Putin's war-fueled economy is 'on the brink' of recession, minister says
The Russian economy is "on the brink" of entering a recession, the country's economy minister warned on Thursday.
Speaking at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, a major annual business event in Russia, Maxim Reshetnikov said data showed the economy "cooling."
When a moderator asked him to describe the state of the economy, he said it seemed that the country was "on the verge of going into recession," according to Russian news agency Interfax.
He later clarified that he wasn't making an outright prediction. "I said that we were on the brink," Reshetnikov said. "From here on out, everything will depend on our decisions."
Reshetnikov has already raised concerns about the direction of the Russian economy. In May, while addressing the State Duma, he said that the economy was cooling so sharply it risked entering a state of economic "hypothermia."
In that address, Reshetnikov urged Russia's central bank to take into account easing inflation when setting interest rates. On June 6, the bank did just that, cutting its key interest rate from 21% to 20%, citing signs of declining inflation.
While inflation is easing slightly, it has remained stubbornly high — now hovering around 10% — since spiking in the wake of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
Since the start of the war, Russia has gone all in on defense spending.
It's on track to spend about $130 billion on defense, roughly a third of its federal budget, up from 28.3% in 2024.
It's also potentially running low on cash, with one Swedish economist predicting that Russia could run out of liquid reserves as soon as this fall.
The country is still grappling with the effects of Western sanctions, which have targeted its oil and gas exports and largely cut financial institutions off from the international financial communication system SWIFT.
Russia's economy is also suffering from a severe labor shortage, driven in part by the military mobilization, as well as a brain drain of young professionals leaving the country.
According to state media, Russia had a shortfall of some 2.6 million workers at the end of 2024, with shortages hitting the manufacturing, trade, and transportation sectors especially hard.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What UK involvement in Iran could look like – and the political questions it raises
At the time of writing, US President Donald Trump is deliberating over whether to join Israel's air campaign to destroy Iran's suspected nuclear weapons programme. This is already a contentious issue within Washington DC and the Trump administration. But if the president decides to take the US into a war with Iran, it will have significant implications for the US's allies, not least the UK. As the recent strategic defence review emphasises, the US is Britain's main ally, an essential partner in defence and intelligence. However, the Trump administration has made clear to its European allies that it no longer regards the defence of the continent as a US national security priority. And the president's commitment to Nato is uncertain. It is possible that Britain and other European allies could be publicly pressured by Trump to support any intervention on Israel's side. The US may expect this in return for the US's continued involvement in Nato and its readiness to honour article 5 (the collective defence principle, which obliges collective retaliation to aggression against one member) for its allies. Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK's latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences. Given the importance of American military power in deterring wider Russian aggression in Europe – and Trump's transactional character – this would present Keir Starmer with a particularly stark dilemma. A purely US air campaign against Iran is feasible. The US Navy will soon have two carrier strike groups in the Middle East region. And the US Air Force's B2 strategic bombers can launch raids across the globe from bases in the continental US. The US also has several military bases in the region. However, as was the case with the 1991 and 2003 wars with Iraq, Washington DC will need permission from Gulf Arab allies to use them. Nonetheless, the Trump administration could request authorisation from the UK's Labour government to use US airbases in the UK and its overseas territories to support an air campaign against Iran. This would not involve the UK deploying forces, but would require the UK to approve the use of the airbases. The Diego Garcia airbase in the Indian Ocean would be a useful asset in this case. But its employment would reopen the controversy over its establishment in the 1960s. It could also call into question the diplomatic deal the UK made with Mauritius last month to cede sovereignty of the Chagos Islands, while keeping this base open. The Mauritians are likely to oppose US airstrikes on Iran. Britain also has options for direct participation. RAF Typhoon jets stationed at Britain's airbase in Akrotiri, Cyprus provided air defence support for Israel during the Iranian missile and drone strikes in April and October 2024. They could conduct similar missions now. But from the Royal Navy's perspective, it would be difficult to divert the aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales from its deployment to the Indo-Pacific, partly because the task group it sails with is a multinational one. Given that the British armed forces are already overstretched, it is difficult to see whether the UK could provide more than basing rights and air support to the Israelis (if requested). A discreet commitment of UK special forces (the 22nd Special Air Service regiment and the Special Boat Service) on the ground is conceivable. This can be – and indeed has been – authorised by previous governments without parliamentary debate. But any further British military commitment is likely to cause a political row. The key question for Starmer and his ministers will not be whether Britain could back a US war against Iran but whether it should. After the debacle of the Iraq war and the ensuing Chilcot inquiry, it is difficult to see how any government – let alone a Labour one – can take Britain into a major interstate conflict on this scale without firm parliamentary support and a solid case in international law. To this end, the Attorney General Richard Hermer has reportedly questioned the legality of Israel's preemptive attack on Iran, and has argued that any British military intervention should be limited to the defence of its allies. We should not forget that Starmer was a human rights lawyer and the head of the Crown Prosecution Service before he became a politician. Another legacy of Iraq is that it is customary (though not a legal requirement) for prime ministers to seek parliamentary approval for any major military operation. David Cameron lost a vote in the House of Commons to approve airstrikes against Bashar al-Assad's regime in Syria in August 2013. But he gained parliamentary support for Britain's commitment to the fight against Islamic State in 2015. A similar debate now is unlikely to lead to approval of British military intervention in this case. Within the Labour party, there is already widespread condemnation of Israeli tactics and Palestinian civilian casualties in Gaza. There is little popular appetite for sending British sailors and airmen into a war with Iran. And, given the US vice-president's own dismissive comments about the military experiences of European allies, the public is also entitled to ask why British servicemen should die or risk breaching international law for an administration that probably will not appreciate their sacrifice. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Geraint Hughes does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Zelenskyy calls for more pressure on Russia after deadly missile strike in Ukrainian capital Kyiv
KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — A Russian missile strike on a nine-story Kyiv apartment building was a sign that more pressure must be applied on Moscow to agree to a ceasefire, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Thursday, as Moscow intensifies attacks in the war. The drone and missile attack on Kyiv early Tuesday, the deadliest assault on the capital this year, killed 28 people across the city and wounded 142 others, Kyiv Military Administration head Tymur Tkachenko said. Zelenskyy, along with the head of the presidential office, Andrii Yermak, and Interior Minister Ihor Klymenko, visited the site of the apartment building in Kyiv's Solomianskyi district on Thursday morning, laying flowers and paying tribute to the 23 people who died there after a direct hit by a missile brought down the structure. 'This attack is a reminder to the world that Russia rejects a ceasefire and chooses killing,' Zelenskyy wrote on Telegram, and thanked Ukraine's partners who he said are ready to pressure Russia to 'feel the real cost of the war.' Intensifying attacks Tuesday's attack on Kyiv was part of a sweeping barrage as Russia once again sought to overwhelm Ukrainian air defenses. Russia fired more than 440 drones and 32 missiles in what Zelenskyy called one of the biggest bombardments of the war, which began on Feb. 24, 2022. As Russia proceeds with a summer offensive on parts of the roughly 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line, U.S.-led peace efforts have failed to gain traction. Russian President Vladimir Putin has effectively rejected an offer from U.S. President Donald Trump for an immediate 30-day ceasefire, making it conditional on a halt on Ukraine's mobilization effort and a freeze on Western arms supplies. Meanwhile, Middle East tensions and U.S. trade tariffs have drawn away world attention from Ukraine's pleas for more diplomatic and economic pressure to be placed on Moscow. In recent weeks, Russia has intensified long-range attacks that have struck urban residential areas. Yet on Wednesday, Putin denied that his military had struck such targets, saying that attacks were 'against military industries, not residential quarters.' Putin told senior news leaders of international news agencies in St. Petersburg, Russia, that he was open to talks with Zelenskyy, but repeated his accusation that the Ukrainian leader had lost his legitimacy after his term expired last year — allegations rejected by Kyiv and its allies. 'We are ready for substantive talks on the principles of a settlement,' Putin said, noting that a previous round of talks in Istanbul had led to an exchange of prisoners and the bodies of fallen soldiers. Prisoners exchanged A new round of such exchanges took place in Ukraine's Chernihiv region on Thursday, involving the repatriation of Ukrainian prisoners of war who, according to Ukraine's Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War or KSHPPV, were suffering from severe health issues caused by injuries and prolonged detention. The exchange was confirmed by Russia's Defense Ministry, which released a video of Russian servicemen at an exchange area in Belarus after being released in the prisoner swap. Commenting on the exchange, Zelenskyy wrote on Telegram: 'We are working to get our people back. Thank you to everyone who helps make these exchanges possible. Our goal is to free each and every one.' Many of the exchanged Ukrainian POWs had spent over three years in captivity, with a large number captured during the defense of the now Russian-occupied city of Mariupol in 2022, according to the KSHPPV, which added that preparations for another prisoner exchange are ongoing. In St. Petersburg on Wednesday, Putin praised Trump's push for peace in Ukraine. But Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha wrote on X on Thursday that it was his country that had 'unconditionally accepted' the U.S. proposal for a ceasefire, and said that Russian claims of willingness to end the war were 'manipulations.' 'It has been exactly 100 days since Ukraine unconditionally accepted the U.S. peace proposal to completely cease fire, put an end to the killing, and move forward with a genuine peace process ... 100 days of Russia escalating terror against Ukraine rather than ending it,' Sybiha wrote. 'Ukraine remains committed to peace. Unfortunately, Russia continues to choose war, disregarding U.S. efforts to end the killing,' he added. Overnight on Wednesday, Russia fired a barrage of 104 Shahed and decoy drones across Ukraine, according to the country's air force. Of those, 88 were intercepted, jammed, or lost from radars mid-flight. There were no immediate reports of casualties or damage caused by the attack. ___ Follow AP's coverage of the war in Ukraine at Justin Spike And Illia Novikov, The Associated Press
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Burkina Faso and Russia sign the final document of their electronuclear program
Burkina Faso has officially signed the final administrative document of a historic intergovernmental nuclear deal with Russia, taking a significant step forward in its quest for nuclear energy. Burkina Faso finalized a significant intergovernmental nuclear agreement with Russia. The deal involves collaboration with Russia's Rosatom to develop nuclear infrastructure for peaceful purposes. Burkina Faso seeks to enhance energy capacity and security through nuclear technology. The agreement, managed by Russia's state-owned atomic energy business Rosatom, paves the way for broad collaboration between the two nations in the construction of nuclear infrastructure for peaceful reasons. Burkina Faso's Minister of Energy, Yacouba Zabré Gouba, made the news during an interview with the Russian media source Sputnik. "Many steps have already been taken, not only through the signing of a roadmap with Rosatom, but also through the conclusion of the four memoranda of understanding that we were able to finalize in 2024," the minister stated. SEE ALSO: Despite Burkina Faso's headstrong stance, some African countries still want to remain friends The agreement underscores Burkina Faso's wider objective of diversifying its energy sources and meeting the country's rising electricity demand. Burkina Faso, one of the world's least electrified countries, sees nuclear energy as a revolutionary chance to increase energy capacity and improve energy security. 'The signing opens new prospects for Burkina Faso and marks the end of several steps that had to be followed,' Gouba stated. 'So from now on, the way is open in terms of cooperation and the electronuclear program with the Russian Federation.' This agreement is the final administrative stage in a larger framework of nuclear cooperation between Russia and the West African country. It follows Russia's approval last week of nuclear deals with Burkina Faso and Mali. Burkina Faso and Mali's nuclear deal with Russia According to the provisions of the agreement, Russia authorized on the 12th of June, Rosatom will play an important role in supporting Burkina Faso and Mali with the building of nuclear power plants and research reactors. The Russian nuclear agency will also offer critical services connected to the nuclear fuel cycle, such as nuclear fuel supply and waste management, putting Russia at the forefront of both country's nuclear goals. DON'T MISS THIS: Ukraine's gamble in Africa seems shaky as Mali takes a harsh decision 'As I said earlier, this is a very important step forward, because these two countries have joined forces, and demonstrated their willingness to work together on collaboration, on cooperation, so that the electronuclear program becomes a reality in Burkina Faso,' Gouba said during his interview with Sputnik. 'We are waiting for the technical and financial offer from Rosatom, and this will later allow us to see whether we should continue with the electronuclear program,' he added. For Russia, the agreement strengthens its position in Africa, particularly in francophone countries that are more aligned with Moscow.
