After California bar exam mess in February, July's test will cost millions more, official says
May 7 (Reuters) - California's botched February bar exam will cost the State Bar of California almost $6 million more than expected in July, with millions in added expenses in the years to come, officials told state lawmakers on Wednesday.
The State Bar's decision to switch to its own bar exam, given both remotely and in person, was expected to save the state bar up to $3.8 million a year. But the problem-plagued February exam and its fallout are now a financial drain on the already cash-strapped state bar. February examinees faced unprecedented technical and logistical problems on the test and the state is returning to its traditional in-person exam in July.
The state bar expects to lose about $3 million in revenue because it is waiving the July testing fees for those who failed or withdrew from the February exam, executive director Leah Wilson told the state's Senate Judiciary Committee during a hearing on a bill, opens new tab that would mandate a state audit of the February test. Wilson said on Friday that she is stepping down from her state bar post in July, citing the faulty rollout of the new exam.
The bar will spend an additional $2 million to secure large testing sites for the July exam after the California Supreme Court ordered that test to be given only in person.
And returning to the Multistate Bar Exam — the 200 multiple-choice questions developed by the National Conference of Bar Examiners — will cost the bar an additional $620,000 in July, Wilson said. The high court on Friday ordered the bar to return to the MBE for the July test after legal academics and test takers questioned the quality and development process of the multiple-choice questions that appeared on the February exam.
Additionally, the state bar must pay test prep company Kaplan Exam Services $6.1 million more before it can exit the five-year contract it entered into last year to provide multiple-choice questions for the bar exam, even if it does not use Kaplan-produced questions, Wilson told the committee. The state bar revealed two weeks ago that due to time constraints, a subset of the February multiple-choice questions were written by a separate contractor using ChatGPT.
On Monday, the state bar sued testing platform Meazure Learning for unspecified damages, claiming the company failed to live up to its promises that its systems could handle thousands of bar examinees. Meazure said on Tuesday that the state bar was trying to "shift the blame for its flawed development process for the February exam." The company declined to comment further on Wednesday.
State bar officials previously had said there would be added costs following the February bar's failure but had given significantly lower estimates.
The hearing also included testimony from four February bar takers, as well as several legal academics who said the development of the exam was rushed and that bar exam experts were excluded from that process.
'How do we make sure we never come back to this place?' said California's Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Tom Umberg, who sponsored the audit bill. 'It's important that we dig deep into this issue.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
12 minutes ago
- The Guardian
LA police make mass arrests as protesters defy overnight curfew
Los Angeles police have announced they are making mass arrests in the city's downtown area, as people gathered in defiance of an overnight curfew imposed after days of protests against Donald Trump's immigration crackdown and military deployment. Late on Tuesday night local time, the LAPD wrote on X that 'multiple groups' continued to congregate within the designated downtown curfew area. 'Those groups are being addressed and mass arrests are being initiated,' it said. The mayor, Karen Bass, had announced a 10-hour curfew for a 1 square mile area of downtown, where demonstrations against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) have continued. The curfew was to run from 8pm to 6am, Bass said. The LAPD said it had carried out more than 300 arrests of protesters in the last two days. The crackdown came after California's governor, Gavin Newsom, filed an emergency request to block the Trump administration from using military forces to accompany Ice officers on raids throughout LA. Trump has ordered the deployment of 4,000 national guard members and 700 marines to LA after days of protests driven by anger over aggressive Ice raids that have targeted garment workers, day labourers, car washes and immigrant communities. Marines and the National Guard have no powers of arrest and are there to protect federal buildings. Newsom and the California attorney general, Rob Bonta, alleged in a lawsuit filed on Monday that Trump's takeover of the state national guard, against the governor's wishes, was unlawful. On Tuesday a federal judge declined to immediately rule on California's request for a restraining order and scheduled a hearing for Thursday. In a speech, Newsom condemned Trump for 'indiscriminately targeting hard-working immigrant families' and militarising the streets of LA, recounting how in recent days Ice agents had grabbed people outside a Home Depot, detained a nine-months-pregnant US citizen, sent unmarked cars to schools and arrested gardeners and seamstresses. 'That's just weakness masquerading as strength,' the governor said. 'If some of us can be snatched off the streets without a warrant based only on suspicion or skin colour, then none of us are safe. Authoritarian regimes begin by targeting people who are least able to defend themselves. But they do not stop there.' Newsom warned that Trump would not stop at California and encouraged people to stand up to the president. 'What Donald Trump wants most is your fealty, your silence, to be complicit in this moment. Do not give in to him,' he said. Trump, meanwhile, delivered a deeply partisan military speech earlier on Tuesday, calling the LA protesters 'animals' and vowing to 'liberate Los Angeles'. Speaking at a event in Fort Bragg, North Carolina, to recognise the 250th anniversary of the US army, Trump made the baseless claim that the demonstrations were being led by paid 'rioters bearing foreign flags with the aim of continuing a foreign invasion'. Trump also repeated a viral conspiracy theory that pallets of bricks were left out for protesters to hurl at police officers. On Tuesday night, hundreds of troops were transferred to LA over the objections of Democratic officials and despite concerns from local law enforcement Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, said he expected the military would remain in the city for 60 days at a cost of at least $134m. Trump said troops would remain until there was 'no danger' and said he would consider invoking the Insurrection Act. 'If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it. We'll see,' he told reporters in the Oval Office. Sign up to First Thing Our US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion California's lawsuit said: 'Trump and Secretary of Defence Hegseth have sought to bring military personnel and a 'warrior culture' to the streets of cities and towns where Americans work, go to school and raise their families. Now they have turned their sights on California, with devastating consequences.' The deployment of the national guard is strongly opposed by California Democrats, as well as by every Democratic governor in the US. Alex Padilla, the California senator, told the Associated Press on Tuesday that protests against Ice and the subsequent legal showdown between his state and the government was 'absolutely a crisis of Trump's own making'. He said: 'There are a lot of people who are passionate about speaking up for fundamental rights and respecting due process, but the deployment of national guard only serves to escalate tensions and the situation. It's exactly what Donald Trump wanted to do.' Padilla said the Los Angeles sheriff's department had not been advised of the federalisation of the national guard. He said his office had pressed the Pentagon for a justification, and 'as far as we're told, the Department of Defence isn't sure what the mission is here'. Jim McDonnell, the LA police chief, said on Monday that the department and its local partners had decades of experience responding to large-scale demonstrations and that they were confident in their ability to continue doing so. 'The arrival of federal military forces in Los Angeles, absent clear coordination, presents a significant logistical and operational challenge for those of us charged with safeguarding this city,' he said. The US Northern Command, or Northcom, said in a statement on Monday that marines from the Second Battalion, 7th Marines, 1st Marine Division 'will seamlessly integrate' with forces 'who are protecting federal personnel and federal property in the greater Los Angeles area'. Northcom said the forces had been trained in de-escalation, crowd control and standing rules for the use of force, and that approximately 1,700 soldiers from the 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, a California national guard unit, were already in the greater Los Angeles area. Robert Mackey and agencies contributed to this report
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Elon Musk was no match for Donald Trump – but his humiliation might only just be beginning
Was he right? A few days ago, Elon Musk declared of his war of words with Donald Trump that 'the most entertaining outcome is the most likely'. Does a capitulation count? Surely not. The world found a kind of grim solace in the great Trump-Musk falling out, and was greatly looking forward to further shocking developments in social media's first soap opera. Would Elon tell us more about why, he alleged before he deleted his post, Trump was in the Epstein files? What did Musk see going on in the Trump White House? Is Trump as deranged as he seems, or, as Donald alleges, is Elon suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome? More important, would Elon block access to his rockets and satellite network (apparently installed in the White House), and fund Democrats to 'crush' Maga candidates in next year's midterm elections, as has been rumoured? Or would Donald cancel the lucrative government contracts and deport Elon to South Africa, where he would surely face a mixed reception? Would Trump use the tanks on his birthday parade to crush his new Tesla? That lot would certainly have been entertaining, if possibly dangerous to the stability of the world. Like so many disappointments from this pair, it seems likely we'll be deprived of what we expected. Instead, we have a highly ironic lesson in the power and inevitability of cooperation, even between the richest person on the planet, and the most powerful politician on earth. Turns out that two men who think they don't need anyone else actually do really rely very much on one another, much more than they thought, and, in the end, found their civil war was doing them more harm than good. The fear of mutually assured destruction was sufficiently strong to prompt a truce. In fairness to Musk, it has to be said that it was Trump who started to ease the tensions in recent days, playing down the threats and muting the insults; but it's Musk who stared commercial ruin in the face and publicly backed down: '"I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far." In the end, the brilliant techbro was no match for the old school New York real estate bully. Without the US government contracts and support for his electric-autonomous car business, Musk would soon be a much diminished figure, if not ruined. While the loss of paper wealth has never bothered him that much – his bravado is part of the reason why he is where he is today – his sincere, if batty, desire to colonise Mars on behalf of humanity must have been the ambition that he simply could not sacrifice for the sake of a feud with a mad orange old bloke. Musk's second biggest motivation in life, war on the 'woke mind virus', would also be best served by keeping Trump in the White House? How will Trump react? As ever, hard to predict, but the signs are he won't restart hostilities. Things will just go quiet. It will never be bold, confident morning again for this pair, unless Musk commits certain acts of obeisance, in which case a reconciliation would be in play. After all, JD Vance once called the now-president Trump 'America's Hitler', Marco Rubio bitterly resented and resisted the 'con man' winning the White House, and Robert Kennedy Junior called the guy a 'sociopath'. They have all since renounced their own posts, become sycophants and been richly rewarded. So, it may well turn out, will Musk. Which would, as he predicted, be an entertaining, if humiliating, outcome.
Reuters
13 minutes ago
- Reuters
US will resume accreditation of Swiss investment advisers
June 11 (Reuters) - The U.S. will resume processing applications from Swiss entities aiming to become registered investment advisers in the U.S., the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Swiss financial market regulator FINMA said in separate statements on Tuesday. SEC had suspended new registrations for several years and would lift the ban with immediate effect after the watchdogs agreed on a direct transmission of information from Swiss institutions to SEC staff and on-site examinations, the statements said. "I am very pleased to announce that the SEC stands ready to provide prompt consideration of the registration applications from Swiss investment advisers," SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins said. "I thank my FINMA counterparts for their collaboration and welcome their actions to make this possible."
