
US judge overturns Amgen's $50.3 mln loss in cancer drug patent case
U.S. District Judge Gregory Williams said in a court order, opens new tab that the patents were unenforceable due to their inventor's "inequitable conduct" at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Williams' opinion outlining his reasoning for the decision was filed under seal.
Attorneys and spokespeople for the companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the ruling.
Germany-based Lindis sued Amgen in 2022, alleging that Blincyto infringed patents related to reducing the side effects of using antibodies to stimulate the body's immune system to kill cancer cells.
Thousand Oaks, California-based Amgen earned $800 million from U.S. sales of Blincyto last year, according to a company report.
A Delaware jury determined in December that Amgen owed at least $50.3 million for infringing Lindis' patents. The jury also said that the infringement was willful, which could have led the court to increase the award up to three times the amount.
Amgen argued that the patents were invalid because their inventor submitted false information in his patent application. Williams held a separate bench trial in January on Amgen's defense.
The case is Lindis Biotech GmbH v. Amgen Inc, U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, No. 1:22-cv-00035.
For Amgen: Michael Wise, Joseph Hamilton, Lara Dueppen, Courtney Prochnow and Alisha Burgin of Perkins Coie; Lisa Pensabene, Hassen Sayeed, Carolyn Wall, Luann Simmons and Sorin Zaharia of O'Melveny & Myers
For Lindis: James Taylor, Jessica Jones, Henry Platt, Robert Gill and Matthew Antonelli of Saul Ewing
Read more:
Amgen hit with $50.3 mln US verdict in cancer drug patent lawsuit
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
16 minutes ago
- Reuters
Senator Schiff asks FCC to disclose if Trump sought content changes in Paramount merger review
WASHINGTON, Aug 18 (Reuters) - Democratic Senator Adam Schiff asked the Federal Communications Commission whether President Donald Trump sought programming or media coverage commitments as part of the approval of CBS-parent Paramount Global's merger with Skydance Media. Schiff on Monday sought details from FCC Chair Brendan Carr on potential political influence by Trump on the review, citing the $16 million settlement paid by Paramount (PSKY.O), opens new tab to Trump weeks before the merger's approval and a series of meetings the FCC held with company executives. The senator also asked if the FCC had talks with the companies concerning specific programs, including 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" during the merger review. CBS announced in July the Late Show would be canceled next year. Schiff said the sequence of events "raises significant questions and alarm that the FCC – an independent regulatory agency – has become a vehicle for President Trump to exact personal retribution and undermine the freedom of the press." Paramount, the White House and the FCC did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal, who last month also sought answers on the review, suggested that the FCC's goal was "government censorship" in approving the deal. "The FCC is engaged in an unprecedented and illegal campaign to chill free speech and independent news reporting protected by the First Amendment," Blumenthal wrote. The FCC voted 2-1 to approve the $8.4 billion merger after Skydance agreed to ensure CBS news and entertainment programming is free of bias, hire an ombudsman for at least two years to review complaints and end diversity programs. Trump has repeatedly attacked broadcast networks for what he perceives as biased news coverage and called on Carr to rescind their licenses. Democratic FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez accused Paramount of "cowardly capitulation" to the Trump administration. She also said the FCC was imposing "never-before-seen controls over newsroom decisions and editorial judgment, in direct violation of the First Amendment and the law." Paramount agreed to pay $16 million to settle a $20 billion lawsuit filed by Trump, claiming CBS News' "60 Minutes" deceptively edited an interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris. Paramount did not admit wrongdoing.


Reuters
17 minutes ago
- Reuters
Gupta lawyers fail to appear for Trafigura fraud case hearing
LONDON, Aug 18 (Reuters) - Lawyers representing Indian businessman Prateek Gupta said they failed to appear for a hearing on Monday because of funding difficulties in a long-running fraud case brought by commodity trader Trafigura about nickel cargoes, a London court heard. Geneva-based Trafigura, a major industrial metals and oil trader, filed a lawsuit against Gupta in February 2023, alleging it had been the victim of a $600-million fraud involving nickel cargoes masterminded by Gupta and in which he and his companies participated. Gupta has said in his defence that Trafigura staff devised the scheme at the centre of the case to substitute low-value materials such as scrap for high-grade nickel. Trafigura and its employees have denied any knowledge of fraud. Gupta's lawyers Preston Turnbull informed Trafigura and the court on Friday that due to a lack of funding they would not be attending Monday's hearing regarding the use of documents in a separate arbitration case. "That is an excuse which has been routinely trotted out by the Gupta defendants throughout these proceedings when it had suited them to do so, and it is without any merit," Trafigura lawyer Edward Ho told Monday's hearing. Preston Turnbull did not respond to a request for comment. In March 2024, lawyers for Gupta told a court he had run out of funds to pay legal fees, and in June last year Gupta changed lawyers to Preston Turnbull from Mishcon De Reya. "The court has previously found, and I agree, that there are sources of funding available to the Gupta defendants," Ho added. "Alleged funding issues have been a recurring theme... to justify their failure to meet court deadlines and to comply with court orders." Judges have granted a succession of delays over many months to Gupta to meet deadlines for disclosure of documents relevant to the case, which is due to go to trial in November. Judge Robin Knowles on Monday granted Trafigura's request to use nine documents disclosed by Gupta in the current fraud case in a separate arbitration case due to be heard next month. The arbitration case involves Trafigura and Hong-Kong based Axiom Ltd because Trafigura sold one of the cargoes provided by Gupta to Axiom, which was found not to contain nickel, the court heard.


Reuters
17 minutes ago
- Reuters
Gas demand at two of the top US LNG plants declines
HOUSTON, Aug 18 (Reuters) - Two of the United States' largest liquefied natural gas export plants recorded major declines in demand for natural gas on Monday, suggesting parts of their facilities might be down, according to data from financial firm LSEG. Cheniere's (LNG.N), opens new tab Sabine Pass export facility in Texas, which utilizes up to 4.5 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day, was down to 3.7 bcf, and Sempra's (SRE.N), opens new tab Cameron LNG plant in Louisiana, which processes 2 bcfd, was down to 1.3 bcf, according to LSEG data. Cheniere declined to comment, while Sempra did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Sabine Pass is the United States' largest LNG plant and Cameron the fourth largest. Together they have helped keep the U.S. as the world's largest LNG exporter since 2023. Monday's drop in consumption from those two facilities pulled the day's demand down to 14.7 bcf, the lowest level in two months, according to LSEG data. U.S. natural gas futures fell about 1% on Monday morning, with front-month gas futures for September delivery on the New York Mercantile Exchange falling 2 cents to $2.90 per million British thermal units.