
Yale-NUS student associates allegedly instructed to destroy over 100 DVDs from library collection
One student associate, who wished to remain anonymous, told The Straits Times that she felt 'very pained and sad' when she was asked on 24 and 25 April to destroy the DVDs using a penknife.
She was instructed to make four deep cuts on each disc to render them unreadable.
Many of the DVDs were films, including titles from The Criterion Collection, a prestigious American distributor known for restoring and releasing classic and contemporary films, often with scholarly materials such as director interviews and critical essays—issues highly prized by film enthusiasts.
'A lot of them were still in good condition and could have definitely found a new home,' the student said.
'I wasn't very comfortable with the scratching task either.'
Another student associate, who was given a cart of at least 100 DVDs earlier in April, expressed frustration at the task.
'I was a bit fed up about the whole thing, to be honest, and was very reluctant to contribute my time to these efforts,' she said.
Associate Professor Natalie Pang, University Librarian at the National University of Singapore (NUS), explained that the disposal of audiovisual materials is governed by stricter regulations than books due to licensing and copyright laws.
'Audiovisual materials are governed by licensing and copyright regulations, which restrict redistribution,' she said.
'We have integrated the DVDs we need into our collection. The DVDs that could not be rehomed were those which could not be redistributed.'
However, Professor Pang did not specify how many DVDs were ultimately destroyed.
Associate Professor Andrew Hui, a founding faculty member of Yale-NUS College, expressed dismay at the decision, calling it 'gut-wrenching.'
Prof. Hui, who had personally requested Criterion Collection films for the library in 2012, warned of the importance of physical media in an age of unstable streaming platforms and shifting licensing rights.
'As streaming platforms are notoriously unstable, licensing rights shift, and digital catalogues are curated by commercial algorithms rather than scholarly values, physical media ensures long-term access to films that shape our collective memory,' he said.
Prof. Hui described the destruction of the DVDs as 'a slow-motion act of cultural amnesia' and criticized the decision to involve student workers in the process.
'In a century where the past can vanish with a click, to destroy them—and to order undergraduates to do so (when they should be watching and learning from them)—is, for a humanist like me, a tiny but terrible act against art.'
A former Yale-NUS librarian, who spoke on condition of anonymity, estimated that the library once housed between 1,600 and 2,000 DVDs.
Book Disposal Controversy
The DVD destruction incident follows closely behind a controversy involving NUS's handling of books from the Yale-NUS College library.
On 20 May, photos and videos surfaced online showing employees from a recycling company loading hundreds of books onto a truck, sparking widespread criticism.
The disposal of hundreds of books was described as wasteful and distressing by alumni, students, and members of the public.
Workers' Party MP Associate Professor Jamus Lim described the incident as a failure of top-down decision-making with little consultation.
In a Facebook post on 21 May, Asst Prof Lim described the disposal as distressing and emblematic of how Yale-NUS was itself shut down.
He noted that many of the books were in excellent condition and could have been redistributed with proper planning and consultation.
NUS Issues Apology
In response to the backlash, NUS issued an apology on May 21 for what it described as an 'operational lapse' in its handling of the excess books.
The university had initially planned to dispose of 9,000 books, but after public outcry, the remaining 8,500 books were spared, while 500 had already been recycled.
Associate Professor Pang clarified that surplus books are typically redistributed across the NUS library system or offered to faculty and students.
However, students had not been given the chance to access the Yale-NUS books before the disposal.
'We understand later that many students were interested in having these books, and we would have usually acceded to their requests,' she said.
'We did not do so on this occasion, and we apologise.'
NUS also revealed plans to improve its procedures for handling surplus books.
The university will now reach out 'more extensively' to faculty, academic libraries, and hold book adoption fairs for students, alumni, and the public.
A public book giveaway on campus will take place from 28 May to 9 June for the remaining 8,500 books.
The incident comes in the final weeks of Yale-NUS College, which officially closed after its last cohort graduated on 14 May.
The liberal arts institution, founded in 2011 through a partnership between Yale University and NUS, is being phased out as part of a merger with NUS' University Scholars Programme, announced in 2021.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Paper
6 hours ago
- New Paper
Singapore indie cinema The Projector in debt to the tune of $1.2m
Ahead of a meeting with creditors set for Aug 29, the firm behind Singapore indie cinema The Projector has revealed that it owes them more than $1.2 million. In an e-mail sent out to creditors on Aug 19 and seen by The Straits Times, Pocket Cinema listed 33 different creditors comprising individuals and organisations. The highest amount - $382,888.03 - is owed to Overseas Movie (Private), while others named in the list include the firm's director Karen Tan, as well as other shareholders, including one of The Projector's founders, Ms Blaise Camille Trigg-Smith. Ms Tan, also one of The Projector's founders, is owed more than $120,000, while Ms Trigg-Smith is owed slightly above $100,000. ST has contacted Ms Tan for more information. Other creditors include those who held memberships with The Projector that have yet to expire. These comprise 2,295 people who are owed a total of more than $89,000. The majority of them, or 1,566, held memberships with The Projector Fan Club. Although membership information on the indie cinema's website has been replaced with a notice of suspension as at Aug 20, a version dated July 9 on the Internet Archive showed that it costs $85 to hold a membership through this tier. All members are entitled to four free tickets, $2 off standard ticket prices, 10 per cent off the total bill at the Intermission bar at Golden Mile Tower and No Spoilers Bar at Cineleisure, special giveaways and prizes, as well as invites to exclusive members-only events and screenings. Other membership tiers include The Projector Student Club, for those with valid student identification, and The Projector Senior Club, for those above the age of 55. Both cost $67. To one 24-year-old patron of The Projector, the $7 he is owed in membership fees is but a petty sum. The patron, who declined to give his name, said: "I'm not really bothered about them owing money to me, since it is a relatively small amount, but more so about losing a space where I can find curated films through their various film festivals and events. "It was also a space for many smaller organisations to host events and share stories." The cinephile added that he, alongside other friends who are regulars, have decided not to claim their refunds to help the now-shuttered indie cinema with their finances. Meanwhile, those with unused tickets were also included in the list of creditors, with a total of $14,302 owed to them. A 28-year-old moviegoer who had bought two tickets to the Aug 20 screening of Punch Drunk Love, a 2002 romantic comedy starring Adam Sandler, told ST that he too was on the list of creditors. He said: "Fortunately for me, the refundable amount of $23 was relatively low. I'm just surprised at the speed at which operations were shut down." One person has 16 unused tickets - the most, compared with others on the list. The meeting for creditors is set for 2.30pm on Aug 29 via video conference, according to the e-mail. The Projector's sudden closure on Aug 19 after more than a decade of operations took many by surprise, with its screenings and events scheduled after the date cancelled. It cited rising operational costs, shifting audience habits and the global decline in cinema attendance as reasons for its closure. Ms Diane Chan, the management consultant of KillerMud Films, said The Projector's announcement had taken the company by surprise. The boutique film distribution company, which focuses on Asian, genre and independent films, is owed more than $1,800, according to the list of creditors. Ms Chan said: "The Projector has built up such a loyal audience for art-house and alternative content over the years. We sincerely hope that they can reinvent themselves and surface again. "We need an independent exhibitor like The Projector for our local cinema industry and arts scene to progress." Incorporated on Sept 16, 2014, Pocket Cinema's records with the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (Acra) showed that it started out as a loss-making venture. In the financial year ending on Dec 31, 2014, it reported a loss of slightly more than $45,000 after taxes. The company's fortunes turned in the financial year ending on Dec 31, 2016, when it made a profit of almost $166,000 after taxes, with its revenue reported to be about $1.16 million. But its profits shrank the following year by more than 2½ times to $64,122 after taxes, despite a revenue of about $1.3 million. Based on Acra records, the latest financial statement was filed in December 2017. Separately, a listing on CommercialGuru showed that The Projector's 10,000 sq ft space at Golden Mile Tower was listed for rent at $33,000 a month from July 28. While the listing was removed as at 11am on Aug 20, it was put up again about four hours later.


AsiaOne
7 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Singapore indie cinema The Projector owes over $1.2m to creditors, Money News
SINGAPORE — Ahead of a meeting with creditors set for Aug 29, the firm behind Singapore indie cinema The Projector has revealed that it owes them more than $1.2 million. In an e-mail sent out to creditors on Aug 19 and seen by The Straits Times, Pocket Cinema listed 33 different creditors comprising individuals and organisations. The highest amount — $382,888.03 — is owed to Overseas Movie (Private), while others named in the list include the firm's director, Karen Tan, as well as other shareholders, including one of The Projector's founders, Blaise Camille Trigg-Smith. Tan, who is also one of The Projector's founders, is owed more than $120,000, while Trigg-Smith is owed slightly above $100,000. ST has contacted Tan for more information. Other creditors include those who held memberships with The Projector that have yet to expire. These comprise 2,295 people who are owed a total of more than $89,000. The majority of them, or 1,566, held memberships with The Projector Fan Club. Although membership information on the indie cinema's website has been replaced with a notice of suspension as of Aug 20, a version dated July 9 on the Internet Archive showed that it costs $85 to hold a membership through this tier. All members are entitled to four free tickets, $2 off standard ticket prices, 10 per cent off the total bill at the Intermission bar at Golden Mile Tower and No Spoilers Bar at Cineleisure, special giveaways and prizes, as well as invites to exclusive members-only events and screenings. Other membership tiers include The Projector Student Club, for those with valid student identification, and The Projector Senior Club, for those above the age of 55. Both cost $67. To one 24-year-old patron of The Projector, the $7 he is owed in membership fees is but a petty sum. The patron, who declined to give his name, said: "I'm not really bothered about them owing money to me, since it is a relatively small amount, but more so about losing a space where I can find curated films through their various film festivals and events. "It was also a space for many smaller organisations to host events and share stories." The cinephile added that he, alongside other friends who are regulars, have decided not to claim their refunds to help the now-shuttered indie cinema with their finances. Meanwhile, those with unused tickets were also included in the list of creditors, with a total of $14,302 owed to them. A 28-year-old moviegoer who had bought two tickets to the Aug 20 screening of Punch-Drunk Love, a 2002 romantic comedy starring Adam Sandler, told ST that he too was on the list of creditors. He said: "Fortunately for me, the refundable amount of $23 was relatively low. I'm just surprised at the speed at which operations were shut down." One person has 16 unused tickets — the most, compared with others on the list. The meeting for creditors is set for 2.30pm on Aug 29 via video conference, according to the e-mail. The Projector's sudden closure on Aug 19 after more than a decade of operations took many by surprise, with its screenings and events scheduled after the date cancelled. It cited rising operational costs, shifting audience habits and the global decline in cinema attendance as reasons for its closure. Diane Chan, the management consultant of KillerMud Films, said The Projector's announcement had taken the company by surprise. The boutique film distribution company, which focuses on Asian, genre and independent films, is owed more than $1,800, according to the list of creditors. Chan said: "The Projector has built up such a loyal audience for art-house and alternative content over the years. We sincerely hope that they can reinvent themselves and surface again. "We need an independent exhibitor like The Projector for our local cinema industry and arts scene to progress." Incorporated on Sept 16, 2014, Pocket Cinema's records with the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (Acra) showed that it started out as a loss-making venture. In the financial year ending on Dec 31, 2014, it reported a loss of slightly more than $45,000 after taxes. The company's fortunes turned in the financial year ending on Dec 31, 2016, when it made a profit of almost $166,000 after taxes, with its revenue reported to be about $1.16 million. But its profits shrank the following year by more than 2½ times to $64,122 after taxes, despite a revenue of about $1.3 million. Based on Acra records, the latest financial statement was filed in December 2017. Separately, a listing on CommercialGuru showed that The Projector's 10,000 sq ft space at Golden Mile Tower was listed for rent at $33,000 a month from July 28. While the listing was removed as at 11am on Aug 20, it was put up again about four hours later. [[nid:721508]] This article was first published in The Straits Times . Permission required for reproduction.


Straits Times
13 hours ago
- Straits Times
Charlie Brown and Peanuts gang back with TV special Snoopy Presents: A Summer Musical
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox NEW YORK – Charlie Brown is not known for his successes. One of American cartoonist Charles M. Schulz's most memorable creations, Charlie is the ultimate clueless kid, never able to kick a football, ace a test or approach his crush , the Little Red-Haired Girl . But in Snoopy Presents: A Summer Musical, a new Peanuts animated special, Charlie scores a major triumph. Thinking not so much of himself but of his little sister Sally and of future generations, he devises a plan to save a beloved institution: the Peanuts gang's summer camp. The desire to preserve a cherished institution also inspired the creative team behind the production, the first new Peanuts television musical in more than 35 years. The last was Snoopy! The Musical from 1988. With this special, which is available on Apple TV+, the writers aim both to celebrate the legacy of Schulz, who died in 2000 – 2025 is the 75th anniversary of the comic strip – and to take the indelible Peanuts crew in a slightly different direction. 'The thought jumped in my mind – wouldn't it be exciting to see the characters, you know, actually sing and dance?' Craig Schulz said in a joint video interview with Bryan Schulz and Cornelius Uliano, his screenplay collaborators and fellow executive producers. Craig is Charles Schulz's son and Bryan is the cartoonist's grandson. The idea occurred to Craig Schulz while he was home watching movie musicals like Tick, Tick… Boom! (2021) and In The Heights (2021). He felt musical numbers would give this fresh Peanuts offering an extended life. 'You could tell the same story we told without making it be a musical,' Craig Schulz said. 'But when you inject the music aspect into it, it really makes it more enjoyable to watch it over and over and over again.' The Schulzes and Uliano, who have been collaborating for more than a decade on film and TV properties intended to introduce today's viewers to Charles Schulz's sly humour and often poignant wit, are also shifting the audience's focus from Snoopy, the Peanuts strip's spotlight-loving beagle, to its human characters. Although Snoopy plays a pivotal role in the plot – he pitches, naturally, a pup tent at the camp, which is called Cloverhill Ranch – he is not the main character. Geared as much towards nostalgic parents as it is at young viewers, A Summer Musical does not share screenwriters or a setting with Camp Snoopy, the Apple TV+ children's series that debuted in 2024. Instead, the 40-minute special, which is directed by Erik Wiese (Sonic Prime, 2022 to 2024; The Mighty B!, 2008 to 2011), explores the emotions of Sally, who arrives at camp for the first time and hates it (as a young Craig Schulz did) , and those of Charlie, who is embarking on his last summer session and adores the woods and the wild (as Bryan Schulz did) . Depicting Charlie as an experienced camper, the writers have avoided including the kind of 'downbeat Charlie Brown gag' found in many earlier Peanuts specials, Craig Schulz said . In their collaborations, 'we never kind of pull the rug out from under him', he added. Charlie's love of camp and Sally's loathing – a surprising Cloverhill resident finally wins her over to the place's charms – fuel the special's first two musical numbers. Jeff Morrow, a Peanuts productions veteran and this musical's main composer, worked with songwriters Alan Zachary and Michael Weiner to create Best Time Ever. It is an upbeat ode that begins with Charlie singing and builds to a powerful – and, to Sally, overpowering – full camp chorus. Their subsequent song for Sally, A Place Like This, details her every complaint. Both numbers mix pop with jazz, which has been the signature Peanuts sound ever since Vince Guaraldi composed the score in 1965 for A Charlie Brown Christmas, the first and much revered Peanuts special. The music takes on a different quality, however, after the campers learn of plans to shutter Cloverhill because of diminishing attendance. Singer-songwriter Ben Folds , the special's music supervisor, wrote three additional numbers, two of which are lyrical ballads. In the producers' own quest to maintain the Peanuts legacy, they have insisted on digital animation that matches Charles Schulz's drawings, and on casting adolescents and children for the young characters' voices, rather than adults who are trying to sound young. 'There're certain qualities in each voice and each character that we're looking for, and that all goes back to the original Christmas special,' Bryan Schulz said. 'That's kind of the template, the gold standard.' Not surprisingly, the producers have often encountered young people who are completely unfamiliar with the original Peanuts comic strip. Craig Schulz recalled that during a project years ago, none of the voice cast had ever read it. But by the end of filming, all the actors had delved into the history and become attached to the characters. He wants the musical's viewers to feel the same way. 'They discovered a whole world they never knew existed,' he said of the cast. 'That's what we always hope. Once you discover that world, it's hard to leave it.' NYTIMES Snoopy Presents: A Summer Musical is available on Apple TV+.