logo
Why Trump's 50-day ultimatum for Russia won't mean quick gains against Ukraine

Why Trump's 50-day ultimatum for Russia won't mean quick gains against Ukraine

Independent6 days ago
US President Donald Trump has issued a 50-day ultimatum to Russia, demanding a peace deal in Ukraine or facing bruising sanctions on its energy exports.
This deadline, however, is seen by some as inadvertently granting the Kremlin additional time to pursue its summer offensive, though dogged Ukrainian resistance makes rapid Russian gains unlikely.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly stated that any peace deal requires Ukraine to withdraw from the four regions illegally annexed by Moscow in September 2022, which Russia never fully captured.
He also demands Kyiv renounce its bid to join NATO and accept strict limits on its armed forces – terms unequivocally rejected by Ukraine and its Western allies.
A chronic shortage of manpower and ammunition has forced Ukrainian forces to focus on holding ground rather than launching counteroffensives.
But despite a renewed Russian push — and an onslaught of aerial attacks on Kyiv and other cities in recent weeks — Ukrainian officials and analysts say it remains unlikely that Moscow can achieve any territorial breakthrough significant enough in 50 days to force Ukraine into accepting the Kremlin's terms anytime soon.
Russia's main targets
Since spring, Russian troops have accelerated their land gains, capturing the most territory in eastern Ukraine since the opening stages of Moscow's full-scale invasion in 2022.
Russian forces are closing in on the eastern strongholds of Pokrovsk and Kostyantynivka in the Donetsk region, methodically capturing villages near both cities to try to cut key supply routes and envelop their defenders — a slow offensive that has unfolded for months.
Capturing those strongholds would allow Russia to push toward Slovyansk and Kramatorsk, setting the stage for the seizure of the entire Donetsk region.
If Russian troops seize those last strongholds, it would open the way for them to forge westward to the Dnipropetrovsk region. The regional capital of Dnipro, a major industrial hub of nearly 1 million, is about 150 kilometers (just over 90 miles) west of Russian positions.
The spread of fighting to Dnipropetrovsk could damage Ukrainian morale and give the Kremlin more leverage in any negotiations.
In the neighboring Luhansk region, Ukrainian troops control a small sliver of land, but Moscow has not seemed to prioritize its capture.
The other two Moscow-annexed regions — Kherson and Zaporizhzhia — seem far from being totally overtaken by Russia.
Early in the war, Russia quickly overran the Kherson region but pulled back from large swaths of it in November 2022, retreating to the eastern bank of the Dnieper River. A new attempt to cross the waterway to seize the rest of the region would involve massive challenges, and Moscow doesn't seem to have the capability to mount such an operation.
Fully capturing the Zaporizhzhia region appears equally challenging.
Russian attempts to establish a 'buffer zone'
Moscow's forces captured several villages in northeastern Ukraine's Sumy region after reclaiming chunks of Russia's Kursk region from Ukrainian troops who staged a surprise incursion in August 2024. Ukraine says its forces have stopped Russia's offensive and maintain a presence on the fringe of the Kursk region, where they are still tying down as many as 10,000 Russian troops.
Putin recently described the offensive into the Sumy region as part of efforts to carve a 'buffer zone' to protect Russian territory from Ukrainian attacks.
The regional capital of Sumy, a city of 268,000, is about 30 kilometers (less than 20 miles) from the border. Putin said Moscow doesn't plan to capture the city for now but doesn't exclude it.
Military analysts, however, say Russian forces in the area clearly lack the strength to capture it.
Russian forces also have pushed an offensive in the neighboring Kharkiv region, but they haven't made much progress against fierce Ukrainian resistance.
Some commentators say Russia may hope to use its gains in the Sumy and Kharkiv regions as bargaining chips in negotiations, trading them for parts of the Donetsk region under Ukrainian control.
'A scenario of territorial swaps as part of the talks is quite realistic,' said Mikhail Karyagin, a Kremlin-friendly political expert, in a commentary.
Wearing down Ukraine with slow pressure
Ukrainian commanders say the scale and pace of Russian operations suggest that any game-changing gains are out of reach, with Moscow's troops advancing slowly at a tremendous cost to its own forces.
While exhausted Ukrainian forces are feeling outnumbered and outgunned, they are relying on drones to stymie Moscow's slow offensive. Significant movements of troops and weapons are easily spotted by drones that are so prolific that both sides use them to track and attack even individual soldiers within minutes.
Russian military commentators recognize that Ukraine's drone proficiency makes any quick gains by Moscow unlikely. They say Russia aims to bleed Ukraine dry with a strategy of 'a thousand cuts,' using relentless pressure on many sectors of the front and steadily increasing long-range aerial attacks against key infrastructure.
'The Russian army aims to exhaust the enemy to such an extent that it will not be able to hold the defense, and make multiple advances merge into one or several successes on a strategic scale that will determine the outcome of the war,' Moscow-based military analyst Sergei Poletayev wrote in an analysis. 'It's not that important where and at what speed to advance: the target is not the capture of this or that line; the target is the enemy army as such.'
Western supplies are essential for Ukraine
Ukrainian troops on the front express exasperation and anger about delays and uncertainty about U.S. weapons shipments.
Delays in U.S. military assistance have forced Kyiv's troops to ration ammunition and scale back operations as Russia intensifies its attacks, Ukrainian soldiers in eastern Ukraine told The Associated Press.
The United States will sell weapons to its NATO allies in Europe so they can provide them to Ukraine, according to Trump and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Included are Patriot air defense systems, a top priority for Ukraine.
Speeded-up weapons shipments from European allies are crucial to allowing Ukraine to stem the Russian attacks, according to analysts.
'The rate of Russian advance is accelerating, and Russia's summer offensive is likely to put the armed forces of Ukraine under intense pressure,' Jack Watling of the Royal United Services Institute in London said in a commentary.
But most of the capabilities that Ukraine needs — from drones to artillery systems — can be provided by NATO allies in Europe, he said.
'In the short-term, Europe can cover most of Ukraine's needs so long as it can purchase some critical weapons types from the U.S.,' Watling said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wall Street Journal booted from White House press trip to Scotland after Epstein report
Wall Street Journal booted from White House press trip to Scotland after Epstein report

The Independent

time18 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Wall Street Journal booted from White House press trip to Scotland after Epstein report

Reporters for The Wall Street Journal have been removed from a pool of journalists covering Donald Trump's upcoming trip to Scotland in the wake of the newspaper's reporting on the president's alleged 50th birthday card to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The reporters' removal, first reported by Politico, also follows the president's $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the newspaper and the journalists who wrote the story, as well as right-wing media mogul Rupert Murdoch and parent companies News Corp and Dow Jones. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement shared with The Independent that neither the newspaper nor 'any other news outlet are not guaranteed special access to cover President Trump in the Oval Office, aboard Air Force One, and in his private workspaces.' 'Due to the Wall Street Journal 's fake and defamatory conduct, they will not be one of the thirteen outlets on board,' she said. 'Every news organization in the entire world wishes to cover President Trump, and the White House has taken significant steps to include as many voices as possible.' The Independent has requested comment from the WSJ and White House Correspondents Association. Trump's lawsuit filed in federal court in Miami on July 18 claims the newspaper, its parent companies, executives and journalists falsely smeared the president by accusing him of writing a sexually suggestive birthday card to Epstein in 2003. The birthday greeting is described by the newspaper as including a sexually suggestive drawing and a birthday wish that says 'may every day be another wonderful secret.' A letter reportedly bearing Trump's name, which the WSJ report claims was reviewed by the newspaper, contains several lines of typewritten text framed by a drawing of a naked woman. His signature is a squiggly 'Donald' below her waist, mimicking pubic hair, according to the report. The defendants 'failed to attach the letter, failed to attach the alleged drawing, failed to show proof that President Trump authored or signed any such letter, and failed to explain how this purported letter was obtained,' according to Trump's lawsuit. 'The reason for those failures is because no authentic letter or drawing exists,' the complaint claims. This is a developing story

Trump administration and Harvard spar in court in case over massive funding freeze
Trump administration and Harvard spar in court in case over massive funding freeze

NBC News

time19 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Trump administration and Harvard spar in court in case over massive funding freeze

The Trump administration and Harvard University on Monday traded barbs in a critical hearing in Boston over the government's threats to slash billions of dollars in the Ivy League school's federal research funding. Harvard accused the Trump administration of violating its First Amendment rights by freezing funds, to exercise authority over the school. Meanwhile, the Department of Justice argued that funding cuts are a means to protect against anti-semitism, an issue that the DOJ claims the Ivy League school had failed to appropriately address, violating the rights of its Jewish students. Both parties had sought a summary judgement from U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs, in which she would hand down a decision without the case going to trial. However, there's no indication on when she will rule. The case could ultimately have larger implications on government oversight in schools. 'This is a blatant, unrepentant violation of the First Amendment.' Steven P. Lehotsky, the attorney for Harvard, said. Lehotsky also said that the case isn't about a breach of contract. 'This case is about so much more for Harvard and for higher education," he said. Burroughs did not rule from the bench, but told the court that she would get to a decision as quickly as she could. Harvard is pushing for the ruling to come down no later than early September, the deadline to file grant paperwork for next year. During the hearing, the parties sparred over whether antisemitism on campus justified the removal of grant funding. Harvard did admit that there was an 'antisemitism problem,' adding that the school had taken actions to combat it. But Lehotsky argued that the issue is 'not germane to funding of Alzheimer's research,' for example. Burroughs, an Obama-appointee, pressed the DOJ, pointing out that she is Jewish, and asked how cutting off funding could help fight anti-semitism. 'The choice was that the government does not want to fund research at institutions that fail to address antisemitism to its satisfaction,' said Michael Velchik, attorney for the Trump administration. The government also argued that it has a right to cancel the terms of its grant contract if the school wasn't meeting policy priorities. However, Burroughs said that the government did not adequately prove that Harvard wasn't meeting those requirements. Velchik also took issue with what he perceived as the framing of Harvard's claims. 'Harvard claims the government is anti-Harvard. I reject that,' Velchik said. 'The government is pro-Jewish students at Harvard. The government is pro-Jewish faculty at Harvard.' For months, the Ivy League institution and the Trump administration have been locked in a tense back-and-forth. Harvard in April refused to adhere to a set of demands issued by the administration's Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism. The list of 10 demands included making sweeping reforms to policies about whom the university can hire and admit and subjecting the ideologies of faculty members to an audit approved by the government. In response, the task force announced that it would slash more than $2 billion in grants. Harvard hit back with the lawsuit, accusing the administration of seeking 'unprecedented and improper' control of the school. As tensions continued to build, the administration further ordered its federal agencies to end their contracts with the school weeks later. The amount in contracts totaled roughly $100 million. Most recently, Harvard drew backlash for quietly renaming the diversity, equity, and inclusion offices of several of its graduate schools. The Harvard Divinity School, for example, swapped its diversity office with an Office of Community and Belonging at the beginning of July. Some critics saw the move as an effort to 'cave' to the Trump administration's demands.

Malcolm-Jamal Warner, 'Cosby Show' actor, dies at 54 in Costa Rica drowning
Malcolm-Jamal Warner, 'Cosby Show' actor, dies at 54 in Costa Rica drowning

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Malcolm-Jamal Warner, 'Cosby Show' actor, dies at 54 in Costa Rica drowning

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store