
Colin Sheridan: Giving up on Gaza now is a surrender to immorality that will shame our children
Whenever I struggle with my own inadequacy regarding Palestine, I think of my friend's 80-year-old mother. Her son — an Irishman working for Unrwa — spent about 500 of the now 621 days of genocide in Gaza, risking his life to do a job he will never talk about.
She would often suffer a week without hearing from him, unaware if he was alive or dead. Despite everybody telling her to do otherwise, she devoured every piece of footage she could, traumatising herself in the hope of catching some proof of life.
When it finally came, it showed him rushing to give aid to a lifeless body under the glare of an Israeli sniper. That clip unleashed an avalanche of relief that was quickly tempered by the horror of his reality. It was also a small window into the world of every Palestinian, everywhere. Is that my son? My friend? My brother? My baby?
Her poise amid such unimaginable anxiety was remarkable, but what floors me now is not her grace under immense pressure, but the consistency of her caring. Because he is no longer in Gaza, ejected by Israel for the crime of doing his job, so you would think his enforced exile — though undoubtedly traumatic for him — would signal the end of something terrible for his mother and a reason to celebrate.
Instead, she is even more bereft, because all she can think of is the men, women and children left behind. She is inconsolable because nobody wants to talk about them. Because her friends — obviously worried for her — tell her to count her blessings and move on.
Imagine that this woman chooses to care so much when her caring should be done? That she despairs because others find it too uncomfortable a reality? Imagine there are those who would call her anti-semitic for cursing the killers of children she never knew?
About a fortnight ago, we reached a new phase in our moral reckoning. The revisionist history phase. The 'it's safe to come out now' phase. Despite the evidence being there, held aloft before our eyes in the form of bloodied carcasses of dismembered children for over 600 consecutive days, it took a major market shift for the indifferent to find their voices.
A commercial cooling-off around all things Israel had to occur before the powerful minority came around to what the powerless majority have long been screaming. And even then, their sudden outrage was selective and carefully curated. Bespoke and designer, edited by a PR teams adept at the art of performative pearl-clutching and careful apology.
A makeshift tent camp for displaced Palestinians in Muwasi, west of Khan Younis in the Gaza Strip. Picture: AP/Abdel Kareem Hana
If you index-linked people's opinion on Palestine (and Iran for that matter) to their salaries, chances are you would discover those who earn more care much less. Why is that I wonder? Are they privy to dossiers compiled on newborn terrorists, tiny anti-semitic infants born with Kalashnikovs in their little brown hands and grenade pins between their baby teeth?
Does this make it easier to have no opinion on genocide whatsoever? To change the subject when it's brought up, or worse, offer a variation on the classic 'it's complicated' defence as a way of asserting their intellectual superiority on the matter.
You could perhaps forgive the postman in Buncrana for not being abreast of the nuances of the Abraham accords and therefore lacking in empathy for his fellow postmen in Beit Hanoun. But I'd bet if you did ask him, he'd have much more to say about children butchered in their sleep than the wealth managers in Dublin, the TDs in the Dáil, and the tenured columnists for some Sunday papers, all of whom are fully aware of Israel's metaphorical stock price, especially as it pertains to their own bottom line.
Of course, you can argue my cynicism is unhelpful. That any expression of solidarity and support, however late, is welcome. Well, I am not the arbiter of that. Palestinians are, but I'd guess they too have noted the timing and tenor of many of the open letters signed by rich and prominent writers, the vapid social media posts from politicians and the vague, half-hearted hints of camaraderie from Hollywood stars, all of whom profit handsomely from billion-dollar industries that are themselves marinated in the blood of black and brown people.
Even as the sun sets on this new phase, we are nowhere near the point of everyone being against this. A cursory glance at the rhetoric regarding Iran is enough to reveal there are many people who will go to their graves unequivocally for it.
That, if they speak slowly and condescendingly enough, they can use the words 'October' and 'Seventh' and 'existential threat' as bywords for impunity.
They do so conveniently ignoring all historical context, as well as the right of armed resistance against an occupying power being enshrined in international law. Not to mention the long-proven use of the Hannibal Directive by Israel to murder its own.
Those who choose to ignore these facts surely believe Palestinians, Lebanese and Iranians are getting exactly what they deserve, and despite that — or maybe because of it — they find themselves platformed all the broadcast channels. Those people are not for turning and will never be against any of this.
Which brings us to Ireland and the cowardice of our political leaders. They are cowards, and their cowardice is not just manifest in their performative inaction, it's amplified by their selective weaponisation of Irishness as a badge of pseudo-solidarity.
Because our ancestors went hungry, we know the plight of the oppressed and so can express concern and tweet about it. Fuck that. There is nothing moral about knowingly trading with evil.
I buried my best friend in my head every day for over a year. He survived. I'm sure his mother buried him every day, twice a day. That grief does not disappear, it lives on in the death of children we never knew. The children he watched walk silently with their little arms in the air, raised in quiet surrender. So many of them now certainly dead. That grief lingers in his insistence that his life was never worth more than those he stayed to protect.
Fatigue makes cowards of us all. To give up now is a surrender to immorality that will shame our children.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump defends US strikes on Iran as intelligence assessment stirs debate
President Donald Trump has insisted that US strikes delivered a crushing blow to Iran's nuclear programme despite a preliminary American intelligence assessment suggesting that the assault inflicted only a marginal setback. 'This was a devastating attack, and it knocked them for a loop,' Mr Trump said as his administration deployed a phalanx of top officials to defend his claims that Iran's nuclear programme was 'completely and fully obliterated'. US defence secretary Pete Hegseth said the leaked intelligence assessment, which said Iran suffered a delay of only a few months, was 'preliminary' and 'low confidence'. President Donald Trump speaks during a media conference at the end of the Nato summit as secretary of state Marco Rubio, right, and defence secretary Pete Hegseth listen, in The Hague, Netherlands (Alex Brandon/AP) US secretary of state Marco Rubio said the officials who disclosed the findings are 'professional stabbers'. The White House pointed to a statement from the Israel Atomic Energy Commission that said Iran faced a setback of 'many years'. Drawing reliable conclusions about the impact of the US strikes is difficult, making the issue a breeding ground for competing claims that could determine how American voters view Mr Trump's risky decision to join Israel's attacks on Iran. Also at stake are Mr Trump's next steps in the Middle East, where diplomatic efforts could be required to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear program. Iran maintains that its atomic ambitions are for peaceful purposes, while US and Israeli leaders have described the country's nuclear programme as the precursor to obtaining a nuclear weapon. One of the targets of the US attack was Fordo, where nuclear infrastructure is buried deep underground. Damage at Fordo enrichment facility after strikes in Iran (Maxar Technologies via AP) The Israeli commission said in a statement that the bombing 'rendered the enrichment facility inoperable'. The statement was distributed by the White House and the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The American strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, combined with Israeli strikes on other parts of Iran's military nuclear programme, have 'set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years', the statement said. In addition, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei told Al Jazeera that there was significant damage from US bombers. 'Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure,' he said. The episode has triggered some of Mr Trump's longstanding vendettas against leaks and intelligence officials, who he has often viewed as a part of a 'deep state' dedicated to undermining his agenda. He also lashed out at media outlets that reported on the classified assessment, describing them as 'scum' and 'disgusting'. President Donald Trump dismissed media reports (Piroschka Van De Wouw, Pool Photo via AP) Mr Trump said questioning the effectiveness of the strikes was disrespectful to the military, which flew stealth bombers halfway around the world to attack the nuclear facilities with weapons designed to penetrate deep underground. The reports, he said, were 'very unfair to the pilots, who risked their lives for our country'. One critical question is whether enriched uranium, which could be developed into fuel for a nuclear bomb, was moved out of facilities before the US strikes. 'I believe they didn't have a chance to get anything out, because we acted fast,' Mr Trump said. He added that 'it's very hard to move that kind of material, and very dangerous'. Classified briefings for legislators, originally scheduled for Tuesday, are now expected to take place on Thursday and Friday.


Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Seven Israeli soldiers killed in armoured vehicle blast in Gaza, says military
The Israeli military says seven Israeli soldiers were killed in the southern Gaza Strip when a Palestinian attacker attached a bomb to their armoured vehicle, while Palestinian health officials reported that 79 people were killed in Israeli attacks across the strip. The attack on the Israeli troops, which occurred on Tuesday, was one of the deadliest for the army in Gaza in months, and quickly drew the nation's attention back to the grinding conflict with the Hamas militant group after nearly two weeks of war between Israel and Iran. Among the 79 reported killed in Gaza were 33 people who died while trying to access aid. Palestinians carry bags containing food and humanitarian aid packages delivered by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a US-backed organisation, in Rafah, southern Gaza Strip (Abdel Kareem Hana/AP) Israel has been operating in Gaza since the Hamas militant group's October 7 2023 attack on Israel. US-led ceasefire efforts have repeatedly stalled. Brigadier General Effie Defrin, the army's chief spokesman, said the soldiers were attacked on Tuesday in the southern Gaza city of Khan Younis, where the army has operated on and off throughout much of the war. 'Helicopters and rescue forces were sent to the spot. They made attempts to rescue the fighters, but without success,' he said. The army said another soldier was seriously wounded in a separate incident in Khan Younis. It gave no further details, but Hamas claimed on its Telegram channel it had ambushed Israeli soldiers taking cover inside a residential building in the area. More than 860 Israeli soldiers have been killed since the war began with the October 7 2023 Hamas attack, including more than 400 during the fighting in Gaza. The initial Hamas attack killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and 251 others were taken hostage. Displaced Palestinians living in a tent camp in Gaza City (Jehad Alshrafi/AP) Some 50 hostages remain in captivity, at least 20 of whom are believed to still be alive. The Israeli offensive has devastated Gaza and killed more than 56,000 people, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, a branch of the Hamas government. The death toll is by far the highest in any round of Israeli-Palestinian fighting. The ministry does not distinguish between civilians and combatants but says more than half of the dead were women and children. The ministry said the dead include 5,759 who have been killed since Israel resumed fighting on March 18, shattering a two-month ceasefire. Israel says it only targets militants and blames civilian deaths on Hamas, which operates in heavily populated areas. Israel says more than 20,000 Hamas militants have been killed, though it has provided no evidence to support that claim. Hamas has not commented on its casualties. A damaged car carrying furniture and a mattress drives among pedestrians through a market surrounded by destroyed buildings in Gaza City, northern Gaza Strip (Jehad Alshrafi/AP) Israeli forces shot and killed a 66-year-old Palestinian woman during a raid on Wednesday in east Jerusalem, her husband and a local Palestinian official said. Joudah Al-Obeidi, a 67-year-old resident of the neighbourhood's Shuafat refugee camp, said his wife Zahia Al-Obeidi was standing on the roof of their home when Israeli forces stormed the camp and shot her in the head. He said she had posed no threat. 'It is a crime,' he told The Associated Press. 'What danger did a sick 66-year-old woman pose to them?' Israeli police said they were investigating the incident, saying a woman had arrived at a military checkpoint with 'serious penetrating injuries' and was pronounced dead. They said Israeli forces fired at 'rioters' who threw rocks and heavy objects at them during the operation, with one officer admitted to hospital with a head injury from a large rock. Marouf Al-Refai, the Palestinian official, said Israeli forces stormed the Shuafat refugee camp overnight, killing Ms al-Obeidi with a shot to the head at around 10pm local time and took her body away. Israel captured east Jerusalem, including the Old City and its holy sites sacred to Jews, Christians and Muslims, in the 1967 Middle East war. It considers the area to be part of its capital – a move that is not internationally recognised. Palestinians want an independent state with east Jerusalem as its capital.

The Journal
4 hours ago
- The Journal
Iran moves to suspend inspections from nuclear watchdog after US and Israel attacks
IRAN'S PARLIAMENT HAS voted in favour of suspending the country's cooperation with the international watchdog agency that oversees nuclear energy. The vote to suspend the relationship with the UN-based International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is a direct consequence of the Israeli and US bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities over the course of the last two weeks. Iran's national security council now has to approve the move for the suspension to go ahead. 'The International Atomic Energy Agency, which refused to even marginally condemn the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities, put its international credibility up for auction,' Iran's parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said, according to state TV. 'The Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran will suspend its cooperation with the IAEA until the security of the nuclear facilities is guaranteed.' Iranian MPs chanted 'Death to America' and 'Death to Israel' after the vote, state TV reported. Iran had already voiced sharp criticism of the IAEA for not condemning Israel's attacks. Yesterday, following the implementation of a fragile ceasefire, IAEA chief Rafael Mariano Grossi said that 'resuming cooperation with the IAEA is key to a successful diplomatic agreement to finally resolve the dispute over Iran's nuclear activities', while proposing to meet with Iran's foreign minister 'soon'. 'As I have repeatedly stated – before and during the conflict – nuclear facilities should never be attacked due to the very real risk of a serious radiological accident,' Grossi said. Advertisement A suspension of cooperation with the IAEA would bring an end to watchdog inspections of Iranian uranium enrichment facilities, which were targeted by US and Israeli strikes. A breaking off of relations with the IAEA would also present a major obstacle to any future negotiations between Iran and Western states over the future of its nuclear programme, beyond the damage already done to those prospects by the US joining Israel's attacks. While President Donald Trump had said the US bombing 'obliterated' three of Iran's nuclear sites, a leaked intelligence report has indicated the strikes only set the country's progress back by around six months. Israel's military said today that the programme had been delayed by 'several years'. Iran has not been shown to be developing nuclear weapons, despite claims by Israel, the White House and many European countries. A US intelligence report in March of this year concluded that Iran was not seeking to develop nuclear weapons. With reporting from AFP Need more clarity and context on what is happening in the Middle East? Check out our FactCheck Knowledge Bank for essential reads and guides to finding good information online. Visit Knowledge Bank Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal