IIHF, PWHL not aligned over scheduling of 2026 women's world hockey championship
The International Ice Hockey Federation has postponed announcing the host city of the 2026 women's world hockey championship.
The IIHF introduced running a women's championship in the same year as an Olympic Games in 2022, but the arrival of the Professional Women's Hockey League has made scheduling the 2026 world championship thorny.
The IIHF said in an email Monday that the allocation of the 2026 women's championship was postponed until its semi-annual congress Oct. 3-4.
The 2022 championship was held Aug. 25 to Sept. 4. in Herning and Frederikshavn, Denmark, after February's Olympic Games in Beijing.
International Ice Hockey Federation women's committee chair Zsuzsanna Kolbenheyer said in April that March-early April for the women's championship is in the IIHF bylaws, and that Denmark's summer tournament was a one-off.
'That was only for that year,' Kolbenheyer said then. 'We always wanted to put it back to the original dates.'
But the PWHL, entering its third season, does not want two long international breaks within weeks of each other. The Olympic Games in Milan-Cortina, Italy, run Feb. 6-22.
'We've had ongoing discussions with the IIHF,' PWHL executive vice-president of hockey operations Jayna Hefford said Friday during a conference call about league expansion. 'We do not have a date for that event, location for that event.
'We do know the Olympics are happening in February, but anything beyond that is not confirmed. So that's the information we have today, and we'll continue to work closely with the IIHF and various national federations.'
Canada will host the 2027 women's championship.
The PWHL's second season ran from Dec. 1, 2024 to May 26 when the Minnesota Frost defended the Walter Cup. Each team played 30 regular-season games.
The league will expand by two clubs next season in Vancouver and Seattle.
Kolbenheyer said during April's women's championship April 9-20 in Ceske Budejovice, Czechia, that a survey was issued to the women's hockey community seeking opinions on world championship dates 'but we decided at the council level that it would be too late to do any changes' to 2026.
The international hockey calendar is crowded. It also includes the men's championship in May, the world under-20 men's championship in December-January, the women's under-18 championship in January and the men's under-18 championship in April.
The IIHF also holds multiple lower-level divisional tournaments in those categories that promote and relegate countries.
The NCAA's women's Frozen Four in mid-March also dictates the women's championship's timing.
The United States beat Canada 4-3 in overtime in this year's world championship final in Czechia.
— With files from Gemma Karstens-Smith in Vancouver.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 2, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Swimmer Köhler still suffers consequences of receiving hate messages
Germany's Angelina Koehler reacts disappointed after competing in the final of the women's 100m butterfly swimming event at the Paris La Defence Arena during the Paris 2024 Olympic Games. Jan Woitas/dpa Swimming world champion Angelina Köhler is still suffering the consequences of receiving hate messages, which included images with reference to Nazism sent to her. "I was attacked by Chinese bots in English and German. I was called a Nazi and sent photos with the Hitler salute," the 24-year-old German told the Sport Bild weekly in an interview published on Wednesday. Advertisement "Because of my ADHD diagnosis, people claimed that I was taking medication like Ritalin. But I don't take any medication at all!" she stressed. The attacks came after Köhler called for clarification after Chinese swimmer Zhang Yufei was included on a list published by broadcasters ARD and The New York Times of 23 Chinese swimmers who tested positive for a banned substance in 2021. None of the athletes were banned and the scandal broke out a few months before the Paris 2024 Games. "The whole thing has left its mark on me. I'm now going into the next competitions like the world championships in Singapore with a different feeling. I don't know what it will be like to face the Chinese team. What will it be like with a Chinese audience? Will I be booed?" Köhler. Advertisement Köhler was fourth in the 100 metre butterfly at the Paris Olympics, while Zhang claimed bronze, and the German spoke of a "bitter aftertaste." During the Games in Paris, Köhler said she was afraid to be out on her own. The hate messages have since decreased, but she still receives some. "I'm restricted in my everyday life by the consequences. It's like a persecution complex. I still don't drink from a bottle that's already been opened. I have to keep a close eye on my bottle to make sure no one pours anything into it," she explained. In addition to artificial intelligence tools that scans messages and shields athletes from hate comments, Köhler would like further support from the German Olympic body (DOSB). "I would like the DOSB to offer a contact person for athletes. So that they don't feel left alone," she said.
CNET
an hour ago
- CNET
Carbon-Plated Running Shoes: What Brands Does an Expert Recommend?
Back in the 1990s, Reebok attempted to make carbon-plated running shoes, but the Nike Vaporfly 4% brought this technology to a wider audience when it appeared in the 2016 Olympics. Promising a 4% boost in performance, carbon-plated running shoes or "super shoes" became available to everyone beginning in 2017. Now, many companies produce carbon-plated running shoes that promise a lightweight, supportive feel. However, they can be expensive. To find out whether they're worth it and which brands you should consider, we asked three exercise and running experts for their thoughts. What are carbon-plated running shoes? Matt Dustin, a certified precision nutrition coach and NASM corrective exercise specialist, explains, "Carbon-plated running shoes have a stiff, thin carbon fiber plate in their midsole." He says the plate can help with energy return and make your strides more efficient. Put another way, says that a carbon plate "acts as a lever to effectively roll the foot forward through the force developed by the leg muscle." Carbon-plated shoes may also help runners run faster and experience less fatigue, according to Kaleigh Ray, staff writer at Treadmill Review Guru and certified exercise physiologist. Ray holds a master's degree in biomechanics from the University of Northern Colorado, where her research focus was on carbon-plated shoes and running shoe construction. Explaining the history of the shoe, she notes that carbon plates were first introduced to trail shoes to reduce the feel of rocks underfoot. However, she says, "The current trend of carbon-plated shoes comes from marathon racing shoes." The best carbon-plated running shoes Ray says most running shoe brands have a quality carbon-plated running shoe. Some are geared toward racing, while others are designed for daily training. Ray adds, "I've raced in the Altra Vanish Carbon, and I'm running the 2025 Boston Marathon in the New Balance SC Elite. These two shoes are really good for midfoot and forefoot runners." Ray also recommends the following shoes for racing: Benefits of carbon-plated running shoes The Altra Vanish Carbon Road Running Shoes Amazon Carbon-plated shoes can propel you forward, quickening your leg turnover, according to the Mayo Clinic. Their construction has several key benefits, which Mayo Clinic boils down to a "lower physiological burden" when compared to standard running shoes. More specifically, carbon-plated running shoes offer support, better energy return and speed. Support If your shoes only have a lot of bouncy foam, they might make you feel fast but a bit unstable. Ray contends that carbon plates add more stability to running shoes, at least for front-to-back movement. Meanwhile, Dustin explains that carbon-plated shoes could also improve joint support. He reports, "Carbon plates can lower the impact on your joints by improving your strides." Finally, Ray adds, "The shoe does a lot of the work your arch normally does, which helps reduce fatigue." Energy return Having a carbon plate in your shoes helps you conserve energy over long distances. In fact, this is one of the main reasons they're so popular among elite and distance runners. Ray adds that the shoes "also help direct the spring of the cushioning in the right direction." This could make each stride more efficient. Speed Coach Kelvin, a certified running coach via UK Athletics and online running coach for We Run, says carbon-plated shoes may help you achieve "faster race times for the same amount of effort." He adds that when wearing carbon-plated shoes, "a runner's legs get beaten up a little less in training, allowing a runner to add incremental gains over weeks and months." A study in the International Journal of Exercise Science found that runners see the most gains from carbon-plated shoes if they run 12 km (about 7.5 miles) per hour. Carbon-plated running shoes cons Carbon-plated running shoes may not be for everyone or every type of run. As Coach Kelvin put it, "Super shoes are designed for faster paces and often feel sloppy and unstable at slower paces." Not only are they more expensive than most regular running shoes, but they take some time to adjust to and may not last as long as other training shoes. Adjustment period The feel of carbon-plated shoes takes some getting used to. As Ray puts it, "Running in very responsive carbon-plated shoes can feel like wearing trampoline shoes. Runners may need time to adjust to this feel and sustain the higher energy return of these shoes." She points out that you may feel out of control when you're running in these shoes for the first time. Dustin adds, "The plate is pretty stiff and can be rough on your feet, especially for those who aren't used to them. They may also change your natural gait mechanics, which could make you uncomfortable or cause injury if used in the wrong way." Cost Most carbon-plated running shoes are priced over $200, with many coming in at over $250. Given that Ray tells us, "Many of these shoes don't lead to improved performance when running below a certain speed," they may not be the right investment for a casual runner. If you're running an 11-minute mile, you probably won't see the same performance improvements from carbon-plated shoes as fast-paced runners. Durability However, carbon-plated shoes often wear out more quickly than standard running shoes. The Mayo Clinic says their lack of durability "is why some runners only pull them out specifically in preparation for and during a race." Dustin agrees with this, saying simply, "Many models don't last as long as typical running shoes, which means you may have to buy new ones more often." Controversy There remains debate about whether shoes like the Nike Vaporfly shoes give runners an unfair advantage. In fact, they were nearly banned from the 2020 Olympics before the World Athletics decided to allow athletes to compete in them. Currently, the World Athletics rules for competitive running shoes say that soles can be no thicker than 40mm and may contain only one carbon fiber plate. The Nike Vaporfly 3 Amazon Who should wear carbon-plated running shoes? Carbon-plated shoes are most beneficial to competitive runners. As Dustin points out, "They're best for serious runners looking to improve speed and efficiency. If you race regularly or train at a high level, they can be helpful." While it probably won't hurt to wear them as a beginner runner, you're unlikely to notice a huge difference in your stride or speed during a short workout. The following groups of people may benefit from carbon-plated running shoes: Runners who want a fast-feeling race shoe Runners looking for a good recovery-day shoe Runners with plantar fasciitis Runners with a heel-striking gait In regards to the final point, Ray elaborates, "Some runners are also low responders to carbon-plated super shoes, which means they don't see improvements to their running performance from wearing them. Sometimes, this is due to footstrike. Midfoot/forefoot runners may not benefit as much from carbon-plated shoes." People with really flat feet may also want to avoid carbon-plated running shoes because they could put extra strain on their arches. Dustin warns, "Runners with a history of Achilles or calf issues should also be cautious, as the mechanics of these shoes can put extra strain on those areas." How do carbon-plated running shoes feel to run in? Despite the stiffness of the carbon plate, these shoes actually feel light and bouncy to run in. While they don't have springs inside, you might feel like they do. The exact feel of your shoes will depend on a few factors, like how much cushion surrounds the carbon fiber plate. "Generally, a carbon plate that is closer to the foot feels firmer," explains you run in carbon-plated running shoes all the time? Most experts don't recommend running in carbon-plated shoes all the time. Not only will you reduce their lifespan, but you may hinder some muscle development. Coach Kelvin explains it this way: "It's not recommended to wear a super shoe for every run because they offload and load the foot in a slightly different way than a daily trainer. Having a rotation of shoes allows a runner's feet to become strong in all areas." Instead, you'd be wise to use these shoes in conjunction with more traditional running shoes. Ray warns that it's not recommended to only wear carbon-plated shoes "because it's important to develop the intrinsic muscles of the foot." The bottom line Carbon-plated running shoes may be performance-enhancing for serious race runners, but don't feel pressured to splurge on a pair if you're a weekend warrior who likes to get in a few miles after brunch. If you do purchase a pair for a race, make sure they're compliant; carbon-plated shoes may be considered an unfair advantage by some race organizers.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: Trump administration clearly doesn't understand the point of Title IX
The Trump administration has declared June to be 'Title IX Month,' and says it will celebrate 'with actions to protect women in line with the true purpose of" the landmark legislation that opened athletics and academia to girls and young women. Hallelujah! This means the Trump administration will finally crack down on all of those schools that, a half-century on, are still shorting their female athletes of both resources and facilities, right? It's going to work with Congress to enact meaningful reform so the Center for SafeSport does, indeed, make sport safe from predatory coaches and support staff? Restore funding to the Department of Education so it can conduct robust Title IX investigations? Insist the NCAA ensures that women athletes aren't being left behind by NIL and whatever the new structure of college sports looks like? Oh, my bad. The administration's interest in Title IX is solely to use it as yet another cudgel to bully and erase transgender women. To promote fearmongering and hate over fewer than 10 NCAA athletes and 100 or so participating in youth and college sports. This obsession over the genitalia of the teeniest, tiniest fraction of the population is, quite frankly, weird. Yet the right-wing has perpetuated the idea that transgender women are a threat to our very existence, and the Trump administration, never missing an opportunity to rile up its base, has run with it. According to this White House, transgender people are so big and so strong they're a marauding horde about to overrun the playing fields and podiums. They're also supposed to be too weak to fight in the military, but never mind that contradiction! Keep your eyes focused on this 'threat.' Except transgender women are not, and never have been, the real danger facing women and women's sports. Or women in larger society, for that matter. When Title IX was passed 53 years ago this month, it was meant to lift the artificial constraints holding women back. And it has. Women now make up more than half the population in higher education, and the idea of telling a woman she can't go to law school or med school because she would take a spot away from a man is now seen as, rightly, laughable. The WNBA and NWSL are thriving, and U.S. women won the medal count at last summer's Paris Olympics — just as they did in Beijing, Tokyo, Pyeongchang and Rio. Ratings and attendance for NCAA basketball, volleyball and softball are skyrocketing. But there are still so many areas where women lag behind. Areas where an administration that was sincere about equity could make a difference. A USA TODAY review in 2022 found that, for every $1 schools spent on travel, equipment and recruiting for their men's teams, they spent 71 cents for their comparable women's squads. In just a two-year period, that added up to $125 million more spent on men than women in basketball, baseball and softball, golf, soccer, swimming and diving, and tennis. Yet the Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights has never — not once — withdrawn federal funding from a school for these end-arounds of Title IX. And given the gutting of the Department of Ed under Trump, that's not likely to change! I doubt Education Secretary Linda McMahon will even be asked about it when she appears Wednesday before the U.S. House Committee on Education and Workforce. The NCAA has been crying to Congress and the White House for protection from the financial dumpster fire it created and fueled. A system that is increasingly funneling more money to male athletes and putting women's teams in jeopardy. The Biden administration tried to remedy some of that, issuing guidance requiring NIL money paid by schools under the proposed House settlement to be subject to Title IX. The Trump administration rolled that guidance back. You can find at least one story a day of a coach being arrested or convicted of abusing a young athlete. They might not get the attention of Larry Nassar's hideous crimes, but one case of abuse of a child is one case too many. Yet Congress has slow-walked SafeSport reforms and done little to address its continuing funding issues. But go on about the tens of transgender athletes in youth and college sports. The work to level the playing field begun by Title IX is not complete; the Trump administration is right about that. It would rather throw bombs and sow division than do it, though, and that is nothing to article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Opinion: Trump administration doesn't get the point of Title IX
