We got a look at radical Rickenbacker Causeway plan. Here are the pros and cons
Miami does need outside-the-box thinking to address the traffic congestion and need for more green space that affect our quality of life. 'The Shoreline' is Regalado's plan, designed with help from a developer, to build a 25-foot-tall viaduct to split vehicles traveling to and from Key Biscayne from pedestrians and cars stopping at Virginia Key. Significantly, it would also increase waterfront recreational space.
'Any meeting that you have in Key Biscayne, the No. 1 complaint will be the Rickenbacker,' Regalado told the Herald Editorial Board. 'I've gotten stuck in it a million times as a county commissioner who has to go out there.'
Her proposal falls somewhere between innovative and pie-in-the-sky. It has been well received by officials and residents in Key Biscayne, and it's worthy of consideration, if Miami-Dade can pull it off.
That's a big if. The Shoreline is still in its very early stages — it hasn't even been presented to the full County Commission — so it's too soon for the Editorial Board to endorse it or oppose it. We recently met with Regalado and project designers and were left both impressed and with lingering questions.
The project would send roughly 28,000 high-speed vehicles that head daily to and from Key Biscayne and fast bicycle pelotons to the top of the viaduct, which would have two lanes in either direction, plus 10-foot-wide shoulders. The viaduct would begin at the east end of the Powell Bridge and stretch the full length of Virginia Key to Bear Cut Bridge before it comes to ground level at the Crandon Marina entrance.
The area below would be used for slower local traffic headed mostly to and from to Virginia Key (roughly 12,000 vehicles per day), bike and pedestrian paths. That would clear space for more beach, park and parking spaces.
The project's intentions are noble; it would not only improve traffic but also pedestrian and bike safety, which is sorely needed given how dangerous the causeway currently is to anyone who's not in a car.
'We're creating, by elevating this [viaduct], an opportunity for mobility and for the free flow of traffic at higher speeds that do not affect or create a friction with those of us... riding our bikes or walking or just going to the beach,' Shoreline designer Juan Mullerat told the Editorial Board.
The project also calls for traffic circles each at MAST Academy and the Marine Stadium entrance, which has no crosswalk, and vehicles would no longer cross bike lanes to get to the beach area. Regalado also envisions connecting the new recreational area of Rickenbacker to the Underline, a gem of a linear park in Miami, where underutilized space beneath the Metrorail is being transformed into 10 miles of bike and pedestrian paths and recreational areas.
'This vision is exactly what the Underline, we, hoped would happen,' Friends of The Underline founder Meg Daly said of the Shoreline. 'This inspirational approach to solving larger problems in having these hybrid projects really makes sense.'
There are questions, though, about how much the Shoreline would cost. The Herald reported a figure of $475 million but a final estimate is not available yet. We suspect the project would cost a lot more than what's been reported. There's no direct comparison in terms of scope but the Interstate 395 'Signature Bridge' in downtown Miami is costing $840 million.
And, then, by making it easier to reach Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, would the new Rickenbacker add pressure to increase development on these two environmentally sensitive islands? Developer David Martin, CEO of Terra Group, paid for the Rickenbacker plan design and has a vested interest in it — he recently purchased the old Silver Sands hotel property on Key Biscayne, the Herald reported. Some Rickenbacker users have also wondered whether the viaduct would be aesthetically pleasing.
Another potential hiccup: Miami-Dade County already has been working on a master plan for the causeway that's not yet public. The county also just started a three-year planning process for a Bear Cut bridge replacement, the Herald reported. How easily could Regalado replace those plans?
The Shoreline could spur a much-needed transformation of the Rickenbacker Causeway and its surroundings. It just has to be feasible.
Click here to send the letter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
5 days ago
- Wall Street Journal
How to End the Tariff Debate
While I find the editorial board's legal reasoning more persuasive than Chad Squitieri's ('President Trump's Tariffs Are on Solid Ground,' Letters, Aug. 9), the law professor is right that Congress should resolve this question now. Given the economic harm and uncertainty caused by IEEPA levies, Congress should awaken from its dormancy and amend the law to specify that it can't be used to justify tariffs. Proactively amending IEEPA has the added benefit of ensuring that a court doesn't unduly limit the president's authority under this important statute beyond what Congress intends. Ben Richmond
Miami Herald
5 days ago
- Miami Herald
Aetna, AvMed fought to run Miami-Dade County employee health care plan. Who won?
Miami-Dade's more than 31,000 county employees are on track for a new insurance provider after Aetna ousted longtime administrator AvMed in a County Commission vote on Wednesday. The planned change would bring the county a new insurance administrator for the first time since George W. Bush was president and raises the stakes for Mayor Daniella Levine Cava, who recommended the switch as a way to save money during a budget crunch. Aetna, a national insurance company owned by the CVS pharmacy chain, claims its national purchasing power produces the kind of discounts that can save Miami-Dade about $40 million a year over rates offered by AvMed, a Florida-based provider with headquarters in Doral. 'We're going to try and reduce the cost curve,' said Carladenise Edwards, chief administrative officer under Levine Cava. 'As we do that, the county will save money over time.' While Miami-Dade commissioners approved the switch in a 7-to-2 vote, AvMed already has a legal challenge that could stall or overturn the decision. As commissioners initially prepared to decide the contract in a last-minute vote last month, AvMed sued, with claims that the Levine Cava administration violated bidding rules in how it recommended awarding the contract to Aetna — allegations the county denies. That vote got delayed, prompting a rare special meeting on Wednesday dedicated solely to the proposed Aetna contract recommended by the mayor. Voting against the switch were Commissioners Roberto Gonzalez and Danielle Cohen Higgins. Commissioners Marleine Bastien, Juan Carlos Bermudez and Eileen Higgins did not attend the meeting. Barring a judge's intervention, the commission vote sets up a scramble to replace the insurance administrator for one of South Florida's largest workforces just weeks ahead of the open-enrollment session that typically begins in late October. AvMed first won the county health care contract in 2007. Like most large governments, Miami-Dade pays for its own employee health care costs and hires an insurance company to administer the billing and reimbursement process for about $600 million in claims per year. The administrator earns a yearly fee for the work — Aetna charges $15 million and AvMed, $10 million — but the county's main costs come from the reimbursement rates negotiated by the administrator for prescriptions, medical procedures and hospitalizations. Two consultants hired by Miami-Dade concluded the Aetna rates would save Miami-Dade about $40 million when compared to AvMed's rates — math AvMed disputed as flawed. Commissioner Oliver Gilbert, who sponsored the legislation approving the Aetna contract, said it made no sense for board members to try and reach their own conclusions in the complex field of actuarial methods, repriced health care claims and shared savings in self-funded insurance plans. 'I'm left with the people we pay to analyze that,' Gilbert said as the meeting neared its third hour and Cohen Higgins and Gonzalez pressed the administration on the competing numbers. 'This is theater at this point.' Cohen Higgins said the board lacked the information and explanations needed to justify a major switch in the county's health care landscape on a shortened timetable. 'I need more,' she said. Levine Cava did not attend the meeting. In the sharpest words of the day, Gonzalez blamed what he called a flawed rollout by Levine Cava last month for causing anxiety among county workers about the proposed Aetna switch. 'I don't trust the mayor — and I want to trust the mayor,' Gonzalez said. Namita Uppal, the county's procurement director and top negotiator on the health care contract, emphasized insurance fees won't change for county employees or the retirees that continue receiving coverage from Miami-Dade. She also said Aetna was already helping answer employees' questions about the potential switch and whether existing AvMed providers will be covered under Aetna. 'I haven't found an example where Aetna came back and said: 'It's not covered,'' she said.
San Francisco Chronicle
09-08-2025
- San Francisco Chronicle
New California dam removal could restore a river — and destroy a community
LAKE PILLSBURY, Lake County — For those living on the shores of this mountain lake, the bone-rattling drive along a gravel road to get here is a small price to pay for the California dream. Tucked amid towering pines and firs and gleaming with cobalt-blue water, Lake Pillsbury in the Mendocino National Forest is home to about 100 year-round residents and thousands of summer dwellers, lured by the pleasures of lakefront living: boating, fishing, swimming or simply enjoying a cold drink on a hot day. 'I don't know if it will knock your socks off,' Frank Lynch, a third-generation cabin owner, said as he motored his pontoon boat across the sun-splashed reservoir on a recent afternoon. 'But it's a really nice lake.' This vacation outpost about 3½ hours north of San Francisco, however, may not last much longer. The dam that impounds the lake is owned by Pacific Gas and Electric Co., and the company wants to take it down. The move would drain the 2,000-acre reservoir, with its 31 miles of shoreline, and deliver a debilitating blow to the community. Removing the Scott Dam, alongside the removal of the smaller Cape Horn Dam downstream, both on the picturesque Eel River, is part of PG&E's plan to retire a century-old hydroelectric operation known as the Potter Valley Project, which the company says has gotten too expensive to run. Last month, PG&E filed the paperwork to decommission the project, officially putting the two dams and corresponding power facilities on course for demolition. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which oversees power-producing operations, has final say over whether and when the company moves forward. Downstream communities along the Eel River as well as environmental groups and tribes have cheered dam removal as a way to restore the river's natural flows. Long-declining salmon and steelhead runs stand to benefit from the restoration. At the same time, the plan has raised concerns about power and water supplies in Northern California. Perhaps most discussed is the potential to lose water that is tunneled out of the Eel River for power generation miles away, then released into the east fork of the Russian River, where it's long served cities and farms in Mendocino, Sonoma and Marin counties. Much less talked about is the fate of Lake Pillsbury. 'People will no longer be able to enjoy what the lake has to offer,' said Lake County Supervisor Bruno Sabatier, among those leading a long-shot campaign to stop the dam removal. 'If we don't fight for these small rural communities, who will?' A bygone way of life There aren't any boat tours on Lake Pillsbury — or hotels, restaurants or grocery stores — but the next best thing may be Lynch's pontoon. With 70 summers on the water and an active role in the community's advocacy group, Lake Pillsbury Alliance, Lynch knows the place better than most, and he's happy to share. From the captain's seat of his 22-foot Sun Tracker, he pointed out the distant herd of tule elk that roams the lake's north shore. He talked about the ghost town of Hullville that lies beneath the water, submerged with reservoir construction in the early 1920s. He mentioned the landing strip next to the reservoir that served soldiers during World War II. And he noted the possibility of losing it all. 'You'd hear people screaming and yelling if they were going to take down a lake that was more accessible,' Lynch said. 'People don't know about this spot so they might not care if it's gone.' Beyond losing a cherished destination, Lynch and other residents worry that draining the reservoir would mean less water for fighting wildfires and a reduction in taxes for the county as visitation drops and real estate values plunge. Lynch's brother, who also owns a home in the area, has been trying to sell his place for 11 months, but with the lake's future on the line, 'he hasn't had a nibble,' Lynch said. Lynch moored his boat at the Lake Pillsbury Resort, a primitive vacation spot that may be the most developed visitor accommodations in the region: about a dozen rental cabins and 40 campsites on a bluff above the water. All were full at the height of summer. A handful of other campgrounds and boat launches similarly front the lake. The resort sells maps, ice and a few kitchen staples such as milk and cereal as well as T-shirts that read 'Save Lake Pillsbury.' Like all homes and businesses here, the resort operates off the grid — in this case, getting power from generators. It has robust Wi-Fi that's often sought out by campers, given there's no cell service anywhere around. 'Some of the parents come in and say, 'Don't give my kids the Wi-Fi (code),'' said Andrea Coppa, a friendly woman working at the office. 'The things we don't do anymore are still here,' said Joey Friedman, a Martinez resident whose extended family had settled in across several camp sites, as they've done each year for decades. 'We're playing games, telling stupid stories, sitting around the campfire.' The manager of the resort, Mike Ahearn, says most of the roughly 7,500 guests he counts each summer are return customers. 'It's all about tradition here,' he said, noting that he's kept the business going because people keep coming back. 'We've never had a record of making money. It's been a labor of love.' Without the lake, Ahearn said, the place is 'done.' A new vision for recreation Dam removal would bring a whole new look and feel to the area. The reservoir would dry up, and the Eel River, which descends from the rugged, upper reaches of the Mendocino National Forest, would resume its historical course through the mostly empty lake bed. PG&E has committed to revegetating the lake bed with native plants and trees, in keeping with the surrounding forest, beginning a rewilding that supporters of dam removal say would reverberate far downstream — with more natural flows of water and greater vitality across the Eel River basin. 'It's going to restore our habitat, our fishing and our way of life,' said Lewis 'Bill' Whipple, former president of the Tribal Council of the Round Valley Indian Tribes, a federation of Native American communities that has grappled with the exploitation of their ancestral lands in the watershed. The undammed Eel would become the largest free-flowing river in California. The main stem of the river runs about 200 miles, generally northward, through the mountains of the Coastal Range to Humboldt County, where it empties into the Pacific near Eureka. One of the expectations of dam removal is that fish migrating from the ocean will find new spawning grounds in the river and creeks above Scott Dam. The dam has been an obstacle to fish passage for more than a century. Liberating the headwaters, environmentalists say, could boost fish reproduction and ultimately fish populations. Historically, as many as 800,000 chinook salmon swam up the Eel annually. The migration now numbers fewer than 20,000. For residents and visitors, the former reservoir site would remain accessible, per an existing conservation easement on the land. But how the land is used would obviously change. Activities would skew toward hiking instead of swimming, and kayaking instead of motorboating. Hunting and off-roading would probably remain pervasive. A series of community meetings to envision the future of the area, both with or without the dams, has yielded countless ideas, most leaning into the region's identity as a recreation hot spot. Among the proposals, should the dams come down, is building a hiking trail along the Eel River that follows a onetime Native American trade route. Another possible trail would climb from the river to the nearby Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument. Many in the community also want to improve the area's roads, telecommunications and fire protection. 'As an undiscovered gem, there's a real opportunity,' said Mark Green, executive director of CalWild, the nonprofit that was commissioned to hold the brainstorming sessions. Officials at the Mendocino National Forest, which manages most of the land around Lake Pillsbury and counts the reservoir as one of its top attractions, declined a request for an interview. But in an emailed statement, District Ranger Frank Aebly said that the Forest Service was committed to 'public recreation and habitat management' if and when the dams are razed. The federal agency hasn't taken a position on dam removal. Aebly said he expects most of the Forest Service campgrounds in the area to stay open, 'though some may close.' PG&E, which owns most of the land beneath the reservoir, told the Chronicle that it intends to sell or give the lake bed to another party, possibly a land trust or tribe, to manage like a preserve. The new owner hasn't been determined. The earliest that deconstruction of the dams and power facilities might begin is late 2028, pending federal approval, company officials said. The work would take two to three years to complete. The estimated cost, to be paid by PG&E and its customers, is $530 million. PG&E officials said the decision to retire the project wasn't taken 'lightly.' But they felt it was necessary to stop saddling ratepayers with the high cost of running the aging operation, especially given the small amount of electricity it generates. The lost power, they said, would be replaced with cheaper energy purchased from the open electricity market. As for the water that the project provides, the company's decommissioning plan supports having a new agency take over the infrastructure that tunnels supplies for power generation from the Eel River to the Russian River. Going forward, however, the new water agency, which won't produce electricity, has committed to moving less water, a setback that communities in the Russian River basin will have to contend with. Appealing to the feds At the Soda Creek Store, shortly after the 9 a.m. opening, Robert 'Buzz' Ogneff was behind the cash register prepping for the day. First order of business was fixing the front door after a bear tried to break in. 'He got in the laundry room (in the back), busted a couple of things,' Ogneff said, as he stood at the counter, shirtless and ready for the morning heat to kick up. 'If the bear got in here, it'd be a real mess.' As the major retailer on the lake, the store is often the first — or last — stop on a visit. Besides offering gas, snacks and beer, there's a small selection of camping equipment, auto accessories and tourist trinkets. For those wanting to commemorate the dust-choked, hourlong drive from Potter Valley (Mendocino County), which is the closest town, koozies for sale at the register proclaim, 'I survived the road to Lake Pillsbury.' The shop, for locals, is also a hub of communications. People come to inquire about road conditions, hunting season, the cannabis harvest and remote residents who haven't been seen or heard from in a while (and probably don't want to be). Nick and Edie Uram have run the store for nearly 35 years. They live on site with their many cats, which means they respond at all hours to lost vacationers, car breakdowns and wildfires. The Urams, both in their 70s, plan to continue operating the business for as long as they can, though they're bracing for change with dam removal. 'It will still be kind of a recreation area,' Nick said. 'But the lake and the waterskiing and the jet skis, if they take out this dam, that's over.' A poster on the front of the store honors Lake Pillsbury as a 'hero' for saving the community during the August Complex fire, the largest wildfire in California history. The lake was used for aerial water drops. The community's efforts to save the lake haven't gone as well, though it has secured support from the county brass. The Lake County Board of Supervisors has sent letters to PG&E and state and federal politicos, making their case that Scott Dam should remain. The board has even petitioned the Trump administration for help, appealing to the president's nationwide directives to boost water supplies and power generation. The federal government hasn't given any indication it will intervene to halt dam removal. Lynch, who stopped at the Soda Creek Store on the way to his permanent home in Sonoma County, doesn't like to think about Lake Pillsbury without a lake. His father and grandfather built their family cabin here in the late 1940s, with only hand tools, and he's never missed a summer on the water. He's even spent the offseason at the lake before, hunkered down in the dark of winter and occasional snow. 'Will I still come when it's 100 degrees and there's only a trickle of a river?' Lynch asked himself aloud. 'No. Not a lot. Well, yeah, I guess I'll still come.'
