Amelia Earhart disappeared 88 years ago, on July 2, 1937. Purdue thinks it knows where.
WEST LAFAYETTE, IN — On the 88th anniversary of Amelia Earhart's disappearance, the Purdue Research Foundation and the Archaeological Legacy Institute (ALI) announced a joint effort to locate the flight pioneer's long lost aircraft.
The official search, named the "Taraia Object Expedition," will begin on Nov. 5, PRF said in a news release Wednesday morning ahead of a press conference, when a field team organized by ALI visits the island Nikumaroro, part of the Phoenix Islands in the island nation of Kiribati, by sea.
The expedition, the release said, will determine whether a visual anomaly known as the "Taraia Object," seen in satellite and other imagery in the island's lagoon, is what remains of Earhart's Lockheed Electra 10E airplane.
Standing directly in front of the hangar Earhart once flew out of at the Purdue University Airport, Richard Pettigrew, ALI's executive director, said the expedition could be the "greatest opportunity ever" to finally close the nearly century-old mystery.
"With such a great amount of very strong evidence, we feel we have no choice but to move forward and hopefully return with proof," Pettigrew said. "I look forward to collaborating with Purdue Research Foundation in writing the final chapter in Amelia Earhart's remarkable life story.'
Earhart became a visiting professor at Purdue in 1935, and she's one of Purdue's most famous former staff members. A New York Times headline from 1936 proclaimed, "MISS EARHART TO GET 'FLYING LABORATORY'; Purdue Announces $50,000 Fund to Provide a Special Plane for Her Researches."
On July 2, 1937, she disappeared over the Pacific Ocean while attempting to become the first female pilot to circumnavigate the world.
'About nine decades ago, Amelia Earhart was recruited to Purdue, and the university president later worked with her to prepare an aircraft for her historic flight around the world,' Purdue President Mung Chiang said in the release. 'Today, as a team of experts try again to locate the plane, the Boilermaker spirit of exploration lives on.'
Steven Schultz, senior vice president and general counsel of Purdue University, said that in recognition of the foundation's contribution, Earhart and her husband, George Putnam, intended to give the plane to Purdue upon her return, where it would be used to further scientific research in aeronautics.
'Both Earhart and her husband and manager, George Putnam, expressed their intention to return the Electra to Purdue after her historic flight,' Schultz said. 'Based on the evidence, we agree with ALI that this expedition offers the best chance not only to solve perhaps the greatest mystery of the 20th century, but also to fulfill Amelia's wishes and bring the Electra home.'
The price tag of the November expedition is estimated at $900K, Schultz said. Of the total, $400K has been raised so far through efforts by ALI, Schultz said, with the remaining $500K being provided by PRF through a line of credit.
No Purdue faculty are scheduled to be included on the expedition, Schultz said, but Purdue alumnus Marc Hagle, who became the first married couple alongside his wife, Sharon, in 2022 to embark on a commercial space flight with Blue Origin, has been designated as a special emissary to the exploration.
The Electra, which disappeared on July 2, 1937, has never been recovered, but a vast amount of circumstantial evidence has been amassed, the release said, largely by The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery (TIGER) over nearly 40 years, supporting the Nikumaroro hypothesis. This idea posits that Earhart and her navigator, Fred Noonan, did not crash at sea but instead landed and were marooned on an uninhabited island and subsequently perished there.
The hypothesis, as updated by ALI with new evidence for the Taraia Object, is based on documentary records, photographs and satellite images, physical evidence, and personal testimony, the release said, including these highlights:
Radio bearings recorded from radio transmissions at the time by the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Coast Guard and Pan American World Airways, which converge on Nikumaroro
A 2017 analysis of human bones discovered on the island in 1940, which determined Earhart's bone lengths were more similar to the discovered bones than 99% of individuals, strongly supporting the conclusion they belong to Earhart
Artifacts including a woman's shoe, a compact case, a freckle cream jar and a medicine vial — all dating to the 1930s
The Bevington Object, a photographic anomaly captured just three months after the plane's disappearance, which appears to represent one of the Electra landing gear on the Nikumaroro reef
The Taraia Object, located in 2020, which has been in the same place in the lagoon since 1938
Schultz said in his more than 12 years as general counsel for the university, Purdue and PRF have been contacted "several" times with claims that the plane had been located, but none had been as strong of a case as ALI's.
Some of the evidence that strengthens ALI's case, Schultz said, is evidence of directional bearings from Earhart's radio signals captured at the time. Schultz said Earhart's voice was heard on U.S. mainland over radio signals in the days following her disappearance, which could have been possible only had her plane survived.
Pettigrew said it is often misunderstood that Earhart's plane "crash landed," but he said that couldn't have been true.
"We're talking about a successful landing on the reef with an intact aircraft," Pettigrew said. "I think it's likely that Amelia was planning to be rescued, refueled, take off again and make it to Hawaii and continue on to California to complete her journey. That was her hope. And for a period of maybe five days, that hope remained alive."
But in the days that followed Earhart's landing on the remote island, Pettigrew said, the tide would have risen, causing the airplane, which had been completely depleted of fuel, to be lifted off its landing place.
"In this concept, the plane would have been rolled and crashed up against the reef as a consequence of the surf and would have broken up," Pettigrew said. "The outer wings would have come off first, then the engine, the landing gear … And remember, it was full of empty gas tanks, so it would be very buoyant."
In early 2024, Deep Sea Vision, a marine robotics company in South Carolina, made headlines when it reported that scans of a blurry sonar image could be the missing Electra plane deep in the Pacific Ocean. Schultz said that claim has since been debunked, and that while Deep Sea Vision's thought-to-be location was deep under water, ALI's location is in very shallow water.
Ric Gillespie, an author and expedition leader of 12 searches in the South Pacific for Earhart's plane, said in an interview Wednesday morning for the TODAY Show that he is skeptical of the satellite photos of the proposed site. Gillespie said in the interview his team had previously searched the proposed site, but found nothing, noting it could be a "coconut tree complete with root ball."
But Schultz said the university and ALI have strong reasons to believe it's not a tree stuck in the water. With the evidence produced, Schultz said, if Purdue and ALI don't pursue the possibility of finding the long lost Electra plane, then who will?
"Purdue is known for calculated risks, and this is a calculated risk," Schultz said. "We feel like we owe it to the legacy to take it."
ALI plans to post project updates, beginning soon, on its subscription video platform, Heritage Broadcasting Service, the release said. If the initial expedition proves successful in confirming the identity of the aircraft, PRF and ALI plan to return for larger excavation efforts in 2026 to uncover and help return what remains of Earhart's plane.
Schultz said at this time, no money has been set aside for if the plane is found and returned to the university.
If the plane is found through this expedition, Schultz said, Purdue has the strongest equitable claim to the remains of the Electra.
"That's based on the clear intent, the donated intent, of Amelia and her husband to bring the plane back to Purdue, and the fact that we facilitated it," Schultz said. "Obviously there are a lot of stakeholders now involved in this, not the least of which is Rick and Ali, but also the people of the Republic of Kiribati, and their views on this matter is very important."
Jillian Ellison is a reporter for the Journal & Courier. She can be reached via email at jellison@gannett.com.
This article originally appeared on Lafayette Journal & Courier: Purdue Research Foundation says it plans to locate Amelia Earhart's plane
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
How do airplane toilets work?
Even in an age where flying is a fairly regular occurrence, there are some things that you never forget about your first journey on an visceral thrill of being pushed back into your seat as the plane accelerates toward take-off, the jitters that accompany your first bout of turbulence, and the SLUUUUURP sound in the lavatory. The alarming noise ensues when you press the 'flush' button in an airplane toilet and the bowl's contents are magically sucked away into oblivion. With the noise and essentially 'clean' bowl as a result, there's clearly some sort of vacuum cleaner-type effect at how do aircraft toilets work? Aerospace engineer Bill Crossley, the head of the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics at Purdue University in Indiana, explains to Popular Science that the answer is as simple as it is ingenious. The system relies on one simple fact. 'When you go up to high altitude and you're flying fast, the pressure outside the cabin is a lot lower than it is inside,' he says. The laws of physics—and specifically the ideal gas law—dictate that the contents of a region with relatively high pressure will tend to flow into a region with relatively low pressure. Flushing the toilet on an airplane opens a valve between the pressurised cabin and a tank that remains at atmospheric pressure. That process creates exactly this sort of pressure differential. In other words, 'when you flush the toilet, you're basically opening a valve to the outside, and the pressure differential sucks away whatever's in the bowl,' Crossley says. The beauty of the system is that it doesn't require vacuum pumps or other complications to create the pressure differential. It simply makes use of the existing difference in pressure between the aircraft's interior and exterior at altitude. Of course, this requires that there is a pressure difference. On the ground, Crossley says, the system uses a vacuum pump. The pump remains in use until the plane reaches an altitude where the atmospheric pressure allows the system to work without it, at which point it is switched off. The idea itself is simple and has remained largely unchanged since it was first patented in 1975. However, retired aircraft engineer Nigel Jones explains that the complexity of the implementation still varies from aircraft to aircraft. Some planes' systems evacuate every toilet to a single tank, while others use multiple smaller tanks. Some use complex piping arrangements, while others opt for simpler configurations. [ Related: How does a composting toilet work? Ditch the flush.] Then there's the Lockheed TriStar, an airliner built between 1968 and 1984 that remains Jones' favorite to this day. The TriStar's toilets were famously arranged in a circle, and they were as idiosyncratic behind the scenes as they were to passengers. '[The TriStar] had a logic system to manage flushing,' he says fondly. 'It had a tank at the front for the forward toilets and another for the five or six toilets at the back. The system had three, I think it was three toilet pumps, and it would flush pumps in turn that the logic box would if say toilet five wanted to flush, the logic box would say, 'Right, it's pump one's turn.' It was incredibly complicated, and all just to flush the toilet.' Some might argue that this system sounds perhaps a little over-engineered. 'We did feel that way every time there was a problem and looking at the pump didn't fix it,' Jones concedes. 'If we had to go in and look at the logic box, we'd have to lie on top of the tank. This was… well, it was not pleasant.' While such complexity may be overkill–and is rarely found in modern airliners–Jones notes that some degree of twisting and turning in the system's piping is important for one simple reason: it slows down the waste. 'It's not a straight run [from toilet to tank], and it can't be,' Jones says. 'The vacuum pressure means that the drawing speed is such that if there were no bends in the pipes, the waste would hit the wall of the tank with considerable force.' How considerable? According to Jones, it would be 'enough that you could potentially break the tank.' Even without such a catastrophic outcome, he notes dryly, 'the noise would be most alarming.' Prior to the advent of the vacuum-based flush, planes used chemical systems similar to those that remain in use today in portable toilets, where the bowl connects directly to a tank full of the dreaded blue liquid. This also explains the origin of the term 'blue ice', which refers to waste that somehow escapes the tank—at high altitude, any such waste freezes immediately, and remains frozen until it returns to the ground, at which point it reveals its true nature to anyone unfortunate enough to cross its path. Such systems are vanishingly rare today, remaining in use only on aircraft large enough for aviation regulations to require the presence of a toilet, but small enough that a vacuum system is more trouble than it's worth. Crossley says that the only planes to fall into this category are small business aircraft, which are sometimes equipped with what he describes as a 'fancy port-a-potty.' On larger planes, he says, the vacuum system really is the only game in town. 'It's everything you want an airplane system to be: first, it's safe; second, it's reliable; and third, it's lightweight.' This story is part of Popular Science's Ask Us Anything series, where we answer your most outlandish, mind-burning questions, from the ordinary to the off-the-wall. Have something you've always wanted to know? Ask us.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
China's Mysterious Ekranoplan Seen In Full For First Time
We are getting our first full look at China's wing-in-ground effect (WIG) craft. It was first identified last week by our friend and submarine warfare analyst HI Sutton. You can read his initial post at Naval News here. It was originally spotted in an image with its nose section obscured. In that image, the flying-boat-hulled aircraft was pictured sitting on a pier situated on the Bohai Sea, which sits at the northwestern reach of the South China Sea. As we have discussed many times before, the Soviet Union was famed for its experimentation and semi-operational use of large WIG craft known as Ekranoplans. The capability and tactical concepts surrounding it never really caught on en-masse, but we are currently experiencing a renaissance of sorts for large WIG aircraft that aim to race above the thick air above the water with relative efficiency and speed (most can fly less efficiently at higher altitudes too). The U.S. is developing just such an aircraft, the Liberty Lifer, in hopes that it could be used to deliver heavy cargo, personnel and materiel to far-flung locales across the great expanses of the Pacific. In doing so it would help reduce some of the Pentagon's looming logistic woes were it to fight across such a large theater. In the case of this mysterious aircraft being tested by China, it is loosely similar in scale to what we have seen of their new amphibious flying boat, the AG600, which is intended to perform resupply, search and rescue, and other missions, especially over the South China Sea. This WIG aircraft appears ideally suited for similar applications in the littorals. Flying low utilizing the thick cushion of air above the water to increase lift and decrease drag, the aircraft also stays under the surface/land-based radar horizon. Considering it is an aircraft, not a boat, it isn't vulnerable to mines, submarines, and other dangers that can lurk even in seemingly lower-threat waters. Still, it is not a survivable asset in a highly contested combat arena, but if a war were to erupt between the U.S. and China, China would be fighting in their own backyard, unlike the United States. Vast areas extending from its shores will remain readily accessible for periods of time. This is where such an aircraft would be useful even in a high-end fight — providing logistical support to remote areas and especially in recovering downed aircrew and other personnel. Even sea control and anti-submarine warfare applications are real possibilities. The biggest claim surrounding this aircraft is that it's jet powered. The image of its rear seems to point to that, but at the time we thought this remained very inconclusive as it looked like propellers may have been intended for it but not yet fitted. Still the exhausts looked large for a turboprop. This new pictures from the front is also inconclusive and there may be spindles or at least some sort of spike at the front of the engine nacelles, which would point to propellers. There are also upper inlets as well, which would mean two large inlets per nacelle if it was jet powered, which seems odd. It's also quite possible that this uses a new hybrid-electric propulsion system, which may make a lot of sense for this kind of aircraft. Regardless, these are low-resolution images that are sparse in details, and the aircraft could end up being jet powered, but it remains a significant question mark for us. As for the rest of the aircraft, it has a large joined v-tail, which is not uncommon for WIG craft. The wings have large outrigger wing-float sponsons on their tips and the hull appears to have smaller sponsons amidships. The nose is perhaps the most exotic element and it looks blended for efficiency, at least in a modern sense. The aircraft very likely leverages heavy use of composite structures allowing for weight savings, aerodynamic enhancement, and limited signature control as a byproduct. We also see a common flying boat stepped hull and a larger door open on its side, which would be useful for hauling cargo and recovering personnel. It's also worth noting that this aircraft could very well be a technology demonstrator that is meant to test a variety of design elements. It could even be a subscale one, or it could be meant to at least inform larger designs. On that note, it has clear similarities to the Pentagon's Liberty Lifter very large WIG craft that is in the works. So there you have it, our first full view of the 'Bohai Sea Monster,' as Sutton calls it. As with any new aircraft 'leaks' out of China, we should see a steady stream of higher-resolution imagery of this craft in the weeks to come. Contact the author: Tyler@
USA Today
4 days ago
- USA Today
Could Amelia Earhart's plane be in this lagoon? New expedition plans to find out
After nearly a century, the disappearance of Amelia Earhart while she was attempting to fly around the world remains one of the greatest unsolved mysteries of the 20th century. For decades, many top-dollar expeditions have attempted to locate Earhart's Lockheed Electra 10E airplane to no avail despite great advancements in technology. But a new expedition may just be what one official described as the "greatest opportunity ever" to finally bookend the enduring mystery. On Wednesday, the Purdue Research Foundation and the Archaeological Legacy Institute announced a joint-effort to locate Earhart's plane in a lagoon off a Pacific island between Australia and Hawaii, where a popular theory suggests Earhart and her navigator, Fred Noonan, may have landed on May 20, 1937. A field team of researchers on Nov. 5 will journey by sea to the island Nikumaroro, part of the Phoenix Islands in the western Pacific Ocean, to determine whether a visual anomaly known as the "Taraia Object," seen in satellite and other imagery in the island's lagoon, is what remains of Earhart's plane. The effort is the latest to try and confirm whether an object captured in satellite or sonar imaging is the missing plane. Last year, an ocean exploration company conducted a deep-sea search within 100 miles of Howland Island, where Earhart and Noonan were last expected to land, after spotting what they believed to be the wreckage of the Electra 10E. It turned out to be a rock formation. But the search team conducting the upcoming expedition on Nikumaroro say they're optimistic, citing a "vast amount of circumstantial evidence" indicating the "Taraia Object" may just be the long lost aircraft. "With such a great amount of very strong evidence, we feel we have no choice but to move forward and hopefully return with proof," said Richard Pettigrew, Archaeological Legacy Institute's executive director, in a statement. "I look forward to collaborating with Purdue Research Foundation in writing the final chapter in Amelia Earhart's remarkable life story.' Evidence suggests Earhart landed on Nikumaroro, researchers say The organizers of the expedition have pointed to the long-running theory that Earhart and Noonan did not crash into the ocean but instead landed on the uninhabited of Nikumaroro and later perished there. Evidence of this theory includes radio bearings that converge on Nikumaroro, an analysis of human bones discovered on the island that are similar to Earhart's bone-lengths, and a number of artifacts including a woman's shoe, a compact case and a medicine vial that have also been discovered there, according to the Purdue Research Foundation. Additionally, a photographic anomaly captured three months after the plane vanished in 1937 appears to show a landing gear on the Nikumaroro reef. More recently in 2020, researchers managed to again spot the "Taraia Object," which has been in the same place on the island's lagoon since 1938. For nearly a century, Earhart's disappearance has been subject to a wide variety of theories, the most widely accepted explanation being that Earhart and Noonan ran out of fuel and crashed in the ocean. Some of the more implausible and disputed theories posit that the flight was part of a secret spy mission, that Earhart assumed another identity or that Earhart and Noonan were captured by a foreign government. The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery, a nonprofit organization based in Pennsylvania, is responsible for collecting much of the evidence supporting the Nikumaroro hypothesis. The upcoming expedition will depart from Majuro in the Marshall Islands on Nov. 5 and spend five days on Nikumaroro inspecting the "Taraia Object," according to the Purdue Research Foundation. If the initial expedition proves successful, the field team plans to return in 2026 to uncover and help return what remains of Earhart's plane, the foundation said. Who was Amelia Earhart? Earhart was born in Atchison, Kansas, on July 24, 1897. She rode in an airplane for the first time in 1920 and soon began taking flying lessons. Within a year, she obtained a pilot's license and went on to set a women's altitude record, reaching the height of 14,000 feet in October 1922. A decade later, she became the first woman to fly solo across the Atlantic Ocean, journeying from Newfoundland to Northern Ireland. She then ventured on a solo flight across the United States. It was in 1936 that she began planning her most ambitious journey yet – a flight around the world. According to the Purdue Research Foundation, Earhart, who was a visiting adviser and counselor at the university, had prepared for the historic trip with the help of Purdue's then-president Edward Elliott. The university's research foundation also helped fund the Lockheed Electra 10E plane that was specifically outfitted for Earhart's global trip. Earhart had intended to give the plane to Purdue after her historic flight so it could be used to further scientific research in aeronautics, the foundation said. Amelia Earhart's final flight Earhart and Noonan departed from Oakland, California, on May 20, 1937. According to the International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery, they made 29 additional stops, including their last known refuel stop in Lae, Papua New Guinea, on July 2 at 10 a.m. Nearing the end of their historic trip, Earhart and Noonan were due on Howland Island – about 2,500 miles away from Lae and set between Australia and Hawaii – where U.S. Coast Guard cutter Itasca was waiting with fuel. Itasca received intermittent voice messages from Earhart as her signal increased. But neither Earhart nor Noonan knew Morse code, so there was no two-way contact, according to the Smithsonian Institute's analysis of government records. After losing contact, the Navy and Coast Guard searched about 250,000 square miles of ocean in search of Earhart and Noonan. On Jan. 5, 1939, they were declared legally dead. Now, with the joint expedition on the horizon, university leaders and researchers are hopeful they'll be able to definitively answer the question, "What happened to Amelia Earhart?" 'Based on the evidence, we agree with (Archaeological Legacy Institute) that this expedition offers the best chance not only to solve perhaps the greatest mystery of the 20th century, but also to fulfill Amelia's wishes and bring the Electra home," said Steven Schultz, senior vice president and general counsel of Purdue University. Contributing: Jillian Ellison, Lafayette Journal & Courier; Clare Mulroy and Samantha Shafiq, USA TODAY
