justice Department made Epstein, who died in prison after he was charged with sex trafficking minors, something of a pet issue when Attorney General Pam Bondi promised to release documents in February. She caused MAGA conspiracy theorists — who hope to uncover a Moloch-worshiping cabal among elites — to melt down when nothing that she released was new. She released Epstein's flight logs and his book of contacts, which had both already been made public. Trump told New York Magazine in 2002 that he liked spending time with Epstein. 'I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,' he said. 'He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.' Following Musk's claims, Reps. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) and Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) wrote a letter to Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel asking them to 'immediately clarify' whether the claims were true, Axios reported. The White House called the lawmakers 'lunatics.' Joe Rogan also asked Patel about Musk's Epstein claim. Patel said he was 'not participating' in the Trump-Musk discourse. Speaking on Von's podcast, Vance said he thinks Musk is 'an incredible entrepreneur,' adding that Musk and DOGE's 'effort to root out waste, fraud and abuse in our country is really good.' He expressed hope that Musk can mend fences, noting that 'Maybe that's not possible now, because he's gone so nuclear.' He also said Musk was making a mistake to turn against Trump. 'I just think it's a huge mistake for the world's wealthiest man, I think one of the most transformational entrepreneurs ever, to be at war with the world's most powerful man, who I think is doing more to save our country than anybody in my lifetime,' Vance said. 'Mom and dad were fighting so he got sent to a friend's house,' reads the top comment on YouTube. More from Rolling Stone Dropkick Murphys and Veterans Rally Against Trump for 'Disrespecting the Vets' 'We Are Taking Away Elon's Friends' Trump Finally Brings Back Illegally Deported Man - to Indict Him Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
